Attachment B_Disclosure Exemption Affidavit_S-10700-00010923.pdf
PDF 186 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Network Detection and Response (NDR) Solution
- Solicitation number
- S-10700-00010923
- Issued by
- Marion County, Oregon
About this file
This document is a Request for Proposals (RFP) issued by the Oregon Department of Administrative Services, Procurement Services (DAS PS) to procure a Network Detection and Response (NDR) Solution, including all required equipment, configurations, licenses, portals, training, integrations with current security systems, maintenance and operations support. The State prefers a SaaS, IaaS or COTS solution and anticipates awarding one contract from this RFP. The RFP outlines the scope of services, deliverables, and required NDR solution functionality, as well as the procurement requirements, evaluation criteria, and award/negotiation process. Proposers must submit their proposals by a specified due date and the State will conduct a multi-round evaluation and selection process.
The RFP provides details on the pricing schema and additional licensing costs for proposed modules, appliances, support, and training. It also addresses requirements around security, performance metrics, service level agreements, references, and value-added services. The State is committed to diversity, equity, and inclusion, and Certified Firm participation is encouraged. The awarded contract will be subject to Oregon laws and regulations, and the State reserves the right to cancel the RFP, reject proposals, and not pay for proposal preparation costs.
View the file
Other files
Show all 22
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
NDR RFP #S-10700-00010923 Page 33 of 44
ATTACHMENT B — DISCLOSURE EXEMPTION AFFIDAVIT
____________________ (Affiant), being first duly sworn under oath, and representing [insert Proposer Name] (hereafter “Proposer”), hereby deposes and swears or affirms under penalty of perjury that:
1. I am an employee of the Proposer, I have knowledge of the Request for Proposals referenced herein, and I have full authority from the Proposer to submit this affidavit and accept the responsibilities stated herein.
2. I am aware that the Proposer has submitted a Proposal, dated on or about [insert date] (the “Proposal”), to the State of Oregon (State) in response to Request for Proposals RFP #S-10700-00010923, for NDR Solution, and I am familiar with the contents of the RFP and Proposal.
3. I have read and am familiar with the provisions of Oregon’s Public Records Law, Oregon Revised Statutes (“ORS”) 192.311 through 192.478, and the Uniform Trade Secrets Act as adopted by the State of Oregon, which is set forth in ORS 646.461 through ORS 646.475. I understand that the Proposal is a public record held by a public body and is subject to disclosure under the Oregon Public Records Law unless specifically exempt from disclosure under that law.
4. I have reviewed the information contained in the Proposal. The Proposer believes the information listed in Exhibit A is exempt from public disclosure (collectively, the “Exempt Information”), which is incorporated herein by this reference. It is my opinion that the Exempt Information is exempt from disclosure under Oregon’s Public Records Law under the specifically designated sections as set forth in Exhibit A or constitutes “Trade Secrets” under either the Oregon Public Records Law or the Uniform Trade Secrets Act as adopted in Oregon because that information is either:
A. A formula, plan, pattern, process, tool, mechanism, compound, procedure, production data, or compilation of information that:
i. is not patented,
ii. is known only to certain individuals within the Proposer’s organization and that is used in a business the Proposer conducts,
iii. has actual or potential commercial value, and
iv. gives its user an opportunity to obtain a business advantage over competitors who do not know or use it.
or
B. Information, including a drawing, cost data, customer list, formula, pattern, compilation, program, device, method, technique or process that:
i. Derives independent economic value, actual or potential, from not being generally known to the public or to other persons who can obtain economic value from its disclosure or use; and
ii. Is the subject of efforts by the Proposer that are reasonable under the circumstances to maintain its secrecy.
5. I understand that disclosure of the information referenced in Exhibit A may depend on official or judicial determinations made in accordance with the Public Records Law.
NDR RFP #S-10700-00010923 Page 34 of 44
Affiant’s Signature
State of ___________)
) ss:
County of ________)
Signed and sworn to before me on ___________ (date) by ______________________ (Affiant’s name).
Notary Public for the State of _________________
My Commission Expires: _________
EXHIBIT A TO ATTACHMENT B
Proposer identifies the following information as exempt from public disclosure under the following designated exemption(s):
| SECTION 1: GENERAL INFORMATION |
| 1.1 INTRODUCTION |
| 1.2 SCHEDULE |
| 1.3 SINGLE POINT OF CONTACT (SPC) |
| 1.4 ATTACHMENTS |
| SECTION 2: AUTHORITY, OVERVIEW, AND SCOPE |
| 2.1 AUTHORITY AND METHOD |
| 2.2 DEFINITION OF TERMS |
| 2.3 OVERVIEW AND PURPOSE |
| 2.3.1 Agency Overview and Background |
| 2.3.2 Project Overview and Background |
| 2.4 SCOPE OF SERVICES, DELIVERABLES, AND NDR SOLUTION FUNCTIONALITY |
| 2.4.1 Scope of Services |
| 2.4.2 Tasks and Deliverables |
| Proposer should include each of the following in its proposed Services description: |
| 2.4.3 NDR Solution Functionality |
| SECTION 3: PROCUREMENT REQUIREMENTS |
| 3.1 MINIMUM SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS |
| 3.1.1 Round 1 Proposal Submissions |
| 3.1.2 Proposal Page Limits |
| 3.1.3 Proposal Format and Quantity |
| 3.2 ROUND 1 PROPOSAL REQUIREMENTS |
| 3.2.1 Proposer Information and Certification Sheet |
| Failure to demonstrate compliance with Oregon Tax Laws and sign Attachment C, Proposer Information and Certification Sheet, may result in a finding of non-Responsibility. |
| 3.2.2 Executive Summary |
| 3.2.4 Staffing Plan, Key Persons, Organizational Chart and Subcontractors (Scored) |
| 3.2.5 Proposer’s Organizational Profile (Scored) |
| 3.2.6 Scope of Services (Scored) |
| 3.2.6.1 Sample Implementation Plan (Scored) |
| 3.2.6.2 Sample SOW (Scored) |
| Proposer shall submit a sample SOW with timeline, electronically as a Microsoft Word File (DOC). |
| 3.2.6.3 Sample Test Plan (Scored) |
| Proposer shall provide a sample plan for supported testing and acceptance of the proposed NDR Solution. |
| 3.2.6.4 Sample Training Plan (Scored) |
| Proposer shall submit a sample training plan that details how Agency staff will be trained on the operations of the NDR Solution. The sample training plan should include a syllabus for instructor-led training and/or on-demand training. Training needs ... |
| 3.2.6.5 Licensing Costs (Scored) |
| Proposer shall provide its pricing schema (e.g. Per throughput flows, per IP address of device, per user, monthly fee, or other) and an itemized list including additional licensing costs for proposed modules, appliances, support, training for all mand... |
| 3.2.6.6 Ongoing Maintenance and Support (Scored) |
| Proposer shall describe how it will continue to support EIS CSS after closing completing SOW activities and transition to maintenance and operations post “go live”. |
| 3.2.6.7 Reporting Samples (Scored) |
| Proposer shall provide sample reports from dashboards, sample executive reports with overview, and sample technical deep dives. |
| 3.2.7 NDR Solution Functionality – Attachment H (Scored) |
| 3.2.8 Security Requirements (Scored) |
| 3.2.9 Performance Metrics and Service Level Agreements (SLAs) (Scored) |
| 3.2.10 Price Proposal (To be scored in later round) |
| 3.2.11 References (Scored) |
| 3.2.12 Underlying Agreements (Not Scored) |
| 3.2.13 Value-Added Services (Not scored) |
| 3.2.14 Sample Contract (Attachment A) (Not Scored) |
| 3.2.15 Disclosure Exemption Affidavit (Pass/Fail) |
| 3.2.16 Certified Disadvantaged Business Outreach Plan (Pass/Fail) |
| 3.2.17 Responsibility Inquiry (Attachment G) (Pass/Fail) |
| SECTION 4: ROUND 1 SOLICITATION PROCESS |
| 4.1 Public Notice |
| 4.2 OregonBuys |
| 4.2.1 All Proposers must be registered in OregonBuys to do business with the State. Registration is free. To create a vendor account, click the blue “Register” button in the top right corner of the OregonBuys website: https://oregonbuys.gov/bso. F... |
| 4.2.2 PROPOSERS ARE SOLELY RESPONSIBLE FOR ENSURING THEIR VENDOR INFORMATION IS CURRENT AND CORRECT IN OREGONBUYS. DAS PS WILL ACCEPT NO RESPONSIBILITY FOR MISSING OR INCORRECT VENDOR INFORMATION OR ALTERNATIVE ACCESSIBILITY TO AMENDMENT(S), ATTACHMEN... |
| 4.2.3 OregonBuys Assistance. Parties needing assistance with OregonBuys may contact the OregonBuys Helpdesk by telephone at (855) 800-5046 or by email at support.oregonbuys@oregon.gov. |
| 4.3 Pre-Proposal Conference |
| 4.4 Questions/Requests for Clarification |
| 4.5 SOLICITATION PROTESTS |
| 4.5.1 Protests to RFP |
| 4.5.2 Protests to Amendment |
| 4.5.3 Requirements for Protests: |
| 4.6 PROPOSAL DELIVERY OPTIONS |
| 4.6.1 Delivery through OregonBuys |
| 4.6.2 Alternate Delivery Options |
| 4.7 PROPOSAL MODIFICATION OR WITHDRAWAL |
| 4.8 PROPOSAL DUE |
| 4.9 PUBLIC OPENING |
| 4.10 PROPOSAL REJECTION |
| 4.11 ROUND 1 EVALUATION PROCESS |
| 4.11.1 Responsiveness and Responsibility Determination |
| 4.11.1.1 Responsiveness determination |
| 4.11.1.2 Responsibility determination |
| 4.11.2 Evaluation Criteria |
| 4.11.2.1 Experience and Capabilities (100 Points) |
| 4.11.2.2 Staffing Plan, Key Persons, Organizational Chart and Subcontractors (50 Points) |
| 4.11.2.3 Proposer Organizational Profile (50 Points) |
| 4.11.2.1 Scope of Services (250 Points) |
| 4.11.2.2 Sample Implementation Plan (100 Points) |
| 4.11.2.1 Sample SOW or Description of Scope of Services (250 Points) |
| 4.11.2.1 Sample Test Plan (100 Points) |
| 4.11.2.2 Sample Training Plan (50 Points) |
| 4.11.2.3 Reporting Samples (50 Points) |
| 4.11.2.4 NDR Solution Functionality (354 Points) |
| 4.11.2.5 Security Requirements (100 Points) |
| 4.11.2.6 Performance Metrics and SLAs (50 Points) |
| 4.11.2.1 References (100 Points) |
| 4.11.3.1 Reciprocal Preference |
| 4.11.3.2 Recycled Materials |
| 4.11.3.3 Tiebreakers |
| 4.12 ROUND 1 POINT AND SCORE CALCULATIONS |
| 4.13 ROUND 1 RANKING OF PROPOSERS |
| 4.14 ROUND 1 NEXT STEP DETERMINATION |
| 4.15 ROUND 2 |
| 4.15.1 Proof of Value (POV)– 45 days (Scored) |
| 4.16 ROUND 2 NEXT STEP DETERMINATION |
| 4.17 ROUND 3 |
| 4.17.1 Best and Final Offer (Scored) |
| 4.18 SCORING AND RANKING OF PROPOSERS FOR SUBSEQUENT ROUNDS |
| 4.19 POINT AND SCORE CALCULATIONS |
| SECTION 5: AWARD AND NEGOTIATION |
| 5.1 AWARD NOTIFICATION PROCESS |
| 5.1.1 Award Consideration |
| 5.1.2 Intent to Award Notice |
| 5.2 INTENT TO AWARD PROTEST |
| 5.2.1 Protest Submission |
| 5.2.1.1 Protests Requirements: |
5.2.2 Response to Protest
| 5.3 APPARENT SUCCESSFUL PROPOSER SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS |
| 5.3.1 Insurance |
| 5.3.2 Taxpayer Identification Number |
| 5.3.3 Business Registry |
| 5.3.4 Pay Equity Certification |
| 5.3.5 Nondiscrimination in Employment |
| 5.4 CONTRACT NEGOTIATION |
| 5.4.1 Negotiation |
| SECTION 6: AWARD AND NEGOTIATION |
| 6.1 COMMITMENT TO DIVERSITY, EQUITY, AND INCLUSION |
| 6.2 CERTIFIED FIRM PARTICIPATION |
| 6.3 GOVERNING LAWS AND REGULATIONS |
| 6.4 OWNERSHIP/PERMISSION TO USE MATERIALS |
| 6.5 CANCELLATION OF RFP; REJECTION OF PROPOSALS; NO DAMAGES. |
| 6.6 COST OF SUBMITTING A PROPOSAL |
| 6.7 STATEWIDE E-WASTE/RECOVERY POLICY |
| 6.8 RECYCLABLE PRODUCTS |
| 6.9 CHECKLIST DISCLAIMER |
| Proposer Name: __________________________________________ |
| OregonBuys Bid#: __________________________________________ |
| Reference Entity: __________________________________________ |
| Reference Contact Name: __________________________________________ |
| Contact Telephone Number: __________________________________________ |
| Contact Email Address: __________________________________________ |
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .