Attachment D.3 Past Performance Questionnaire.docx

DOCX document 23 KB Posted

Attached to
FY 22 RFQ NOAA SHIP RONALD H. BROWN Drydock Repairs
Solicitation number
1305M222QNMAN0008
Issued by

About this file

This document contains a past performance questionnaire for reference contract number 1305M222QNMAN0008 related to the FY 22 RFQ NOAA SHIP RONALD H. BROWN Drydock Repairs solicitation. The past performance questionnaire assesses a contractor's quality of service, schedule, and management on a previous contract using rating boxes of exceptional, very good, satisfactory, marginal, and unsatisfactory. It requests a rater's name, signature, and date and is to be returned to the contract specialist Tamara Horton by January 20, 2022. The related solicitation is for FY22 RFQ for NOAA Ship RONALD H. BROWN Drydock Repairs from the Department of Commerce National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration but no further details are provided.

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
Amendment 0002.pdf PDF
Attachment D.3 Past Performance Questionnaire REV 1.docx DOCX document
Amendment 0001.pdf PDF
Attachment D.2 Past Performance Information Form REV 1.docx DOCX document
RFQ RONALD H. BROWN DRYDOCK REPAIRS REVISION 1.pdf PDF
073-6932898.pdf PDF
BROWN Register of Lifting Appliances and Loose Gear_2020.pdf PDF
Portable Fire Extinguisher List.pdf PDF
Attachment D.1 RONALD H. BROWN FY 22 DRYDOCK SPEC PACKAGE.pdf PDF
RB Ventilation Manual Closure List.pdf PDF
TM RB 573-02.pdf PDF
RB-245 Vol I.pdf PDF
AIRMAR 12Hz Transducer Drawing.pdf PDF
RB-461A-07 Multibeam Fairing Construction REV Ar.pdf PDF
Righting Device Inspection Form Blank.pdf PDF
181-6932834.pdf PDF
Alfa Laval PureBallast Technical Manual.pdf PDF
101-6932801.pdf PDF
183-6932837.pdf PDF
RB-245 Vol II.pdf PDF
528-6932928.pdf PDF
101-6932805.pdf PDF
573-6932840.pdf PDF
Tech Manual RB-573-05 Sect. 1_2.pdf PDF
997-1A.pdf PDF
NOAA_RHB_480VAC_SWBD_ONLY_RED.pdf PDF
RB-085-001.pdf PDF
000-1F.pdf PDF
RB-568-00_Bow Thruster Tech Man Sect 2.pdf PDF
00-631-001 PAINT SCHEDULE.pdf PDF
501-6932918.pdf PDF
Attachment D.5 Price Schedule.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Tech Manaul 167-00.pdf PDF
101-6932815.pdf PDF
Motor Inventory_NOAA Ship BROWN.xls XLS spreadsheet
101-6932819.pdf PDF
573-1C.pdf PDF
573-6932841.pdf PDF
RB-529-002.pdf PDF
101-6932804.pdf PDF
171-6932832.pdf PDF
Attachment D.6 NOAA AIRS PROCESS.pdf PDF
Tank Capacity Summary.pdf PDF
631-3B.pdf PDF
101-6932813.pdf PDF
635-2.pdf PDF
300-6932772 One Line.pdf PDF
000-2C.pdf PDF
Switchboard Breakers Info.pdf PDF
99-141156-C_Installation Manual_Sea_Tel_TVHD.pdf PDF
Show 40 more

Latest 50 of 81 listed here. See the rest on GovTribe.

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

Solicitation #: 1305M222QNMAN0008 Attachment: D.3

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

REFERENCE CONTRACT #: ___________________________(Contract number of the Past Performance this information is based on)

Send Completed Questionnaire to Contract Specialist, Tamara Horton no later than January 20, 2022 at 3:00 pm Eastern Time:

1. QUALITY OF SERVICE

Assess the contractor’s performance to contract requirements, specifications, and standards of good workmanship (e.g. commonly accepted technical, professional, or environmental standards).

(Check the appropriate rating box.)

RATING
ADJECTIVAL RATING
DEFINITION

EXCEPTIONAL

Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were highly effective.

VERY GOOD

Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were effective.

SATISFACTORY

Performance meets contractual requirements. The element being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor appear or were satisfactory.

MARGINAL

Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the Contractor has not yet identified corrective actions.

UNSATISFACTORY

Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The element being assessed contains a serious problem(s) for which the Contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

Comments:

2. SCHEDULE

Assess the timeliness of the contractor against the completion of the contract, task orders, milestones, delivery schedules, and administrative requirements (e.g. efforts that contribute to or affect the schedule variance).

(Check the appropriate rating box.)

RATING
ADJECTIVAL RATING
DEFINITION

Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were highly effective.

Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were effective.

Performance meets contractual requirements. The element being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor appear or were satisfactory.

Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the Contractor has not yet identified corrective actions.

Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The element being assessed contains a serious problem(s) for which the Contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

3. MANAGEMENT

Assess the integration and coordination of all activities needed to execute the contract, specifically the timeliness, completeness and quality of problem identification, corrective action plans, proposal submittals, the contractor’s history of reasonable and cooperative behavior, and customer satisfaction.

(Check the appropriate rating box.)

RATING
ADJECTIVAL RATING
DEFINITION

Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were highly effective.

Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were effective.

Performance meets contractual requirements. The element being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor appear or were satisfactory.

Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the Contractor has not yet identified corrective actions.

Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The element being assessed contains a serious problem(s) for which the Contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

ADDITIONAL COMMENTS, IF ANY:

Rater’s Name: ___________________________ Rater’s Signature: ________________________ Date: ____________________________________

Send Completed Questionnaire to Contract Specialist, Tamara Horton, no later than January 20, 2022 at 3:00 pm Eastern Time:

Tamara.Horton@noaa.gov

Source Selection Information

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .