Attachment C Structural Calculations~2.pdf
PDF 4 MB Posted
- Solicitation number
- S-63400-00011304
- Issued by
- Tillamook County, Moro City, Oregon
About this file
This document contains structural calculations and design drawings for a prototype 'STAFF' cabin at the OPRD Nehalem Bay State Park site in Nehalem, Oregon. The structural system includes a light-frame wood stud wall bearing system, 2x solid sawn roof and floor joists with wood panel sheathing, and conventional spread and continuous footings. The calculations cover gravity and lateral load designs, as well as foundation design, conforming to the 2022 Oregon Structural Specialty Code. The design loads include a flat roof snow load of 75 psf, a residential floor live load of 40 psf, and a basic wind speed of 135 mph. The seismic design category is D, with a mapped spectral response acceleration of 2.199g at short periods. The project includes the design of one prototype cabin, with no mention of additional quantities or a contract term.
The pricing structure, funding sources, and any set-asides are not detailed in this document. There are no references to an incumbent contractor or the current competitive environment. The calculations and drawings appear to be provided for permitting purposes, with no indication of a formal solicitation or bidding process.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| ITB 10654 Nehalem Bay Staff Housing Cabins Building Project.docx | DOCX document | |
| Attachment A Technical Specifications~1.docx | DOCX document | |
| BID TABULATION~4.docx | DOCX document | |
| Attachment B Drawings~14.pdf | ||
| Addendum 2 to ITB 10654 Nehalem Bay Staff Housing Cabins Building Project.docx | DOCX document | |
| Attachment E Nehalem Bay Site Improvement Plans.pdf | ||
| RFP HVAC Aug 2024.doc | DOC document | |
| Pre-Bid sign-in sheet.docx | DOCX document | |
| Addendum 1 to ITB 10654 Nehalem Bay Staff Housing Cabins Building Project.docx | DOCX document | |
| Attachment D Tillamook County Dune Permit.pdf | ||
| Addendum 3 Attachment B Revised Drawing Sheets.pdf | ||
| Addendum 3 to ITB 10654 Nehalem Bay State Park Staff Cabin Project.docx | DOCX document | |
| Intent to Award~11.docx | DOCX document |
Show all 13
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
3933 S Kelly Avenue Portland, OR 97239 tel: 503.222.4453 VLMK.COM
OPRD NEHALEM BAY STATE PARK
CABIN DESIGN
34600 Garey Street
Nehalem, OR 97131
STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS
VLMK Project Number: 20230299
Scott Edwards Architecture
2525 E Burnside St
Portland, OR 97214
Prepared By: Brandon Palmateer, EIT
June 20th, 2023
Addendum: August 10th, 2023 A
EXP. 12/31/2023EXP. 12/31/2025
Structural Calculations: OPRD Nehalem Bay State Park DC - 1
G:\Acad2023\20230299\Calculations\20230299 DC.docx
Project: OPRD Nehalem Bay State Park Project Number: 20230299
Project Address: 34600 Garey Street
Nehalem, OR 97131
Document: Structural Calculations for Building Permit
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Design Outline and Criteria
DC-1 thru DC-3
Gravity Framing Design
G-1 thru G-13
Lateral Load Design
L-1 thru L-12
Foundation Design
C-1 thru C-2
DESCRIPTION OF STRUCTURAL SYSTEM
This ‘OPRD Nehalem Bay State Park’ consists of the design of (1) prototype ‘STAFF’ cabin at the site located at 34600 Garey Street, Nehalem, OR 97131.
Bearing Wall System: Light frame wood stud walls
Roof Structure: 2x solid sawn joists with wood panel sheathing
Floor Framing: 2x solid sawn joists with wood panel sheathing
Foundations: Conventional spread and continuous footings
Lateral System: Light frame wood bearing shearwalls
***LIMITATIONS***
VLMK Engineering + Design was retained in a limited capacity for this project. No responsibility and/or liability is assumed by, nor is any to be assigned to, VLMK Engineering + Design for items beyond that shown in this Structural Calculation Package.
A
A
Structural Calculations: OPRD Nehalem Bay State Park DC - 2
CODES
2022 Oregon Structural Specialty Code (Based on the 2021 International Building Code)
DESIGN LOADS
Live Loads
Roof Snow Load
Flat Roof Snow Load, Pf 75 psf Snow Exposure Factor, Ce 1.0 Snow Load Importance Factor, Is 1.0 Thermal Factor, Ct 1.0 Snow Drift As Required
Floor Loads
Residential 40 psf
Dead Loads
Roof (Light-Framed Timber)
Standing Seam Deck 3.0 psf Sheathing (5/8” plywood) 1.8 psf Insulation 1.0 psf 2x Joists at 24” o.c. 2.7 psf Mechanical and Electrical 1.0 psf 5/8” Gypsum Board Ceiling 2.8 psf Miscellaneous 2.9 psf Total Roof Load 15.0 psf
Floor (Residential Wood)
Sheathing (3/4” plywood) 2.3 psf Sub-floor (1/2” particle board) 2.5 psf 2x Joists at 16” o.c. 4.0 psf Beams 1.0 psf Mechanical and Electrical 1.0 psf Miscellaneous 4.2 psf Total Floor Load 15.0 psf
Additional Loads
Roof Mounted Mechanical Units As Noted
Wall Weights
Wood-Stud Exterior Walls 15 psf
Structural Calculations: OPRD Nehalem Bay State Park DC - 3
Wind
Basic Design Wind Speed, V (3-sec gust) 135 mph Nominal Design Wind Speed, Vasd 105 mph Risk Category II Wind Exposure C Internal Pressure Coefficient GCpi = +/- 0.18
Seismic
Location Latitude Longitude
45.705638 -122.935218
Seismic Importance Factor, Ie 1.0 Risk Category II Mapped Spectral Response Accelerations Ss = 2.199
S1 = 1.016 Site Class D Spectral Response Coefficients Sds = 2.4922
Sd1 = 1.759 Seismic Design Category D Basic Seismic force resisting system(s) Light Frame Wood
Bearing/Shear Walls Response Modification Factor R = 6.5 Analysis Procedure Used Equivalent Static
GRAVITY
(LARGER THAN STAFF CABIN)
G-1
G-2
Wood Beam LIC# : KW-06015627, Build:20.23.04.05 VLMK CONSULTING ENGINEERS (c) ENERCALC INC 1983-2023
DESCRIPTION: Deluxe Cabin - Floor Joist (Max Length)
Project File: 20220558.ec6
Project Title:
Engineer:
Project ID:
Project Descr:
CODE REFERENCES
Calculations per NDS 2018, IBC 2018, CBC 2019, ASCE 7-16 Load Combination Set : IBC 2021
Material Properties
Beam Bracing : Beam is Fully Braced against lateral-torsional buckling Repetitive Member Stress Increase
Allowable Stress Design
Douglas Fir-Larch No.2
875.0 875.0 600.0 625.0
1,300.0 470.0
170.0
425.0 31.210
Analysis Method :
Eminbend - xx ksi Wood Species :
Wood Grade :
Fb + psi psi
Fv psi
Fb -
Ft psi
Fc - Prll psi psiFc - Perp
E : Modulus of Elasticity Ebend- xx ksi
Density pcf
Load Combination : IBC 2021
.Applied Loads Service loads entered. Load Factors will be applied for calculations.
Beam self weight NOT internally calculated and added
Uniform Load : D = 0.0150, L = 0.040 ksf, Tributary Width = 2.0 ft .DESIGN SUMMARY Design OK
Maximum Bending Stress Ratio 0.768: 1
Load Combination +D+L
Span # where maximum occurs Span # 1 Location of maximum on span 5.250ft
53.32 psi=
1,106.88psi
2x10Section used for this span
Span # where maximum occurs Location of maximum on span
Span # 1=
Load Combination +D+L
170.00 psi==
Section used for this span 2x10 Maximum Shear Stress Ratio 0.314 : 1
0.000 ft=
850.43psi
Maximum Deflection
0 <360
Ratio = 0 <180
Max Downward Transient Deflection 0.171 in 736Ratio = >=360 Max Upward Transient Deflection 0 in Ratio = Max Downward Total Deflection 0.235 in Ratio = >=180 Max Upward Total Deflection 0 in fb: Actual F'b fv: Actual F'v
Span: 1 : L Only n/a Span: 1 : +D+L n/a
.Maximum Forces & Stresses for Load Combinations
Span # Moment ValuesLoad Combination
C iCLx CCCM CF rt
Shear ValuesMax Stress Ratios M CDV fbM fvF'b V F'vSegment Length Cfu
D Only 0.0 0.00 0.00.0 1.00Length = 10.50 ft 1 0.233 0.095 0.90 1.100 1.151.00 1.00 0.41 231.9 996.2 0.13 153.01.00 14.51.00 1.00+D+L 1.100 1.151.00 1.00 0.0 0.00 0.01.00 0.01.00 1.00Length = 10.50 ft 1 0.768 0.314 1.00 1.100 1.151.00 1.00 1.52 850.4 1,106.9 0.49 170.01.00 53.31.00 1.00+D+0.750L 1.100 1.151.00 1.00 0.0 0.00 0.01.00 0.01.00 1.00Length = 10.50 ft 1 0.503 0.205 1.25 1.100 1.151.00 1.00 1.24 695.8 1,383.6 0.40 212.51.00 43.61.00 1.00+0.60D 1.100 1.151.00 1.00 0.0 0.00 0.01.00 0.01.00 1.00Length = 10.50 ft 1 0.079 0.032 1.60 1.100 1.151.00 1.00 0.25 139.2 1,771.0 0.08 272.01.00 8.71.00
G-3
LIC# : KW-06015627, Build:20.23.2.14 VLMK CONSULTING ENGINEERS (c) ENERCALC INC 1983-2022
DESCRIPTION: Deluxe Cabin - Floor Joist (Short Length)
Project File: 20220558.ec6
Project Title:
Engineer:
Project ID:
Project Descr:
CODE REFERENCES
Calculations per NDS 2018, IBC 2018, CBC 2019, ASCE 7-16 Load Combination Set : IBC 2021
Material Properties
Beam Bracing : Beam is Fully Braced against lateral-torsional buckling
Allowable Stress Design
Douglas Fir-Larch No.2
875.0 875.0 600.0 625.0
1,300.0 470.0
170.0
425.0 31.210
Analysis Method :
Eminbend - xx ksi Wood Species :
Wood Grade :
Fb + psi psi
Fv psi
Fb -
Ft psi
Fc - Prll psi psiFc - Perp
E : Modulus of Elasticity Ebend- xx ksi
Density pcf
Load Combination : IBC 2021
.Applied Loads Service loads entered. Load Factors will be applied for calculations.
Beam self weight NOT internally calculated and added
Uniform Load : D = 0.0150, L = 0.040 ksf, Tributary Width = 2.0 ft .DESIGN SUMMARY Design OK
Maximum Bending Stress Ratio 0.513: 1
Load Combination +D+L
Span # where maximum occurs Span # 1 Location of maximum on span 4.000ft
38.54 psi=
962.50psi
2x10Section used for this span
Span # where maximum occurs Location of maximum on span
Span # 1=
Load Combination +D+L
170.00 psi==
Section used for this span 2x10 Maximum Shear Stress Ratio 0.227 : 1
7.241 ft=
493.67psi
Maximum Deflection
0 <360
Ratio = 0 <180
Max Downward Transient Deflection 0.058 in 1664Ratio = >=360 Max Upward Transient Deflection 0 in Ratio = Max Downward Total Deflection 0.079 in Ratio = >=180 Max Upward Total Deflection 0 in fb: Actual F'b fv: Actual F'v
Span: 1 : L Only n/a Span: 1 : +D+L n/a
Load Combination Support 1 Support 2 Vertical Reactions Support notation : Far left is #1 Values in KIPS
Max Upward from all Load Conditions 0.440 0.440 Max Upward from Load Combinations 0.440 0.440 Max Upward from Load Cases 0.320 0.320 D Only 0.120 0.120 +D+L 0.440 0.440 +D+0.750L 0.360 0.360 +0.60D 0.072 0.072 L Only 0.320 0.320
G-4
DESCRIPTION: Deluxe Cabin - Floor Beam (interior) (sawn lumber)
Project File: 20220558.ec6
Project Title:
Engineer:
Project ID:
Project Descr:
CODE REFERENCES
Calculations per NDS 2018, IBC 2018, CBC 2019, ASCE 7-16 Load Combination Set : IBC 2021
Material Properties
Beam Bracing : Completely Unbraced
Allowable Stress Design
Douglas Fir-Larch No.1
1,350.0 1,350.0
925.0 625.0
1,600.0 580.0
170.0
675.0 31.210
Analysis Method :
Eminbend - xx ksi Wood Species :
Wood Grade :
Fb + psi psi
Fv psi
Fb -
Ft psi
Fc - Prll psi psiFc - Perp
E : Modulus of Elasticity Ebend- xx ksi
Density pcf
Load Combination : IBC 2021
.Applied Loads Service loads entered. Load Factors will be applied for calculations.
Beam self weight NOT internally calculated and added Loads on all spans...
Uniform Load on ALL spans : D = 0.1320, L = 0.350 k/ft .DESIGN SUMMARY Design OK
Maximum Bending Stress Ratio 0.699: 1
Load Combination +D+L
Span # where maximum occurs Span # 1 Location of maximum on span 6.250ft
60.49 psi=
1,333.01psi
6x12Section used for this span
Span # where maximum occurs Location of maximum on span
Span # 1=
Load Combination +D+L
170.00 psi==
Section used for this span 6x12 Maximum Shear Stress Ratio 0.356 : 1
11.542 ft=
931.86psi
Maximum Deflection
0 <360
Ratio = 0 <240
Max Downward Transient Deflection 0.173 in 865Ratio = >=360 Max Upward Transient Deflection 0 in Ratio = Max Downward Total Deflection 0.239 in Ratio = >=240 Max Upward Total Deflection 0 in fb: Actual F'b fv: Actual F'v
Span: 1 : L Only n/a Span: 1 : +D+L n/a
.Maximum Forces & Stresses for Load Combinations
Span # Moment ValuesLoad Combination
C iCLx CCCM CF rt
Shear ValuesMax Stress Ratios M CDV fbM fvF'b V F'vSegment Length Cfu
D Only 0.0 0.00 0.00.0 0.99Length = 12.50 ft 1 0.212 0.108 0.90 1.000 1.001.00 1.00 2.58 255.2 1,201.5 0.70 153.01.00 16.61.00 0.99+D+L 1.000 1.001.00 1.00 0.0 0.00 0.01.00 0.01.00 0.99Length = 12.50 ft 1 0.699 0.356 1.00 1.000 1.001.00 1.00 9.41 931.9 1,333.0 2.55 170.01.00 60.51.00 0.99+D+0.750L 1.000 1.001.00 1.00 0.0 0.00 0.01.00 0.01.00 0.98Length = 12.50 ft 1 0.460 0.233 1.25 1.000 1.001.00 1.00 7.71 762.7 1,659.4 2.09 212.51.00 49.51.00 0.98+0.60D 1.000 1.001.00 1.00 0.0 0.00 0.01.00 0.01.00 0.98Length = 12.50 ft 1 0.073 0.037 1.60 1.000 1.001.00 1.00 1.55 153.1 2,110.0 0.42 272.01.00 9.91.00
G-5
DESCRIPTION: EXTERIOR FLOOR BEAM (SAWN LUMBER)
Project File: 20220558.ec6
Project Title:
Engineer:
Project ID:
Project Descr:
CODE REFERENCES
Calculations per NDS 2018, IBC 2018, CBC 2019, ASCE 7-16
Load Combination Set : IBC 2021
Material Properties
Beam Bracing : Beam is Fully Braced against lateral-torsional buckling
Allowable Stress Design
Douglas Fir-Larch
No.1
675 31.21
Analysis Method :
Eminbend - xx ksi
Wood Species :
Wood Grade :
Fb + psi psi
Fv psi
Fb -
Ft psi
Fc - Prll psi psiFc - Perp
E : Modulus of Elasticity
Ebend- xx ksi
Density pcf
Load Combination : IBC 2021
Applied Loads Service loads entered. Load Factors will be applied for calculations.
Beam self weight NOT internally calculated and added Uniform Load : D = 0.0150, L = 0.040 ksf, Tributary Width = 4.50 ft, (FLOOR) Uniform Load : D = 0.0150, S = 0.0750 ksf, Tributary Width = 6.0 ft, (ROOF) Uniform Load : D = 0.0150 ksf, Tributary Width = 10.0 ft, (WALL)
DESIGN SUMMARY Design OK
Maximum Bending Stress Ratio 0.940: 1
Load Combination +D+0.750L+0.750S
Span # where maximum occurs Span # 1
Location of maximum on span 5.500ft
84.66 psi=
1,242.00psi
6x12Section used for this span
Span # where maximum occurs
Location of maximum on span
Span # 1=
Load Combination +D+0.750L+0.750S
156.40 psi==
Section used for this span 6x12
Maximum Shear Stress Ratio 0.541 : 1
10.077 ft=
1,167.79psi
Maximum Deflection
0 <360
Ratio = 0 <180
Max Downward Transient Deflection 0.141 in 937Ratio = >=360
Max Upward Transient Deflection 0 in Ratio =
Max Downward Total Deflection 0.244 in Ratio = >=180 Max Upward Total Deflection 0 in fb: Actual
F'b fv: Actual
F'v
Span: 1 : S Only n/a
Span: 1 : +D+0.750L+0.750S n/a
G-6
DESCRIPTION: Deluxe Cabin Roof Joist- (75 psf snow)
Project File: 20220558.ec6
Project Title:
Engineer:
Project ID:
Project Descr:
CODE REFERENCES
Calculations per NDS 2018, IBC 2018, CBC 2019, ASCE 7-16
Load Combination Set : IBC 2021
Material Properties
Beam Bracing : Beam is Fully Braced against lateral-torsional buckling Repetitive Member Stress Increase
Allowable Stress Design
Douglas Fir-Larch
No.2
900.0
900.0
1,350.0
625.0
1,600.0
580.0
180.0
575.0 31.210
Analysis Method :
Eminbend - xx ksi
Wood Species :
Wood Grade :
Fb + psi psi
Fv psi
Fb -
Ft psi
Fc - Prll psi psiFc - Perp
E : Modulus of Elasticity
Ebend- xx ksi
Density pcf
Load Combination : IBC 2021
Applied Loads Service loads entered. Load Factors will be applied for calculations.
Beam self weight NOT internally calculated and added Loads on all spans...
Uniform Load on ALL spans : D = 0.0150, S = 0.0750 ksf, Tributary Width = 2.0 ft
DESIGN SUMMARY Design OK
Maximum Bending Stress Ratio 0.738: 1
Load Combination +D+S
Span # where maximum occurs Span # 1
Location of maximum on span 4.374ft
90.00 psi=
1,309.28psi
2x10Section used for this span
Span # where maximum occurs
Location of maximum on span
Span # 1=
Load Combination +D+S
207.00 psi==
Section used for this span 2x10
Maximum Shear Stress Ratio 0.435 : 1
9.000 ft=
966.40psi
Maximum Deflection
550 >=360
Ratio = 458 >=180
Max Downward Transient Deflection 0.132 in 819Ratio = >=360
Max Upward Transient Deflection -0.065 in Ratio =
Max Downward Total Deflection 0.158 in Ratio = >=180 Max Upward Total Deflection -0.078 in fb: Actual
F'b fv: Actual
F'v
Span: 1 : S Only
Span: 2 : S Only
Span: 1 : +D+S Span: 2 : +D+S
Maximum Forces & Stresses for Load Combinations
Span #
Moment ValuesLoad Combination C iCLx CCCM CF rt
Shear ValuesMax Stress Ratios
M CDV fbM fvF'b V F'vSegment Length Cfu
D Only 0.0 0.00 0.00.0
1.00Length = 9.0 ft 1 0.157 0.093 0.90 1.100 1.151.00 1.00 0.29 161.1 1,024.7 0.14 162.01.00 15.01.00
1.00Length = 1.50 ft 2 0.018 0.093 0.90 1.100 1.151.00 1.00 0.03 18.9 1,024.7 0.04 162.01.00 15.01.00
1.00+D+S 1.100 1.151.00 1.00 0.0 0.00 0.01.00 0.01.00
1.00Length = 9.0 ft 1 0.738 0.435 1.15 1.100 1.151.00 1.00 1.72 966.4 1,309.3 0.83 207.01.00 90.01.00
1.00Length = 1.50 ft 2 0.087 0.435 1.15 1.100 1.151.00 1.00 0.20 113.6 1,309.3 0.27 207.01.00 90.01.00
1.00+D+0.750S 1.100 1.151.00 1.00 0.0 0.00 0.01.00 0.01.00
1.00Length = 9.0 ft 1 0.584 0.344 1.15 1.100 1.151.00 1.00 1.36 765.1 1,309.3 0.66 207.01.00 71.21.00
1.00Length = 1.50 ft 2 0.069 0.344 1.15 1.100 1.151.00 1.00 0.16 89.9 1,309.3 0.21 207.01.00 71.21.00
G-7
DESCRIPTION: CABIN RIDGE BEAM - SIMPLE SPAN
Project File: 20220558.ec6
Project Title:
Engineer:
Project ID:
Project Descr:
CODE REFERENCES
Calculations per NDS 2018, IBC 2018, CBC 2019, ASCE 7-16
Load Combination Set : IBC 2021
Material Properties
Beam Bracing : Beam is Fully Braced against lateral-torsional buckling
Allowable Stress Design
DF/DF
24F-V4
2,400.0
1,850.0
1,650.0
650.0
1,800.0
950.0
265.0
1,100.0 31.210
Analysis Method :
Eminbend - xx ksi
Wood Species :
Wood Grade :
Fb + psi psi
Fv psi
Fb -
Ft psi
Fc - Prll psi psiFc - Perp
E : Modulus of Elasticity
1,600.0ksi
850.0ksi
Ebend- yy
Eminbend - yy
Ebend- xx ksi
Density pcf
Load Combination : IBC 2021
Applied Loads Service loads entered. Load Factors will be applied for calculations.
Beam self weight NOT internally calculated and added Uniform Load : D = 0.0150, S = 0.0750 ksf, Tributary Width = 9.0 ft
DESIGN SUMMARY Design OK
Maximum Bending Stress Ratio 0.478: 1
Load Combination +D+S
Span # where maximum occurs Span # 1
Location of maximum on span 6.500ft
94.98 psi=
2,760.00psi
5.125x13.5Section used for this span
Span # where maximum occurs
Location of maximum on span
Span # 1=
Load Combination +D+S
304.75 psi==
Section used for this span 5.125x13.5
Maximum Shear Stress Ratio 0.312 : 1
11.909 ft=
1,319.02psi
Maximum Deflection
0 <240
Ratio = 0 <180
Max Downward Transient Deflection 0.231 in 676Ratio = >=240
Max Upward Transient Deflection 0 in Ratio =
Max Downward Total Deflection 0.277 in Ratio = >=180 Max Upward Total Deflection 0 in fb: Actual
F'b fv: Actual
F'v
Span: 1 : S Only n/a
Span: 1 : +D+S
G-8
DESCRIPTION: DELUXE CABIN HEADER (INTERIOR)
Project File: 20220558.ec6
Project Title:
Engineer:
Project ID:
Project Descr:
CODE REFERENCES
Calculations per NDS 2018, IBC 2018, CBC 2019, ASCE 7-16 Load Combination Set : IBC 2021
Material Properties
Beam Bracing : Completely Unbraced
Allowable Stress Design
Douglas Fir-Larch No.1
675 31.21
Analysis Method :
Eminbend - xx ksi Wood Species :
Wood Grade :
Fb + psi psi
Fv psi
Fb -
Ft psi
Fc - Prll psi psiFc - Perp
E : Modulus of Elasticity Ebend- xx ksi
Density pcf
Load Combination : IBC 2021
.Applied Loads Service loads entered. Load Factors will be applied for calculations.
Beam self weight NOT internally calculated and added
Point Load : D = 1.418, S = 7.090 k @ 1.667 ft, (KING POST REACTION) .DESIGN SUMMARY Design OK
Maximum Bending Stress Ratio 0.918: 1
Load Combination +D+S
Span # where maximum occurs Span # 1 Location of maximum on span 1.667ft
162.06 psi=
1,255.81psi
4x12Section used for this span
Span # where maximum occurs Location of maximum on span
Span # 1=
Load Combination +D+S
207.00 psi==
Section used for this span 4x12 Maximum Shear Stress Ratio 0.783 : 1
1.679 ft=
1,152.36psi
Maximum Deflection
0 <360
Ratio = 0 <180
Max Downward Transient Deflection 0.013 in 2971Ratio = >=360 Max Upward Transient Deflection 0 in Ratio = Max Downward Total Deflection 0.016 in Ratio = >=180 Max Upward Total Deflection 0 in fb: Actual F'b fv: Actual F'v
Span: 1 : S Only n/a Span: 1 : +D+S n/a
.Maximum Forces & Stresses for Load Combinations
Span # Moment ValuesLoad Combination
C iCLx CCCM CF rt
Shear ValuesMax Stress Ratios M CDV fbM fvF'b V F'vSegment Length Cfu
D Only 0.0 0.00 0.00.0 0.99Length = 3.333 ft 1 0.195 0.167 0.90 1.100 1.001.00 1.00 1.18 192.1 984.5 0.71 162.01.00 27.01.00 0.99+D+S 1.100 1.001.00 1.00 0.0 0.00 0.01.00 0.01.00 0.99Length = 3.333 ft 1 0.918 0.783 1.15 1.100 1.001.00 1.00 7.09 1,152.4 1,255.8 4.25 207.01.00 162.11.00 0.99+D+0.750S 1.100 1.001.00 1.00 0.0 0.00 0.01.00 0.01.00 0.99Length = 3.333 ft 1 0.726 0.620 1.15 1.100 1.001.00 1.00 5.61 912.3 1,255.8 3.37 207.01.00 128.31.00 0.99+0.60D 1.100 1.001.00 1.00 0.0 0.00 0.01.00 0.01.00 0.99Length = 3.333 ft 1 0.066 0.056 1.60 1.100 1.001.00 1.00 0.71 115.2 1,741.3 0.43 288.01.00 16.21.00
G-9
DESCRIPTION: DELUXE CABIN DOOR HEADER (EXTERIOR)
Project File: 20220558.ec6
Project Title:
Engineer:
Project ID:
Project Descr:
CODE REFERENCES
Calculations per NDS 2018, IBC 2018, CBC 2019, ASCE 7-16 Load Combination Set : IBC 2021
Material Properties
Beam Bracing : Beam is Fully Braced against lateral-torsional buckling
Allowable Stress Design
Douglas Fir-Larch No.1
675 31.21
Analysis Method :
Eminbend - xx ksi Wood Species :
Wood Grade :
Fb + psi psi
Fv psi
Fb -
Ft psi
Fc - Prll psi psiFc - Perp
E : Modulus of Elasticity Ebend- xx ksi
Density pcf
Load Combination : IBC 2021
.Applied Loads Service loads entered. Load Factors will be applied for calculations.
Beam self weight NOT internally calculated and added
Point Load : D = 1.418, S = 7.090 k @ 1.667 ft, (KING POST REACTION) .DESIGN SUMMARY Design OK
Maximum Bending Stress Ratio 0.682: 1
Load Combination +D+S
Span # where maximum occurs Span # 1 Location of maximum on span 1.670ft
125.91 psi=
1,552.50psi
6x10Section used for this span
Span # where maximum occurs Location of maximum on span
Span # 1=
Load Combination +D+S
195.50 psi==
Section used for this span 6x10 Maximum Shear Stress Ratio 0.644 : 1
0.000 ft=
1,058.46psi
Maximum Deflection
0 <360
Ratio = 0 <180
Max Downward Transient Deflection 0.017 in 2487Ratio = >=360 Max Upward Transient Deflection 0 in Ratio = Max Downward Total Deflection 0.020 in Ratio = >=180 Max Upward Total Deflection 0 in fb: Actual F'b fv: Actual F'v
Span: 1 : S Only n/a Span: 1 : +D+S n/a
.Maximum Forces & Stresses for Load Combinations
Span # Moment ValuesLoad Combination
C iCLx CCCM CF rt
Shear ValuesMax Stress Ratios M CDV fbM fvF'b V F'vSegment Length Cfu
D Only 0.0 0.00 0.00.0 1.00Length = 3.440 ft 1 0.145 0.137 0.90 1.000 1.001.00 1.00 1.22 176.4 1,215.0 0.73 153.01.00 21.01.00 1.00+D+S 1.000 1.001.00 1.00 0.0 0.00 0.01.00 0.01.00 1.00Length = 3.440 ft 1 0.682 0.644 1.15 1.000 1.001.00 1.00 7.30 1,058.5 1,552.5 4.39 195.51.00 125.91.00 1.00+D+0.750S 1.000 1.001.00 1.00 0.0 0.00 0.01.00 0.01.00 1.00Length = 3.440 ft 1 0.540 0.510 1.15 1.000 1.001.00 1.00 5.78 838.0 1,552.5 3.47 195.51.00 99.71.00 1.00+0.60D 1.000 1.001.00 1.00 0.0 0.00 0.01.00 0.01.00 1.00Length = 3.440 ft 1 0.049 0.046 1.60 1.000 1.001.00 1.00 0.73 105.8 2,160.0 0.44 272.01.00 12.61.00
G-10
LIC# : KW-06015627, Build:20.23.2.14 VLMK CONSULTING ENGINEERS (c) ENERCALC INC 1983-2022
DESCRIPTION: DELUXE CABIN BACK WINDOW HEADER
Project File: 20220558.ec6
Project Title:
Engineer:
Project ID:
Project Descr:
CODE REFERENCES
Calculations per NDS 2018, IBC 2018, CBC 2019, ASCE 7-16 Load Combination Set : IBC 2021
Material Properties
Beam Bracing : Beam is Fully Braced against lateral-torsional buckling
Allowable Stress Design
Douglas Fir-Larch No.2
425 31.21
Analysis Method :
Eminbend - xx ksi Wood Species :
Wood Grade :
Fb + psi psi
Fv psi
Fb -
Ft psi
Fc - Prll psi psiFc - Perp
E : Modulus of Elasticity Ebend- xx ksi
Density pcf
Load Combination : IBC 2021
.Applied Loads Service loads entered. Load Factors will be applied for calculations.
Beam self weight NOT internally calculated and added
Point Load : D = 0.8080, S = 4.044 k @ 1.50 ft, (KING STUD REACTION) .DESIGN SUMMARY Design OK
Maximum Bending Stress Ratio 0.842: 1
Load Combination +D+S
Span # where maximum occurs Span # 1 Location of maximum on span 1.500ft
88.22 psi=
1,006.25psi
6x8Section used for this span
Span # where maximum occurs Location of maximum on span
Span # 1=
Load Combination +D+S
195.50 psi==
Section used for this span 6x8 Maximum Shear Stress Ratio 0.451 : 1
0.000 ft=
846.89psi
Maximum Deflection
0 <360
Ratio = 0 <180
Max Downward Transient Deflection 0.016 in 2289Ratio = >=360 Max Upward Transient Deflection 0 in Ratio = Max Downward Total Deflection 0.019 in Ratio = >=180 Max Upward Total Deflection 0 in fb: Actual F'b fv: Actual F'v
Span: 1 : S Only n/a Span: 1 : +D+S n/a
Load Combination Support 1 Support 2 Vertical Reactions Support notation : Far left is #1 Values in KIPS
Max Upward from all Load Conditions 2.426 2.426 Max Upward from Load Combinations 2.426 2.426 Max Upward from Load Cases 2.022 2.022 D Only 0.404 0.404 +D+S 2.426 2.426 +D+0.750S 1.921 1.921 +0.60D 0.242 0.242 S Only 2.022 2.022
G-11
DESCRIPTION: Ceiling Joist
Project File: 20220558.ec6
Project Title:
Engineer:
Project ID:
Project Descr:
CODE REFERENCES
Calculations per NDS 2018, IBC 2018, CBC 2019, ASCE 7-16
Load Combination Set : IBC 2021
Material Properties
Beam Bracing : Completely Unbraced Repetitive Member Stress Increase
Allowable Stress Design
Douglas Fir-Larch
No.2
575 31.21
Analysis Method :
Eminbend - xx ksi
Wood Species :
Wood Grade :
Fb + psi psi
Fv psi
Fb -
Ft psi
Fc - Prll psi psiFc - Perp
E : Modulus of Elasticity
Ebend- xx ksi
Density pcf
Load Combination : IBC 2021
Applied Loads Service loads entered. Load Factors will be applied for calculations.
Beam self weight NOT internally calculated and added Uniform Load : D = 0.010, L = 0.010 ksf, Tributary Width = 1.333 ft, (Ceiling Joist) Point Load : D = 0.0620 k @ 4.0 ft, (Mechanical)
DESIGN SUMMARY Design OK
Maximum Bending Stress Ratio 0.453: 1
Load Combination +D+L
Span # where maximum occurs Span # 1
Location of maximum on span 4.000ft
22.90 psi=
1,182.61psi
2x6Section used for this span
Span # where maximum occurs
Location of maximum on span
Span # 1=
Load Combination +D+L
180.00 psi==
Section used for this span 2x6
Maximum Shear Stress Ratio 0.127 : 1
7.562 ft=
535.19psi
Maximum Deflection
0 <360
Ratio = 0 <180
Max Downward Transient Deflection 0.037 in 2585Ratio = >=360
Max Upward Transient Deflection 0 in Ratio =
Max Downward Total Deflection 0.109 in Ratio = >=180 Max Upward Total Deflection 0 in fb: Actual
F'b fv: Actual
F'v
Span: 1 : L Only n/a
Span: 1 : +D+L
G-12
DESCRIPTION: Rear Wall Exterior Beam
Project File: 20220558.ec6
Project Title:
Engineer:
Project ID:
Project Descr:
CODE REFERENCES
Calculations per NDS 2018, IBC 2018, CBC 2019, ASCE 7-16
Load Combination Set : IBC 2021
Material Properties
Beam Bracing : Beam is Fully Braced against lateral-torsional buckling
Allowable Stress Design
Douglas Fir-Larch
No.1
1,350.0
1,350.0
925.0
625.0
1,600.0
580.0
170.0
675.0 31.210
Analysis Method :
Eminbend - xx ksi
Wood Species :
Wood Grade :
Fb + psi psi
Fv psi
Fb -
Ft psi
Fc - Prll psi psiFc - Perp
E : Modulus of Elasticity
Ebend- xx ksi
Density pcf
Load Combination : IBC 2021
Applied Loads Service loads entered. Load Factors will be applied for calculations.
Beam self weight NOT internally calculated and added Uniform Load : D = 0.0150 ksf, Tributary Width = 10.0 ft, (Wall) Point Load : D = 0.480, S = 2.40 k @ 3.50 ft, (Roof)
DESIGN SUMMARY Design OK
Maximum Bending Stress Ratio 0.605: 1
Load Combination +D+S
Span # where maximum occurs Span # 1
Location of maximum on span 3.515ft
54.36 psi=
1,242.00psi
6x12Section used for this span
Span # where maximum occurs
Location of maximum on span
Span # 1=
Load Combination +D+S
156.40 psi==
Section used for this span 6x12
Maximum Shear Stress Ratio 0.348 : 1
0.000 ft=
751.26psi
Maximum Deflection
0 <360
Ratio = 0 <180
Max Downward Transient Deflection 0.056 in 1928Ratio = >=360
Max Upward Transient Deflection 0 in Ratio =
Max Downward Total Deflection 0.088 in Ratio = >=180 Max Upward Total Deflection 0 in fb: Actual
F'b fv: Actual
F'v
Span: 1 : S Only n/a
Span: 1 : +D+S
G-13A
LATERAL
v4.00 - Software Copyright 2015 VLMK Consulting Engineers. All Rights Reserved.
Wind Loads - Main Wind-Force Resisting System - Envelope Procedure Based on the 2018 International Building Code and ASCE 7-16, Section 28.5 (Part 2: Low-rise Buildings)
V = 140 mph Basic Wind Speed 3-Second Gust (USD) [Figure 26.5-1A, B, C, & D]
C Exposure Category [Section 26.7.3]
II Risk Category (I), (II), (III), or (IV) [IBC Table 1604.5]
Kzt = 1.00 Topographic Factor [Figure 26.8-1]
Roof Slope = 25 Degrees
Load Factor = 1.0 USD = 1.0W, ASD = 0.6W
Design Wind Pressure: p s = λK zt p s30 [Equation 28.5-1]
Horizontal Loads ( 1.0W USD LEVEL )
Height Adjustment
(ft) λ
15 1.21
20 1.29
25 1.35
30 1.40
35 1.45
40 1.49
45 1.53
50 1.56
55 1.59
60 1.62
Vertical Loads ( 1.0W USD LEVEL )
Height Adjustment
(ft) λ
Windward Windward
Roof (EOH) Roof (GOH)
15 1.21 -20.9 -8.0 -28.6 -15.5 -15.1 -2.2 -23.0 -9.9 -39.1 -33.3
20 1.29 -22.3 -8.5 -30.4 -16.5 -16.1 -2.3 -24.5 -10.6 -41.7 -35.5
25 1.35 -23.4 -8.9 -31.9 -17.3 -16.9 -2.4 -25.7 -11.1 -43.6 -37.1
30 1.40 -24.2 -9.2 -33.0 -17.9 -17.5 -2.5 -26.6 -11.5 -45.2 -38.5
35 1.45 -25.1 -9.6 -34.2 -18.6 -18.1 -2.6 -27.6 -11.9 -46.8 -39.9
40 1.49 -25.8 -9.8 -35.2 -19.1 -18.6 -2.7 -28.3 -12.2 -48.1 -41.0
45 1.53 -26.5 -10.1 -36.1 -19.6 -19.1 -2.8 -29.1 -12.5 -49.4 -42.1
50 1.56 -27.0 -10.3 -36.8 -20.0 -19.5 -2.8 -29.6 -12.8 -50.4 -42.9
55 1.59 -27.5 -10.5 -37.5 -20.4 -19.9 -2.9 -30.2 -13.0 -51.4 -43.7
60 1.62 -28.0 -10.7 -38.2 -20.7 -20.3 -2.9 -30.8 -13.3 -52.3 -44.6
1 2 1 2 1 2 1 2
Notes: 1.) Loads shown may be governed by Minimum Wind Design Loads per Section 28.6.4.
2.) Pressures shown are applied to the horizontal and vertical projections.
3.) Plus and minus signs signify pressures acting toward (+) and away (-) from the surfaces.
4.) Load case 2 at 25° is provided only for interpolation between 25° and 30° (Figure 28.5-1 - Note 4).
5.) Reference ASCE 7-16 Figure 28.5-1 for more information.
62.0
63.2
50.3 8.1
58.1
59.7
60.8
8.5
8.8
9.1
9.4
52.7
54.6
56.6
(psf)
Windward OverhangInterior Zones
(psf)
End Zones
(psf)
End Zones
(psf)
8.0
Wall (A)
Interior Zones
(psf)
Wall (C) Roof (D)Roof (B)
47.2
9.3
9.5
9.6
9.8
9.8
10.0
40.9
42.0
43.1
44.0
8.3
8.6
9.0
34.1
36.4
38.1
39.5
8.0
Roof (G)
Leeward
Roof (H)
Case 1 or 2:
Windward
Roof (E)
Leeward
Roof (F)
10.410.2 45.7
Windward
10.0 44.8 10.2
Project: OPRD CABIINS Job #: 20220558 By: ABU Date: 03/23 Sheet #:
L-1
L-2 v4.02 - Software Copyright 2020 VLMK Consulting Engineers. All Rights Reserved.
Shearwall Design Force Transfer Method with One Opening Based on the 2018 International Building Code & 2015 SDPWS Section 4.3.5.2 (Force Transfer Method)
Internal Diaphragm Shear Zones (per Diekmann's approach) v = plf
Notes:
1. Input Wind loads as 0.6W values.
Load Combination: -0.6D + 0.6W
2. Input Seismic loads as 0.7E values.
Load Combination: -(0.6-0.14SDS)D + 0.7E
Vtotal = lbs total shear to wall vmax = plf maximum panel shear
Shearwall Aspect Ratios (SDPWS Section 4.3.4.4 & 4.3.4.2)
Reduction Factor for Seismic Forces
Overall Shearwall
Pier B-D,1-2
Pier B-D,4-5
Chord Force Analysis
Vertical Chord Forces Horizontal Chord Forces
B A Max Horizontal
C B Strap Force:
D D Hmax = lbs
E E
External Overturning Analysis
Roof Dead Load = psf Tributary Roof = ft
Floor Dead Load = psf Tributary Floor = ft SDS = short period
Wall Dead Load = psf Wind or Seismic? response factor
Holdown Offset = in measured from centerline of holdown to end of wall
MOT= lb-ft
MRES= lb-ft
Uplift= lbs
Uplift Above = lbs
Design Uplift= lbs
1297.65
-626
-564
3.67
3.33
-407
-972
-1598
-2050
2.332
3.67
205 2
Ratio
1.58
1.84
1.84
Width
6.33
Height
3.67
W
12976.5
-377 0
649272
1.75
1.00
1.00
1.00
-377 y x
4 52 311
A
B
C
D
E
Project: OPRD CABINS Job #: 20220558 By: ABU Date: 03/23 Sheet #:
L-3
Shearwall Design Force Transfer Method with One Opening (BACK WALL) Based on the 2018 International Building Code & 2015 SDPWS Section 4.3.5.2 (Force Transfer Method)
Internal Diaphragm Shear Zones (per Diekmann's approach) v = plf
Notes:
1. Input Wind loads as 0.6W values.
Load Combination: -0.6D + 0.6W
2. Input Seismic loads as 0.7E values.
Load Combination: -(0.6-0.14SDS)D + 0.7E
Vtotal = lbs total shear to wall vmax = plf maximum panel shear
Shearwall Aspect Ratios (SDPWS Section 4.3.4.4 & 4.3.4.2)
Reduction Factor for Seismic Forces
Overall Shearwall
Pier B-D,1-2
Pier B-D,4-5
Chord Force Analysis
Vertical Chord Forces Horizontal Chord Forces
B A Max Horizontal
C B Strap Force:
D D Hmax = lbs
E E
External Overturning Analysis
Roof Dead Load = psf Tributary Roof = ft
Floor Dead Load = psf Tributary Floor = ft SDS = short period
Wall Dead Load = psf Wind or Seismic? response factor
Holdown Offset = in measured from centerline of holdown to end of wall
MOT= lb-ft
MRES= lb-ft
Uplift= lbs
Uplift Above = lbs
Design Uplift= lbs
26496
-268
-537
5.5
1.5
-276
-813
-1082
-1220
2.677
5.5
122 6.33
6.5
6.5
Ratio
0.63
0.79
0.87
Width
6.33
Height
5.5
-450
W
19520
-450
-380 0
1025645
1.75
1.00
1.00
1.00
-344 y x
4 52 311
A
B
C
D
E
Project: OPRD CABINS Job #: 20220558 By: ABU Date: 03/23 Sheet #:
L-4
Shearwall Design Force Transfer Method with Two Openings (SIDE WALLS) Based on the 2018 International Building Code & 2015 SDPWS Section 4.3.5.2 (Force Transfer Method)
Internal Diaphragm Shear Zones (per Diekmann's approach) v = plf
Vtotal = lbs total shear to wall vmax = plf maximum panel shear
T Notes: C
1. Input Wind loads as 0.6W values. Load Combination: -0.6D + 0.6W
2. Input Seismic loads as 0.7E values. Load Combination: (0.6-0.14SDS)D + 0.7E
Shearwall Aspect Ratios (SDPWS Section 4.3.4.4 & 4.3.4.2)
Reduction Factor for Seismic Forces
Overall Shearwall
Pier B-D,1-2
Pier B-D,4-5
Pier B-D,7-8
Chord Force Analysis
Vertical Chord Forces Horizontal Chord Forces
B A
C B
D D
E E
Max Horizontal Strap Force: Hmax = lbs
External Overturning Analysis
Roof Dead Load = psf Tributary Roof = ft
Floor Dead Load = psf Tributary Floor = ft SDS = short period
Wall Dead Load = psf Wind or Seismic? response factor
Holdown Offset = in measured from centerline of holdown to end of wall
MOT= lb-ft
MRES= lb-ft
Uplift = lbs Uplift Above = lbs Design Uplift= lbs
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
0 -2245
-501
-305
0 1125
501 0196
-138
211 29 0 257
-211 -29
-738
7 8
6.25 0.533.33
629167
4 52
Ratio
198271
8.83 0.38
4.67 0.71
24.17
Width
2.67 6.25 1.75 8.83
0.37
1 2
-167
-138138
4.67
2.34
3.33
3.33
3.33
3.33
Height
-2245
1.75
333 1096 1353 1982
70979
W
17837
0 0
-196
0 738
-136 0
1649 1513
-196
-257
857 886 y x
B
A
D
E
C
1 2 3 4 5 x
6 7 8
Project: OPRD CABINS Job #: 20220558 By: ABU Date: 03/23 Sheet #:
L-5
Wood Shearwall Overturning Analysis Based on the 2018 International Building Code
Design Input
Roof DL = 15.0 psf
Floor DL = 105.0 psf
Wall DL = 15.0 psf
Tolerance = 200 lbs
Holdown Offset = 6.0 in (see Note 3)
SDS = 1.750 Design Acceleration
Ω = 2.5 Overstrength Factor
Notes:
1. Input Wind loads as 0.6W values. Load Combination: -0.6D + 0.6W
2. Input Seismic loads as 0.7E values. Load Combination: -(0.6-0.14SDS)D + 0.7E
3. Holdown Offset measured from centerline of holdown to end of wall.
4. Simpson Holdowns are based on a minimum 3 1/2" stud/post width (2x4 wall) except as noted.
5. At Simpson HDU14, HD12, and HD19 holdowns, designer is to verify anchor bolt requirements and post size & capacity considering effective post height.
6. Simpson strap values are based on 18" floor-to-floor clearspan.
7. TCONC is an ultimate (strength) level force and does not include uplift from above since this value is calculated as an allowable (service) level force. TCONC based on Load Combination: -(0.9-0.2SDS)D + ΩE
Shearwall Overturning Analysis
Note 1,2 (W)ind Roof Floor holdown Uplift Total Notes 4,5,6 Note 7
Height Width Load -or- Trib Trib -or- MOT MRES Above Uplift Strap/Holdown TCONC
(ft) (ft) (plf) (S)eis (ft) (ft) strap (lb-ft) (lb-ft) (lbs) (lbs) Required (lbs)
MIDDLE WALL
9.8 11.0 313 W 12.0 6.0 holdown 33569 34712 0 -109 OK --
Wall
P
P up
WALL
WT.
ROOF/FLOOR LOAD
HEIGHT
WIDTH
Project: OPRD CABINS Job #: 20220558 By: ABU Date: 03/23 Sheet #:
L-6
L-7
Shearwall Design Force Transfer Method with One Opening Based on the 2018 International Building Code & 2015 SDPWS Section 4.3.5.2 (Force Transfer Method)
Internal Diaphragm Shear Zones (per Diekmann's approach) v = plf
Notes:
1. Input Wind loads as 0.6W values.
Load Combination: -0.6D + 0.6W
2. Input Seismic loads as 0.7E values.
Load Combination: -(0.6-0.14SDS)D + 0.7E
Vtotal = lbs total shear to wall vmax = plf maximum panel shear
Shearwall Aspect Ratios (SDPWS Section 4.3.4.4 & 4.3.4.2)
Reduction Factor for Seismic Forces
Overall Shearwall
Pier B-D,1-2
Pier B-D,4-5
Chord Force Analysis
Vertical Chord Forces Horizontal Chord Forces
B A Max Horizontal
C B Strap Force:
D D Hmax = lbs
E E
External Overturning Analysis
Roof Dead Load = psf Tributary Roof = ft
Floor Dead Load = psf Tributary Floor = ft SDS = short period
Wall Dead Load = psf Wind or Seismic? response factor
Holdown Offset = in measured from centerline of holdown to end of wall
MOT= lb-ft
MRES= lb-ft
Uplift= lbs
Uplift Above = lbs
Design Uplift= lbs
1202.7
-581
-523
3.67
3.33
-377
-900
-1481
-1900
2.332
3.67
190 2
Ratio
1.58
1.84
1.84
Width
6.33
Height
3.67
S
12027
-350 0
601252
1.75
1.00
1.00
1.00
-350 y x
4 52 311
A
B
C
D
E
Project: OPRD CABINS Job #: 20220558 By: ABU Date: 03/23 Sheet #:
(FRONT WALL)
L-8
Shearwall Design Force Transfer Method with One Opening (BACK WALL) Based on the 2018 International Building Code & 2015 SDPWS Section 4.3.5.2 (Force Transfer Method)
Internal Diaphragm Shear Zones (per Diekmann's approach) v = plf
Notes:
1. Input Wind loads as 0.6W values.
Load Combination: -0.6D + 0.6W
2. Input Seismic loads as 0.7E values.
Load Combination: -(0.6-0.14SDS)D + 0.7E
Vtotal = lbs total shear to wall vmax = plf maximum panel shear
Shearwall Aspect Ratios (SDPWS Section 4.3.4.4 & 4.3.4.2)
Reduction Factor for Seismic Forces
Overall Shearwall
Pier B-D,1-2
Pier B-D,4-5
Chord Force Analysis
Vertical Chord Forces Horizontal Chord Forces
B A Max Horizontal
C B Strap Force:
D D Hmax = lbs
E E
External Overturning Analysis
Roof Dead Load = psf Tributary Roof = ft
Floor Dead Load = psf Tributary Floor = ft SDS = short period
Wall Dead Load = psf Wind or Seismic? response factor
Holdown Offset = in measured from centerline of holdown to end of wall
MOT= lb-ft
MRES= lb-ft
Uplift= lbs
Uplift Above = lbs
Design Uplift= lbs
1.75
1.00
1.00
1.00
-262
-290 0
781492
-337
S
14880
-337
93 6.33
6.5
6.5
Ratio
0.63
0.79
0.87
Width
6.33
Height
5.5
2.677
5.5
5.5
1.5
-211
-620
-825
-930
20107
-205
-409 y x
4 52 311
A
B
C
D
E
Project: OPRD CABINS Job #: 20220558 By: ABU Date: 03/23 Sheet #:
L-9
Shearwall Design Force Transfer Method with Two Openings (SIDE WALLS) Based on the 2018 International Building Code & 2015 SDPWS Section 4.3.5.2 (Force Transfer Method)
Internal Diaphragm Shear Zones (per Diekmann's approach) v = plf
Vtotal = lbs total shear to wall vmax = plf maximum panel shear
T Notes: C
1. Input Wind loads as 0.6W values. Load Combination: -0.6D + 0.6W
2. Input Seismic loads as 0.7E values. Load Combination: (0.6-0.14SDS)D + 0.7E
Shearwall Aspect Ratios (SDPWS Section 4.3.4.4 & 4.3.4.2)
Reduction Factor for Seismic Forces
Overall Shearwall
Pier B-D,1-2
Pier B-D,4-5
Pier B-D,7-8
Chord Force Analysis
Vertical Chord Forces Horizontal Chord Forces
B A
C B
D D
E E
Max Horizontal Strap Force: Hmax = lbs
External Overturning Analysis
Roof Dead Load = psf Tributary Roof = ft
Floor Dead Load = psf Tributary Floor = ft SDS = short period
Wall Dead Load = psf Wind or Seismic? response factor
Holdown Offset = in measured from centerline of holdown to end of wall
MOT= lb-ft
MRES= lb-ft
Uplift = lbs Uplift Above = lbs Design Uplift= lbs
-214 0
2595 2381
-309
-405
1348 1394
-1180
1.75
523 1724 2129 3118
55995
S
28061
0 0
-309
0 1161
2.67 6.25 1.75 8.83
0.37
1 2
-262
-217217
4.67
2.34
3.33
3.33
3.33
3.33
Height
Ratio
3118112
8.83 0.38
4.67 0.71
24.17
Width
-1161
7 8
6.25 0.533.33
989262
4 52
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
0 -1180
-788
-479
0 1770
788 0309
-217
333 46 0 405
-333 -46 y x
B
A
D
E
C
1 2 3 4 5 x
6 7 8
Project: OPRD CABINS Job #: 20220558 By: ABU Date: 03/23 Sheet #:
L-10
Wood Shearwall Overturning Analysis Based on the 2018 International Building Code
Design Input
Roof DL = 30.0 psf
Floor DL = 105.0 psf
Wall DL = 15.0 psf
Tolerance = 200 lbs
Holdown Offset = 6.0 in (see Note 3)
SDS = 1.750 Design Acceleration
Ω = 2.5 Overstrength Factor
Notes:
1. Input Wind loads as 0.6W values. Load Combination: -0.6D + 0.6W
2. Input Seismic loads as 0.7E values. Load Combination: -(0.6-0.14SDS)D + 0.7E
3. Holdown Offset measured from centerline of holdown to end of wall.
4. Simpson Holdowns are based on a minimum 3 1/2" stud/post width (2x4 wall) except as noted.
5. At Simpson HDU14, HD12, and HD19 holdowns, designer is to verify anchor bolt requirements and post size & capacity considering effective post height.
6. Simpson strap values are based on 18" floor-to-floor clearspan.
7. TCONC is an ultimate (strength) level force and does not include uplift from above since this value is calculated as an allowable (service) level force. TCONC based on Load Combination: -(0.9-0.2SDS)D + ΩE
Shearwall Overturning Analysis
Note 1,2 (W)ind Roof Floor holdown Uplift Total Notes 4,5,6 Note 7
Height Width Load -or- Trib Trib -or- MOT MRES Above Uplift Strap/Holdown TCONC
(ft) (ft) (plf) (S)eis (ft) (ft) strap (lb-ft) (lb-ft) (lbs) (lbs) Required (lbs)
MIDDLE WALL
9.8 11.0 213 s 12.0 6.0 holdown 22844 24404 0 -149 OK 4169
Wall
P
P up
WALL
WT.
ROOF/FLOOR LOAD
HEIGHT
WIDTH
Project: OPRD CABINS Job #: 20220558 By: ABU Date: 03/23 Sheet #:
L-11
L-12
FOUNDATIONS
C-1
C-2
9840 lbs 2000 psf
2.218 ft 3'-0"A
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .