Attachment C_Past Performance Questionnaire Form.docx

DOCX document 226 KB Posted

Attached to
Z1DA--652-24-108 Replace Roofs and Flashing Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
36C24624R0064
Issued by
Department of Veterans Affairs Veterans Health Administration Veterans Integrated Service Network 6

About this file

This document is a Past Performance Questionnaire form related to a federal contract opportunity. The form requests information about the contractor's past performance, including quality, schedule/timeliness, customer satisfaction, management, cost/financial management, safety/security, and overall performance. The reference is asked to provide an adjective rating (Exceptional, Very Good, Satisfactory, Marginal, or Unsatisfactory) and comments for each performance area. The form also includes instructions for the reference and information about the related solicitation, including the solicitation number, project title, and description of the work. The referenced federal contract opportunity is for Project 652-24-108 Replace Roofs and Flashing, Solicitation Number 36C24624R0064, issued by the Department of Veterans Affairs Veterans Health Administration Veterans Integrated Service Network 6.

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Other files attached to Z1DA--652-24-108 Replace Roofs and Flashing, newest first.
File Type Posted
36C24624R0064 0004.docx DOCX document
S02_Solicitation_36C24624R0064 0004.docx DOCX document
36C24624R0064 0003.docx DOCX document
Questions and Answers_2.pdf PDF
36C24624R0064 0002.docx DOCX document
Specification New Guardrail System_SECTION 05 52 13.pdf PDF
652-24-108 Combined Specifications_10Jun2024.pdf PDF
Questions and Answers_1.pdf PDF
Site Visit Attendance Log 06-07-2024.pdf PDF
36C24624R0064 0001.docx DOCX document
36C24624R0064.docx DOCX document
Attachment D_Contractor EMR Certification Form 2023.docx DOCX document
Attachment A_Wage Determination General Decision Number VA20240007 03292024.pdf PDF
Attachment F_Itemized Schedule of Values Cost Breakdown.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Attachment E_652-24-108 Replace Roofs and Flashing CD_8Jun2023.pdf PDF
Attachment B_Relevant Corporate Experience Form.docx DOCX document
Show all 16

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

VA PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

CONTRACT INFORMATION (Contractor/Offeror to complete Blocks 1-4)

1. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR INFORMATION

Past Performance Reference No. (1-5):

Offeror Name:

Address:

Phone Number: DUNs Number:

Contact Name:

Email Address: Contact Phone Number:

2. GENERAL WORK INFORMATION
Work performed as:Offering EntityPredecessor CompaniesKey Personnel Percent (%) of project work performed by Offering Entity, Predecessor Companies or Key Personnel: List of Major Subcontractor(s) and Role(s):

3. CONTRACT INFORMATION

Contract Number:

Contractor Name Reference Contract Awarded To: Contractor DUNS Awarded: Agency/Customer:

Delivery/Task Order Number (if applicable):

Contract Type: Firm Fixed Price Cost Reimbursement Other (Please explain) Contract Title:

Contract Location:

Award Date (mm/dd/yy):

Construction Completion Date (mm/dd/yy):

Awardee Ongoing Services:

Original Contract Price (Award Amount):

Final Contract Price (to include all modifications, if applicable):

REFERENCE INFORMATION

Past Performance Questionnaire Reference Name & Title:

Phone No.:

Email:

Address:

Contracting Officer (CO) or Individual Responsible for Signing Contract Name & Title:

Phone No.:

Email:

Address:

Resident Engineer/CO’s Technical Representative or Construction Supervisor Name & Title:

Phone No.: Email: Address:

Solicitation No.:

Project Title:

ORP PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE (CONTINUED)

4. PROJECT DESCRIPTION

Type of Work (check all that apply): VA Federal Medical Office Other: Reference Project Key Personnel Assigned as Key to Solicitation Project: Yes No If yes, please provide key personnel names and roles:

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE WORK PERFORMED

EXPLANATION OF RELEVANCY TO SOLICITATION REQUIREMENTS

INSTRUCTIONS FOR REFERENCES COMPLETING THIS QUESTIONNAIRE: VA requests that the reference completes this questionnaire and submits it directly back to [INSERT CONTRACTING POC] no later than 4:00 PM EST on [INSERT DATE] with a subject line that reads [Solicitation Number] - [Name of Offeror], Completed Past Performance Questionnaire”. The government reserves the right to verify all information on this form. To select: click box and fill shape in black.

Use the following adjective ratings and definitions in your evaluation of the Contractor’s performance.

RATING
DEFINITION
NOTE
(E) Exceptional
Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor was highly effective.
An Exceptional rating is appropriate when the Contractor successfully performed multiple significant events that were of benefit to the Government. A singular benefit, however, could be of such magnitude that it alone constitutes an Exceptional rating. Also, there should have been NO significant weaknesses identified.
(VG) Very Good
Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.
A Very Good rating is appropriate when the Contractor successfully performed a significant event that was a benefit to the Government. There should have been no significant weaknesses identified.
(S) Satisfactory
Performance meets minimum contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory.
A Satisfactory rating is appropriate when there were only minor problems, or major problems that the contractor recovered from without impact to the contract. There should have been NO significant weaknesses identified. Per VA policy, a fundamental principle of assigning ratings is that contractors will not be assessed a rating lower than Satisfactory solely for not performing beyond the requirements of the contract.
(M) Marginal
Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions. The contractor's proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.
A Marginal is appropriate when a significant event occurred that the contractor had trouble overcoming which impacted the Government.
(U) Unsatisfactory
Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains serious problem(s) for which the contractor's corrective actions appear or were ineffective.
An Unsatisfactory rating is appropriate when multiple significant events occurred that the contractor had trouble overcoming and which impacted the Government. A singular problem, however, could be of such serious magnitude that it alone constitutes an unsatisfactory rating.
(N) Not Applicable
No information or did not apply to your contract
Rating will be neither positive nor negative.

TO BE COMPLETED BY PPQ REFERENCE

PPQ REFERENCE

PPQ Reference Point of Contact Information Name:

Title:

Agency/Company:

Phone Number:

Email Address:

Contract No.:

Contract Type:

Contract Title: Contract Location:

Describe your role in the project:

Does the narrative in No. 4, above, accurately describe the scope, complexity, and relevance (Y/N):

Date Questionnaire was completed (mm/dd/yy):

PPQ Reference’s Signature:

Instructions: Please select the adjective rating that best reflects your evaluation of the contractor’s performance.

1. QUALITY:
E
VG
S
M
U
N

(a) Quality of construction, workmanship, quality of materials used, interior and overall appearance.

(b) Ability to meet quality standards specified for technical performance.

(c) Timeliness/effectiveness of contract problem resolution without extensive customer guidance.

(d) Adequacy/effectiveness of quality control program and adherence to contract quality assurance requirements (without adverse effect on performance).

2. SCHEDULE/TIMELINESS OF PERFORMANCE:
E
VG
S
M
U
N

(a) Compliance with contract delivery/completion schedules including any significant intermediate milestones. (If the schedule was not met, please address below.)

(b) Rate the contractor’s use of available resources to accomplish tasks identified in the contract.

(c) Rate your satisfaction with the contractor’s ability to respond to questions and/or comments in a timely manner.

3. CUSTOMER SATISFACTION:
E
VG
S
M
U
N

(a) To what extent were the end users satisfied with the project?

(b) Contractor was reasonable and cooperative in dealing with your staff (including the ability to successfully resolve disagreements/disputes; responsiveness to administrative reports, businesslike and communication).

(c) To what extent was the contractor cooperative, businesslike, and concerned with the interests of the customer?

(d) Overall customer satisfaction.

Solicitation No.:

Project Title:

4. MANAGEMENT/ PERSONNEL/LABOR
E
VG
S
M
U
N

(a) Effectiveness of management, including management of subcontractors and/or labor force?

(b) Ability to hire, apply, and retain a qualified workforce to this effort.

(c) Government Information Property Control.

(d) Knowledge/expertise demonstrated by contractor key personnel.

(e) Government contract requiring a subcontracting plan (Complete if the contractor was required to submit and adhere to a small business subcontracting plan. Were small business goals met?

(f) Ability to simultaneously manage multiple projects with multiple disciplines.

(g) Ability to assimilate and incorporate changes in requirements and/or priority, including planning, execution and response to Government changes.

(h) Effectiveness of overall management (including ability to effectively lead, manage and control the project).

5. COST/FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT
E
VG
S
M
U
N

(a) Ability to meet the terms and conditions within the contractually agreed price(s)?

(b) Contractor proposed innovative alternative methods/processes that reduced cost, improved maintainability or other factors that benefited the PM.

(c) Is the Contractor’s accounting system adequate for management and tracking of costs? (If no, please explain in comment section below.)

Yes
No

(d) If this is/was a Government contract, has/was this contract been partially or completely terminated for default or convenience or are there any pending terminations? (Indicate if show cause or cure notices were issued, or any default action in comment section below.)

Yes

No

(e) Have there been any indications that the contractor has had any financial problems? (If yes, please explain in the comment section below.)

Yes
No
6. SAFETY/SECURITY
E
VG
S
M
U
N

(a) To what extent was the contractor able to maintain an environment of safety, adhere to its approved safety plan, and respond to safety issues? (Includes: following the users rules, regulations, and requirements regarding housekeeping, safety, correction of noted deficiencies, etc.).

(b) Contractor complied with all general and IT security requirements for the project and personnel security requirements.

7. GENERAL
E
VG
S
M
U
N

(a) Ability to successfully respond to emergency and/or surge situations (including notifying COR, PM or Contracting Officer in a timely manner regarding urgent contractual issues).

(b) Compliance with contractual terms/provisions (If there were specific issues, please explain in the comments sections below

(c) In summary, provide an overall rating for the work performed by this contractor.

8. SUMMARY

Would you hire or work with this firm again? (If no, please explain in the comments section below.)
YesNo

COMMENTS SECTION

Please provide responses to the above questions (if applicable) and/or additional remarks. Also, please provide a brief narrative addressing specific strengths, weaknesses, deficiencies, or other comments which may assist our office in evaluating performance risk (please attach additional pages if necessary):

image1.png

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .