ATTACHMENT 8 Past Performance Questionnaire_614-17-113.pdf.pdf
PDF 337 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- 36C24926R0037_0001
About this file
This is a Past Performance Questionnaire for federal contract evaluation purposes. The questionnaire is designed to collect performance assessments for contractors bidding on Project 614-17-113 – Renovate Bldg. 1 Primary Care at the Lt. Col. Luke Weathers, Jr VA Medical Center in Memphis, Tennessee. The solicitation is issued by NCO 9 Network Contracting Activity (Solicitation Number 36C24926R0037). Completed questionnaires must be submitted directly to Contract Specialist Matthew Whisman at matthew.whisman@va.gov no later than July 31, 2026, at 2:00 PM EST. Assessors should not send information to the offeror being evaluated.
Section A requires contractors to provide prospective contractor information, point of contact, phone number, assessor contract award number, service descriptions, contract award dates and amounts, period of performance, and authorization for information release. Section B is completed by assessors knowledgeable of the contractor's performance and includes rating scales for quality of service, schedule, cost control and invoicing, and business relations across nine evaluation criteria. Ratings are categorized as either ACCEPTABLE or UNACCEPTABLE, with rationale required for any unsatisfactory ratings. Additional assessment areas include contractor responsiveness to complaints, timeliness of reporting and invoices, working relationship quality, and overall business practices. The questionnaire concludes with an overall performance rating and requests assessors identify their role (Contract Specialist/Contracting Officer, Technical Project Lead, or Other) and period of involvement with the contract.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Addendum 2_Cover Sheet.pdf | ||
| Addendum 2_Revised Drawings.pdf | ||
| Addendum 2_Revised Specifications.pdf | ||
| Addendum 2_Questions and Answers.pdf | ||
| 36C24926R0037 0004.docx | DOCX document | |
| 36C24926R0037 0003.docx | DOCX document | |
| Site Visit Sign-in Sheet_36C24926R0037.pdf | ||
| 36C24926R0037 0002.docx | DOCX document | |
| Sign Proof.pdf | ||
| Sign Schedule.pdf | ||
| Solicitation Questions and Answers_614-17-113.pdf | ||
| 36C24926R0037 0001.docx | DOCX document | |
| ATTACHMENT 6 General Conditions Breakout.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| ATTACHMENT 2 Project Specifications Vol 2 of 2_614-17-113.pdf | ||
| ATTACHMENT 9 DBA Wage Determination TN20260200 5-18-2026.pdf | ||
| ATTACHMENT 3 Project Drawings_614-17-113.pdf | ||
| ATTACHMENT 7 Price Breakout Schedule.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| ATTACHMENT 5 Contractor EMR Certification Form.docx | DOCX document | |
| ATTACHMENT 1 Project Specifications Vol 1 of 2_614-17-113.pdf | ||
| ATTACHMENT 4 Calc. of Self Performed Work.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| 36C24926R0037_1.docx | DOCX document |
Show all 21
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
SUBJECT: Past Performance Questionnaire for Project # 614-17-113 – Renovate Bldg. 1 Primary Care, at the Lt. Col. Luke Weathers, Jr VA Medical Center, Memphis, TN.
PAST PERFORMANCE INSTRUCTIONS
The NCO 9 Network Contracting Activity has issued a solicitation for Project 614-17-113 – Renovate Bldg. 1 Primary Care.
Past performance information will be used to evaluate proposals received. Section A is to be completed by the Offeror. Section A of the enclosed questionnaire lists the contractor who has identified your office as a source to evaluate their past performance. Section A also authorizes release of this information to NCO 9 Network Contracting Activity.
The Offeror must provide this entire document to each of its assessors. The Assessor shall only submit past performance questionnaires directly to the Contract Specialist – Matthew Whisman by way of email at matthew.whisman@va.gov.
Section B in its entirety is to be completed by the assessor(s). An individual assessor knowledgeable of the contractor’s quality of supplies and services rendered is requested to verify, complete the questionnaire, and submit to the Contracting Office. If evaluating more than one contract for the same contractor, use a separate questionnaire for each contract being evaluated.
Because this information is critical to the evaluation process, your time and effort in providing your assessment is greatly appreciated. The questionnaire should be completed as soon as possible but not later than July 31, 2026, at 2:00 PM EST. Assessor is requested to send electronically to (matthew.whisman@va.gov). Assessor: Please do not send this information to the Offeror being evaluated.
Thank you in advance for your cooperation and expeditious response to this request.
Procurement Sensitive Do Not Disclose --- See FAR Subparts 2.101 and 3.104-4 FOR OFFICIAL
USE ONLY
USE ONLY
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
SECTION A: Contractor Information (to be completed by the contractor for who past performance information is being collected, prior to forwarding to assessors)
Solicitation Number 36C24926R0037 Project/Requirement Project 614-17-113 Customer/Agency Lt. Col. Luke Weathers, Jr VAMC, Memphis, TN.
1. Prospective Government Contractor’s Name and Address
2. Contractor Point of Contact:
3. Phone Number (with area code):
4. Assessor Contract Award Number:
5. Description of Services:
6. Contract Award Date: _______________ Contract Amount: Initial ___________ Final___________
7. Period of Performance:
ASSESSOR INFORMATION:
Assessor Name Title Phone Number/Email Address
8. Authorization is hereby granted to provide the information requested in this questionnaire to NCO 9 Network Contracting Activity, Murfreesboro, Tennessee.
Signature
Name and Title of Authorizing Official Date
SECTION B: Assessors Information (to be completed by assessors).
USE ONLY
RATING SCALE Definitions
Past performance Evaluation Ratings Rating Description ACCEPTABLE Based on the Offeror's performance record, the
Government has a reasonable expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort, or the Offeror's performance record is unknown. (See note below.)
UNACCEPTABLE Based on the Offeror's performance record, the Government has no reasonable expectation that the offeror will be able to successfully perform the required effort.
The questions on the survey (see below) shall be rated in accordance with the definitions provided in the Rating Scale. Any unsatisfactory or marginal rating shall be supplemented with an explanation in the space provided.
QUALITY OF SERVICE
1. Rate the contractor's compliance with contractual requirements.
ACCEPTABLE_______ UNACCEPTABLE_______
2. Overall rating of contractor quality of service.
ACCEPTABLE_______ UNACCEPTABLE_______
PLEASE PROVIDE RATIONALE FOR ASSIGNED RATING:
SCHEDULE
3. Delivery of service was within required time period specified by contract requirements.
ACCEPTABLE_______ UNACCEPTABLE_______
USE ONLY
4. Rate the contractor's ability to control cost and submit invoices.
Are invoices complete, accurate, and timely?
ACCEPTABLE_______ UNACCEPTABLE_______
PLEASE PROVIDE RATIONALE FOR ASSIGNED RATING:
BUSINESS RELATIONS
5. Overall rating of contractor's business practices (e.g. maintaining a positive working relationship, business ethics, timely and effectively resolution of any problems, etc.)
ACCEPTABLE_______ UNACCEPTABLE_______
6. Rate the working relationship between contractor's management, and your company (i.e. contractor's history of reasonable and cooperative behavior, commitment of customer satisfaction; concern for the interest of the customer).
ACCEPTABLE_______ UNACCEPTABLE_______
7. Rate the contractor's ability to submit required reports and/or invoices in a timely manner.
ACCEPTABLE_______ UNACCEPTABLE_______
8. Rate the contractor's responsiveness to customer complaint resolution.
ACCEPTABLE_______ UNACCEPTABLE_______
9. Overall rating of contractor's business relations.
ACCEPTABLE_______ UNACCEPTABLE_______
USE ONLY
PLEASE PROVIDE RATIONALE FOR ASSIGNED RATING:
How would you feel about awarding another contract to this contractor?
__________ Would not hesitate to award another contract to this contractor.
__________ Would most likely award another contract to this contractor.
__________ Would think twice about awarding another contract to this contractor but would do so if no better alternative existed.
__________ Do not wish to award another contact to this contractor.
__________ Would not award another contract to this contractor.
PLEASE PROVIDE RATIONALE FOR ASSIGNED RATING:
USE ONLY
Overall rating of contractor's performance (quality, schedule, business relations,) on contract being assessed.
ACCEPTABLE UNACCEPTABLE
VII. General Comments:
ASSESSOR:
Identify your role in the contract award or administration and the period of your involvement.
ROLE PERIOD OF INVOLVEMENT
Contract Specialist/Contracting Officer Technical Project Lead/Project Officer
OTHERS
(Signature) (Date)
(Typed or Printed Name) (Organization Name)
(Phone Number)
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .