Attachment 7 - Past Performance Questionnaire.doc

DOC document 127 KB Posted

Attached to
Building 215 Clean Room HEPA Filter Replacement
Solicitation number
1333ND26RNB190014
Issued by

About this file

This is a Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ) template for evaluating contractor performance on federal contracts, specifically for NIST AMD Team-E/Boulder solicitations.

The questionnaire is designed to be completed jointly by the contractor and the contracting officer's client or representative. Contractors provide basic information including firm name, CAGE code, DUNS number, contract details (number, type, title, location, award date, completion date, and pricing), and a project description addressing work complexity and relevance to the current solicitation. Clients complete a separate section evaluating the contractor's performance across seven major categories: Quality (technical data preparation, quality standards compliance, problem resolution, and quality control); Schedule/Timeliness (delivery schedule compliance and resource utilization); Customer Satisfaction (end-user satisfaction, contractor cooperation, and overall satisfaction); Management/Personnel/Labor (on-site management, workforce qualification, government property control, personnel expertise, small business utilization, multi-project capability, and change management); Cost/Financial Management (price compliance, cost-reduction innovation, invoice accuracy, accounting systems adequacy, terminations for default, and financial stability); Safety/Security (safety plan adherence and security compliance); and General (emergency response capability, contractual compliance, and willingness to work with contractor again). Each performance element is rated using a five-point scale: Exceptional (E), Very Good (VG), Satisfactory (S), Marginal (M), Unsatisfactory (U), or Not Applicable (N). The template includes narrative sections for detailed comments addressing strengths, weaknesses, and deficiencies. Completed questionnaires must be submitted with the proposal to the contracting officer.

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
Amendment 0004 - 1333ND26RNB190014.pdf PDF
RFI IDs 33-36 Images_Compressed.pdf PDF
Amendment 0003 - 1333ND26RNB190014.pdf PDF
Amendment 0002 - 1333ND26RNB190014.pdf PDF
Attachment 8 - Project Data Sheet.doc DOC document
Information regarding Site Visit and RFIs.pdf PDF
Attachment 10 - Key Personnel Resume Form.docx DOCX document
Attachment 5 - Cleanroom Rebalance 35 Report.pdf PDF
Attachment 2 - Drawings.pdf PDF
Attachment 1 - BUILDING 215 - Basis of Design Report.pdf PDF
Attachment 7 - Davis Bacon Wage Rates.pdf PDF
Attachment 6 - Guidelines for Contractors and A-E firms - September 9 2025.pdf PDF
Attachment 3 - Specifications.pdf PDF
Attachment 9 - Past Performance Questionnaire.doc DOC document
Attachment 4 - Phasing Plan.pdf PDF
Solicitation 1333ND26RNB190014 - B215 HEPA Filters.pdf PDF
Amendment 0001 - 1333ND26RNB190014.pdf PDF
Attachment 5 - Davis Bacon Wage Rates.pdf PDF
Attachment 1 - Basis for Design.pdf PDF
Attachment 4 - Guidelines for Contractors and A-E firms - March 11 2024.pdf PDF
RFP 1333ND24RNB190036 - B101 Towers.pdf PDF
Attachment 8 - Key Personnel Resume Form.docx DOCX document
Attachment 3 - Specifications.pdf PDF
Attachment 6 - Project Data Sheet.doc DOC document
Attachment 2 - Drawings.pdf PDF
Information regarding Site Visit and RFIs.pdf PDF
Show all 26

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

ATTACHMENT 5

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE (PPQ)

CONTRACT INFORMATION (Contractor to complete Blocks 1-4)

1. Contractor Information Firm Name:

CAGE Code:

Address:

DUNs Number:

Phone Number:

Email Address:

Point of Contact: Contact Phone Number:

2. Work Performed as: FORMCHECKBOX Prime Contractor FORMCHECKBOX Sub Contractor FORMCHECKBOX Joint Venture FORMCHECKBOX Other (Explain)

Percent of project work performed:

If subcontractor, who was the prime (Name/Phone #):

3. Contract Information Contract Number:

Delivery/Task Order Number (if applicable):

Contract Type: FORMCHECKBOX Firm Fixed Price FORMCHECKBOX Cost Reimbursement FORMCHECKBOX Other (Please specify):

Contract Title:

Contract Location:

Award Date (mm/dd/yy):

Contract Completion Date (mm/dd/yy):

Actual Completion Date (mm/dd/yy):

Explain Differences:

Original Contract Price (Award Amount):

Final Contract Price (to include all modifications, if applicable):

Explain Differences:

4. Project Description:

Complexity of Work FORMCHECKBOX High FORMCHECKBOX Med FORMCHECKBOX Routine How is this project relevant to project of submission? (Please provide details such as similar equipment, requirements, conditions, etc.)

CLIENT INFORMATION (Client to complete Blocks 5-8)

5. Client Information

Name:

Title:

Phone Number:

Email Address:

6. Describe the client’s role in the project:

7. Date Questionnaire was completed (mm/dd/yy):

8. Client’s Signature:

NOTE: THE CONTRACTING OFFICER REQUESTS THAT THE CLIENT COMPLETES THIS QUESTIONNAIRE AND SUBMITS DIRECTLY BACK TO THE OFFEROR. THE OFFEROR WILL SUBMIT THE COMPLETED QUESTIONNAIRE TO THE CONTRACTING OFFICER WITH THEIR PROPOSAL, AND MAY DUPLICATE THIS QUESTIONNAIRE FOR FUTURE SUBMISSION ON NIST AMD TEAM-E/BOULDER SOLICITATIONS. CLIENTS ARE HIGHLY ENCOURAGED TO SUBMIT QUESTIONNAIRES DIRECTLY TO THE OFFEROR. HOWEVER, QUESTIONNAIRES MAY BE SUBMITTED DIRECTLY TO THE NIST AMD BOULDER CONTRACTING OFFICER. PLEASE CONTACT THE OFFEROR FOR CONTRACTING OFFICER POINT OF CONTACT INFORMATION. THE GOVERNMENT RESERVES THE RIGHT TO VERIFY ANY AND ALL INFORMATION ON THIS FORM.

ADJECTIVE RATINGS AND DEFINITIONS TO BE USED TO BEST REFLECT

YOUR EVALUATION OF THE CONTRACTOR’S PERFORMANCE

RATING

DEFINITION

NOTE

(E) Exceptional

Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government/Owner’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor was highly effective.

An Exceptional rating is appropriate when the Contractor successfully performed multiple significant events that were of benefit to the Government/Owner. A singular benefit, however, could be of such magnitude that it alone constitutes an Exceptional rating. Also, there should have been NO significant weaknesses identified.

(VG) Very Good

Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s/Owner’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.
A Very Good rating is appropriate when the Contractor successfully performed a significant event that was a benefit to the Government/Owner. There should have been no significant weaknesses identified.

(S) Satisfactory

Performance meets minimum contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory.

A Satisfactory rating is appropriate when there were only minor problems, or major problems that the contractor recovered from without impact to the contract. There should have been NO significant weaknesses identified. Per DOD policy, a fundamental principle of assigning ratings is that contractors will not be assessed a rating lower than Satisfactory solely for not performing beyond the requirements of the contract.

(M) Marginal
Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions. The contractor's proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.
A Marginal is appropriate when a significant event occurred that the contractor had trouble overcoming which impacted the Government/Owner.

(U) Unsatisfactory

Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains serious problem(s) for which the contractor's corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

An Unsatisfactory rating is appropriate when multiple significant events occurred that the contractor had trouble overcoming and which impacted the Government/Owner. A singular problem, however, could be of such serious magnitude that it alone constitutes an unsatisfactory rating.

(N) Not Applicable

No information or did not apply to your contract

Rating will be neither positive nor negative.

TO BE COMPLETED BY CLIENT

PLEASE CIRCLE THE ADJECTIVE RATING WHICH BEST REFLECTS

YOUR EVALUATION OF THE CONTRACTOR’S PAST PERFORMANCE.

1. QUALITY:

a) Quality of technical data/report preparation efforts.
E VG S M U N
b) Ability to meet quality standards specified for technical performance.
E VG S M U N
c) Timeliness/effectiveness of contract problem resolution without extensive customer guidance.
E VG S M U N
d) Adequacy/effectiveness of quality control program and adherence to contract quality assurance requirements (without adverse effect on performance).
E VG S M U N

2. SCHEDULE/TIMELINESS OF PERFORMANCE:

a) Compliance with contract delivery/completion schedules including any significant intermediate milestones. (If liquidated damages were assessed or the schedule was not met, please address below)
E VG S M U N
b) Rate the contractor’s use of available resources to accomplish tasks identified in the contract.
E VG S M U N

3. CUSTOMER SATISFACTION:

a) To what extent were the end users satisfied with the project?
E VG S M U N
b) Contractor was reasonable and cooperative in dealing with your staff (including the ability to successfully resolve disagreements/disputes; responsiveness to administrative reports, businesslike and communication).
E VG S M U N
c) To what extent was the contractor cooperative, businesslike, and concerned with the interests of the customer?
E VG S M U N
d) Overall customer satisfaction.
E VG S M U N

4. MANAGEMENT/ PERSONNEL/LABOR:

a) Effectiveness of on-site management, including management of subcontractors, suppliers, materials, and/or labor force?
E VG S M U N
b) Ability to hire, apply, and retain a qualified workforce to this effort.
E VG S M U N
c) Government Property Control.
E VG S M U N
d) Knowledge/expertise demonstrated by contractor personnel.
E VG S M U N
e) Utilization of Small Business concerns.
E VG S M U N
f) Ability to simultaneously manage multiple projects with multiple disciplines.
E VG S M U N
g) Ability to assimilate and incorporate changes in requirements and/or priority, including planning, execution and response to Government changes.
E VG S M U N
h) Effectiveness of overall management (including ability to effectively lead, manage and control the program).
E VG S M U N

5. COST/FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT:

a) Ability to meet the terms and conditions within the contractually agreed price(s)?
E VG S M U N
b) Contractor proposed innovative alternative methods/processes that reduced cost, improved maintainability or other factors that benefited the client.
E VG S M U N
c) If this is/was a Government cost type contract, please rate the Contractor’s timeliness and accuracy in submitting monthly invoices with appropriate back-up documentation, monthly status reports/budget variance reports, compliance with established budgets and avoidance of significant and/or unexplained variances (under runs or overruns).
E VG S M U N
d) Is the Contractor’s accounting system adequate for management and tracking of costs? If no, please explain in Remarks section.
Yes No
e) If this is/was a Government contract, has/was this contract been partially or completely terminated for default or convenience or are there any pending terminations? Indicate if show cause or cure notices were issued, or any default action in comment section below.
Yes No
f) Have there been any indications that the contractor has had any financial problems? If yes, please explain below.
Yes No

6. SAFETY/SECURITY:

a) To what extent was the contractor able to maintain an environment of safety, adhere to its approved safety plan, and respond to safety issues? (Includes: following the users rules, regulations, and requirements regarding housekeeping, safety, correction of noted deficiencies, etc.)
E VG S M U N
b) Contractor complied with all security requirements for the project and personnel security requirements.
E VG S M U N

7. GENERAL:

a) Ability to successfully respond to emergency and/or surge situations (including notifying COR, PM or Contracting Officer in a timely manner regarding urgent contractual issues).
E VG S M U N
b) Compliance with contractual terms/provisions (explain if specific issues).
E VG S M U N
c) Would you hire or work with this firm again? (If no, please explain below)
Yes No
d) In summary, provide an overall rating for the work performed by this contractor.
E VG S M U N

Please provide responses to the questions above (if applicable) and/or additional remarks. Furthermore, please provide a brief narrative addressing specific strengths, weaknesses, deficiencies, or other comments which may assist our office in evaluating performance risk (please attach additional pages if necessary):

PAGE

PPQ

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .