Attachment 6 - Past Performance Questionnaire.docx
DOCX document 31 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- W912DY24R0047
About this file
This document is a Past Performance Questionnaire that is intended to be completed by a contracting agency to provide feedback on a contractor's prior performance. The questionnaire covers several key performance areas including quality of work, cost controls, timeliness of performance, effectiveness of management, and overall customer satisfaction. The agency is asked to rate the contractor's performance in each area on a scale from unsatisfactory to excellent. The questionnaire also requests contact information for the person completing the form and details about the prior contract, such as the contract title, number, description, and pricing. This completed questionnaire is likely to be submitted as part of a proposal for the related federal contract opportunity, a Request for Proposal (RFP) issued by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Huntsville Center for energy management services at the U.S. Army Garrison in Miami, Florida. The RFP has a firm-fixed price contract type and a period of performance not to exceed 25 years.
View the file
Other files
Show all 26
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
ATTACHMENT 6
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
Please return this completed Questionnaire via instructions provided in the RFP. Thank you for your assistance.
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
Company/Agency Name
Address
Person Completing Survey
Date Survey Completed
Position Held in Reference to the Contract
Length of Involvement in Contract
Email Address
Telephone Number
Fax Number
Contractor
Contract Title
Contract Number
Project Description
Contract Type/Cost
Award Date
Original Contract Price
Final Contract Price
Explain Difference
Percentage of Work Performed by Contractor
Roles and Responsibilities as Sub or Prime
Expected Completion Date
Actual Completion Date
Explain Differences
(Presented for Information Only – Not to be completed by Offeror)
1. Quality of Work:
| a) | How would you rate the contractor’s compliance with applicable safety standards to protect personnel and company/agency resources? | |||
| |_| Unsatisfactory | |_| Marginal | |_| Satisfactory | |_| Very Good | |_| Excellent |
| b) | How would you rate the contractor’s compliance with applicable labor standards? | |||
| |_| Unsatisfactory | |_| Marginal | |_| Satisfactory | |_| Very Good | |_| Excellent |
| c) | How would you rank the contractor’s effort in Quality Control in ensuring quality workmanship on your project? | |||
| |_| Unsatisfactory | |_| Marginal | |_| Satisfactory | |_| Very Good | |_| Excellent |
| d) | How would you rate the contractor’s commitment throughout the project to customer satisfaction? | |||
| |_| Unsatisfactory | |_| Marginal | |_| Satisfactory | |_| Very Good | |_| Excellent |
| e) | How would you rate the contractor for their overall Quality of Work? | |||
| |_| Unsatisfactory | |_| Marginal | |_| Satisfactory | |_| Very Good | |_| Excellent |
2. Cost Controls:
| a) | How would you rate the Contractor’s ability to perform the required services at the contract price without adverse effect on performance? | |||
| |_| Unsatisfactory | |_| Marginal | |_| Satisfactory | |_| Very Good | |_| Excellent |
| b) | How would you rate the contractor’s ability to submit a fair and reasonable proposal when requested to perform additional work? | |||
| |_| Unsatisfactory | |_| Marginal | |_| Satisfactory | |_| Very Good | |_| Excellent |
| c) | If this contract is an indefinite delivery type contract (e.g., Multiple Award Environmental Contract, Task Order Contract, etc.), has the Contractor submitted competitive quotes on the individual orders issued under this contract? | |||
| |_| Yes | |_| No | |_| N/A | ||
| d) | How would you rate the contractor for their overall ability to maintain Cost Controls throughout the project? | |||
| |_| Unsatisfactory | |_| Marginal | |_| Satisfactory | |_| Very Good | |_| Excellent |
3. Timeliness of Performance:
| a) | How would you rate the contractor’s timeliness in submitting schedules, reports, billings and other contract submittals? | |||
| |_| Always | |_| Usually | |_| Sometimes | |_| Never | |_| N/A |
| b) | How would you rate the contractor’s timeliness in responding to requests for proposals for additional work? | |||
| |_| Always | |_| Usually | |_| Sometimes | |_| Never | |_| N/A |
| c) | Did the contractor complete the contract on time taking into account all excusable delays? | |||
| |_| Yes | |_| No | |_| N/A | ||
| d) | Was the contractor assessed any liquidated damages or deductions for late or nonperformance of required work? If yes, please explain. | |||
| |_| Yes | |_| No | |||
| e) | Did the contractor exceed contractual requirements in relation to Timeliness of Performance in a way that was deemed beneficial to your agency? | |||
| |_| Yes | |_| No | |_| N/A | ||
| If you answered No, indicate your reason by checking one of the following: | ||||
| |_| Contractor met the requirements, but did not exceed them | ||||
| |_| Did not meet some of the requirements | ||||
| |_| Did not meet requirements and recovery is not likely | ||||
| f) | How would you rate the contractor’s overall Timeliness of Performance? | |||
| |_| Unsatisfactory | |_| Marginal | |_| Satisfactory | |_| Very Good | |_| Excellent |
4. Effectiveness of Management:
| a) | How would you rate the contractor’s ability to award subcontracts in a timely manner and properly manage them? | ||||
| |_| Always | |_| Usually | |_| Sometimes | |_| Never | |_| N/A | |
| b) | If applicable, did the contractor meet its small, small disadvantaged and women-owned business participation goals? | ||||
| |_| Yes | |_| No | |_| N/A | |||
| c) | How would you rate the management of this firm as it relates to the completion of your contract and to the qualifications of its on-site personnel. Please explain. | ||||
| |_| Unsatisfactory | |_| Marginal | |_| Satisfactory | |_| Very Good | |_| Excellent | |
| d) | Describe the performance of the following personnel (if applicable) | ||||
| 1. Program Manger | |_| U | |_| M | |_| S | |_| VG | |_| E |
| 2. Project Manager | |_| U | |_| M | |_| S | |_| VG | |_| E |
| 3. Engineering/Technical | |_| U | |_| M | |_| S | |_| VG | |_| E |
| 4. Quality Control Manager | |_| U | |_| M | |_| S | |_| VG | |_| E |
| 5. Safety Officer | |_| U | |_| M | |_| S | |_| VG | |_| E |
| 6. Superintendent | |_| U | |_| M | |_| S | |_| VG | |_| E |
5. Customer Satisfaction:
| a) | Did the Contractor show reasonable and cooperative behavior and attention to customer satisfaction? | |
| |_| Yes | |_| No | |_| N/A |
| If you answered NO, please explain why: |
6. Overall Rating of Contractor:
In summary, which of the following would you choose to best describe the overall quality of this firm’s past performance?
|_| Unsatisfactory |_| Marginal |_| Satisfactory |_| Very Good |_| Excellent
7. Contact Information Name of Person Completing Form
| Position |
| Project Description |
| Role of Contractor |
| Phone No. |
The information in this Questionnaire may be verified by Personnel from the U.S. Army Engineering and Support Center, Huntsville.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .