Attachment_5_Past_Performance_Information_Form_FA9301_24_R_0001_CES_20231107.pdf
PDF 185 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Integrated Solid Waste Services (ISWS) Contract Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- FA930124R0001
About this file
This document provides details for the Integrated Solid Waste Services contract opportunity with the Department of the Air Force Materiel Command Test Center. The solicitation seeks proposals for solid waste services at Edwards Air Force Base in California. Services include waste collection, transportation, and disposal. The requirement also includes managing recycling programs and providing portable toilets and handwashing stations during base events. The incumbent contractor is eligible to recompete for the follow-on contract. The performance work statement and additional attachments outline requirements, the evaluation criteria, and templates for proposals, past performance reviews, and wage determinations. The period of performance is one base year with four option years. Proposals are due by January 2023 and award is expected in April 2023.
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
Show all 13
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Past and Present Performance Questionnaire
SUBJECT: Request for Past Performance Evaluation
TO:
You have been identified as a point of contact for a past and/or present performance evaluation of the firm listed on the attached questionnaire. This firm is currently being considered for a Base Custodial Services contract at Edwards AFB, CA.
Your prompt attention to this questionnaire will be greatly appreciated. If you have any questions concerning this request, I can be contacted at ________________________________.
Please submit completed questionnaire to the Government Contract Specialist identified on the attached questionnaire.
Contractor Signature
1 Attachment: Past and Present Performance Questionnaire
A. GENERAL INFORMATION:
Please correct any information below known to be inaccurate
Contractor’s Name: ____________________ Address:
Telephone Number: ____________________ Fax Number: ____________________ Point of Contact: ____________________
Project Title and Brief Description of Work*:
Contract Number Provided by Offeror: ________________ Dollar Amount: $__________
Contract Period or Dates of Performance Provided by Offeror*: _____________________
* Note: If offeror holds or has held other contracts with your agency/organization in the last 3 years, please complete separate evaluation forms for those contracts as well.
Contractor performed as the Prime Contractor Sub-Contractor Key Personnel
B. RESPONDENT INFORMATION:
Name of Respondent: _____________________ Title: ______________________ Address: ___________________________________________________________ Telephone Number: __________________________________________________ Fax Number: ________________________________________________________ Email Address: ______________________________________________________
C. SEND COMPLETED SURVEY FORM TO (E-mail is Preferred Method):
Thomas A. Prothro
AFTC/PZIOB
Thomas.prothro@us.af.mil
Stacey Stuart
AFTC/PZIOB
stacey.stuart@us.af.mil mailto:Thomas.prothro@us.af.mil mailto:stacey.stuart@us.af.mil
D. PERFORMANCE INFORMATION:
Choose the appropriate letter on the scale (E, G, S, M, U, N) that most accurately describes the contractor’s performance or situation or N/A if performance in this area is not applicable to the effort addressed.
PLEASE PROVIDE A NARRATIVE EXPLANATION FOR ANY RATINGS OF M or U.
E G S M U N Exceptional Good Satisfactory Marginal Unsatisfactory Neutral
Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with no more than a few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective
Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with no more than some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective
Performance meets contractual requirements.
The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were satisfactory
Performance does not meet some contractual requirements.
The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions or the contractor’s corrective actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented
Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner.
The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains a serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear to be or were ineffective
Performance was not observed or applicable to the current effort being reported against.
CONTRACTOR’S NAME: _______________ CONTRACT #: _______________
Place an “X” in the appropriate column using the definitions matrix above.
Contractor Performance or Situation E G S M U N N/A
1. How well did the contractor implement an orderly transition from the incumbent contractor?
2. How well did the contractor comply with contractual terms and conditions including the preparation and timely/accurate submission of any required documents?
3. How well did the contractor attract and retain qualified and fully trained personnel at all levels within their organization to ensure contract compliance?
4. How well did the contractor manage personnel clearances in order to regularly service secured locations?
5. How well does the contractor’s organization provide the necessary manning, training, equipment, and supplies to meet contractual requirements?
6. How would you rate the contractor’s critical key management and technical staff in terms of expertise, knowledge and qualifications?
7. Rate contractor’s ability to respond to workload fluctuations, e.g.
budgetary fluctuations that resulted in increased or decreased activities.
8. How willing was the contractor to improve and correct noncompliance issues or concerns?
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14. Was the contractor ever issued a default, cure or show cause notice, Notice of
Violation under the referenced contract? If yes, explain outcome in “remarks.”
YES NO
15. Would you award another contract to this contractor? If not, explain in “remarks.”
YES NO
16. If a Government Contract, is the contractor rated in CPARS? YES NO
Remarks (provide detail regarding unfavorable ratings):
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .