Attachment 3 - Past Performance Questionnaire.doc
DOC document 103 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Fort Lee Job Order Contract (JOC)
- Solicitation number
- W91QF5-19-R-0008
About this file
This document contains a past performance questionnaire template and details of a solicitation for a Job Order Contract at Fort Lee, Virginia. The past performance questionnaire is to be completed by a reference for a contractor's previous work and evaluates categories such as compliance, project management, timeliness, cost controls, and customer satisfaction on an adjective rating scale.
The solicitation seeks proposals for a Firm-Fixed-Price Indefinite Delivery/Indefinite Quantity Job Order Contract with a one-year base period and four one-year options to support sustainment, maintenance, repair, and minor construction projects at Fort Lee. The North American Industry Classification System code is 236220 and the size standard is $36.5M. The contract will manage various facility types and systems and may include informal drawings but not installation facilities engineering or architect-engineer services. Questions are due by April 20, 2020 and the contracting office points of contact are provided.
View the file
Other files
Show all 21
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
SOURCE SELECTION INFORMATION (SEE FAR 3.104)
APPENDIX D – ENCLOSURE 2
PAST PERFORMANCE EVALUATION QUESTIONNAIRE FORM
| Contractor: | Contract No.: | ||||
| Subcontract No. (if applicable): | POC: | Title: | (Name) | (E.G. PCO/ACO/TM) |
(Agency, Telephone No., & E-mail Address)
The following questions pertain to the Contractor’s record of past (within the past five years) and current performance. The information that you provide will be used in the awarding of a federal contract. Therefore, it is important that our information be as factual and accurate as possible. Please provide examples and/or explanations (use additional pages if necessary). The following adjectival ratings shall be used in your response.
Outstanding: Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many requirements that benefit the end user. Work was accomplished with few, if any, minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were highly effective.
Good: Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some requirements that benefit the end user. Work was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were effective.
Acceptable: Performance meets contractual requirements. Work was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were satisfactory.
Marginal: Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. Serious problems with Contractor performance were experienced for which the Contractor has either not yet identified corrective actions or the corrective actions taken appear only marginally effective.
Unacceptable: Performance does not meet most contractual requirements. Serious problems with Contractor performance were experienced for which the corrective actions were ineffective.
PART I. (To be completed by the Offeror)
A. CONTRACT IDENTIFICATION
Contractor/Company Name/Division:
Address:
Program Identification/Title:
Contract Number:
Contract Type:
Prime Contractor Name (if different from the Contractor name cited above): Contract Award Date:
Forecasted or Actual Contract Completion Date: Nature of the Contractual Effort or Items Purchased:
B. IDENTIFICATION OF OFFEROR’S REPRESENTATIVE
Name:
Title:
Date:
Telephone Number:
Address:
E-mail Address:
PART II. EVALUATION (To be completed by Point of Contact – Respondent) A. Compliance of Products, Services, Documents, and Related Deliverables to Specification Requirements and Standards of Good Workmanship
Outstanding (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below) Good Acceptable Marginal (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below) Unsatisfactory (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below)
Comments:
B. Effectiveness of Project Management (to include use and control of subcontractors).
Outstanding (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below)
Acceptable Marginal (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below) Unsatisfactory (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below)
C. Timeliness of Performance for Services and Product Deliverables.
Outstanding (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below)
Acceptable Marginal (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below) Unsatisfactory (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below)
Comments:
D. Effectiveness in Forecasting and Controlling Estimated Costs (Use this Question on Cost Reimbursement Type Contracts Only).
file_0.wmf
Outstanding (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below)
Acceptable Marginal (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below) Unsatisfactory (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below)
E. Commitment to Customer Satisfaction and Business-like Concern for its Customers’ Interest
Outstanding (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below)
Acceptable Marginal (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below) Unsatisfactory (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below)
F. General Comments. Provide any other relevant performance information.
G. Other Information Sources. Please provide the following information:
Are you aware of other relevant past efforts by this company?
If yes, please provide the name and telephone number of a point of contact:
H. Respondent Identification. Please provide the following information:
Organization: Name:
Title:
Date:
Telephone Number Address:
E-mail Address:
PART III. RETURN INFORMATION
Please return this completed Questionnaire via e-mail to the Contracting Officer identified in the solicitation.
Thank you for your assistance.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .