Attachment 2 - UFC 4-860-03.pdf

UFC 4-860-03

13 FEBRUARY 2008

UNIFIED FACILITIES CRITERIA (UFC)

RAILROAD TRACK MAINTENANCE & SAFETY

STANDARDS

APPROVED FOR PUBLIC RELEASE; DISTRIBUTION UNLIMITED

RAILROAD TRACK MAINTENANCE

& SAFETY STANDARDS

Any copyrighted material included in this UFC is identified at its point of use.

Use of the copyrighted material apart from this UFC must have the permission of the copyright holder.

U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS (Preparing Activity)

NAVAL FACILITIES ENGINEERING COMMAND

AIR FORCE CIVIL ENGINEER SUPPORT AGENCY

Record of Changes (changes are indicated by \1\ ... /1/)

Change No. Date Location

This UFC supersedes the TM 5-628/AFR 91-44 dated 1 April 1991, Navy draft MO 103.9 dated 2001, and UFC 4-860-03FA Railroad Track Standards dated 16 January 2004.

FOREWORD

The Unified Facilities Criteria (UFC) system is prescribed by MIL-STD 3007 and provides planning, design, construction, sustainment, restoration, and modernization criteria, and applies to the Military Departments, the Defense Agencies, and the DoD Field Activities in accordance with USD(AT&L) Memorandum dated 29 May 2002. UFC will be used for all DoD projects and work for other customers where appropriate. All construction outside of the United States is also governed by Status of Forces Agreements (SOFA), Host Nation Funded Construction Agreements (HNFA), and in some instances, Bilateral Infrastructure Agreements (BIA).

Therefore, the acquisition team must ensure compliance with the more stringent of the UFC, the SOFA, the HNFA, and the BIA, as applicable.

UFC are living documents and will be periodically reviewed, updated, and made available to users as part of the Services’ responsibility for providing technical criteria for military construction. Headquarters, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (HQUSACE), Naval Facilities Engineering Command (NAVFAC), and Air Force Civil Engineer Support Agency (AFCESA) are responsible for administration of the UFC system. Defense agencies should contact the preparing service for document interpretation and improvements. Technical content of UFC is the responsibility of the cognizant DoD working group. Recommended changes with supporting rationale should be sent to the respective service proponent office by the following electronic form: Criteria Change Request (CCR). The form is also accessible from the Internet sites listed below.

UFC are effective upon issuance and are distributed only in electronic media from the following source:

• Whole Building Design Guide web site http://dod.wbdg.org/.

Hard copies of UFC printed from electronic media should be checked against the current electronic version prior to use to ensure that they are current.

AUTHORIZED BY:

JAMES C. DALTON, P.E.

Chief, Engineering and Construction U.S. Army Corps of Engineers

JOSEPH E. GOTT, P.E.

Chief Engineer and Director, Capital Improvements, Acting Naval Facilities Engineering Command

PAUL A. PARKER

The Deputy Civil Engineer DCS/Logistics, Installations & Mission Support Department of the Air Force

Dr. GET W. MOY, P.E.

Director, Installations Requirements and Management Office of the Deputy Under Secretary of Defense (Installations and Environment) http://www.wbdg.org/pdfs/ufc_implementation.pdf http://www.wbdg.org/ccb/browse_cat.php?o=29&c=4 http://dod.wbdg.org/ ii

REVISION SUMMARY SHEET

Description of Changes: UFC 4-860-03 unifies the Army/Air Force Handbook of Railroad Track Standards with the Navy’s Railroad Trackage Field Assessment Manual the into one Department of Defense UFC manual.

Reasons for Changes:

• Consolidation of DOD railroad track standards into one single document.

• Consolidation of both railroad track maintenance standards and safety standards into a singular technical manual.

Impact: Inspection frequencies remain unchanged and the quality of track required remains nearly the same. These factors reflect a negligible cost impact as a result of the required track maintenance activities. However, the following benefits should be realized:

• Improvement in installation personnel’s ability to determine the level of effort required for each track inspection.

• DOD Inspections that will be more consistent with the Federal Railway

Administration (FRA) safety standards used for commercial trackage.

• Proper and expanded use of new technology and materials, such as new types of ties that have gained industry acceptance.

• Improvement of railroad track inspections and overall railroad management due to the much greater use of table formats for clarity and understanding.

• Improved inspections since the UFC now differentiates between railroad maintenance requirements and the very minimal FRA safety standards.

iii

CONTENTS

CHAPTER 1. INTENT AND APPLICATION ................................................................................. 1-1

CHAPTER 2. INSPECTION OF TRACK AND

RECORD KEEPING.......................................................................................................... 2-1 CHAPTER 3. ROADWAY ............................................................................................................. 3-1 CHAPTER 4. BALLAST ................................................................................................................ 4-1 CHAPTER 5. TIES ........................................................................................................................ 5-1

CHAPTER 6. OTHER TRACK MATERIALS

(OTM), TIE PLATES, ANCHORS, RAIL

FASTENINGS, ETC. ......................................................................................................... 6-1

CHAPTER 7. RAIL ........................................................................................................................ 7-1 CHAPTER 8. TURNOUTS............................................................................................................ 8-1 CHAPTER 9. RAIL CROSSINGS ................................................................................................. 9-1 CHAPTER 10. ROAD CROSSINGS........................................................................................... 10-1 CHAPTER 11. BRIDGES............................................................................................................ 11-1 CHAPTER 12. TRACK GEOMETRY.......................................................................................... 12-1 CHAPTER 13. CLEARANCES ................................................................................................... 13-1 CHAPTER 14. MISCELLANEOUS TRACK APPLIANCES........................................................ 14-1 CHAPTER 15. MAINTENANCE ACTIVITIES FOR CATEGORY C TRACK ............................. 15-1

APPENDIX A. REFERENCES......................................................................................................A-1

APPENDIX B. TRACK INSPECTION RECORD AND TURNOUT INSPECTION CHECKLIST..B-1

APPENDIX C. FIELD IDENTIFICATION OF RAIL DEFECTS.....................................................C-1 APPENDIX D. DETAILS OF RAIL SECTIONS.............................................................................D-1 APPENDIX E. FRA PART 213......................................................................................................E-1 APPENDIX F. SUMMARY OF STANDARD ................................................................................. F-1 iv

FIGURES

Figure 5-1. Examples of Good and Defective Ties ................................................................................ 5-2 Figure 5-2 Required Tie Support at Joints ............................................................................................ 5-3 (Safety Standard)..................................................................................................................................... 5-3 Figure 6-1. Single Shoulder Tie Plate.................................................................................................... 6-1 Figure 6-2. Double Shoulder Tie Plate .................................................................................................. 6-1 Figure 6-3. Spiking Pattern for Tangents and Curves of 4 Degrees or Less........................................ 6-2 Figure 6-4. Spiking Pattern for Curves Greater than 4 Degrees but Less than 36 Degrees................ 6-2 Figure 6-5. Spiking Pattern for Curves 36 Degrees and Greater........................................................... 6-3 Figure 6-6. Incorrect Spiking of Angle Bars ......................................................................................... 6-3 Figure 6-7. Correct Spiking of Angle Bars ............................................................................................ 6-3 Figure 6-8. Proper Bolt Installation....................................................................................................... 6-5 Figure 6-9. Alternating Bolt Pattern ...................................................................................................... 6-5 Figure 6-10. Recommended Minimum Anchoring Pattern for 39-foot Rails. ..................................... 6-7 Figure 7-1. Rail Wear Measurement...................................................................................................... 7-5 Figure 7-2. Rail Base Corrosion Measurement..................................................................................... 7-5 Figure 7-3. End Batter Measurement .................................................................................................... 7-6 Figure 8-2. Reversing Tangent Length and Switch Stand Placement .................................................. 8-2 Figure 8-3. Switch Point Contour. ......................................................................................................... 8-3 Figure 8-4. Switch Point Plan and Elevation. ....................................................................................... 8-4 Figure 8-5. Frog Point and Tread Contours.......................................................................................... 8-6 Figure 8-6. Allowable Wear on Guarding Face of Self-Guarded Frog................................................ 8-6 Figure 8-7. Measurement of Flangeway Width, Flangeway Depth, Guard Check Gage, and Guard

Face Gage....................................................................................................................................... 8-8 Figure 10-1. Track Construction for Road Crossing .......................................................................... 10-2 Figure 12-1. Gage Measurement.......................................................................................................... 12-1 Figure 12-2. Required Gage Measurement Locations Within Turnouts............................................ 12-3 Figure 12-3. Crosslevel Measurement ................................................................................................. 12-4 Figure 12-4. Determination of Warp.................................................................................................... 12-7 Figure 12-5. Measurement of Curve Alignment.................................................................................. 12-8 Figure 13-1. Minimum Clearances for Tangent Track....................................................................... 13-3 Figure B-1. Example Track Inspection Record.....................................................................................B-4 Figure B-2. Example Turnout Inspection Record.................................................................................B-5 Figure B-3 Highway Grade Crossing Warning System Inspection/ Test Report .................................B-6 Figure B-4 Safety Inspection Worksheet ...............................................................................................B-7 Figure B-5 Tie Detailed Inspection Worksheet .....................................................................................B-8 Figure B-6 Track Geometry Detailed Inspection Worksheet ................................................................B-9 Figure B-7. Turnout Inspection Worksheet (Components) ................................................................B-10 Figure B-8. Turnout Inspection Worksheet (General, Ties and Measurements)...............................B-11 Figure B-9. Grade Crossing Detailed Inspection Worksheet (Includes Rail Crossings) ...................B-12 Figure B-10. Rail, F+OTM, Ballast, Drainage, and Appliances Detailed Inspection Worksheet

(Includes Inspection Impaired)....................................................................................................B-13 Figure C-1. Rail Nomenclature..............................................................................................................C-1 Figure C-2. Relative Positions of Planes Through a Rail .....................................................................C-1 Figure C-3. General Appearance of Bolt Hole Cracks..........................................................................C-2 Figure C-4. General Appearance of Broken Base.................................................................................C-3 Figure C-5. General Appearance of Broken Rail..................................................................................C-3 Figure C-6. General Appearance of Corrugation .................................................................................C-4 Figure C-7. General Appearance of Crushed Head ..............................................................................C-4 Figure C-8. Rail End Batter ...................................................................................................................C-5 v

Figure C-9. Typical Appearance of Engine Burn .................................................................................C-5 Figure C-10. General Appearance of Engine Burn Fracture...............................................................C-6 Figure C-11. General Appearance of Flaking.......................................................................................C-7 Figure C-12. General Appearance of Flow ...........................................................................................C-7 Figure C-13. General Appearance of Head/Web Separation................................................................C-8 Figure C-14. General Appearance of Horizontal Split Head................................................................C-8 Figure C-15. General Appearance of Mill Defects................................................................................C-9 Figure C-16. General Appearance of Piped Rail...................................................................................C-9 Figure C-17. Cross-sectional View of Piped Rail ..................................................................................C-9 Figure C-18. General Appearance of Vertical Head and Side Wear..................................................C-10 Figure C-19. General Appearance of Shelling ....................................................................................C-11 Figure C-20. General Appearance of Slivers.......................................................................................C-11 Figure C-21. General Appearance of Split Web ..................................................................................C-11 Figure C-22. General Appearance of Torch-Cut Rail.........................................................................C-12 Figure C-23. General Appearance of Transverse Defects...................................................................C-13 Figure C-24. General Appearance of Vertical Split Head ..................................................................C-13 Figure D-1. Details of T-Rail Section ................................................................................................... D-1

TABLES

Table 7-1 - Rail Defect Standards .......................................................................................................... 7-2 Table 8-1 - Measurements and Operating Restrictions for Frogs and Guard Rails ............................ 8-7 Table 8-2 - Minimum length of straight guarding face in advance of frog point ................................ 8-8 Table 12-1 - Recommended gage for curved track .............................................................................. 12-4 Table 12-2 - Recommended Superelevation for Curved Track ........................................................... 12-5 Table 13-1 - Clearance Requirements for Tangent Tracks ................................................................. 13-2 Table D-1 - Details of Rail Sections ...................................................................................................... D-2 Table D-1 - Details of Rail Sections (Concluded)................................................................................. D-4

CHAPTER 1

INTENT AND APPLICATION

1-1. INTRODUCTION.

a. The Department of Defense's (DOD) railroad system is a critical asset for both peacetime and mobilization missions.

b. The standards in this UFC are presented to protect investments in track maintenance and rehabilitation and to ensure that DOD's railroad track is maintained at the level needed to support mission requirements. The standards in this UFC provide maintenance standards for each possible type of deficiency addressed in the Federal Railroad Administration (FRA) Track Safety Standards. DOD policy is to maintain its railroad track at a standard that exceeds FRA Class 2 safety standards and adhere to additional DOD speed restrictions as stated in this UFC. The following standards specifically identify separate thresholds for safety standards and maintenance standards.

If a standard is not specifically listed as a safety standard, it shall be used as a maintenance standard. For Navy installations, NAVFAC Instruction (NAVFACINST) 11230.1, Inspection, Certification, and Audit of Crane and Railroad Trackage, shall also be used based on category of track and amount of use.

c. Simply meeting the minimum standard required in this UFC is not necessarily the best, most cost-effective, long-term maintenance policy. The frequent occurrence of substandard or restricted conditions indicates the need for a comprehensive track evaluation to determine if major repair or rehabilitation is warranted.

1-2. DEFINITIONS. The following standards are discussed in this UFC:

a. Safety Standards. Based on the degree of hazard, these standards provide minimum safe operating limits for specific defects. FRA and DOD safety standards are addressed in Appendix F for comparison with maintenance standards. When established safety limits are exceeded, speed restrictions or “No Operation” shall be applied and enforced.

b. Maintenance Standards. These standards provide limits for specific defects and should be used to determine when maintenance is desirable and should be accomplished.

This allows for maintenance or repair before the condition exceeding safety standards develops. Each installation shall develop a maintenance policy for additional defects not addressed in this UFC.

1-3. REFERENCES. Appendix A contains a list of references used in this UFC.

1-4. INTENT.

a. These standards define the minimum required maintenance condition levels for railroad track. These standards shall be used for inspection and routine maintenance of railroad track by in-house or contract personnel.

b. These standards are not intended for, and shall not be used as specifications for, new construction or major track rehabilitation. The guidance given for Navy projects in UFC 4-860-02N, Design: Trackage, and for Army and Air Force projects in UFC 4-860-01FA, Design: Railroad Design and Rehabilitation, with Unified Facilities Guide Specification (UFGS) 05650, Railroad Track and Accessories, and/or host nation industry/government

1-1 standards will continue to apply to new construction and the complete reconstruction of segments of existing facilities.

c. Should the commercial carrier serving the installation require a more restrictive FRA standard or criteria not included in these standards, the installation track shall be maintained to meet the carrier's requirements.

d. The judgment of the designated track inspector and the criteria presented in this UFC must supplement each other in the application of these standards.

1-5. TRACK CATEGORIES. All railroad track shall be maintained in accordance with one of the following categories:

Category Types of Track and Use Minimum FRA Class of Track

Safety Standard

A All active mainline track, or other active track with speed greater than 10 mph

B Active passing track, sidings, yard tracks, holding track, classification yard or storage track

C Inactive track; no current mobilization requirements 0

1-6. APPLICATION.

a. Requirements versus Recommendations. In this UFC, the words “shall” and “is required” indicate requirements of the standards that must be met as prescribed by NAVFACINST 11230.1 for the Navy or AR 420-72 for the Army. Recommendations are indicated by the words “may,” “should,” and “it is recommended that….” These recommendations represent good maintenance practice. DOD policy is to maintain the railroad track at full compliance with these maintenance standards and to restrict operations on any track below the safety standards.

b. Condition Levels. These standards establish four levels of track condition. These condition levels indicate relative seriousness of defects, allow comparison of different types of defects, and provide a means for prioritizing repair work. The three track condition levels are as follows:

(1) Full Compliance: Track that meets all the requirements of the standards.

Track at this level has, at most, only minor defects and should be fully capable of handling all train operations within the operating rules of the installation. Routine maintenance is required to maintain this condition level, and repair work will generally be only minor.

(2) Restricted Operation: Track has defects serious enough to make it unsuitable for operations greater than 10 mph, essentially “normal yard speed.” Based on the inspector’s judgment, track which has defects serious enough to make it unsuitable for operations at 10 mph may be reduced to 5 mph. Essentially, a train may be allowed to “crawl” over the track. This level is intended as a warning zone to indicate that the track is approaching a condition that will require removal from service.

(3) No Operation: Track has defects serious enough to require removal from service. At this level, the operation of trains over the track is generally considered hazardous. Operations shall not be allowed except as noted in paragraph 1-6.c.(5).

c. Operating Restrictions.

1-2

(1) These standards establish minimum required condition levels and also identify track conditions requiring restriction or suspension of train operations. It is intended that a track inspector apply the required restriction or suspension immediately upon discovery of the substandard condition, and that the track be repaired to meet the appropriate condition level as soon as practical. A track restriction shall require the operational speed to be less than posted speed, but not more than 10 mph.

(2) Notification of Track Restriction.

(a) Army Track. The certified track inspector shall notify both the train operating personnel first and the director of public works (DPW) immediately upon the discovery of any condition that would warrant any restriction below normal operating practices. The DPW shall notify the installation transportation officer (ITO) verbally and in writing of any condition requiring train operations to be restricted or suspended.

(b) Air Force Track. The track inspector shall notify both the train operating personnel and the base civil engineer (BCE) immediately upon the discovery of any condition that would warrant any restriction below normal operating practices. The BCE shall notify the base traffic management officer (TMO) verbally and in writing of any condition requiring train operations to be restricted or suspended.

(c) Navy Track. The track inspector shall notify both the train operating personnel and the trackage certifying official immediately upon the discovery of any condition that would warrant a restriction beyond normal operating practices or a suspension in operations. Documentation and notification of restricted or non-certification of track shall be performed by the certifying official in accordance with NAVFACINST 11230.1.

(3) Operations over Restricted Track. For locations where operating restrictions have been imposed, the speed of the train or other on-track vehicles shall be reduced to the required level before the first wheel reaches the defective area and not increased until the last wheel has passed the defective area.

(4) Removal of Track Restriction. A track restriction may be removed after all defects resulting in the restriction have been repaired.

(a) Army Track. The certified track inspector shall notify the DPW upon completion of the repairs. The DPW shall notify the ITO in writing that the restrictions have been lifted.

(b) Air Force Track. The restriction shall not be considered removed until the TMO receives written notification of removal from the BCE.

(c) Navy Track. The trackage certifying official shall recertify the trackage repaired to the level allowed by repairs made. Certification and notification will be in accordance with NAVFACINST 11230.1.

(5) Track Removed From Service. Any portion of track where conditions fall below the minimum operable track condition (track condition is at the “No Operation” level) shall be closed to operations until repairs are completed. However, such track may be used under written permit from the track management authority and in the presence of a track inspector. During operations over the closed portion of track, the track inspector shall have visual contact with the train operator at all times and be prepared to signal the train crew to stop. For Navy track, movement of hazardous materials over track removed from service will be in accordance with NAVFACINST 11230.1.

1-3

d. Judgment of the track inspector shall govern. A track inspector shall have the authority to impose operating restrictions beyond the minimum required in these standards when conditions warrant.

e. Defective conditions or combinations of conditions may be found which are not directly addressed in these standards. In such cases, a track inspector shall exercise judgment in applying an appropriate operating restriction.

1-4

CHAPTER 2

INSPECTION OF TRACK

AND RECORD KEEPING

2-1. TRACK INSPECTORS’ QUALIFICATIONS. Track inspectors are responsible for conducting safety inspections (paragraph 2-3.c) and detailed track inspections (paragraph 2-3.).

a. Army. For Army track, the individual who completes the required track inspections shall be a certified track inspector as specified in AR 420-72.

b. Air Force. For Air Force track, the individual who completes the required track inspections shall be qualified to perform such inspections as designated by the BCE.

c. Navy. The individual who completes the required track inspections shall meet the requirements of NAVFACINST 11230.1 and be designated by the activity's certifying official.

2-2. RESPONSIBILITY OF THE TRACK INSPECTORS.

a. The designated track inspector is responsible for:

(1) Assuring that inspections are performed in accordance with this chapter and for Navy installations the additional requirements of NAVFACINST 11230.1.

(2) Examining the track to determine whether the track condition complies with the safety requirements and the maintenance standard requirements addressed in this

UFC.

(3) Reporting any deficiencies from the full compliance condition level.

2-3. CATEGORIES OF INSPECTIONS.

a. Continuous Operator Inspection. Safety checks shall be conducted daily or before use. In addition, on-the-job observations shall be going on at all times when equipment is working. Railroad operations personnel shall be encouraged to observe and report track problems, deficiencies, obstructions and the “feel” of the track. Items to be aware of are broken rails and other rail defects, faulty switch point closure, indication of wide gage, poor alignment or surface (profile), loose crossing planks, wheel flanges hitting frog points and joint bars, working spikes and loose joints, rail pull-a-parts, evidence of imminent track buckling, blocked drainage, scour at bridges, and the threat of slides. All these things can contribute to train derailments and should be brought to the attention of the responsible person for correction.

b. Preventive Maintenance Inspection. Preventive maintenance is a continuous working inspection, examination of component parts, lubrication, adjustment, and minor repair. If not affecting the full compliance level, maintenance defects shall be corrected during the next maintenance cycle.

(1) Navy Installations Only. Further discussion of requirements and instructions on performing preventive maintenance are provided in NAVFACINST 11230.1.

c. Safety Inspection. Safety inspection is that inspection of track performed in accordance with paragraphs 213.233, 213.235 and 213.239 of the FRA Track Safety Standards (see Appendix E) and this UFC. The purpose of this inspection is to identify defects that require restricted operations or no operations on the track being inspected.

(1) Schedule. As a minimum, track shall be inspected at the following interval:

2-1

Track Category Traffic Frequency Minimum Required Inspection

Frequency

A Mainline Track – Off-station Navy only*

Weekly

A & B Two or more movements per week Monthly

A & B Greater than one movement per month but less than two movements per week

Quarterly

A & B One movement or less per month Semi-annual

C No movements or inactive Annual detailed inspection only (See Chapter 15)

*For Navy installation only: Off-station track is defined as that track belonging to the Navy that extends outside the main station through residential and/or commercial public areas.

(2) Inspection Method. Track inspections shall be made on foot or in an on-track vehicle at a speed which is conducive to effective track inspection, but in no case to exceed 5 mph. Turnouts, rail crossings, and bridges shall be inspected on foot.

(3) Inspection Records. The inspector shall complete and sign the Track Inspection Record on the day the inspection is made. Inspection records must specify the track inspected, date of inspection, location and nature of any deviation from the requirements, proposed corrective action, and the remedial action taken. Inspection reports which document deficiencies resulting in a track falling below its designated condition level shall be kept on file until all deficiencies have been corrected. As a minimum, inspection records shall be retained for at least one year after the inspection covered by the report. An example record is provided in Figure B-1. A reproducible master of the Track Inspection Record is provided in NAVFACINST 11230.1 or in Appendix B as used in the RAILER software.

d. Detailed Track Inspection. A detailed inspection shall be made to support sustainment, restoration and maintenance (SRM). Detailed inspections are conducted annually. Detailed inspections will be supported by engineering evaluations when there is any doubt of physical condition. The Track Inspection Record discussed in paragraph 2- 3.c.(3) should be used to document detailed inspections. The purpose of the detailed inspection is to identify all track defects including those exceeding maintenance standards provided in this UFC. Results of this inspection will not only be used to establish urgent repairs, but by using the inspection reports and relating them to the activity's basic trackage requirements, its in-house capabilities, priorities, available funding, and other factors, the annual and long-range trackage maintenance and repair programs are developed and programmed.

e. Electric/Electromechanical Grade Crossing Signals. The inspection and testing of electric/ electromechanical signals at road–railroad grade crossings shall be performed at the frequency specified in paragraph 10-6.b and documented in accordance with paragraph 10-6.c.

2-2

f. Internal Rail Defect Inspection. Internal rail defect inspection shall be performed on class A and B railroad tracks at five-year intervals as specified in paragraph 7-2.b.

g. Special Safety Inspections.

(1) Infrequently Used Track. Track that has not been used for a period of six months or more shall be inspected prior to the first movement over the track.

(2) Mass Rail Movement. For track that has not been inspected within the last two months, a track inspection is recommended before any mass rail movement (15 cars or more).

(3) Unusual Occurrences. Track inspections shall be conducted following unusual occurrences such as derailment, accident, flood, fire, earthquake, severe storm, or other occurrence that could have an adverse effect on the track structure. These inspections shall be conducted before the first movement over the track following the unusual occurrence.

2-4. INSPECTION OF PARTIALLY VISIBLE TRACK.

a. At locations where vegetation, dirt, debris, or other undesirable materials cover the ties and/or rail preventing effective track inspection, the undesirable material shall be removed and a thorough track inspection performed. Train operation shall not exceed 10 mph until the undesirable materials are removed and a thorough track safety inspection is performed.

b. At locations where ballast or other material is installed to meet operational requirements, sufficient material shall be removed to spot-check trackage.

c. Paved Areas.

(1) In road crossings and other paved areas where complete inspection of the track is not possible, the track inspector must be alert for external signs of track deterioration. External signs indicating track deterioration are:

(a) Changes in gage and/or crosslevel.

(b) Settlement of the rails (changes in track profile).

(c) Excessive vertical or lateral movement of the rails as a train passes.

(d) Deterioration (cracking or breaking

up) of the pavement in the vicinity of the track.

(2) Based on indication of defects with consideration taken for age and usage, activities shall establish a program to spot-check trackage encased in pavement.

(3) Operating Restrictions for Track in Pavement. When external signs of track deterioration develop, particular attention should be given to the track geometry measurements through the paved area. Track geometry measurements—combined with visual indications of lateral and vertical movement and the requirements for road crossing flangeways—shall be used to assign operating restrictions for the track through the paved area.

2-5. TRACK MAPS AND TRACK SCHEMATICS. Track maps are essential in identifying and locating the components of the track network. Installations shall maintain a complete, accurate, and up-to-date set of track maps for use by maintenance and engineering personnel.

a. Track Charts. As described in the documents below, track charts may be used to supplement track maps.

2-3

(1) Army/Air Force: TM 5-627/AFM 91-33, Maintenance of Trackage.

(2) Navy: MO-103, Maintenance of Trackage, and NAVFACINST 11230.1.

b. Criteria:

(1) Scale. Track maps should be drawn to a legible scale. The scale should be shown on each page of the map.

(2) Title. Track maps should contain a standard title block.

(3) Legend. Track maps should contain a legend identifying all symbols used on the track map.

c. Track Data. Data presented on track maps should include:

(1) All track, active and inactive.

(2) Track name or identification for each track.

(3) Track category for each track.

(4) Buildings, loading docks, bridges, trestles, culverts, and other structures on or adjacent to the railroad roadway.

(5) Highway and road crossings.

(6) Connections to serving railroads.

(7) Limits of track ownership and maintenance responsibilities.

(8) Installation property lines and railroad right-of-way lines.

(9) Rail weight and section.

(10) Turnout identification number and weight and section.

(11) Degree of curvature for all curves.

(12) Grades and profile information.

(13) Track stationing or mileposts.

d. Track Schematics. Non-scaled, condensed track plans describing layout of tracks and turnouts. They are useful in track inspection reporting and record keeping.

2-4

CHAPTER 3

ROADWAY

3-1. ROADWAY.

a. Inspection. The roadway shall be inspected for the following defects:

(1) Ballast/subgrade pumping.

(2) Erosion of embankments and cut slopes.

(3) Embankment sliding or slippage.

(4) Potential slope stability problems.

(5) Settlement at approaches to bridges and road crossings.

(6) Washouts under and adjacent to the track.

If any of these defects are present, remedial action is required within a time frame necessary to prevent damage to the track structure.

b. Hazardous Conditions. Any condition presenting a hazard to the safe movement of trains shall be corrected before the first movement over that location.

3-2. DRAINAGE.

a. General.

(1) A well-drained roadbed is essential to good track maintenance.

(2) Any attempts to divert water onto the roadway or to obstruct ditches or drainage structures shall be reported immediately to the trackage certifying official.

(3) Drains, ditches, and other open drainage structures shall be protected to prevent hazard to personnel.

b. Size and Design. Ditches and other drainage structures (culverts, drains, and drop inlets) shall be of sufficient size and construction to handle the expected flow of water.

c. Obstructions. Ditches and drainage structures shall be maintained to allow the free passage of water. At locations where flow is obstructed or otherwise inadequate, remedial action is required. During construction operations adjacent to the track structure, all ditches and other drainage structures shall be kept unobstructed.

d. Inspection.

(1) Inspection and cleaning of drainage structures and channels shall be performed at least annually, preferably in the fall in anticipation of spring runoffs.

(2) Inspections of ditches and other drainage structures during and after heavy rains are recommended to assure that these structures are adequate to carry the runoff.

(3) Drainage ditches and structures shall be inspected for the presence of:

(a) Brush.

(b) Drift.

(c) Excessive ice and snow.

(d) Other obstructions that may interfere with the flow of water.

If any of these are present, immediate remedial action is required to prevent damage to the roadway and track structure.

(4) Particular attention shall be given to drainage conditions at turnouts, rail crossings, road crossings, bridge ends, and all locations where conditions may restrict adequate drainage.

(5) For obstructed or partially collapsed drainage structures, a safety standard shall be implemented to restrict speeds.

3-1

3-3. VEGETATION.

a. Vegetation shall be controlled so that it does not:

(1) Grow within the ballast section or obstruct ballast drainage.

(2) Interfere with adequate visibility (sight distance) at grade crossings.

(3) Obstruct visibility of location markers, switch position indicators, signs, or signals.

(4) Obstruct drainage.

(5) Interfere with the safe operation of trains.

(6) Prevent proper track inspection.

(7) Present a fire hazard to timber structures.

(8) Interfere with personnel walking within 8 feet of the track centerline.

(9) Brush the sides of engine or rolling stock.

b. Vegetation Interference. At locations where vegetation interferes with the effective inspection of the track or train operations, train operations shall be restricted until the vegetation is removed and a thorough track inspection is performed.

c. Vegetation Control. Undesirable vegetation growing within the roadway shall be removed by chemical or manual means. Chemical vegetation control shall be accomplished as prescribed in the following manuals:

(1) Army: AR 200-5, Pest Management Program, and TM 5-630, Natural Resources Land Management.

(2) Air Force: AFI 32-1053, Pest Management Program.

(3) Navy: OPNAVINST 6250.4, Pest Management Program.

d. Desirable Vegetation. Vegetation such as crown vetch may be planted and grown on the slopes of cuts and fills and in other locations within the roadway to prevent erosion.

The growth of desirable vegetation should be controlled to meet the requirements of paragraph 3-3.a.

3-2

CHAPTER 4

BALLAST

4-1. GENERAL. Ballast is a select material placed on the subgrade to:

a. Provide adequate drainage of the track.

b. Restrain the track laterally, longitudinally, and vertically under the dynamic loads imposed by trains and the thermal stresses induced in the rails by changing temperature.

c. Distribute the load of the track and trains to prevent overstressing the subgrade.

4-2. SELECTION CRITERIA.

a. Considerations for selecting materials to be used as ballast include:

(1) Size and gradation.

(2) Shape (angularity).

(3) Weight.

(4) Strength.

(5) Durability.

(6) Cleanliness (no dirt or fines).

(7) Economics.

b. New ballast materials used in the maintenance of track shall meet the requirements specified in the AREMA Manual For Railway Engineering, Chapter 1, Part 2.

4-3. MAINTENANCE.

a. The ballast section should be clean, free-draining, and free of vegetation, soil (mud), and other foreign materials.

b. During major maintenance or track rehabilitation, dirty or fouled crushed stone or slag ballast meeting the requirements of paragraph 4-2.b may be cleaned/screened or reconditioned and reused.

c. Ballast materials shall provide a full crib and uniform shoulders, but shall not be allowed to cover or be at a level above the top of the ties. At turnouts, ballast shall not interfere with moveable parts of switches and sufficient clearance shall be maintained around switch rods and connecting rods. See paragraph 8-3.g, “Pocketing Switches.”

4-1

CHAPTER 5

TIES

5-1. GENERAL. The functions of a tie are to:

a. Maintain gage.

b. Maintain surface (profile).

c. Maintain alignment.

d. Distribute the load from the rail to the ballast and subgrade.

The inability of a tie to adequately perform any of the above functions constitutes a defective tie.

5-2. WOOD TIES.

a. Tie Selection, Treatment and Inspection.

(1) Tie Selection. New ties selected for the maintenance of track shall be adequately seasoned and treated and meet the requirements specified in the AREMA Manual For Railway Engineering, Chapter 30, Part 1, for 6-inch grade and the preferred 7-inch grade ties. The preferred species for ties are the following hardwoods: red oak, white oak, beech, ash, and hickory ties. Gum ties can also be used if local experience reflects satisfactory service. Where softwoods are used, the southern pine and Douglas fir species are preferred. Southern pine is not recommended for main line track or areas with high humidity. Beech and ash ties can also be used if local experience reflects satisfactory experience.

(2) Treatment. Ties shall be pressure-treated in accordance with the most current version of the American Wood Preserver's Association (AWPA) Standard C6. See UFGS 05650 for tie treatment recommendations.

(3) Inspection. It is recommended that all timber ties be inspected by an independent, qualified, professional inspector. Inspections should take place at producing plants where the ties can be inspected in the white (before treatment) and after treatment. Accepted ties are to be branded (stamped) by the inspector responsible for the acceptance.

(4) Switch Ties & Turnout Ties. It is recommended that switch ties be mixed oak hardwood.

b. Installation. Ties shall be installed perpendicular to the rails and properly tamped and spiked. Ties shall be installed with the top of the tie (or the tie plate) in full contact with the base of the rail and the bottom of the tie near the rail seat in full contact with the ballast.

c. Identification of Defective Wood Ties. A wood tie is defective if it is:

(1) Broken through.

(2) Split or otherwise impaired to the extent that it will not hold spikes or other rail fasteners.

(3) So deteriorated that the tie plate can move laterally more than 0.5 inch relative to the crosstie.

(4) Cut by the tie plate more than 2 inches.

(5) Cut by wheel flanges, dragging equipment, fire, etc., to a depth of more than 2 inches within 12 inches of the base of the rail, frog, or load-bearing area.

(6) Rotted, hollow, or generally deteriorated to a point where a substantial amount of the material is decayed or missing.

5-1

(7) Ties that are “end-broken.” End-broken ties often can be broken beneath the base plate and the defect is not noticeable except for a small rise in the end of the tie, from a plane of the center portion.

These defects are shown in Figure 5-1.

Figure 5-1. Examples of Good and Defective Ties

5-3. CONCRETE TIES.

a. Tie Selection. New concrete ties selected for the maintenance of track shall meet the requirements specified in AREMA Manual for Railway Engineering, Chapter 30, Part 4.

Mixing wood and concrete ties in the same track section is not recommended. Concrete ties are very susceptible to impact, leading to premature failure when used in jointed track and require a more substantial ballast section.

b. Switch Ties. At this time, few concrete switch ties are being manufactured due to weight and difficulty in handling; hardwood switch ties are recommended.

c. Installation. Ties shall be installed perpendicular to the rails and properly tamped and fastened. Ties shall be installed with the top of the tie in full contact with the base of the rail and the bottom of the tie near the rail seat in full contact with the ballast.

d. Identification of Defective Concrete Ties. A concrete tie is defective if:

(1) Tie is broken across under one or both rail seats.

(2) Tie is broken across in the center and showing signs of further deterioration, loss of tension in pre-stressing wires, exposure of wires, crumbling, etc.

(3) Tie is broken longitudinally, resulting in loss of ability to hold one or both cast-shoulders in place.

5-2

(4) Both cast-shoulders in one rail are loose. (One loose shoulder per rail is not sufficient cause for removal unless it is causing some distress to adjacent ties.)

(5) Tie is damaged by derailment or dragging equipment which, in the opinion of the track inspector, should be replaced. It should be noted that quite serious damage can be done to the tie ends without seriously affecting the performance of the tie.

5-4. PLASTIC TIES

a. Tie Selection. Various plastic ties have been tested and proven to provide adequate support and low maintenance. Plastic ties shall have textured sides to provide stability. See UFGS 05650 for material requirements. Plastic ties can be cost-effective in areas of high decay. The weight of plastic is similar to wood and mixing wood and plastic ties in the same track section is permissible.

b. Installation. Ties shall be installed perpendicular to the rails and properly tamped and fastened. Ties shall be installed with the top of the tie in full contact with the base of the rail and the bottom of the tie near the rail seat in full contact with the ballast. Plastic ties can be installed with either cut or screw spikes, with screw spikes recommended.

c. Identification of Defective Plastic Ties. Plastic ties shall be treated as wood ties for determining defective ties. See paragraph 5-2.c.

5-5. STEEL TIES AND COMPOSITE TIES.

a. Advances in steel tie technology have proven successful and practical and should be considered as a possible alternative in replacing wood ties.

b. One type of composite tie is a hardwood tie treated with borates to prevent decay and rot from fungus, insects, and termites, then encapsulated in a tough plastic covering.

Another composite tie is one which includes high-density polyethylene, rubber, and fiberglass with certain proprietary inert filler materials. Yet another composite tie is produced with fiberglass blown foam and molded into various tie sizes and lengths.

5-6. GENERAL.

a. Improper Tie Support (Down or Hanging Ties). Ties that do not support both rails are considered defective. If these ties are not materially defective, they shall be ballasted, tamped up, and respiked/refastened to fully support the rails.

Figure 5-2. Required Tie Support at Joints (Safety Standard)

b. Missing Fasteners. Ties that are installed, but not spiked with a sufficient number of spikes in accordance with paragraph 6-3.c., are considered defective. If these ties are not materially defective, necessary spikes shall be added.

5-3

c. Tie Requirements.

(1) Track shall have a minimum number of non-defective ties per 39-foot rail length in combination with a maximum number of consecutive defective ties as specified below:

Minimum Number of Non-Defective Ties per 39 Feet

Tangent & Curves Less Than 2° Curves Equal to or Greater Than 2°

Maintenance Category A 12 13 Category B 10 11

Safety Restricted 8 10 No Operation 7 9

Number of Consecutive Defective Ties

Tangent and Curves Less Than 2° Curves Equal to or Greater Than 2°

Maintenance 3 2 Safety Restricted

3 4

No Operation 5 4

(2) Joint Ties. All joints shall be supported by the number of non-defective ties specified below. The centerline of these joint ties shall be within 24 inches of the rail ends as shown in Figure 5-2. Safety standard: Any track without a non-defective tie within 24 inches of the rail ends shall be “No Operations.”

Minimum Number of Non-Defective Ties per Joint

Maintenance Category A 2 Category B 1 Safety No Operation 0

d. Tie Spacing. The center-to-center distance between adjacent ties usually ranges from 19 to 22 inches. The recommended tie spacing for new track is given below:

Track Category Tie Spacing (Inches) Number of Ties per 39-ft Rail

A 19.5 24

B 21 22

5-4

Army Criteria: For all track with an average tie spacing greater than 22 inches (less than 22 ties per 39-foot rail), the desired spacing should be established during the next maintenance or rehabilitation cycle.

Navy & Air Force Criteria: The maintenance standards shall require a maximum average center-to-center tie spacing of 24…