Attachment 2 Performance Requirements Summary (PRS).pdf

TE 16

Performance Requirements Summary

PWS Paragraph Performance Objective Performance Standard Acceptable Quality Level (AQL) Monitoring Method Incentive / Deduction

1.4.1

Fabricate, requisition, store, maintain, and operate equipment and targets for operation of the Aviation Gunnery Range (AGR).

AGR Equipment and Targets will be ready for use during all scheduled periods of aviation gunnery training events.

100% of all AGR equipment and targets will be inspected on schedule. 95% of all active targets will be available for use. Deficiencies will be logged in the maintenance database and scheduled for repair within 24 hours of noted deficiency.

Random inspection.

Randomly verify on-site processes.

Increase or decrease in surveillance.

CPAR ratings reflecting good or poor performance could affect decisions to exercise options or to make future contract awards.

1.4.2

Requisition, store, maintain, and operate equipment and targetry for operation of the other ranges and facilities listed within this PWS.

Range and training area targetry will be ready for use during all scheduled periods of training.

100% of all Range and Training Area equipment and targets will be inspected on schedule. Deficiencies will be logged in the maintenance database and scheduled for repair within 24 hours of noted deficiency.100% of all small arms automated targets will be functional for using units.

Review of maintenance logs.

Random inspection.

Increase or decrease in surveillance.

CPAR ratings reflecting good or poor performance could affect decisions to exercise options or to make future contract awards.

1.4.3

Perform organizational direct support/general support (DSGS), preventive maintenance, and repair on range materials, computer-controlled hard-wired target devices, radio-controlled solar-powered target devices, and moving targets.

Maintenance and repair will be conducted without impact to range or training area scheduling. Long term repairs will be scheduled around using unit training requirements.

95% of all maintenance and repairs will be completed in projected timelines. COR will be kept updated on maintenance/repair schedules with adjustment requests approved by the COR.

Random inspection.

Randomly verify on-site processes.

Review maintenance logs.

Routine inspection of automated range operability.

CPAR ratings reflecting good or poor performance could affect decisions to exercise options or to make future contract awards.

Performance Evaluation Criteria

TE 16, page 1 of 8

PWS Paragraph Performance Objective Performance Standard Acceptable Quality Level (AQL) Monitoring Method Incentive / Deduction

1.4.4 Operate moving and stationary targets as required by the using units.

Scheduled ranges and training areas requiring RCS operators will be supported by the contractor. The contractor will provide qualified RCS operators knowledgeable with the training requirements of the range.

100% of all scheduled automated ranges will be supported by RCS operators. Gaps in coverage by RCS operators will be supplemented by Firing Desk personnel.

Random inspection.

Randomly verify on-site processes.

Routine inspection of RCS operator functionality. Random review of RCS training program.

CPAR ratings reflecting good or poor performance could affect decisions to exercise options or to make future contract awards.

1.4.5

Inspect, maintain, and repair the range/training complex/related real property and appurtenances including, but not limited to, target berms, service roads, permanent foxholes and bunkers, drainage pipes and systems, sediment control structures, terraces, fences, gates, parking lots, vegetation control, electrical power, and data lines from the entrance of administrative areas to all targets and buildings.

Range complex maintenance activities will be performed efficently and successfully without impact to training units or safety of using unit training requirements. Deficiencies will be logged in maintenance database and scheduled for repair as required.

95% of all maintenance and repairs will be completed. Delays in repair will be scheduled for completion within 90 days of noted deficiency.

Random sampling of maintained areas.

Routine inspection.

On site visits to review processes.

Increase or decrease in surveillance.

CPAR ratings reflecting good or poor performance could affect decisions to exercise options or to make future contract awards.

1.4.6 Perform range supply, maintenance, administrative, and operational functions as listed within this PWS.

Operational fuctions are completed to standard in accordance with specific tasks within this PWS

Supply, maintenance, administrative, and operational tasks are completed and submitted or processed with 95% accuracy. Suspenses are met 95% in accordance with directed suspense dates.

Random document review.

Review of records and reports for accuracy. Conduct of weekly meetings.

Increase or decrease in surveillance.

CPAR ratings reflecting good or poor performance could affect decisions to exercise options or to make future contract awards.

Technical Exhibit 16 Performance Requirement Summary (PRS)

TE 16, page 2 of 8

PWS Paragraph Performance Objective Performance Standard Acceptable Quality Level (AQL) Monitoring Method Incentive / Deduction

1.4.7 Provide operational support of the

Range Operations Center.

Range Operations Center provides functionally accurate information and products that facilitate the support of using units, directorates, and installation activities.

95% of all operational support tasks are completed on time and accurately. 100% of all safety-related incidents and events are evaluated, disseminated, and actioned without gaps or delays in support of the event.

Random inspection. Random on site review. Routine document review.

Increase or decrease in surveillance.

CPAR ratings reflecting good or poor performance could affect decisions to exercise options or to make future contract awards.

1.4.8 Perform mowing and vegetation control of LOS areas, road rights-of-way, and range areas.

Mowing and vegetation control does not present an impact to ranges or access points for target maintenance.

95% of all LOS, road rights-of-way, and range areas are maintained annually.

Random sampling and inspection of maintenance areas.

On site review of processes.

Review work plans.

Increase or decrease in surveillance.

CPAR ratings reflecting good or poor performance could affect decisions to exercise options or to make future contract awards.

1.4.9

Provide operational AVOID support for Fort Rucker by managing, operating, providing technical support, deploying, and sustaining the AVOID database.

AVOID database is maintained.

Vertical hazards are identified and surveyed in accordance with SOP and installation regulatory requirements.

AVOID database is maintained with 95% accuracy. 100% of reported vertical hazards are surveyed, identified, and disseminated to reporting agencies.

Random review of AVOID databse.

Routine monitoring of hazard notifications. Random on site review of database management.

Increase or decrease in surveillance.

CPAR ratings reflecting good or poor performance could affect decisions to exercise options or to make future contract awards.

1.4.10 Prepare and submit reports .

Reports are accurately submitted in accordance with directed suspsenses and frequency.

95% of reports submitted on time. 100% of reports submitted.

Regular review of recurring reports for timeliness and accuracy.

CPAR ratings reflecting good or poor performance could affect decisions to exercise options or to make future contract awards.

Technical Exhibit 16 Performance Requirement Summary (PRS)

TE 16, page 3 of 8

100%

Core Task Weighted Value

3%

PWS Paragraph Weighted Value 25% 5% 2%

5% 2%

1.4.1

3% 25% 5%

25%

1.4.2 1.4.3 1.4.4 1.4.5 1.4.6 1.4.7 1.4.8 1.4.9

1.4.10

TE 16, page 4 of 8

Month / Year: December-19 Core Task and Title Items Inspected Deficiencies Eval Percentage Rating

1.4.1 Aviation Gunnery Targetry

41 14 65.85%

104 1 99.04% 70 1 98.57%

Core Task Summary Rating 215 16 87.82% SATISFACTORY

1.4.2 Range Targetry

47 1 97.87% 36 100.00% 24 100.00% 37 100.00%

Core Task Summary Rating 144 1 99.47% EXCEPTIONAL

1.4.3 Electronic Maintenance

1 100.00% 1 100.00% 3 100.00%

15 100.00% 7 100.00% 1 100.00% 1 100.00%

Core Task Summary Rating 29 0 100.00% EXCEPTIONAL

1.4.4 Range Computer Systems

6 100.00% Core Task Summary Rating 6 0 100.00% EXCEPTIONAL

1.4.5 Range Complex Maintenance

75 1 98.67% 65 2 96.92% 16 100.00%

Core Task Summary Rating 156 3 98.53%

1.4.6 Operational Support

66 4 93.94% Core Task Summary Rating 66 4 93.94% VERY GOOD

MPMG Range CPQC Range MRF Range

Power Center Inspections Firing Pad Inspections

AGRC Target Inspections

Inspection Description

Evaluation Metric Summary (Example)

RCS Inspection

Record UOS Training Develop Range Scenarios

Repair Circuit Cards Replace Faulty Electronic Component

Maintain RCS Computers Prepare Electronic BOM

Draft Design Plans

ARF Range

Work Sections Inspection

Erosion Checklist Training Facilities Inspection

Small Arms Range Inspections

TE 16, page 5 of 8

Month / Year: December-19 Core Task and Title Items Inspected Deficiencies Eval Percentage Rating

1.4.7 Range Operations

15 100.00% 90 9 90.00% 90 2 97.78%

Core Task Summary Rating 195 11 95.93% VERY GOOD

1.4.8 LOS and Roadway Maintenance

60 100.00% Core Task Summary Report 60 0 100.00% EXCEPTIONAL

1.4.9 AVOID Management

8 100.00% Core Task Summary Report 8 0 100.00% EXCEPTIONAL

1.4.10 Reports

12 100.00% 60 100.00%

Core Task Summary Report 72 0 100.00% EXCEPTIONAL 2 10.00% Deduction

0.00% Deduction 0.00% Deduction

Monthly Evaluation Rating 85.24% SATISFACTORY

Score Rating

0.00% UNSATISFACTORY

75.00% SATISFACTORY

90.00% VERY GOOD

96.00% EXCEPTIONAL

Minor Safety Violation (5%)

Daily Brief Inspection Staff Journal Log Accuracy

Incident Reporting

Inspection Description

Evaluation Metric Summary (Example)

LRC Reports Submitted CDRLs Submitted

Hazards Reported / Verified

Acres Scheduled / Maintained

Moderate Safety Violation (15%) Major Safety Violation (25%)

TE 16, page 6 of 8

Month / Year: December-19 Item # Location

1 C01L 2 C04L 3 C10L 4 C01M 5 D01L 6 D04L 7 D05L 8 D11L 9 F04L

10 F06L 11 F07L 12 K01L 13 K03L 14 K04L

15 K1FP

16 K2FP

17 Matteson

18 FAFP 22

19 TA-6 BEE Course

20 MRF

21 K1PC

22 Minor Safety Violation 23 Minor Safety Vioation 24 Daily Journal 25 Daily Brief

Evaluation Metric Summary (Example) Description Minor Erosion Damage on Berm Erosion Damage on Berm Minor Erosion Behind Right Timber Wall

Repair Erosion Damage as Needed Repair Erosion Damage as Needed Re-stencil Numbers, Repair Erosion Damage as Needed Minor Water Erosion on Left Side of Berm Washboarding on Access Trail

Water Erosion at end of Timber Wall Erosion Damage on Berm Erosion Damage on Berm Erosion Damage on Berm Repair Rocket Strikes on Access Trail as Needed

Lights Left on, Rotting Floor Near Stair Well Lane 3, 300m Target Will Not Expose, in the Red Minor Water Erosion on Back Side of Berm Damage Involving GFE Trailer and Backing Up Damage to Back Hoe Due to Improper Use of Equipment

Washboarding on Access Trail Police Brass as Needed SFLOA Sign Needs Painting CFL Sign Needs Repair T-post on Northern Survey Marker Needs to be Reset into Ground

Nine errors found in journal, corrections annotated Two errors found in brief, corrections annotated

TE 16, page 7 of 8

Month / Year: December-19

Areas of Concern:

Consistency with 1594 Journal Entries (systemic).

Turnover at Firing Desk.

Damage involving GFE trailer and Back Hoe.

Close calls during exodus involving personnel down range when POW is open to the public.

Evaluation Metric Summary (Example) Narrative:

All contractually obligated tasks have been performed to standard.

TE 16, page 8 of 8