Attachment 16b - L2_Past Performance Questionnaire.docx

Solicitation: FA8903-26-R-0001 Mississippi (MS) Group Optimized Remediation Contract (ORC) L-2

SECTION L ATTACHMENT

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE COVER LETTER

TO: [CONTRACTING OFFICER OF CUSTOMER]

FROM: [CONTRACTOR]

SUBJECT: Present/Past Performance Questionnaire for Contract: [CONTRACT TITLE]

We are currently responding to the 772d Enterprise Sourcing Squadron’s (ESS) Request for Proposal (RFP). This RFP requires Offerors to identify customers and solicit their response regarding the performance of our company. We are providing present and past performance data to 772d ESS relating to our performance on the [CONTRACT TITLE] contract / [CONTRACT NUMBER]. The RFP instructs that we provide our customers with the attached questionnaire and requests that you provide requested data and submit it by XX January 2026 directly to:

Contract Name: Mississippi Group Optimized Remediation Contract Attn: Nathan J. Fry, Contracting Officer Email address: nathan.fry.7@us.af.mil Cc: john.finkenstadt.1@us.af.mil ; jose.hernandez.108@us.af.mil

Please email the questionnaire(s) to the address above when completed.

The information contained in the completed Past Performance Questionnaire is considered sensitive and cannot be released to us, the Offeror, or any other parties except the Contracting Officer and Contract Specialist. If you have any questions about the acquisition or the attached questionnaire, your questions must be directed back to the 772d ESS points of contact identified above. Thank you for your timely assistance.

Sincerely, [CONTRACTOR REPRESENTATIVE]

SECTION L ATTACHMENT

Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ) Record Solicitation Mississippi Group Optimized Remediation Contract (ORC)

Section 1: Contract Identification A. Contractor (Company/Division):

B. Contractor Cage Code:

C. Contract Specifics:

1. Contract or Task Order Number:

2. Contract Type (e.g. firm-fixed-price, CR, etc):

3. Period of Performance:

4. Geographic Location of work:

5. Contract Dollar Value: $

6. Description/scope of work performed:

7. Contractor’s Role: ☐ Prime Contractor ☐ Subcontractor

Section 2: Customer/Agency Identification

A. Customer/Agency name:

B. Primary Point of Contact:

1. Primary Name:

2. Primary Office:

3. Primary Address:

4. Primary Telephone:

C. Other suggested points of contact:

Section 3: Performance Areas:

In the tables below, indicate the rating that most accurately describes the contractor’s performance or situation by placing an “X” in the appropriate block to the right of each question. Provide supporting information in the remarks space provided. Attach additional pages if more space is needed. PLEASE PROVIDE A NARRATIVE EXPLANATION FOR ANY RATINGS OF M or U. The performance rating scale is defined as follows:

Code Performance Rating

E EXCEPTIONAL – Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many requirements to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.

VG VERY GOOD – Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.

S SATISFACTORY – Performance meets contractual requirements. The element being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory.

M MARGINAL – Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions or the contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.

U UNSATISFACTORY – Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The element being assessed contains serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

N/A NOT APPLICABLE – Unable to provide a rating. Contract did not include performance for this element, performance was not observed, or information was not available. Do not know.

A. Experience providing quality documents including preparing and amending records of decision, explanations of significant difference, feasibility studies, conceptual site models, technical plans, and reports that were accurate, timely and complete. Met all regulatory schedule requirements as documented in project schedule and / or Project/Program Management Plan. Deliverables accepted with no more than two rounds of technical comments from AF / Regulatory agency with only minor grammatical or formatting edits.

B. Experience performing site work in compliance with required and applicable regulations (e.g., health and safety, ARARs, environmental, OSHA, state, federal, professional certifications and registrations requirements). Site work resulted in zero fines or Notices of Violation.

C. Experience implementing RCRA processes and / or CERCLA processes IAW regulation and protective of Human Health and the Environment (an "exceptional or very good" represents completion of combined actions / interrelated pieces of the entire the RCRA and / or CERCLA process).

D. Experience developing and maintaining project management plan and schedule that details required actions and performance objectives across multiple sites.

E. Experience performing an effort that required work on multiple remediation disciplines with more than (5) five sites on installations or former installations (able to coordinate work on multiple sites and areas well).

Narrative/Remarks:

2. Regulatory Interaction and Stakeholder Coordination

A. Experience working proactively and collaboratively in support of the Government to achieve timely regulatory agreement/approval of project goals (e.g., performance objectives, reduced Life Cycle Costs, modification of remedies and decision documents).

B. Experience working with relevant state regulatory processes IAW in accordance with regulation and protective of human health and the environment.

C. Experience implementing and / or facilitating Community Involvement, addressing challenging stakeholders and / or collaborating with community stakeholders in such instances as public events, meetings and during work related to Site Closeout, Restoration Advisory Boards, and / or additional outreach.

D. Experience coordinating with Government stakeholders to successfully transition work to incoming contractor, providing all the required technical and programmatic files and documents (such as GIS, mapping, sampling data, records, and plans) to coordinate contract closeout and assist the incoming contractor to successfully assume all site responsibilities within contractual timeframe.

E. Experience managing environmental restoration activities on property with multiple owners / stakeholders (e.g., local redevelopment authorities, private entities, federal agencies, and municipalities) while maintaining schedules and achieving performance objectives.

3. Analysis and Data Management

A. Experience managing, reviewing, and analyzing large quantities of data and preparing reports (such as, work plans and conceptual site models) that are used to support site decisions and effectively communicate site status, issues, performance against metrics, and recommendations.

B. Experience managing and reviewing data for reporting of human health, ecological, and other risk assessments as required, conducted IAW state and EPA risk assessment guidance.

C. Experience in using site data to identify, obtain approval, and implement an innovative approach that results in accelerated site closeout or reduced long term cost.

D. Experience in assessing, analyzing, and validating data to assure the data are of sufficient quality/integrity to support site decisions.

E. Experience designing, installing, operating, maintaining, and / or optimizing remediation systems, such as, a pump and treat system in a manner that ensures appropriate maintenance of the selected remedy and usability of data to establish remedy performance thresholds and ability to recognize when system(s) is not operating properly or anticipate a system failure.

4. Were there any adverse performance issues/problems? If so, how were they resolved? (Please reference questions above by topic area and letter.)

Cure Notice

Show Cause Notice

Suspension of Payment

Termination for Convenience/Default

Denial of Claim

Other

Remarks:

Response by: