Attachment 13 - Present Past Performance Questionnaire - 16 Feb 22.pdf

FA488722R0002 – Attachment 13

PRESENT PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE (PPPQ)

SECTION 1: CONTRACT IDENTIFICATION – INFORMATION MUST BE TYPED

(TO BE COMPLETED BY OFFEROR)

A. Contractor

B. Contractor Cage Code

C. Role (check): Prime Teaming Partner

Joint Venture Partner

Other (specify)

D. Contract/Blanket Purchase Agreement (BPA) Number

Task/Call/Delivery/Purchase Order Number

Note: Each PPPI and corresponding PPPQ shall cover actual work performed and not overarching contracts, such as Indefinite-Delivery Indefinite Quantity (IDIQ) basic contracts, Blanket Purchase Agreements (BPA), etc. (i.e., each PPPI and corresponding PPPQ shall only address one performance effort such as a TO for an IDIQ contract, a call order off of a BPA, or delivery order).

E. Contract Type (FFP, CPFF, ID/IQ (include types), LH, etc.)

F. Period of Performance

G. Place(s) of Performance:

Multiple locations? Yes No If yes, specify locations:

CONUS OCONUS Both

Provide details:

State Federal DoD Other Provide details:

H. Total Contract or Task/Call/Delivery/Purchase Order $ Value (including options)

I. Has a CPAR (or more than one CPAR) been completed for this contract Yes No If Yes, provide dates covered by CPARs:

*****FOLLOWING SECTIONS COMPLETED BY CONTRACTING AGENCY*****

SECTION 2: CUSTOMER OR AGENCY IDENTIFICATION

A. Customer or Agency Name

B. Customer or Agency Description

C. Description of Service(s) provided (Provide details on type of work, locations worked, and organizations serviced, to include Department of Defense, Government, or commercial work)

SECTION 3: EVALUATOR IDENTIFICATION

A. Name B. Title C. Phone: Work: Cell:

D. E-mail E. Years worked on Subject Contract

SECTION 4: EVALUATION

Please indicate your satisfaction with the Contractor’s performance by placing an “X” in the appropriate block using the scale provided to the right of each question. This scale is defined as follows:

Measure of Merit - Technical Ratings – FACTOR 1 Technical Rating Description ACCEPTABLE Project met the requirements of the solicitation.

UNACCEPTABLE Project did not meet the requirements of the solicitation.

Please provide detailed narrative comments to support your ratings. At a minimum, please discuss each response for which you indicated “Acceptable” or “Unacceptable” in response to the questions below (use additional sheets, if necessary).

T1. Bonding Capacity A U N/A

Ability of Contractor to: provide correct adequate bonding as needed. Met all project bonding requirements.

Explanation:

T2. Project Approach A U N/A

Ability of Contractor to: provide accurate project phasing, effective and a sound process for interfacing with the government team throughout the project life cycle, and adequate set of processes and procedures detailing how the Offeror will execute all work diligently without any unnecessary or unauthorized delays, breaks or deviations.

T3. Quality Control Plan/Health and Safety Plan A U N/A

Ability of Contractor to: provide an adequate Quality Control Plan and Health and Safety Plan. The contractor’s ability to follow these plans and address issues as they arise.

PAST PERFORMANCE EVALUATION RATINGS

Adjectival Rating Description Acceptable Based on the Offeror’s performance record, the Government has a reasonable expectation that the Offeror will successfully perform the required effort, or the Offeror’s performance record is unknown.

Unacceptable Based on the Offeror’s performance record, the Government does not have a reasonable expectation that the offeror will be able to successfully perform the required effort.

PP1. Date/Methods or Project (Recentcy) A U N/A

Was the work completed rencenty insofar as advancement in methods or technology would be applicable to a current project of similar scope?

Notes:

PP2. Perform the Scope (Relevancy) A U N/A

Ability of the contractor to: successfully perform the scope and provide necessary expertise, personnel, and materials

Please provide scope/magnitude below.

Brief Description Of Scope:

Price 1. A U N/A

Ability of the contractor to: provide a reasonable price absent any significant cost modifications, unbalanced pricing, and accurately reflect total price.

Notes:

SECTION 5: NARRATIVE SUMMARY

A. Was this contract partially or completely terminated for default or convenience or are there any pending terminations? (Place an “X” by all that apply.)

Yes No Default Convenience Pending Terminations

If yes, please explain (e.g., inability to meet cost, performance, or delivery schedules, etc).

B. Would you have any reservations about having this Contractor perform again on one of your critical and demanding programs?

Evaluator’s Signature Date