Attachment_10_Project_Expectations_7124.docx
DOCX document 137 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- S-KS0043-00010843
- Issued by
- Marion County, Oregon
About this file
The document is an attachment titled "Project Expectations" for a Request for Proposals (RFP) issued by the City of Salem, Oregon for Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) software and implementation services. The RFP seeks proposals for a software license that is enterprise-based and has a fixed price for a minimum of five years, as well as fixed-fee professional services based on milestones. The city requires a project management plan, organizational change management, system design requirements, data conversion, testing, go-live support, and other detailed deliverables. The city also has specific contract requirements, including approval of key personnel, a 45-day warranty, a 30-day final acceptance period, and indemnification clauses.
The pricing for the software license and subscription is expected to be fixed, with increases based on an index. Professional services are to be priced as fixed-fee and milestone-based, with payments tied to acceptance of deliverables outlined in the Statement of Work (SOW). The city desires to avoid any constraints on the fixed-fee contract for professional services, such as configuration quantities or other government characteristics. The project is part of RFP No. 245050 for ERP software and implementation services in the state of Oregon.
View the file
Other files
Show all 23
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
RFP for ERP Software and Implementation Services City of Salem, Oregon
Attachment 10 Project Expectations Please answer all of the questions below:
Type of Agreement
| Question |
| Yes |
| No |
| Comments |
Software license is based on enterprise licenses/subscription (i.e., not user based)
Software license/subscription price is fixed for a minimum of five years
Software license/subscription price increases are based on an index
Pricing for professional services is fixed fee and milestone based
Payment for professional services is based on acceptance of deliverables identified in the SOW
Functional requirements process maps are attached to agreement and used to provide accountability for scope
Vendor does not constrain fixed fee contract for professional services with configuration quantities or other characteristics of the government (employees, funds, etc.)
Project Management
| Question |
| Yes |
| No |
| Comment |
What is the split of on-site/off-site work?
Approximate number of projects (including this one) will the project manager be working on besides this proposed project
Approximate number of hours per month will project manager serve this project
Approximate number of trips per month for project manager
Frequency of status reports
Deliverables
| Question |
| Yes |
| No |
| Assumption of Responsibility |
(Client/Vendor)
Project Management
Project Plan is a Deliverable
Project Plan Deliverable includes:
Project Tasks
Project Schedule
Project Resources
Project Dependencies
Project Deliverables
Project Milestones
Status Reports are a Deliverable
Status Report Deliverable includes:
Schedule Compliance
Issues Log
Vendor Staffing Plan
Is client participation tracked during project?
Organizational Change Management
Organizational Change Management is a Deliverable
Organizational Change Management Deliverable includes:
Stakeholder Assessment
Communications Plan
Documentation of New Business Processes
Knowledge Transfer
Training Plan is a Deliverable
Training Plan Deliverable includes:
Stakeholder Identification
Training Scope
Training Schedule
Training Materials Plan
Training materials are customized for client
System Design
Requirements Traceability is a Deliverable
Requirements Traceability Deliverable includes:
Update to Functional Requirements
Report specifications are documented
Interface specifications are documented
Build
As-Built/Design Documentation is a Deliverable
Conversion
Conversion Plan is included as a Deliverable
Conversion Data Acceptance is included as a Deliverable
Testing
Testing Plan is included as a Deliverable
Testing Plan deliverable addresses:
Testing Tools
Testing Schedule
Unit Testing
Integration Testing
User Acceptance Testing
Performance Testing
Regression Testing
Test Scripts are included as a Deliverable
Go-Live and Support
Cutover Plan is included as Deliverable
Cutover Plan includes:
Plan for Open Issues
Requirements traceability matrix is updated
Post Go-Live Support Plan
Final Acceptance Documentation is included as Deliverable
Contract Terms Please indicate whether your firm will agree to the following project terms.
| Contract / Proposal Requirement |
| Response |
Key Personnel - The City requires assurances as to the consistency and quality of vendor staffing for its project. Key points of the City’s key personnel provision include: The City shall have the ability to interview and approve key personnel proposed by the vendor and the vendor key personnel may not be removed from the project without the City’s approval.
Note: This requirement only applies to consulting services.
Warranty – The Proposer will warrant that all work will be performed by an adequate number of qualified individuals with suitable training, education, and experience and that all work performed and all deliverables, including the system itself will conform to the scope and specifications as stated in the eventual SOW, including the vendor responses to the functional requirements for a period extending no less than 45 days after final acceptance.
Acceptance – Vendor shall provide final acceptance period after go-live of not less than thirty (30) days to confirm that the project meets all SOW requirements. Milestone payment for final acceptance is no less than 5% of the total implementation fees for the phase.
Hold Harmless – Vendor shall hold harmless, defend and indemnify City and its officers, employees, agents, and volunteers, from and against any and all liability, loss, damage, expense, costs (including without limitation costs and fees of litigation) of every nature arising out of or in connection with Vendor’s performance of work hereunder or its failure to comply with any of its obligations contained in this Agreement, except such loss or damage which was caused by the sole negligence or willful misconduct of City.
System Configuration Limits – Vendor shall consider the scope of the project defined by the City’s business process goals, functional requirements, and desire to implement the licensed software to best meet the needs of the City. The scope shall not be constrained by any configuration limits that would be necessary to achieve the project scope.
Service Level Agreements – Vendor shall identify clear service level objectives for availability.
Service Level Agreement Remedy – Vendor shall provide remedies for failure to meet service levels that includes but is not limited to refund of fees paid for service periods where the failure to meet service level objective is met.
Fixed Fee Pricing Based on Milestones – Vendor shall provide fixed fee pricing based on milestones for all implementation services. Fixed fee pricing shall not be further limited by an hours cap on select services.
image1.png
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .