Attachment 1 Past Performance Questionaire.pdf

PDF 159 KB Posted

Attached to
Natick Soldier Systems Center Multiple Award Task Order Contract (MATOC) for Construction
Solicitation number
W911QY25R0003
Issued by

About this file

This document is a Performance Assessment Questionnaire used by the U.S. Army Contracting Command - Aberdeen Proving Ground Natick Contracting Division to evaluate past performance for a potential contract (Solicitation Number W911QY25R0003). The questionnaire is designed to gather detailed feedback from previous contract points of contact regarding a contractor's performance across multiple evaluation dimensions, including compliance with specifications, project management effectiveness, timeliness of deliverables, commitment to customer satisfaction, and overall contract execution.

The questionnaire requires respondents to rate the contractor's performance using a four-tier confidence scale ranging from "Substantial Confidence" to "No Confidence" for each assessment category, with a mandatory written rationale for each rating. Key sections include evaluating product/service compliance, project management, performance timeliness, cost control (for cost-reimbursement contracts), and customer commitment. The document is part of a competitive source selection process for a Multiple Award Task Order Contract (MATOC) for construction-related work at the Natick Soldier Systems Center, with a total shared capacity of $99,000,000 and a potential 8-year ordering period. The solicitation is 100% set aside for small businesses with a NAICS code of 238990 and a small business size standard of $19.0 Million.

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
W911QY-25-R-0003 RFP amendment 0006 02 July 2025.pdf PDF
W911QY-25-R-0003 RFP amendment 0006 02 July 2025 Conformed Copy.pdf PDF
W911QY25R0003 Questions and Responses Master 06262025.pdf PDF
W911QY-25-R-0003 RFP amendment 0005 26 May 2025.pdf PDF
W911QY-25-R-0003 RFP amendment 0005 26 May 2025 Conformed Copy.pdf PDF
Bid Bond SF24-23a.pdf PDF
W911QY-25-R-0003 RFP amendment 0001 14 May 2025.pdf PDF
Seed Project SOW Attachment 5 Submittal Register.pdf PDF
W911QY25R0003 Questions and Responses Master 06182025.pdf PDF
EM 385-1-1 _EFFECTIVE 15 March 2024.pdf PDF
Attachment 2 Cost Proposal Rev 06 18 2025.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
W911QY25R0003 Questions and Responses MASTER 06182025.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Tax Exempt Form.PDF PDF
UFC 4 010.pdf PDF
Seed Project SOW Attachment 5 Submittal Register.docx DOCX document
W911QY-25-R-0003 RFP amendment 0004 18 June 2025.pdf PDF
W911QY-25-R-0003 RFP amendment 0004 18 June 2025 Conformed Copy.pdf PDF
Bldg45 Reno Addendum1.pdf PDF
W911QY-25-R-0003RFP amendment 0003 04 June 2025.pdf PDF
W911QY-25-R-0003 RFP amendment 0002 04 June 2025.pdf PDF
MATOC Sign in Sheet.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
W911QY-25-R-0003-RFP Conformed Copy 04 June 2025.pdf PDF
W911QY25R0003 Questions and Responses 23MAY2025.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
W911QY25R0003 Questions and Responses.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Attachment 3 - Seed Project SOW.pdf PDF
Seed Project SOW Attachment 5 - Submittal Register.pdf PDF
W911QY25R0003 RFP 14MAY2025 v2.pdf PDF
Seed Project SOW Attachment 2 - Integrated Solid Waste Management Plan.pdf PDF
Attachment 2 - Cost Proposal.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Seed Project SOW Attachment 4 - Quality Assurance Surveillance Plan.pdf PDF
Attachment 4 - NSSC Contractor Site Access Request Form.pdf PDF
Seed Project SOW Attachment 5 - Submittal Register.docx DOCX document
Attachment 5 - Davis-Bacon Wage Determination MA20250001 Rev5.pdf PDF
Attachment 3 - Seed Project SOW.docx DOCX document
Seed Project SOW Attachment 1 - Construction Drawings B.45 Seed Project (1).pdf PDF
W911QY25R0003 RFP 14MAY2025.pdf PDF
Seed Project SOW Attachment 3 - Accident Prevention Plan TOC.pdf PDF
Show all 37

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

CUI//SP-PROCURE//FEDCON ONLY

Performance Assessment

Performance Assessment Questionnaire – Cover Letter

DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY

U.S. ARMY CONTRACTING COMMAND - ABERDEEN PROVING GROUND

NATICK CONTRACTING DIVISION

GENERAL GREENE AVENUE

NATICK, MA 01760-5011

Date:

SUBJECT: Offeror Past Performance Assessment in Support of Request for Proposal

(RFP) W911QY25R0003

Dear Sir/Ma’am, The US Army Contracting Command (ACC) – Aberdeen Proving Ground (APG) Natick Contracting Division (NCD) is currently conducting a competitive source selection to evaluate offerors on the subject RFP. As part of this evaluation, we have requested that the offerors provide information about their past performance on recent and relevant federal, state, or local government or commercial contracts as compared to the North American Industry Classification System [NAICS] 236220. You have been identified as the point of contact cited on the enclosure.

Your assessment of their performance is extremely valuable to our evaluation. Please complete the enclosure and return to the ACC-APG NCD10 General Green Ave, building 1, Natick, MA, 01760, no later than 15 days after receipt of request or 05 June 2025, whichever occurs first. Submit your completed questionnaire to Timothy.M.Konetzny.civ@army.mil and Alexander.M.Ponusky.civ@army.mil.

Your cooperation is greatly appreciated. Questions may be directed to the undersigned at (520)-692-1394/Timothy.M.Konetzny.civ@army.mil.

Sincerely, Timothy M. Konetzny Contracting Officer

Performance Assessment Questionnaire

[Questionnaire should include questions to assess compliance with FAR 52.219-8 and FAR 52.219-9.]

Please provide your candid responses. The information that you provide will be used in the awarding of federal contracts. Therefore, it is important that your information be as factual, accurate and complete as possible to preclude the need for follow-up by the evaluators. If you do not have knowledge of or experience with the company in question, please forward this Questionnaire to the person who does. Please return the completed Questionnaire to the Contracting Officer identified in the cover letter within the stated timeframe.

Rating Definitions:

Substantial Confidence: Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many requirements that benefit the end user. Work was accomplished with few, if any, minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective. The offeror has been highly successfully in performing the required effort.

Satisfactory Confidence: Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some requirements that benefit the end user. Work was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective. The offeror has successfully performed the required effort.

Limited Confidence: Performance does not meet some contractual requirements.

Serious problems with contractor performance were experienced for which the contractor has either not yet identified corrective actions, or the corrective actions taken appear only marginally effective. The offeror has had little success performing the required effort.

No Confidence: Performance does not meet most contractual requirements. Serious problems with contractor performance were experienced for which the corrective actions were ineffective. The offeror has not successfully performed the required effort.

PART I. (To be completed by the Offeror)

A. CONTRACT IDENTIFICATION

Contractor/Company Name/Division:

Address:

Program Identification/Title:

Contract Number:

Contract Type:

Prime Contractor Name (if different from the contractor name cited above):

Contract Award Date:

Forecasted or Actual Contract Completion Date:

Nature of the Contractual Effort or Items Purchased:

Total Contract Value:

B. IDENTIFICATION OF OFFEROR’S REPRESENTATIVE

Name:

Title:

Date:

Telephone Number:

Address:

E-mail Address:

PART II. EVALUATION (To be completed by Point of Contact – Respondent) *Note: rationale is required for each response.

A. Compliance of Products, Services, Documents, and Related Deliverables to Specification Requirements and Standards of Good Workmanship

Substantial Confidence Satisfactory Confidence Limited Confidence No Confidence

Rationale: __________________________________________________________

B. Effectiveness of Project Management (to include use and control of subcontractors).

C. Timeliness of Performance for Services and Product Deliverables.

D. Effectiveness in Forecasting and Controlling Estimated Costs (Use this Question on Cost Reimbursement Type Contracts Only).

E. Commitment to Customer Satisfaction and Business-like Concern for its Customers’ Interest

F. General Comments. Provide any other relevant performance information.

Comments: _________________________________________________________

G. Other Information Sources. Please provide the following information:

Are you aware of other relevant past efforts by this company?

If yes, please provide the name and telephone number of a point of contact:

Point of Contact (Name): __________________________________________ Telephone Number: ______________________________________________

H. Respondent Identification. Please provide the following information:

Organization:

Name:

Title:

Date:

Telephone Number Address:

E-mail Address:

PART III. RETURN INFORMATION

Please return this completed Questionnaire to the Contracting Officer identified in the cover letter.

Thank you for your assistance.

Date1_af_date:
2025-04-30T10:29:57-0400
KONETZNY.TIMOTHY.MICHAEL.1248164600

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .