Attachment 1 Past Performance Questionaire.pdf
PDF 159 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Natick Soldier Systems Center Multiple Award Task Order Contract (MATOC) for Construction
- Solicitation number
- W911QY25R0003
About this file
This document is a Performance Assessment Questionnaire used by the U.S. Army Contracting Command - Aberdeen Proving Ground Natick Contracting Division to evaluate past performance for a potential contract (Solicitation Number W911QY25R0003). The questionnaire is designed to gather detailed feedback from previous contract points of contact regarding a contractor's performance across multiple evaluation dimensions, including compliance with specifications, project management effectiveness, timeliness of deliverables, commitment to customer satisfaction, and overall contract execution.
The questionnaire requires respondents to rate the contractor's performance using a four-tier confidence scale ranging from "Substantial Confidence" to "No Confidence" for each assessment category, with a mandatory written rationale for each rating. Key sections include evaluating product/service compliance, project management, performance timeliness, cost control (for cost-reimbursement contracts), and customer commitment. The document is part of a competitive source selection process for a Multiple Award Task Order Contract (MATOC) for construction-related work at the Natick Soldier Systems Center, with a total shared capacity of $99,000,000 and a potential 8-year ordering period. The solicitation is 100% set aside for small businesses with a NAICS code of 238990 and a small business size standard of $19.0 Million.
View the file
Other files
Show all 37
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
CUI//SP-PROCURE//FEDCON ONLY
Performance Assessment
Performance Assessment Questionnaire – Cover Letter
DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
U.S. ARMY CONTRACTING COMMAND - ABERDEEN PROVING GROUND
NATICK CONTRACTING DIVISION
GENERAL GREENE AVENUE
NATICK, MA 01760-5011
Date:
SUBJECT: Offeror Past Performance Assessment in Support of Request for Proposal
(RFP) W911QY25R0003
Dear Sir/Ma’am, The US Army Contracting Command (ACC) – Aberdeen Proving Ground (APG) Natick Contracting Division (NCD) is currently conducting a competitive source selection to evaluate offerors on the subject RFP. As part of this evaluation, we have requested that the offerors provide information about their past performance on recent and relevant federal, state, or local government or commercial contracts as compared to the North American Industry Classification System [NAICS] 236220. You have been identified as the point of contact cited on the enclosure.
Your assessment of their performance is extremely valuable to our evaluation. Please complete the enclosure and return to the ACC-APG NCD10 General Green Ave, building 1, Natick, MA, 01760, no later than 15 days after receipt of request or 05 June 2025, whichever occurs first. Submit your completed questionnaire to Timothy.M.Konetzny.civ@army.mil and Alexander.M.Ponusky.civ@army.mil.
Your cooperation is greatly appreciated. Questions may be directed to the undersigned at (520)-692-1394/Timothy.M.Konetzny.civ@army.mil.
Sincerely, Timothy M. Konetzny Contracting Officer
Performance Assessment Questionnaire
[Questionnaire should include questions to assess compliance with FAR 52.219-8 and FAR 52.219-9.]
Please provide your candid responses. The information that you provide will be used in the awarding of federal contracts. Therefore, it is important that your information be as factual, accurate and complete as possible to preclude the need for follow-up by the evaluators. If you do not have knowledge of or experience with the company in question, please forward this Questionnaire to the person who does. Please return the completed Questionnaire to the Contracting Officer identified in the cover letter within the stated timeframe.
Rating Definitions:
Substantial Confidence: Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many requirements that benefit the end user. Work was accomplished with few, if any, minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective. The offeror has been highly successfully in performing the required effort.
Satisfactory Confidence: Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some requirements that benefit the end user. Work was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective. The offeror has successfully performed the required effort.
Limited Confidence: Performance does not meet some contractual requirements.
Serious problems with contractor performance were experienced for which the contractor has either not yet identified corrective actions, or the corrective actions taken appear only marginally effective. The offeror has had little success performing the required effort.
No Confidence: Performance does not meet most contractual requirements. Serious problems with contractor performance were experienced for which the corrective actions were ineffective. The offeror has not successfully performed the required effort.
PART I. (To be completed by the Offeror)
A. CONTRACT IDENTIFICATION
Contractor/Company Name/Division:
Address:
Program Identification/Title:
Contract Number:
Contract Type:
Prime Contractor Name (if different from the contractor name cited above):
Contract Award Date:
Forecasted or Actual Contract Completion Date:
Nature of the Contractual Effort or Items Purchased:
Total Contract Value:
B. IDENTIFICATION OF OFFEROR’S REPRESENTATIVE
Name:
Title:
Date:
Telephone Number:
Address:
E-mail Address:
PART II. EVALUATION (To be completed by Point of Contact – Respondent) *Note: rationale is required for each response.
A. Compliance of Products, Services, Documents, and Related Deliverables to Specification Requirements and Standards of Good Workmanship
Substantial Confidence Satisfactory Confidence Limited Confidence No Confidence
Rationale: __________________________________________________________
B. Effectiveness of Project Management (to include use and control of subcontractors).
C. Timeliness of Performance for Services and Product Deliverables.
D. Effectiveness in Forecasting and Controlling Estimated Costs (Use this Question on Cost Reimbursement Type Contracts Only).
E. Commitment to Customer Satisfaction and Business-like Concern for its Customers’ Interest
F. General Comments. Provide any other relevant performance information.
Comments: _________________________________________________________
G. Other Information Sources. Please provide the following information:
Are you aware of other relevant past efforts by this company?
If yes, please provide the name and telephone number of a point of contact:
Point of Contact (Name): __________________________________________ Telephone Number: ______________________________________________
H. Respondent Identification. Please provide the following information:
Organization:
Name:
Title:
Date:
Telephone Number Address:
E-mail Address:
PART III. RETURN INFORMATION
Please return this completed Questionnaire to the Contracting Officer identified in the cover letter.
Thank you for your assistance.
| Date1_af_date: | |
| 2025-04-30T10:29:57-0400 | |
| KONETZNY.TIMOTHY.MICHAEL.1248164600 |
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .