Attachment 02 - FAR 52.212-2 - Addendum - 6.24.25.pdf

PDF 92 KB Posted

Attached to
Water Pump and Motor Replacement and Refurbishment Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
FA460025Q0057
Issued by
Department of the Air Force Air Combat Command

About this file

This document is a Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) provision (52.212-2) for evaluating commercial products and commercial services, dated November 2021. The document outlines the evaluation criteria for a water pump and motor replacement and refurbishment solicitation, which is a 100% small business set-aside under NAICS Code 238220. The evaluation will be based on three key factors: (1) Price, ranked by total evaluated price and assessed for reasonableness, (2) Technical Capability, requiring vendors to submit a plan demonstrating ability to perform water pump and motor replacement and refurbishment services, and (3) Past Performance, evaluated on an Acceptable/Unacceptable basis.

The solicitation requires vendors to be registered in the System for Award Management (SAM) and includes a mandatory site visit on 1 July 2025 at 9:00 AM CST. Interested parties must submit an NCIC screening form for site visit attendees by 30 June 2025. Questions are due by 1 July 2025 at 11:00 AM CST, with answers provided by 2 July 2025. Quote submissions are due by 3 July 2025 at 11:00 AM CST, to be submitted via email to specific Air Force contacts. The contract is being issued by the Department of the Air Force Air Combat Command and involves replacing a condenser pump and motor at B185 comfort cooling water towers, with requirements for compatibility, form, and function.

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Show all 12

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

52.212-2 Evaluation-Commercial Products and Commercial Services. Nov 2021

Evaluation-Commercial Products and Commercial Services (Nov 2021)

(a) The Government will award a contract resulting from this solicitation to the responsible offeror whose offer conforming to the solicitation will be most advantageous to the Government, price and other factors considered. The following factors shall be used to evaluate offers:

(1) Price: The quotations will be ranked according to their total evaluated price (TEP) as identified by contract line-item total pricing. The Government will evaluate offers for award purposes by adding the total price for all CLINs for the required period of performance.

The offeror's price quotation will be evaluated using one or more of the procedures and techniques defined in FAR 13.106-2 and FAR 13.106-3 in order to determine price reasonableness. For a price to be reasonable, it must represent a price that a prudent person would pay in the conduct of competitive business. Normally, price reasonableness is established through competitive quotations as described in FAR 13.106-3.

(2) Technical Capability: The Vendor shall submit a plan in Word or PDF format describing how they will meet the requirements outlined in the Performance Work Statement (PWS). The Vendor shall demonstrate that they can provide all content within the PWS.

(a) The offeror shall demonstrate their ability to perform the water pump and motor replacement service

(b) The offeror shall demonstrate their ability to perform the water pump refurbishment service

Quotes will be evaluated to be technically acceptable or not technically acceptable based on the evaluation factors listed above.

(3) Past Performance: The lowest total evaluated priced, technically acceptable offeror’s past performance will be evaluated on an Acceptable/Unacceptable basis. In order for the Government to have a reasonable expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort, the offeror must demonstrate that they have provided water pump and motor replacement and/or water pump refurbishment services.

(b) Options. The Government will evaluate offers for award purposes by adding the total price for all options to the total price for the basic requirement. The Government may determine that an offer is unacceptable if the option prices are significantly unbalanced. Evaluation of options shall not obligate the Government to exercise the option(s).

(c) A written notice of award or acceptance of an offer, mailed or otherwise furnished to the successful offeror within the time for acceptance specified in the offer, shall result in a binding contract without further action by either party. Before the offer's specified expiration time, the Government may accept an offer (or part of an offer), whether or not there are negotiations after its receipt, unless a written notice of withdrawal is received before award.

(d) Basis for Award. If the lowest total evaluated priced, technically acceptable offeror receives an “Acceptable” past performance rating, evaluation of that quote is complete, award will be made to that offeror, and the evaluation process will stop. If the lowest total evaluated priced, technically acceptable offeror receives an “Unacceptable” past performance rating, evaluation of that quote will stop. In that instance, the next lowest total evaluated priced offeror will be evaluated using the methodology above and the process will continue (in order by price) until a technically acceptable offeror is evaluated to have an acceptable past performance rating, or until all offerors are evaluated.

Clarifications conducted to resolve minor or clerical errors will not constitute discussions and the Contracting Officer reserves the right to award a contract without the opportunity for a quote revision. The Government intends to award a contract without discussions (while keeping with FAR Part 12 and 13).

(End of provision)

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .