Attach No. 4 PPQ.docx

39 KB Posted

Attached to
Refuse Services
Solicitation number
FA875126Q0031
Issued by

About this file

Written by GovTribe AI ·

This is a Past Performance Questionnaire template for solicitation FA875126Q0031, Rome Research Site/DFAS Refuse Services. The document consists of two sections designed to evaluate contractor past performance: Section A is completed by offerors for each reference and submitted with their proposal, while Section B is completed by the references themselves and returned directly to the Contract Specialist, Tabitha Haggart, at AFRL/RIKO in Rome, New York. The response date for all submissions is 20 March 2026. Contact information for the Contract Specialist includes phone number (315) 330-3787 and email Tabitha.Haggart@us.af.mil.

Section A requires offerors to provide detailed information about each reference contract, including company name, contact details, contract number, program name, contracting officer information, contract type, work description, contract duration and amounts, compliance comments, and major subcontractor information. Section B is a comprehensive rating form completed by references that evaluates contractor performance across six evaluation categories: Technical Capability (10 rating items), Timely Performance (5 items), Management Effectiveness (7 items), Contract Administration (2 items), Compliance with Security Standards (7 items), and Overall Performance (1 item). Each item uses a six-point scale: Exceptional (E), Good (G), Satisfactory (S), Marginal (M), Unsatisfactory (U), or Neutral (N), with detailed performance definitions for each rating level. The questionnaire includes space for comments, identification of subcontracted work percentages, and reference contact information, with instructions encouraging the knowledgeable individual managing day-to-day contractor operations to complete the assessment, supplemented by input from others within the organization as applicable.

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
Attchment No. 3 Quote Template 25 March 2026.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
RRS DFAS Refuse PWS 25 March.pdf PDF
QA doc 2.pdf PDF
QA doc 1.docx DOCX document
Combined Synopsis Solicitation v1.pdf PDF
Attachment No. 1 RRS DFAS Refuse PWS 23 Feb_.pdf PDF
Attchment No. 3 Quote Template.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Attachment No. 2 OFFEROR REPRESENTATIONS AND CERTIFICATIONS.docx DOCX document
Attachment No. 5 Wage Determination 2015-4165 Rev No. 31 dated 3 December 2025.pdf PDF

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Try for free Login

Text version

The file's text, extracted by GovTribe without its formatting.

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

INSTRUCTIONS FOR OFFEROR

1. Offerors will complete Section A of the questionnaire (Page 2 & 3) for each reference and include with their proposal. The offeror will submit Section B of the questionnaire directly to their references and request the reference return the questionnaire directly to the Contract Specialist identified below. Offeror will complete Block 2 of Section B (Contract number and Program Name) before submitting to their references.

QUOTE RESPONSE DATE: 20 MARCH 2026

CONTRACT SPECIALIST:

NAME:TABITHA HAGGART
TEL:(315) 330-3787

EMAIL: Tabitha.Haggart@us.af.mil

SECTION A:

Offerors will complete Section A of the questionnaire (Pages 2 & 3) for each reference and include with their quote.

1.COMPANY NAME/ REFERENCE NAME:__________________________________________
ADDRESS:____________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________
TEL:___________________________FAX:_____________________________
EMAIL:____________________________________________________________________

2. CONTRACT #: _______________________PROGRAM NAME:____________________________

3.CONTRACTING OFFICER (IF DIFFERENT FROM REFERENCE): ________________________
ADDRESS:____________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________
TEL:___________________________FAX:_____________________________
EMAIL:____________________________________________________________________
4.CONTRACT TYPE:Firm-Fixed PriceCost-ReimbursementOther (describe)
_________________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________________
5.DESCRIPTION OF WORK:_______________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________________

6. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE EFFORT Prime ____ or Subcontractor ____

7.AWARD DATE: __________________SCHEDULED COMPLETION: ___________________
CURRENT / FINAL COMPLETION DATE (if different):_________________________________
8.AMOUNT PER YEAR: ___________________ CONTRACT TOTAL AMOUNT: ____________________
CURRENT / FINAL AMOUNT (if different): _________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________________________________

9. COMMENTS REGARDING COMPLIANCE WITH CONTRACT TERMS AND CONDITIONS

10.COMMENTS REGARDING ANY KNOWN PERFORMANCE DEEMED UNACCEPTABLE TO THE
CUSTOMER, OR NOT IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CONTRACT TERMS AND CONDITIONS
11.LIST ALL MAJOR SUBCONTRACTORS THAT WORKED ON REFERENCED PROJECT, IN WHAT TRADE, AND WHAT PERCENTAGE OF WORK DONE: ___________________________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________________

Past Performance Questionnaire

SECTION B: Past performance reference completes this entire Past Performance Questionnaire section.

INSTRUCTIONS FOR REFERENCE

You have been identified as a past performance reference for solicitation FA875126Q0031 Rome Research Site/DFAS Refuse Services at the Air Force Research Laboratory, Rome NY. In order for the Government to evaluate the past performance of the Offeror identifying you as a reference, please complete Section B of this Past Performance Questionnaire, then return it to the Contract Specialist below. The Contract Number and Program Name provided by the Offeror are found in Block #2 below. If the Offeror performed additional contracts for your organization, please provide past performance information on those contracts as well.

Response Date: 20 MARCH 2026

CONTRACT SPECIALIST: TABITHA HAGGART

AFRL/RIKO

26 ELECTRONIC PKWY

ROME NY 13441-4514

TEL:(315) 330-3787
E-MAIL:Tabitha.Haggart@us.af.mil

The individual knowledgeable of the contractor’s day-to-day operations and overall performance should complete this questionnaire. However, that individual is encouraged to supplement their own knowledge of the contractor’s performance with the judgment of others within their organization, as applicable. Thank you for your assistance.

1.NAME:____________________________________________________________________
POSITION:____________________________________________________________________
ADDRESS:____________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________
TEL:___________________________FAX:_____________________________
EMAIL:____________________________________________________________________
2.CONTRACT #:_______________________PROGRAM NAME:___________________________
3.RELATIONSHIP AND TIME INVOLVED WITH OFFEROR:
_________________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________________
4.WHAT, IF ANY, ELEMENTS OF WORK WERE SUBCONTRACTED? PLEASE ESTIMATE
THE PERCENTAGE OF THE TOTAL WORK THAT WAS SUBCONTRACTED?
_________________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________________

SECTION B, CONTINUED: Please rate the offeror’s performance using the scale below.

E
G
S
M
U
N
Exceptional
Good
Satisfactory
Marginal
Unsatisfactory
Neutral

Performance meets contractual requirements with many exceeded to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with no more than a few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.

Performance meets contractual requirements with some exceeded to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with no more than some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.

Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were satisfactory.

Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions or the contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.

Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains a serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

Performance was not observed or not applicable to the current effort being reported against.

EVALUATION AREAS

I. Technical Capability E G S M U N

1.
Contractor developed and submitted realistic approaches, plans, and performance goals.
2.
Contractor provided services that met or exceeded contract requirements.
3.
Contractor was able to troubleshoot and recommend mitigating solutions.
4.
Contractor provided effective training to Contractor personnel.
5.
Contractor completed all efforts with good workmanship. There were minor, if any, deficiencies.
6.
Performance of services was cost effective. There were minimal cost increases to the original negotiated amount. If there were significant changes, please explain below.
7.
Contractor provided effective Quality Control and inspection procedures that resulted in a high quality service.
8.
Contractor provided satisfactory resolution to any quality issues observed during contract performance.
9.
Contractor followed their approved Quality Control plan and instituted improvements whenever possible.
10.
Contractor performed without a trend of related deficiencies and without issuance of Corrective Action Report(s).

Comments:

II. Timely Performance E G S M U N

1.
Contractor met established frequency requirements to complete the project on time and to ensure quality service.
2.
Contractor performed all work without the issuance of a cure notice or show cause letter. (If a notice was issued, please describe the circumstances in the comments section and identify how the situation was resolved.)
3.
Contractor provided timely proposals and responses to contract changes, if any.
4.
Contractor submitted progress schedules and interim progress reports, as required, in a timely manner.
5.
Contractor provided deliverables/submittals on time as required.

Comments:

III. Management Effectiveness E G S M U N

1.
Contractor provided experienced, qualified personnel with the technical and administrative abilities needed to meet contract requirements.
2.
Contractor hired quality subcontractors and effectively managed and coordinated their work.
3.
Contractor ensured the site Program Manager or equivalent had sufficient authority to make decisions and take actions during contract performance.
4.
Contractor paid employees/subcontractors fully and on time.
5.
Contractor cooperated to resolve problems, attended meetings, and maintained effective communication to ensure satisfactory resolution.
6.
Contractor demonstrated ability to hire and maintain qualified personnel, as well as replace personnel if necessary, during the contract period.
7.
Contractor successfully implemented a Transition Plan, mobilizing without causing service disruption.

Comments:

IV. Contract Administration E G S M U N

1.
Contractor provided complete and correct documentation in a timely manner.
2.
Contractor was responsive during contract performance on administrative issues.

Comments:

V. Compliance with Security Standards E G S M U N

1.
Adherence to DD Form 254 requirements.
2.
Adherence to security requirements specifically identified in the SOW/PWS.
3.
Adherence to policies/procedures for safeguarding classified information.
4.
Adherence to Facility Security procedures.
5.
Contractor demonstrated safe work habits through proper and adequate use of protective equipment and job site protection to maintain accident, injury, and damage free work zone.
6.
Contractor fulfilled all safety regulations without notice, warning, work suspension, or other outside motivation.
7.
Response to spills, mishaps, or other incidents was timely. Reports were made as required. Collateral risk was mitigated promptly. If no incidents for the project, please write N/A.

Comments:

VI. Overall Performance E G S M U N

1.
Please rate the contractor’s overall performance.

ADDITIONAL COMMENTS (attach additional sheets as necessary):

Attachment 4

FA875126Q0031

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .