Attach. 4 - Past Performance Questionnaire.pdf

PDF 143 KB Posted

Attached to
FY25 Barrier Maintenance
Solicitation number
FA462024QA213
Issued by

About this file

This document contains a past performance questionnaire for a barrier maintenance services contract. Fairchild Air Force Base is soliciting feedback on contractors' past performance of barrier maintenance and repair work. The questionnaire asks respondents to evaluate contractors' staffing, personnel experience and performance, responsiveness, quality control procedures, and overall performance on a scale of 1 to 5. Respondents are also asked whether the contractor received any cure notices or if they would award the contractor another contract. Completed questionnaires are due by April 25, 2024 and should be returned to 2nd Lt. Brandon Teague or Zachery Ray.

The related federal contract opportunity is for vehicle barrier maintenance and repair services at Fairchild AFB. The contractor will provide preventative maintenance, inspection, and minor repairs to operational vehicle barriers. The contract will be awarded by the Department of the Air Force Air Mobility Command.

View the file

Other files

Show all 15

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

FA462024QA213 – FY25 Barrier Maintenance Attach. 4 – Past Performance Questionnaire

FA462024QA213 – FY25 Barrier Maintenance

PRESENT/PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

1. Your assistance is respectfully requested in providing information on the below present/past performance questionnaire. The importance of your opinion cannot be overstated since this survey will measure the present/past performance of each prospective offeror for providing barrier maintenance services at Fairchild AFB, WA.

2. INSTRUCTIONS FOR FORM COMPLETION: Please fill this questionnaire in by hand or electronically and email the results to the Contract Specialist, 2d Lt Brandon Teague, at brandon.teague.1@us.af.mil and the Contracting Officer, Zachery Ray, at zachery.ray.2@us.af.mil.

Email submissions are preferred but you can also return by mail to the following address:

92 CONS/PKA

Attn: 2d Lt Brandon Teague and Mr. Zachery Ray 110 W. Ent St Fairchild AFB WA 99011

3. Please direct questions to 2d Lt Teague at (509) 247-3488. Your Participation is greatly appreciated.

4. PLEASE RETURN NO LATER THAN: 25 April 2024, at 1:00 PM (Pacific Time)

Section A: CONTRACTOR INFORMATION

Contractor’s name and address:

a. Point of Contact:

b. Phone #:

c. Contract Number:

d. Project Title:

e. Period of Performance:

SECTION B: RESPONDENT INFORMATION

a. Respondent’s name and address:

Organization:

Address:

City: State: Zip:

b. Respondent’s Name and Title:

c. Signature:

d. Commercial Phone #: DSN Phone #:

Fax #: E-Mail:

e. Contract Type (i.e.: Firm Fixed Price):

f. Award Amount: $ Final Amount: $

g. What was the job title(s) for this project?

What was the scope and major functions performed under this contract?

If you have questions regarding this questionnaire, please call 2d Lt Teague at (509) 247-3488.

For any ratings less than satisfactory rating, please provide explanation in Remarks section below.

1 2 3 4 5 Unsatisfactory Marginal Satisfactory Very

Good Exceptional

Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains a serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being evaluated reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions.

The contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.

Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory

Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s benefit.

The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being evaluated was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor was effective.

The Contractor’s performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many (requirements) to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were highly effective.

CONTRACTOR PRESENT/PAST PERFORMANCE EVALUATION

1. How effective was the contractor at having adequate personnel to meet the requirement of the Performance Work Statement?

5. 4. ____3. ____2. ____1.

COMMENTS/REMARKS:

2. Were the contract employees knowledgeable and experienced in their position?

3 How well did contract personnel perform assigned duties?

4. Were the contract employees knowledgeable and experienced in their positions?

5. How well did the contractor correct deficiencies and valid customer complaints in a timely manner and pursuant to their quality control procedures?

6. Was the contractor responsive to contract changes?

7. How would you rate the contractor's overall performance?

8. Were Contract Discrepancy Reports (CDR) issued, Yes/No ____ Were they addressed appropriately? Yes/No ______ If so, how?

9. 10. Did contract personnel possess all required licensing and certifications prior to start date? Yes/No ____

10. Was the contractor ever issued a cure or show cause notice under the referenced contract? Yes/No ___

11. Would you award another contract to this contractor? Yes/No ____Please explain in "remarks”.

REMARKS:

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .