Attach 9 Self-Score Worksheet.xlsx
XLSX spreadsheet 31 KB Posted
- Attached to
- USALearning Training and Education Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- 24322622R0002
- Issued by
- Office of Personnel Management
About this file
This is a request for proposal for USALearning Training and Education Support Products and Services. The solicitation seeks proposals for analysis, design, development, implementation and evaluation services across three functional areas: formal and informal learning instructional system design and support; simulators, live and virtual training; and organizational training and planning. Offerors must submit proposals by May 20, 2022 via Microsoft Teams and include all required documentation. The requirement is a total small business set-aside with a NAICS code of 611430 and size standard of $12 million. The base period of performance is one five-year ordering period with two optional ordering periods. Awards will be made to the offerors representing the highest technically rated proposals with reasonable prices.
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
Show all 35
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
SELF-SCORING WORKSHEET
| ATTACHMENT 9 - SELF SCORING WORKSHEET | USALearning Training and Education Support Products and Services |
| 24322622R0002 |
| OFFEROR NAME: | ||||||||
| Scored Evaluation Criteria | Point Value | Enter YES or NO for each question | Score | *Do Not Use this Column* TEP Deduction Points | *Do Not Use this Column* TEP Revised Score | *Do Not Use this Column* TEP Notes for Deduction | Offeror Notes | |
| VOLUME 2 – TECHNICAL APPROACH | ||||||||
| TECHNICAL APPROACH: SAMPLE TASK ORDER (STO) PROPOSAL | ||||||||
| Does the STO proposal discuss in detail all requirements (FA 1-3), to include how the offeror would design, develop and deliver all product or services described? | 500 | 0 | 0 | |||||
| Is the proposal formatted in a manner that is easy to read, free of grammatical and punctuation errors and conveys information in a clear and concise manner? | 300 | 0 | 0 | |||||
| Does the staffing plan show each role and estimated hours for each? | 350 | 0 | 0 | |||||
| Is a WBS provided for each FA requirement; does it include all required items listed in the Performance Work Statement (PWS) | 350 | 0 | 0 | |||||
| Is a milestone schedule provided and does it include all required elements in the PWS? | 250 | 0 | 0 | |||||
| Is a separate cost proposal provided that included all requirements listed in the PWS? | 350 | 0 | 0 | |||||
| SUBTOTAL SCORE FOR STO | 0 | 0 | ||||||
| TECHNICAL APPROACH: PRODUCT DEMONSTRATION | ||||||||
| INSTRUCTIONS | ||||||||
| 1. Offeror will demonstrate one product example in a one hour demonstration. Project demo should be one selected from the list below: |
• Formal learning as self-paced interactive instructional module
• Instructional/serious learning game or application that runs independently over a mobile and/or desktop environment
• Informal learning activity or portal that utilizes xAPI predominantly for tracking of independent learning activities
2. The questions below will be answered in advance of the demonstration. The actual demonstration must support any YES responses provided for the questions below. Not all questions should be answered YES- only those questions that relate to the project being demonstrated would be answered YES.
3. Any YES response that is inadequately covered may result in deduction of points. Due to time limitations, not all elements or products below can be demonstrated. Offeror will choose projects that best support capabilities overview that can be conducted within 1-hour demonstration.
4. All *ASTERICK MARKED questions must be answered and COVERED as part of the demonstration.
| Offeror will select only one from the list below | ||||
| Project demo is utilized for formal learning as self-paced interactive instructional module that run over a customer LMS | 100 | 0 | 0 | |
| Project demo is an instructional/serious learning game or application that runs independently over a mobile and/or desktop environment | 125 | 0 | 0 | |
| Product demo is informal learning activity or portal that utilizes xAPI predominantly for tracking of independent learning activities | 150 | 0 | 0 | |
| Offeror will provide YES/NO responses to all the below questions. For all "YES" responses, include the video time marker in column F that indicates the start time for that topic demo | ||||
| *Is a project demo provided in a .mp4 format that is 60:00 minutes or less? | 500 | 0 | 0 | |
| * Is a separate Index/table of contents provided that shows topic references and times? | 500 | 0 | 0 | |
| *Is the project section 508 compliant? Offeror to show all code and design elements that support their response. (RESPONSE REQUIRED) | 500 | 0 | 0 | |
| Does the project use SCORM for compatibility/conformance with SCORM compliant LMS? | 150 | 0 | 0 | |
| Does the project use xAPI for tracking learner based activities? | 350 | 0 | 0 | |
| Was a review software/tool utilized for customer reviews/testing? | 200 | 0 | 0 | |
| Was the demonstration clearly and easy to follow? Was the provided index clear in referencing each topic in the SSW? | 500 | 0 | 0 | |
| Media Elements: Offeror will provide YES/NO responses to all the below questions as applicable to the project. It is not anticipated that all questions will be a "YES" response, and only items that will be included in the demo should be included as YES Reponses. For all "YES" responses, include the video time marker in column F that indicates the start time for that topic demo | ||||
| Does the demo include video as part of the content delivery? | 10 | 0 | 0 | |
| If video is used, is it close-captioned? | 15 | 0 | 0 | |
| Does the video utilize professional talent? | 10 | 0 | 0 | |
| Is the video in a streaming format, playable on multiple devices, including mobile? | 25 | 0 | 0 | |
| Is xAPI utilized to track the learning playback of videos? | 15 | 0 | 0 | |
| Is there audio only narration used to support static content? | 5 | 0 | 0 | |
| Does the audio narration utilize professional voice talent? | 10 | 0 | 0 | |
| Is there a text-script (visible or not-visible) that provides an identical script to the audio? | 15 | 0 | 0 | |
| Does the demo utilize 3-D animations? | 10 | 0 | 0 | |
| Are there 3-D background or elements that are composited with video scenes? (backgrounds with video actors chromakeyed) | 5 | 0 | 0 | |
| Does the demo utilize 2-D animations? | 5 | 0 | 0 | |
| Are photos utilized to support content or information presented? | 2 | 0 | 0 | |
| Are images alt-tagged? | 10 | 0 | 0 | |
| Are there branched screens or elements or additional roll-over content that provides additional learning information or context? | 5 | 0 | 0 | |
| Is role-playing utilized in part or all of the learning? | 30 | 0 | 0 | |
| Does the project incorporate social learning (peer-to-peer) as part of additional engagement? | 15 | 0 | 0 | |
| Is micro-learning utilized (as a standalone trackable activity) | 15 | 0 | 0 | |
| Is the learning activity-based? | 15 | 0 | 0 | |
| Does the micro-learning activity utilize xAPI for tracking? | 15 | 0 | 0 | |
| If xAPI is utilized, does it report the data to a LRS? | 15 | 0 | 0 | |
| If LRS is utilized, does it have a dashboard for viewing learner data? | 25 | 0 | 0 | |
| If xAPI and/or LRS is utilized, does it provide learner completion data to the LMS? | 30 | 0 | 0 | |
| Is a game-engine utilized for the project/demo? | 15 | 0 | 0 | |
| If yes to the above, is the game-engine open-source? | 10 | 0 | 0 | |
| Is the demo a mobile iOS or Android application? | 15 | 0 | 0 | |
| Does the demo or application utilize a browser-based environment, such as Chrome, Edge or Firefox? | 15 | 0 | 0 | |
| Does the demo include assessment questions? (T/F multiple choice) | 10 | 0 | 0 | |
| Does the learning assessment utilize scenarios? | 25 | 0 | 0 | |
| Is this a blended learning (i.e. distance, face-to-face, self-paced, non-self paced) solution? | 45 | 0 | 0 | |
| Instructional Methodologies, Models and Learning Theory Application. Describe, during the demo, which of below instructional systems design methods and/or learning theory applications was utilized as part of the design of the project demonstration. NOTE: not all of the below will apply to every project, only answer YES for those that apply and will be described during the demonstration. Any such description should include why and how the method or approach was used in the project. | ||||
| Behaviorism | 75 | 0 | 0 | |
| Social Constructivism | 75 | 0 | 0 | |
| Cognitive Constructivism | 75 | 0 | 0 | |
| Vygotsky's Theory of Learning | 75 | 0 | 0 | |
| Experiential learning theory | 75 | 0 | 0 | |
| Learning-by-doing learning theory | 75 | 0 | 0 | |
| Gagne's 9 Levels of Learning | 75 | 0 | 0 | |
| Problem-Based Learning | 75 | 0 | 0 | |
| Collaborative Learning Approach | 75 | 0 | 0 | |
| Action-based Learning Model | 75 | 0 | 0 | |
| Blooms Domains of Learning (Also known as Bloom's Taxonomy) | 75 | 0 | 0 | |
| Other - Specify during demo | 75 | 0 | 0 | |
| Project Methodology. Describe, during the demo, which of below project management approaches(s) was utilized as part of the design of the project demonstration. NOTE: not all of the below will apply to every project, only answer YES for those that apply and will be described during the demonstration. Any such description should include why and how the method or approach was used in the project. | ||||
| Analyze, Design, Develop, Implement, Evaluate (ADDIE) | 75 | 0 | 0 | |
| Agile | 75 | 0 | 0 | |
| Scrum | 75 | 0 | 0 | |
| Waterfall | 75 | 0 | 0 | |
| Critical Path | 75 | 0 | 0 | |
| Other - Specify during demo | 76 | 0 | 0 | |
| SUBTOTAL SCORE FOR TECHNICAL- PRODUCT DEMONSTRATION | 0 | 0 | ||
| VOLUME 2: TOTAL SCORE | 0 | 0 | ||
| VOLUME 3 – RELEVANT EXPERIENCE | ||||
| INSTRUCTIONS | ||||
| 1. Offeror will provide two (2) projects for FA1; three (3) projects for FA2; and one (1) project for FA3 for each category/subcategory below. |
2. All listed projects must be completed or ongoing within the past three (3) years from the date of solictation and must have a minimum obligated value (including base + exercised options) at time of proposal of at least $50,000 for work performed by the offeror team. If the Prime offeror was also the prime for the contract listed or first tier subcontractor was a small business, answer YES as applicable.
3. Each project may be listed only one time. If the project spans several FA topics below, select the one that represents the majority of the work.
4. If offeror was the Prime or first tier subcontractor was a small business, answer Yes for 100 additional points.
5. Prime Offeror must have provided at least 50% of the value of projects listed in this section. Value of contracts will be listed in the notes for every project. Please round numbers (no decimal points).
| Relevant Experience Projects: FUNCTIONA AREA 1 (FA1) - Formal/Informal Learning | ||||
| FORMAL LEARNING: List one Learning Projects by Contract #. All listed contracts must be accompanied by separate documentation (see Section _ Instructions to Offerors). | NOTES- name and value | |||
| Project 1: | 250 | 0 | 0 | |
| Was your company the Prime for this contract? | 100 | 0 | 0 | |
| INFORMAL LEARNING: List one Informal Learning Projects by Contract #. All listed contracts must be accompanied by separate documentation (see Section _ Instructions to Offerors). | ||||
| Project 2 | 250 | 0 | 0 | |
| Was your company the Prime for this contract? | 100 | 0 | 0 | |
| Relevant Experience Projects: FUNCTIONA AREA 2 (FA2) - Simulators & Live/Virtual | ||||
| LIVE & VIRTUAL: List one Live and Virtual Simulation Learning Projects by Contract #. | ||||
| Project 3: | 250 | 0 | 0 | |
| Was your company the Prime for this contract? | 100 | 0 | 0 | |
| PERSONAL COMPUTER LEARNING GAME List one Personal Computer Learning Game Projects by Contract #. | ||||
| Project 4: | 250 | 0 | 0 | |
| Was your company the Prime for this contract? | 100 | 0 | 0 | |
| MOBILE GAMES & APPS: List one Mobile Games and Apps Projects by Contract #. | ||||
| Project 5: | 250 | 0 | 0 | |
| Was your company the Prime for this contract? | 100 | 0 | 0 | |
| Relevant Experience Projects: FUNCTIONA AREA 3 (FA3) - Organizational Training and Planning | ||||
| ORGANIZATIONAL NEEDS ASSESSMENT: List one project from one of the categories below: |
a. Strategic Planning
b. Executive Coaching & Mentoring
c. Training Meeting & Conference Support
| Project 6: | 250 | 0 | 0 | |
| Was your company the Prime for this contract? | 100 | 0 | 0 | |
| Relevant Experience (Primary) Projects with OCONUS Locations | ||||
| Do you have project experience in supporting OCONUS Location Training? SCORING CREDIT IS LIMITED TO A MAXIMUM OF ONE PROJECTS ONLY. Project listed may be the same or different that work listed above. | ||||
| Project: | 100 | 0 | 0 | |
| Was your company the Prime for this contract? | 100 | 0 | 0 | |
| VOLUME 3: TOTAL SCORE | 0 | 0 | ||
| VOLUME 4 – PAST PERFORMANCE | ||||
| INSTRUCTIONS | ||||
| 1. For all projects listed as relevant experience indicate the CPARS or other past performance score per instructions provided in Attachment 2. |
2. All listed projects will be accompanied by CPARS record or Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ) (Attachment 12).
3. Add rows as needed for up to (6) contract past performances.
4. Projects must be the same as listed in Volume 3 section above. Do not provide additional projects not identified in Volume 3 or points will be deducted.
| List Each Project that has an Average Past Performance Score between 3.50 and 3.74. Type the word Yes or No in Column D for EACH project. | ||||
| 350 | 0 | 0 | ||
| 350 | 0 | 0 | ||
| List Each Project that has an Average Past Performance Score between 3.75 and 3.99. Type the word "Yes" or "No" in Column D for EACH project. | ||||
| 400 | 0 | 0 | ||
| 400 | 0 | 0 | ||
| List Each Project that has an Average Past Performance Score between 4.00 and 4.24. Type the word Yes or No in Column D for EACH project. | ||||
| 450 | 0 | 0 | ||
| 450 | 0 | 0 | ||
| List Each Project that has an Average Past Performance Score between 4.25 and 4.49. Type the word Yes or No in Column D for EACH project. | ||||
| 500 | 0 | 0 | ||
| 500 | 0 | 0 | ||
| List Each Project that has an Average Past Performance Score between 4.50 and 4.74. Type the word Yes or No in Column D for EACH project. | ||||
| 550 | 0 | 0 | ||
| 550 | 0 | 0 | ||
| List Each Project that has an Average Past Performance Score between 4.75 and 5.00. Type the word Yes or No in Column D for EACH project. | ||||
| 600 | 0 | 0 | ||
| 600 | 0 | 0 | ||
| VOLUME 4: TOTAL SCORE | 0 | 0 | ||
| VOLUME 5 – CERTIFICATIONS, AND CLEARANCES | ||||
| Does the Prime Offeror have any of the following? Type the word Yes or No in Column D for EACH System, Certification, or Clearance. | ||||
| ISO 9001 | 200 | 0 | 0 | |
| Secret FCL (If taking credit for Top Secret, answer No to Secret) | 200 | 0 | 0 | |
| Top Secret FCL | 400 | 0 | 0 | |
| DHS Trusted Tester (one or more individuals currently on staff) | 100 | 0 | 0 | |
| Project Management Professional (PMP) Certification (one or more individuals) | 100 | 0 | 0 | |
| Program or Portfolio management (PgMP)/ (PfMP) Certification (one or more individuals) | 150 | 0 | 0 | |
| Instructional Systems Design/Technologist with Master Degree (one or more individuals) | 100 | 0 | 0 | |
| Instructional Systems Design/Technologist with PhD or EdD (one or more individuals) | 150 | 0 | 0 | |
| VOLUME 5: TOTAL SCORE | 0 | 0 | ||
| TOTAL POINTS SCORED: | 0 | 0 |
ESRI_MAPINFO_SHEET
DO NOT EDIT
For Esri use only
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .