Attach 14 Sample Self-Score Worksheet.xlsx
XLSX spreadsheet 33 KB Posted
- Attached to
- USALearning Training and Education Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- 24322622R0002
- Issued by
- Office of Personnel Management
About this file
This is a solicitation for Training and Education Support Products and Services for the Office of Personnel Management (OPM). The contractor shall provide solutions for formal and informal learning instructional design and support services, simulators, live and virtual training, and organizational training and planning. The North American Industry Classification System code is 611430. This is a total small business set-aside.
Proposals are due by May 20, 2022 and must be submitted via Microsoft Teams. The period of performance is one five-year base period and two optional periods not exceeding five and six months respectively. The contractor must have a facility security clearance and past performance will be evaluated. Pricing will be fixed-price, time-and-materials, labor hour, and not-to-exceed travel. The contract type is indefinite-delivery/indefinite-quantity with both single and multiple awards contemplated.
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
Show all 35
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
SAMPLE SELF-SCORING WORKSHEET
| ATTACHMENT 14 - SAMPLE SELF SCORING WORKSHEET | USALearning Training and Education Support Products and Services | |
| This is a SAMPLE only. Offeror will utilize the Self-Scoring Worksheet template (Attachment 9) for completion of the SSW proposal | 24322622R0002 |
| OFFEROR NAME: ACME CORPORATION | ||||||||
| Scored Evaluation Criteria | Point Value | Enter YES or NO for each question | Score | *Do Not Use this Column* TEP Deduction Points | *Do Not Use this Column* TEP Revised Score | *Do Not Use this Column* TEP Notes for Deduction | The notes in this column are for sample purposes only. The Offeror should replace notes or delete as applicable | |
| VOLUME 2 – TECHNICAL APPROACH | ||||||||
| TECHNICAL APPROACH: SAMPLE TASK ORDER (STO) PROPOSAL | ||||||||
| Does the STO proposal discuss in detail all requirements (FA 1-3), to include how the offeror would design, develop and deliver all product or services described? | 500 | YES | 300 | 300 | See pages xx- xx of the STO proposal | |||
| Is the proposal formatted in a manner that is easy to read, free of grammatical and punctuation errors and conveys information in a clear and concise manner? | 300 | YES | 500 | 500 | ||||
| Does the staffing plan show each role and estimated hours for each? | 350 | YES | 350 | 350 | See attachment(s) x of the STO proposal | |||
| Is a WBS provided for each FA requirement; does it include all required items listed in the Performance Work Statement (PWS) | 350 | YES | 350 | 350 | See attachment(s) x of the STO proposal | |||
| Is a milestone schedule provided and does it include all required elements in the PWS? | 250 | YES | 250 | 250 | See page xx of the STO proposal | |||
| Is a separate cost proposal provided that included all requirements listed in the PWS? | 350 | YES | 350 | 350 | See separate cost proposal | |||
| SUBTOTAL SCORE FOR STO | 2100 | 2100 | ||||||
| TECHNICAL APPROACH: PRODUCT DEMONSTRATION | ||||||||
| INSTRUCTIONS | ||||||||
| 1. Offeror will demonstrate one product example in a one hour demonstration. Project demo should be one selected from the list below: |
• Formal learning as self-paced interactive instructional module
• Instructional/serious learning game or application that runs independently over a mobile and/or desktop environment
• Informal learning activity or portal that utilizes xAPI predominantly for tracking of independent learning activities
2. The questions below will be answered in advance of the demonstration. The actual demonstration must support any YES responses provided for the questions below. Not all questions should be answered YES- only those questions that relate to the project being demonstrated would be answered YES.
3. Any YES response that is inadequately covered may result in a deduction of points. Due to time limitations, not all elements or products below can be demonstrated. Offeror will choose projects that best support capabilities overview that can be conducted within 1-hour demonstration.
4. All *ASTERICK MARKED questions must be answered and COVERED as part of the demonstration.
| Offeror will select only one from the list below | ||||||
| Project demo is utilized for formal learning as self-paced interactive instructional module that run over a customer LMS | 100 | YES | 100 | 100 | ||
| Project demo is an instructional/serious learning game or application that runs independently over a mobile and/or desktop environment | 125 | YES | 125 | 125 | ||
| Product demo is informal learning activity or portal that utilizes xAPI predominantly for tracking of independent learning activities | 150 | YES | 150 | 150 | ||
| Offeror will provide YES/NO responses to all the below questions. For all "YES" responses, include the video time marker in column F that indicates the start time for that topic demo | ||||||
| *Is a project demo provided in a .mp4 format that is 60:00 minutes or less? | 500 | YES | 500 | 500 | If yes, provide screen capture showing end of video timeline | |
| * Is a separate Index/table of contents provided that shows topic references and times? | 500 | YES | 500 | 500 | In addition to printed TOC, provide time references for questions below | |
| *Is the project section 508 compliant? Offeror to show all code and design elements that support their response. (RESPONSE REQUIRED) | 500 | YES | 500 | 500 | Time marker 1:25 to 5:56 | |
| Does the project use SCORM for compatibility/conformance with SCORM compliant LMS? | 150 | YES | 150 | 150 | Time marker 3:55 | |
| Does the project use xAPI for tracking learner based activities? | 350 | NO | 0 | 0 | ||
| Was a review software/tool utilized for customer reviews/testing? | 200 | YES | 200 | 200 | Time marker 3:17 | |
| Was the demonstration clearly and easy to follow? Was the provided index clear in referencing each topic in the SSW? | 500 | YES | 500 | 500 | ||
| Media Elements: Offeror will provide YES/NO responses to all the below questions as applicable to the project. It is not anticipated that all questions will be a "YES" response, and only items that will be included in the demo should be included as YES Reponses. For all "YES" responses, include the video time marker in column F that indicates the start time for that topic demo | ||||||
| Does the demo include video as part of the content delivery? | 10 | YES | 10 | 10 | Time marker 23:13 - 25:35 | |
| If video is used, is it close-captioned? | 15 | YES | 15 | 15 | Time marker 23:13 - 25:35 | |
| Does the video utilize professional talent? | 10 | YES | 10 | 10 | Time marker 23:13 - 25:35 | |
| Is the video in a streaming format, playable on multiple devices, including mobile? | 25 | YES | 25 | 25 | Time marker 23:13 - 25:35 | |
| Is xAPI utilized to track the learning playback of videos? | 15 | NO | 0 | 0 | ||
| Is there audio only narration used to support static content? | 5 | YES | 5 | 5 | Time marker 5:57 to 19:04 | |
| Does the audio narration utilize professional voice talent? | 10 | NO | 0 | 0 | ||
| Is there a text-script (visible or not-visible) that provides an identical script to the audio? | 15 | YES | 15 | 15 | Time marker 5:57 to 19:04 | |
| Does the demo utilize 3-D animations? | 10 | YES | 10 | 10 | Time marker 33:22 to 40:44 | |
| Are there 3-D background or elements that are composited with video scenes? (backgrounds with video actors chromakeyed) | 5 | YES | 5 | 5 | Time marker 33:22 to 40:44 | |
| Does the demo utilize 2-D animations? | 5 | NO | 0 | 0 | ||
| Are photos utilized to support content or information presented? | 2 | YES | 2 | 2 | Time markers 2:41, 2:55, 5:32 | |
| Are images alt-tagged? | 10 | YES | 10 | 10 | Time markers 2:41, 2:55, 5:32 | |
| Are there branched screens or elements or additional roll-over content that provides additional learning information or context? | 5 | YES | 75 | 75 | Time markers 3 7:43, 8:21 | |
| Is role-playing utilized in part or all of the learning? | 30 | NO | 0 | 0 | ||
| Does the project incorporate social learning (peer-to-peer) as part of additional engagement? | 15 | NO | 0 | 0 | ||
| Is micro-learning utilized (as a standalone trackable activity) | 15 | NO | 0 | 0 | ||
| Is the learning activity-based? | 15 | YES | 15 | 15 | Time marker 47:14- 49:55 | |
| Does the micro-learning activity utilize xAPI for tracking? | 15 | NO | 0 | 0 | ||
| If xAPI is utilized, does it report the data to a LRS? | 15 | NO | 0 | 0 | ||
| If LRS is utilized, does it have a dashboard for viewing learner data? | 25 | NO | 0 | 0 | ||
| If xAPI and/or LRS is utilized, does it provide learner completion data to the LMS? | 30 | NO | 0 | 0 | ||
| Is a game-engine utilized for the project/demo? | 15 | NO | 0 | 0 | ||
| If yes to the above, is the game-engine open-source? | 10 | NO | 0 | 0 | ||
| Is the demo a mobile iOS or Android application? | 15 | NO | 0 | 0 | ||
| Does the demo or application utilize a browser-based environment, such as Chrome, Edge or Firefox? | 15 | YES | 15 | 15 | Time marker 55:21 | |
| Does the demo include assessment questions? (T/F multiple choice) | 10 | YES | 10 | 10 | Time marker 29:32 | |
| Does the learning assessment utilize scenarios? | 25 | NO | 0 | 0 | ||
| Is this a blended learning (i.e. distance, face-to-face, self-paced, non-self paced) solution? | 45 | YES | 45 | 45 | Time marker 53:47 | |
| Instructional Methodologies, Models and Learning Theory Application. Describe, during the demo, which of below instructional systems design methods and/or learning theory applications was utilized as part of the design of the project demonstration. NOTE: not all of the below will apply to every project, only answer YES for those that apply and will be described during the demonstration. Any such description should include why and how the method or approach was used in the project. | ||||||
| Behaviorism | 75 | NO | 0 | 0 | ||
| Social Constructivism | 75 | NO | 0 | 0 | ||
| Cognitive Constructivism | 75 | NO | 0 | 0 | ||
| Vygotsky's Theory of Learning | 75 | NO | 0 | 0 | ||
| Experiential learning theory | 75 | NO | 0 | 0 | ||
| Learning-by-doing learning theory | 75 | NO | 0 | 0 | ||
| Gagne's 9 Levels of Learning | 75 | YES | 75 | 75 | Time marker 50:15 to 54:44 | |
| Problem-Based Learning | 75 | NO | 0 | 0 | ||
| Collaborative Learning Approach | 75 | NO | 0 | 0 | ||
| Action-based Learning Model | 75 | NO | 0 | 0 | ||
| Blooms Domains of Learning (Also known as Bloom's Taxonomy) | 75 | NO | 0 | 0 | ||
| Other - Specify during demo | 75 | NO | 0 | 0 | ||
| Project Methodology. Describe, during the demo, which of below project management approaches(s) was utilized as part of the design of the project demonstration. NOTE: not all of the below will apply to every project, only answer YES for those that apply and will be described during the demonstration. Any such description should include why and how the method or approach was used in the project. | ||||||
| Analyze, Design, Develop, Implement, Evaluate (ADDIE) | 75 | YES | 75 | 75 | Discussed time marker 59:10 | |
| Agile | 75 | NO | 0 | 0 | ||
| Scrum | 75 | NO | 0 | 0 | ||
| Waterfall | 75 | NO | 0 | 0 | ||
| Critical Path | 75 | NO | 0 | 0 | ||
| Other - Specify during demo | 76 | YES | 75 | 75 | PRINCE2 method Time 15:59 | |
| SUBTOTAL SCORE FOR TECHNICAL- PRODUCT DEMONSTRATION | 3217 | 3217 | ||||
| VOLUME 2: TOTAL SCORE | 5317 | 5317 | ||||
| VOLUME 3 – RELEVANT EXPERIENCE | ||||||
| INSTRUCTIONS | ||||||
| 1. Offeror will provide two (2) projects for FA1; three (3) projects for FA2; and one (1) project for FA3 for each category/subcategory below. |
2. All listed projects must be completed or ongoing within the past three (3) years from date of solicitation and must have a minimum obligated value (include base + exercised options) at time of proposal of at least $50,000 for work performed by the offeror team. If the Prime offeror was also the prime for the contract listed or first teir subcontractor was a small business, answer YES as applicable.
3. Each project may be listed only one time. If the project spans several FA topics below, select the one that represents the majority of the work.
4. If offeror was the Prime or first tier subcontractor was a small business, answer Yes for 100 additional points.
5. Prime Offeror must have provided at least 50% of the value of projects listed in this section. Value of contracts will be listed in the notes for every project. Please round numbers (no decimal points).
| Relevant Experience Projects: FUNCTIONA AREA 1 (FA1) - Formal/Informal Learning | |||||
| FORMAL LEARNING: List one Learning Projects by Contract #. All listed contracts must be accompanied by separate documentation (see Section _ Instructions to Offerors). | NOTES- name and value | ||||
| Project 1: Contract No. ABCDEF-15-C-0001 | 250 | YES | 250 | 250 | eLearning Course Development- $1,870,000 |
| Was your company the Prime for this contract? | 100 | YES | 100 | 100 | |
| INFORMAL LEARNING: List one Informal Learning Projects by Contract #. All listed contracts must be accompanied by separate documentation (see Section _ Instructions to Offerors). | |||||
| Project 2 Contract No. GHIJ-15-C-0001 | 250 | YES | 250 | 250 | Social Learning engagement- $66,990 |
| Was your company the Prime for this contract? | 100 | NO | 0 | 0 | Was a sub under BIGcontractorInc. |
| Relevant Experience Projects: FUNCTIONA AREA 2 (FA2) - Simulators & Live/Virtual | |||||
| LIVE & VIRTUAL: List one Live and Virtual Simulation Learning Projects by Contract #. | |||||
| Project 3: Contract No. XYZ-15-C-0001 | 250 | YES | 250 | 250 | AV/VR augmentation support- $774,000 |
| Was your company the Prime for this contract? | 100 | YES | 100 | 100 | |
| PERSONAL COMPUTER LEARNING GAME List one Personal Computer Learning Game Projects by Contract #. | |||||
| Project 4: Contract No. BABAG-15-C-0001 | 250 | YES | 250 | 250 | Medic Activity Game- $8,900,000 |
| Was your company the Prime for this contract? | 100 | YES | 100 | 100 | |
| MOBILE GAMES & APPS: List one Mobile Games and Apps Projects by Contract #. | |||||
| Project 5: Contract No. GHIJ-15-C-0001 | 250 | YES | 250 | 250 | KnowitApp - $2,359,000 |
| Was your company the Prime for this contract? | 100 | NO | 0 | 0 | |
| Relevant Experience Projects: FUNCTIONA AREA 3 (FA3) - Organizational Training and Planning | |||||
| ORGANIZATIONAL NEEDS ASSESSMENT: List one project from one of the categories below: |
a. Strategic Planning
b. Executive Coaching & Mentoring
c. Training Meeting & Conference Support
| Project 6: Contract No. GHIJ-15-C-0001 | 250 | YES | 250 | 250 | XYZ Organization Assessment | |
| Was your company the Prime for this contract? | 100 | NO | 0 | 0 | ||
| Relevant Experience (Primary) Projects with OCONUS Locations | ||||||
| Do you have project experience in supporting OCONUS Location Training? SCORING CREDIT IS LIMITED TO A MAXIMUM OF ONE PROJECTS ONLY. Project listed may be the same or different that work listed above. | ||||||
| Project 6: Contract No. GHIJ-15-C-0001 | 100 | YES | 100 | 100 | Project 6 included OCONUS work | |
| Project N/A | 100 | NO | 0 | 0 | N/A | |
| VOLUME 3: TOTAL SCORE | 1900 | 1900 | ||||
| VOLUME 4 – PAST PERFORMANCE | ||||||
| INSTRUCTIONS | ||||||
| 1. For all projects listed as relevant experience indicate the CPARS or other past performance score per instructions provided in Attachment 2. |
2. All listed projects will be accompanied by CPARS record of Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ) (Attachment 12).
3. Add rows as needed for up to (6) contract past performances.
4. Projects must be the same as listed in Volume 3 section above. Do not proivde additional projects not identified in Volume 3 or points will be deducted.
| List Each Project that has an Average Past Performance Score between 3.50 and 3.74. Type the word Yes or No in Column D for EACH project. | ||||||
| (example) Project 4: Contract No. XYZ-15-C-0001 | 350 | YES | 350 | 350 | Project 4 Past Performance score was 3.50 | |
| 350 | NO | 0 | 0 | |||
| List Each Project that has an Average Past Performance Score between 3.75 and 3.99. Type the word "Yes" or "No" in Column D for EACH project. | ||||||
| (example) Project 6 Task Order No. ABCDEFG-0001 | 400 | YES | 400 | 400 | Project 6 Past Performance score was 3.90 | |
| 400 | NO | 0 | 0 | |||
| List Each Project that has an Average Past Performance Score between 4.00 and 4.24. Type the word Yes or No in Column D for EACH project. | ||||||
| (example) Project 2: Task Order No. JKLMNOP-0007 | 450 | YES | 450 | 450 | Project 2 Past Performance score was 4.20 | |
| 450 | NO | 0 | 0 | |||
| List Each Project that has an Average Past Performance Score between 4.25 and 4.49. Type the word Yes or No in Column D for EACH project. | ||||||
| (example) Project 3: Contract No. ABCDEF-15-C-0001 | 500 | YES | 500 | 500 | Project 3 Past Performance score was 4.35 | |
| 500 | NO | 0 | 0 | |||
| List Each Project that has an Average Past Performance Score between 4.50 and 4.74. Type the word Yes or No in Column D for EACH project. | ||||||
| (example) Project 1: Contract No. BABAG-15-C-0001 | 550 | YES | 550 | 550 | Project 1 Past Performance score was 4.60 | |
| 550 | NO | 0 | 0 | |||
| List Each Project that has an Average Past Performance Score between 4.75 and 5.00. Type the word Yes or No in Column D for EACH project. | ||||||
| (example) Project 5 Task Order No. PQRS-0007 | 600 | YES | 600 | 600 | Project 5 Past Performance score was 4.80 | |
| 600 | NO | 0 | 0 | |||
| VOLUME 4: TOTAL SCORE | 2850 | 2850 | ||||
| VOLUME 5 – CERTIFICATIONS, AND CLEARANCES | ||||||
| Does the Prime Offeror have any of the following? Type the word Yes or No in Column D for EACH System, Certification, or Clearance. | ||||||
| ISO 9001 | 200 | NO | 0 | 0 | ||
| Secret FCL (If taking credit for Top Secret, answer No to Secret) | 200 | NO | 0 | 0 | ||
| Top Secret FCL | 400 | YES | 400 | 400 | The Offeror has a Top Secret FCL | |
| DHS Trusted Tester (one or more individuals currently on staff) | 100 | YES | 100 | 100 | DHS Trusted Tester - John Smith cert attached | |
| Project Management Professional (PMP) Certification (one or more individuals) | 100 | YES | 100 | 100 | Project Mgr with PmP- Jane Doe attached | |
| Program or Portfolio management (PgMP)/ (PfMP) Certification (one or more individuals) | 150 | YES | 150 | 150 | Program Mgr with PfMP cert -Alex Rodriguez | |
| Instructional Systems Design/Technologist with Master Degree (one or more individuals) | 100 | YES | 100 | 100 | Carol King transcript attached | |
| Instructional Systems Design/Technologist with PhD or EdD (one or more individuals) | 150 | YES | 150 | 150 | David Gilmour transcript attached | |
| VOLUME 5: TOTAL SCORE | 1000 | 1000 | ||||
| TOTAL POINTS SCORED: | 11,067 | 11,067 |
ESRI_MAPINFO_SHEET
DO NOT EDIT
For Esri use only
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .