Attach 10 Past Performance Questionnaire 07092025.pdf

ATTACHMENT

PPQ Page 1 of 4

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE (PPQ)

CONTRACT INFORMATION (Contractor to complete Blocks 1-4)

1. Offeror Information Company Name:

Address: Unique Entity Identifier Number:

Phone Number:

Point of Contact: Contact Phone Number:

POC email address:

2. Work Performed as: Prime Contractor Subcontractor Other (Explain) Percent of project work performed:

If subcontractor, provide the company name of the prime contractor, its address, its phone number, company point of contact, their phone number, and their email address:

3. Contract Information Contract Number:

Delivery/Task Order Number (if applicable):

Contract Type: Firm-Fixed-Price Time-and-Materials Other (Please specify):

Contract Description:

Contract Location:

Award Date (mm/dd/yy):

Contract Completion Date (mm/dd/yy):

Original Contract Price, including Options:

Final Contract Price (to include modifications, if applicable): Explain Differences:

4. Project Description:

Complexity of Work High Med Routine How is this project relevant to the requirements of Solicitation No. 1333ND25RNB190009? (Please provide details such as similar equipment, requirements, conditions, etc.)

CLIENT INFORMATION (Client to complete Blocks 5-8)

5. Client Information

Company Name:

Company Point of Contact and Title:

Phone Number:

Email Address:

6. Describe the client’s role in the project:

7. Date Questionnaire was completed (mm/dd/yy):

8. Client’s Signature:

PPQ Page 2 of 4

ADJECTIVE RATINGS AND DEFINITIONS TO BE USED TO BEST REFLECT

YOUR EVALUATION OF THE CONTRACTOR’S PERFORMANCE

RATING DEFINITION NOTE

(E) Exceptional Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government/Owner’s benefit.

The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor was highly effective.

An Exceptional rating is appropriate when the Contractor successfully performed multiple significant events that were of benefit to the Government/Owner. A singular benefit, however, could be of such magnitude that it alone constitutes an Exceptional rating. Also, there should have been NO significant weaknesses identified.

(VG) Very Good Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s/Owner’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.

A Very Good rating is appropriate when the Contractor successfully performed a significant event that was a benefit to the Government/Owner. There should have been no significant weaknesses identified.

(S) Satisfactory Performance meets minimum contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory.

A Satisfactory rating is appropriate when there were only minor problems, or major problems that the contractor recovered from without impact to the contract. There should have been NO significant weaknesses identified. Per DOD policy, a fundamental principle of assigning ratings is that contractors will not be assessed a rating lower than Satisfactory solely for not performing beyond the requirements of the contract.

(M) Marginal Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions. The contractor's proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.

A Marginal is appropriate when a significant event occurred that the contractor had trouble overcoming which impacted the Government/Owner.

(U) Unsatisfactory Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains serious problem(s) for which the contractor's corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

An Unsatisfactory rating is appropriate when multiple significant events occurred that the contractor had trouble overcoming and which impacted the Government/Owner. A singular problem, however, could be of such serious magnitude that it alone constitutes an unsatisfactory rating.

(N) Not Applicable No information or did not apply to your contract/order Ratings are not going to be applied to a particular area for evaluation

PPQ Page 3 of 4

TO BE COMPLETED BY CLIENT

PLEASE CIRCLE THE ADJECTIVE RATING WHICH BEST REFLECTS

YOUR EVALUATION OF THE CONTRACTOR’S PAST PERFORMANCE.

1. QUALITY:

a) Quality of technical data/report preparation efforts. E VG S M U N

b) Ability to meet quality standards specified for technical performance. E VG S M U N

c) Timeliness/effectiveness of contract problem resolution without extensive customer guidance. E VG S M U N

d) Adequacy/effectiveness of quality control program and adherence to contract quality assurance requirements (without adverse effect on performance).

E

VG

S

M

U

N

2. SCHEDULE/TIMELINESS OF PERFORMANCE:

a) Compliance with delivery/completion schedules including any significant intermediate milestones. (If liquidated damages were assessed or the schedule was not met, please address below)

b) Rate the contractor’s use of available resources to accomplish tasks identified in the contract. E VG S M U N

3. CUSTOMER SATISFACTION:

a) To what extent were the end users satisfied with the quality of the contractor’s work?

E VG S M U N

b) Contractor was reasonable and cooperative in dealing with staff (including the ability to successfully resolve disagreements/disputes; responsiveness to administrative reports, businesslike and communication).

c) To what extent was the contractor cooperative, businesslike, and concerned with the interests of the customer? E VG S M U N

d) Overall customer satisfaction, considering a, b and c above. E VG S M U N

4. MANAGEMENT/ PERSONNEL/LABOR:

a) Effectiveness of on-site contractor management, including management of subcontractors, materials, and/or labor force? E VG S M U N

b) Timeliness of recruiting, hiring, and retaining a qualified company employees for this effort.

E VG S M U N

c) Government Property Control. E VG S M U N

d) Knowledge/expertise demonstrated by contractor personnel. E VG S M U N

e) Demonstrated ability to simultaneously manage multiple projects with multiple disciplines. E VG S M U N

f) Demonstrated ability to assimilate and incorporate changes in requirements and/or priority, including planning, execution and response to client changes. E VG S M U N

g) Effectiveness of overall company management (including ability to effectively lead, manage and control the company’s compliance with project requirements).

E VG S M U N

5. SAFETY/SECURITY:

a) To what extent did the contractor maintain an environment of safety, adhere to its approved safety plan, and respond to safety issues? (Includes:

following the users rules, regulations, and requirements regarding housekeeping, safety, correction of noted deficiencies, etc.)

PPQ Page 4 of 4

b) Contractor complied with all security requirements for the project and personnel security requirements. E VG S M U N

6. GENERAL:

a) Demonstrated ability to successfully respond to emergency and/or surge situations (including notifying COR, PM or Contracting Officer in a timely manner regarding urgent contractual issues).

b) Compliance with contractual terms/provisions (explain if specific issues). E VG S M U N

c) Would you work with this firm again? (If no, please explain below) Yes No

d) In summary, provide an overall rating for the work performed by this contractor. E VG S M U N

Please provide responses to the questions above (if applicable) and/or additional remarks. Furthermore, please provide a brief narrative addressing specific strengths, weaknesses, deficiencies, or other comments which may assist our office in evaluating performance risk (please attach additional pages if necessary):