Att (3) QASP Appendix 1-Performance Parameters.pdf

Vessel Maintenance Technical Achievements

UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD VERY GOOD EXCELLENT

1 Technical Performance-maint.c5.1.1.1;

reg compliancec5.1.1.2;

inventory counts c5.1.8.4.10;

timely repairs c5.1.8.4.2;

Staffing c5.3.3;

safetyc5.3.3.8

No scheduled maintenance completed; 3 or more B checks over due; The Contractor is constantly deficient in inventory controls/ documentation; Inventory and Safety processes are routinely neglected;

There were two or more major Safety violations/ infractions; Staffing goals have not been met after repeated requests by the Government;

Contractor has failed to meet overall cost, schedule, and technical performance requirements of the contract as defined and measured against the criteria in the award fee plan for the award-fee evaluation period.

Most scheduled maintenance completed; 1 to 3 B checks over due;

The Contractor has been minimal in inventory controls/ documentation;

Inventory and Safety processes have been followed, but with Government interaction; There was one major and at least one minor Safety violation/ infraction; Staffing goals are being met with difficulty; Contractor has met overall cost, schedule, and technical performance requirements of the contract as defined and measured against the criteria in the award-fee plan for the award-fee evaluation period.

All scheduled maintenance completed with in 1 day of due date;

No B checks over due ; The Contractor has performed good in inventory controls and processes;

There was no major and only one minor Safety violation/ infraction;

Staffing goals are being met easily;

Contractor has exceeded some of the significant award-fee criteria and has met overall cost, schedule, and technical performance requirements of the contract as defined and measured against the criteria in the award-fee plan for the award-fee evaluation period.

All scheduled maintenance completed prior to due date; No B checks are over due ; The Contractor has performed very well in inventory controls and processes; No maintenance actions have bordered on being unsafe; There have been no major or minor Safety violations/ infractions; Staffing goals are met and future staffing solutions are identified; Contractor has exceeded many of the significant award-fee criteria and has met overall cost, schedule, and technical performance requirements of the contract as defined and measured against the criteria in the award-fee plan for the award-fee evaluation period.

All scheduled maintenance completed prior to due date and future potential scheduled maintenance issues have been identified; No over due B checks; The Contractor has performed exceptionally well at inventory control and followed all procedures; Safety procedures have been followed; No major or minor Safety violations/ infractions; Staffing goals are met and certified mechanics/ drivers (if needed); Contractor has exceeded almost all of the significant award-fee criteria and has met overall cost, schedule, and technical performance requirements of the contract as defined and measured against the criteria in the award-fee plan for the award-fee evaluation period.

2 Timeliness- OR Ratec5.1.1.5;

transportingc5.1.3;

deploymentc5.1.14.1

75%-84% monthly average of total vessel availability; Special taskings (testing, NSSEs, special operations,etc) are not being met

Less than 80% of vessels at any maintenance location (graded individually, not program-wide) adhere to the maintenace schedule agreed upon by the government at time of induction, with the exception of approved growth work.

85%-90% monthly average of total vessel availability; Special taskings (testing, NSSEs, special operations,etc) are being met with difficulty

80-84% of vessels at any maintenance location (graded individually, not program-wide) adhere to the maintenace schedule agreed upon by the government at time of induction, with the exception of approved growth work.

91%-93% monthly average of total vessel availability; Special taskings (testing, NSSEs, special operations,etc) are being met with minor difficulties

85-89% of vessels at any maintenance location (graded individually, not program-wide) adhere to the maintenace schedule agreed upon by the government at time of induction, with the exception of approved growth work.

94%-97% monthly average of total vessel availability; Special taskings (testing, NSSEs, special operations,etc) are being met with no difficulties

90-94% of vessels at any maintenance location (graded individually, not program-wide) adhere to the maintenace schedule agreed upon by the government at time of induction, with the exception of approved growth work.

98%-100% monthly average of total vessel availability; Special taskings (testing, NSSEs, special operations,etc) are being completed with ease.

95% of vessels at any maintenance location (graded individually, not program-wide) adhere to the maintenace schedule agreed upon by the government at time of induction, with the exception of approved growth work.

3 Cost Control cost center reporting c5.3.3.7

The Contractor has been ineffective and unresponsive in controlling and managing costs; cost overruns have occurred that should have been identified. Over 15% of warranty claims not submitted or followed through to completion in accordance with the PWS.

The Contractor has been controlling and managing costs in accordance with the contract requirements; cost overruns have occurred that should have been identified, but have been minor. Less than 10% of warranty claims not submitted or followed through to completion in accordance with the PWS.

The Contractor has managed costs effectively, yet remained within contract constraints; No cost overruns have occurred. Less than 5% of warranty claims not submitted or followed through to completion in accordance with the PWS.

The Contractor has managed costs to a savings of expected expenditures;

The Contractor has demonstrated aggressive cost savings processes that have saved the Government from unnecessary expenditures. Less than 3% of warranty claims not submitted or followed through to completion in accordance with the PWS.

The Contractor has managed costs below expected levels while not substitituing quality. The Contractor has demonstrated aggressive cost savings in procurements, and budget controls. Followed through with every warranty claim.

4 Business Relations COTR is not satisfied with the Contractor and how they are performing to the contract

COTR is minimally satisfied with the Contractor and how they are performing to the contract

COTR is satisfied that the Contractor is performing to the level of requirements of the contract.

COTR is satisfied that the Contractor is performing above the level of requirements of the contract.

COTR is extremely satisfied with how the contractor is performing to the requirements of the contract.

Point Scale Points Points Points Points Points 0 0-50 51-75 76-90 91-100

Award Fee Percentage Earned 0% 1% - 50% 51% - 75% 76% - 90% 91% - 100%