Att 0004_Bidders Library Info - SAMPLE PWSs for Task Orders.docx

Examples of Performance Work Statements based on previous contracts that represent possible future task order requirements

Example 1:

Manufacturing Technology Maturation Plan for Future Rotorcraft

1.0 PURPOSE:

In an ongoing effort to reduce sustainment costs and improve the affordability of both legacy and future rotorcraft systems, the US Army Program Executive Office – Aviation (PEO AVN) seeks to develop a strategic investment strategy for the identification, development and potential implementation of advanced manufacturing technologies and processes. In support of PEO AVN desires, the Manufacturing Science and Technology Division (ManTech) within the Engineering Directorate (ED) of the U.S. Army Combat Capabilities Development Command (CCDC)) propose to execute a Manufacturing Technology Maturation Plan for Future Rotorcraft. Top level goals for this plan include:

· Accelerate the development, transition and use of innovative, cross-cutting technologies for implementation opportunities for future/legacy rotorcraft variants

· Investigate/identify enabling technologies along with their investment needs and potential timeframes of application with a roadmap

· Targeted technology will include candidates that offer pervasive benefits of reducing risk/cost to multiple variants and configurations

· Leverage currently funded CCDC ManTech efforts such as “Additive Manufacturing for Repair of High Value Aviation Assets” and “Direct Digital Manufacturing”, in addition to previous work done for the Future Vertical Lift – Business Case Analysis (FVL-BCA) Producibility Team, America Makes, Digital Manufacturing and Design Innovation Institute (DMDII) and the Institute for Advanced Composites Manufacturing Innovation (IACMI).

The purpose of this Task Order is to accelerate the development, transition and use of innovative, cross-cutting technologies by developing and delivering a technology maturation plan for implementation opportunities within future rotorcraft variants. The plan shall include identification of technologies with specific advancement milestones and timelines to meet future rotorcraft design deadlines. The team shall leverage previous efforts that assessed the advanced manufacturability/producibility techniques and their potential benefits to the affordability of future rotorcraft.

This plan shall identify enabling technologies along with their investment needs and potential timeframes of application. This analysis and road mapping exercise should look beyond the three candidates presented via the FVL-BCA (additive manufacturing, digital thread and advanced composites) and consider other topic areas that may be of interest such as sensors, avionics, automation, and engine advancements. Targeted technologies shall include broad disciplines that offer pervasive benefits of reducing risk/cost to multiple variants and configurations.

The investigation and evaluation of state-of-the-art manufacturing technologies, techniques and processes shall occur through caucus and road mapping activities with PEO Aviation and the aerospace industry leaders in major technology thrust areas. The contractor shall facilitate road mapping workshops with industry participants to identify the critical technologies related to future aircraft. The process includes site visits and reviews with industry partners to better understand ongoing efforts to enhance the affordability of new technologies for both legacy and developmental systems including industry Internal Research and Development (IRAD) efforts. The effort will include both short and long term potential technological developments.

The proposed effort focuses on four primary components in a two-phase approach:

1) US Army workshops

2) Industry/OEM/supplier workshops

3) Analysis/Recommendations

4) Roadmap, Final Report, Final Review

Further detail on each of these components can be found in Section 3.0 of this Performance Work Statement (PWS).

2.0 APPLICABLE DOCUMENTS: Applicable top-level documents are identified by number, version, title, date, and category in the Document Summary List (DSL), an attachment to the Basic Contract. The document versions specified on the DSL take precedence over the generic references (without revision letters) cited in the PWS.

The contractor shall prepare and deliver documentation in accordance with (IAW) the quantities and schedules specified in the Contract Data Requirements List (DD Forms 1423) attached to the Basic Contract PWS

3.0 PERFORMANCE REQUIREMENTS: The work required by this task order shall be performed IAW this PWS and in accordance with the terms and conditions of the basic contract. Work shall be performed IAW Sections 3.1 (Program Management) and 3.2.1 Manufacturing Assessments within the basic PWS.

3.1 Program Management

Perform Program Management IAW paragraph 3.1 of the basic PWS on the efforts that support the PEO AVN staff. The contractor shall manage costs and schedules and prepare monthly technical and financial reports while conducting regular project reviews with the PEO AVN staff.

3.1.1 Program Management Plan and Schedule

The contractor shall provide a program management plan in support of the proposed effort. The program management plan provides an overview of the project, scope of the effort, objectives and location of each workshop, deliverables, proposed schedule, and the organization completing the effort. The contractor shall develop a program management plan IAW DI-MGMT-81797. The first draft is due NLT 5 working days prior to kickoff meeting, and the final is due NLT 10 working days after completion of the kickoff meeting.

3.2 Manufacturing Assessment and Roadmap Development

PHASE I

In accordance with paragraph 3.2.1 of the general PWS, the contractor shall conduct the following, supporting the development of a Manufacturing Technology Maturation Plan for Future Rotorcraft in a two-phase approach. Phase I objectives include:

a. Kickoff Meeting. The contractor shall host a kickoff meeting NLT 30 calendar days after contract award. The kickoff should be conducted at Redstone Arsenal. The kickoff meeting will provide an overview of the project and proposed schedule, the team completing the effort, objectives, proposed locations for workshops, and deliverables. The contractor shall develop and deliver draft briefing materials NLT 5 working days prior to the kickoff meeting. Following completion of the kickoff meeting, the contractor shall develop and deliver meeting minutes NLT 10 working days after completion of the meeting.

b. Army Workshops. Using the approved roadmapping process, the contractor shall host two initial workshops and one Phase I final workshop (see 3.2 g below) with Army personnel and subject matter experts to develop a manufacturing technology roadmap and identify opportunities for the Future Vertical Lift (FVL) program and aircraft. Each Army workshop shall be 2-3 days and conducted at Redstone Arsenal. The contractor shall develop a summary and minutes for each Army workshop and deliver the minutes NLT 10 working days after completion of the workshop. Upon completion of the second Army workshop, the contractor shall compile the workshop results and develop concept posters needed to support roadmap development. Draft concept posters developed following Army workshops shall be delivered NLT 5 working days prior to the Phase I review.

c. Industry/OEM/Supplier Workshops. The contractor shall conduct two (2) manufacturing technology roadmapping workshops among manufacturers of rotary aircraft and, where feasible, their supply bases. The contractor shall develop a summary and minutes for each industry workshop and deliver the minutes NLT 10 working days after completion of the workshop. Upon completion of the second industry workshop, the contractor shall compile the workshop results and develop concept posters needed to support the overall roadmap development. Draft concept posters developed following industry workshops shall be delivered NLT 5 working days prior to the Phase I project review.

d. Phase I Review with Government. The contractor shall host a review of the first two Government Workshops as well as the first two (2) Industry Workshops NLT 60 days after completion of the second Industry workshop. This review will provide an overview and summary of the workshop results and present the draft concept poster developed from a consolidation of Army and Industry workshops. The contractor shall develop briefing materials and deliver draft briefing materials NLT 5 working days prior to the Phase I review. The contractor shall develop and deliver the minutes NLT 10 working days after completion of this review.

PHASE II

In accordance with paragraph 3.2.1 of the general PWS, the contractor shall conduct the following, supporting the development of a Manufacturing Technology Maturation Plan for Future Rotorcraft in the second phase of a two-phase approach. Phase II objectives include:

a. Industry/OEM/Supplier Workshops. The contractor shall conduct four (4) manufacturing technology roadmapping workshops among manufacturers of rotary aircraft and/or rotary aircraft subsystems. The contractor shall develop a summary and minutes for each industry workshop and deliver the minutes NLT 10 working days after completion of the workshop. Upon completion of the final industry workshop, the contractor shall compile the workshop results and develop concept posters needed to support the overall roadmap development. Draft concept posters developed following industry workshops shall be delivered NLT 5 working days prior to the Phase I project review.

b. Phase II Review with Government. The contractor shall host a review of the four (4) Industry Workshops completed in Phase II NLT 60 days after completion of the final Industry workshop. This review will provide an overview and summary of the workshop results and present the draft concept poster developed from a consolidation of Army and Industry workshops. The contractor shall develop briefing materials and deliver draft briefing materials NLT 5 working days prior to the Phase II review. The contractor shall develop and deliver the minutes NLT 10 working days after completion of this review.

c. Analysis and Recommendations. The contractor shall analyze the results, information, and data gathered from the Army and Industry workshops and develop recommendations that will be provided in the final roadmap and report and presented at the final project review.

d. Roadmap. The contractor shall compile the results of all workshops, reviews, and draft concept posters into a manufacturing technology roadmap for FVL. The roadmap should identify manufacturing technology gaps, key areas where manufacturing technology needs to mature, critical timelines associated with technology maturation in key areas, and investment opportunities and requirements to achieve FVL program goals and milestones. The contractor shall develop a draft roadmap and deliver NLT 5 working days prior to the final Army workshop. The final roadmap shall be delivered NLT 30 days following completion of the final project review.

e. Final Project Review. The contractor shall host a final project review 90 days after completion of the Phase II review with Government. The final project review will provide an overview and summary of all of the workshop results and effort completed prior to the final project review and present the manufacturing technology roadmap. The contractor shall develop briefing materials and deliver draft briefing materials NLT 5 working days prior to the final project review. Following completion of the final project review, the contractor shall develop meeting minutes and deliver the minutes NLT 10 working days after completion of the review.

3.4 Task Order Deliverables

3.4.1 The contractor shall prepare a Task Order Progress Report – Monthly Technical Progress Report IAW A005.

3.4.2 The contractor shall prepare a Task Order Monthly Financial Report IAW A003.

3.4.3 The contractor shall prepare a Task Order Final Report IAW A006. Final Report shall summarize the entire project effort, findings, conclusions and recommendations for PEO AVN and FVL Product Office. A draft final report shall be provided NLT 30 days prior to project completion, with a signed version provided NLT 5 working days prior to project completion.

3.4.4 The contractor shall prepare briefing materials IAW DI-MGMT-81605, in support of kickoff, Army/Industry workshops and required program reviews.

3.4.4.1 The contractor shall prepare workshop meeting summaries and minutes IAW DI-ADMN-81505 in support of kickoff, Army/Industry workshops and program reviews.

3.4.5 The contractor shall compile workshop results and develop concept posters supporting overall roadmap development IAW DI-MISC-80508B.

3.4.6 The contractor shall compile the results of all workshops, reviews, and draft concept posters into a manufacturing technology roadmap for FVL IAW DI-MISC-80508B.

4.0 TRAVEL: Travel shall be required in the performance of this project to various US Army and OEM/industry locations.

No OCONUS travel is authorized or is anticipated in performance of this PWS. All travel must be approved in advance and in writing by the COR.

5.0 SECURITY: The contractor will not be required to have access to classified information or classified manufacturing locations. The contractor shall not use foreign national employees to perform the efforts of this task. All DoD contractor’s with security clearances must receive annual Threat awareness and reporting training IAW AR 381-12.

The contractor shall develop an OPSEC Standing Operating Procedure (SOP)/Plan within 90 calendar days of contract award, to be reviewed and approved by the responsible Government OPSEC officer, per AR 530-1, Operations Security. This SOP/Plan will include the government's critical information, why it needs to be protected, where it is located, who is responsible for it, and how to protect it.

Level I OPSEC Awareness Training: Per AR 530-1, Operations Security, all contractor employees, to include subcontractor employees shall complete Level I OPSEC Awareness Training within 30 calendar days of their reporting for duty. All subcontractors shall take the Level 1 OPSEC Awareness Training located at the below website and print the certificates demonstrating completion. The contractor shall submit certificates of completion for each affected contractor employee and subcontractor employee, to the COR, within 10 calendar days after completion of training by all employees and subcontractor personnel. OPSEC awareness training is available at the following website: https://securityawareness.usalearning.gov/opsec/index.htm

6.0. INFORMATION ASSURANCE/ANTI-TERRORISM/OPERATIONS SECURITY: Contractor employees shall not support IA/AT/OPSEC functions and will not be required to access Government networks under this contract. The contractor will require access to federally-controlled facilities. Prior to these visits, appropriate and necessary visitor information and certifications will be provided to the facility in the proper and required format.

7.0 GOVERNMENT FURNISHED PROPERTY (GFP): N/A

8.0 GOVERNMENT FURNISHED INFORMATION (GFI): N/A

9.0 PERFORMANCE OBJECTIVES/METRICS: The Government’s assessment of the contractor’s performance in achieving performance objectives shall utilize the standards, acceptable quality levels, and surveillance methods described in the Performance Requirements Summary matrix set forth in Basic Contract Appendix A.

10.0 SCHEDULE:

The project tasks in Phase I shall be completed 9 months after task order award. The project tasks in Phase II shall be completed 12 months after Phase II tasks have been initiated. The final report for the Phase I and Phase II tasks shall be delivered within 30 calendar days of the end of the technical performance for the task order.

11.0 ADDITIONAL INSTRUCTIONS:

It is requested that the cost estimates and labor estimates be broken out to define how the 2 Phases of the project will be executed. The Phase I and Phase II efforts will be incrementally funded with AMRDEC RDTE funding.

Example 2:

ManTech for Complex Missile Seekers – Lens and Component Centering/Cable Routing Improvements

1.0 BACKGROUND: Although dual mode seeker/sensor missile systems have demonstrated technical superiority and performance over all other autonomous fire-and-forget platforms, cost remains the Achilles' heel that will limit the Army's ability to deploy adequate quantities of these missile systems in the Army's strategic battlefield plan for quick and decisive victory. The staggering costs of dual mode seekers, the heart of the missile system, results from vastly inadequate design rules, inaccurate and non-uniform circuit models, labor intensive assembly and fabrication, inadequate manufacturing technique/processes and time consuming test requirements. The inability to accurately design and model each sensor as an integrated entity operating independently while at the same time requiring both sensors to maintain system performance compatibility dictates the development of individual specific function circuits that often have conflicting requirements when both sensors are integrated together to form the dual mode seeker/sensor. Each specific sensor contains critical components that require delicate handling, extremely precise placement, and critical alignment by highly skilled and talented technicians and engineers. These specific functional elements are assembled by semi-automated and manual methods to form more complex seeker/sensor functional assemblies. The final dual mode seeker/sensor assembly is a compilation of many different types of circuits that perform many different types of complex operations and functions. The integration and assembly of specification compliant circuits and higher level assemblies into a given configuration rarely results in a first pass success. The next logical step is to develop affordable manufacturing/technical solutions for complex dual mode missile seekers/sensors.

2.0 PURPOSE: Currently, there is an Army ManTech project being managed by AMRDEC Engineering Directorate MST Division intended to develop affordable manufacturing/technical solutions for dual mode seeker/sensors. Rather than use a generic seeker/sensor requirement as the product model, the Joint Air to Ground Missile (JAGM) dual mode seeker/sensor will be used. The JAGM’s dual mode seeker/sensor will provide a real requirement and customer for the manufacturing/technical solutions to be developed under this technical requirement. The JAGM dual mode seeker/sensor is comprised of a semi-active laser and a millimeter wave sensor. The successful completion of the multiyear Army ManTech project will develop the manufacturing/technical solutions to ensure the JAGM Missile System achieves the Army's mandated and approved cost reduction goals. The first step in this process was an assessment of the current manufacturing technology approach and determine opportunities for improvement in cost and project risk. This task order is intended to execute selected opportunities for manufacturing improvements.

3.0 APPLICABLE DOCUMENTS: Applicable top level documents are identified by number, version, title, date, and category in the Document Summary List (DSL), an attachment to the Basic Contract. The document versions specified on the DSL take precedence over the generic references (without revision letters) cited in the PWS.

The contractor shall prepare and deliver documentation in accordance with (IAW) the quantities and schedules specified in section 4.1.1 of this PWS.

4.0 PERFORMANCE REQUIREMENTS: The work required by this task order shall be performed IAW this PWS and in accordance with the terms and conditions of the basic contract. Work shall be performed IAW Sections 3.1 (Program Management), 3.2.2 Manufacturing Process Analysis and Development, and 3.2.3 Process Demonstrations within the basic PWS.

4.1 Program Management

Perform Program Management IAW paragraph 3.1 of the basic PWS on efforts that support AMRDEC.

The contractor shall provide overall program management for the effort and shall provide technical support to AMRDEC engineers and technicians with personnel experienced in the engineering, manufacture, and testing of JAGM missile sensor components.

The contractor shall provide a final report documenting:

· Technology Assessment and Identification

· Selected solutions and impact

4.1.1 Program Management Deliverables

Prepare a Task Order Progress Report – Monthly Progress Report IAW A005.

Prepare a Task Order Monthly Financial Report IAW A003.

Prepare a Task Order Final Report IAW A006. The contractor shall include in the Final Report a definitive Manufacturing Technology Assessment report, based upon the requirements of paragraph 4.2 concerning the JAGM’s seeker/sensors potential in achieving the benchmarking metrics while sustaining high rate production.

Quarterly Reviews - Contractor shall conduct quarterly program reviews either at the contractor's facility or the subcontractor’s facility.

4.2 JAGM Dual Mode Seeker Manufacturing Improvement Efforts

In accordance with paragraph 3.2.2 of the basic PWS, electronics and missile sensor manufacturing processes shall be analyzed in order that the process output will be realized in the most efficient manner obtainable. In accordance with paragraph 3.2.3 of the basic PWS, the contractor shall validate manufacturing technology solutions utilizing in-house capabilities and industry partners’ process demonstrations. Concepts shall be tested and optimized to include prototype components.

4.2.1 Lens and Component Centering Improvement – Project focus will be on Immersion Lens centering and Modern Integrated Detector Preamp Assembly (MIDPA) centering. Currently, excess time is being spent centering the Immersion Lens and MIDPA in the JAGM seeker subassembly process. The objective is to improve lens and component centering processes to reduce process time while also reducing variability in assembly procedures. The effort shall provide repeatable improved methods for control of position, centration and tilt of optics and associated devices.

Specific tasks shall include a review of the current processes, research of lens centering techniques and tooling approaches, building and evaluating prototypes, inspecting to ensure reduction in variability in assembly procedures and finalizing a solution. At the conclusion of the effort a transition plan shall be provided.

The quantifiable metrics shall include reduction in time spent centering the lens & MIDPA in the JAGM subassembly steps, improvement in throughput, and improvement in process yield. In addition to these metrics, included shall be improved methods for repeatable and reproducible control of position, assembly procedures, centration and tilt of optics and other devices.

4.2.2 Complex Seeker Cable Routing – Project focus will be on improvement of the seeker cable routing process to reduce process time and rework. Currently excessive process time is spent preparing and installing seeker gimbal cable and harness assemblies. In addition, excessive rework occurs due to problems associated with the cable routing process. The objective is to improve the cable routing process and reduce test failures at the next higher assembly level caused by excess levels of cable tension and friction, which requires teardown and rework of the seeker.

Specific tasks shall include identification of potential interference issues, review of current processes and data, review of design constraints, review of current materials and methods, research into alternatives, building and evaluating prototypes, performing design validation and verification tests and finalizing a solution. At the conclusion of the effort a transition plan shall be provided.

Quantifiable metrics shall include reduction in manufacturing time, reduction in amount of rework, and reduction in rework cost. In addition to these metrics, included shall be an improved manufacturing process design to support future production rate and meet cost objectives, identification of additional uses, benefits, and transition opportunities outside of JAGM, and a provision of process improvements to allow all operators to perform the manufacturing sequence in a repeatable and reproducible manner.

5.0 TRAVEL: Travel will be required in the performance of this PWS. It is anticipated the contractor shall travel to Lockheed Martin in Orlando and Ocala, Florida (prime contractor for the JAGM system). No OCONUS travel is authorized or is anticipated in performance of this PWS.

6.0 SECURITY: The contractor will not be required to have access to classified information or classified manufacturing locations. The contractor shall not use foreign national employees to perform the efforts of this task.

7.0. INFORMATION ASSURANCE/ANTI-TERRORISM/OPERATIONS SECURITY: Contractor employees shall not support IA/AT/OPSEC functions and will not be required to access Government networks under this contract. The contractor will require only intermittent access to federally-controlled facilities. Prior to these visits, appropriate and necessary visitor information will be provided to the facility in the proper and required format.

8.0 GOVERNMENT FURNISHED PROPERTY (GFP): N/A

9.0 GOVERNMENT FURNISHED INFORMATION (GFI): N/A

10.0 PERFORMANCE OBJECTIVES/METRICS: The Government’s assessment of the contractor’s performance in achieving performance objectives shall utilize the standards, acceptable quality levels, and surveillance methods described in the Performance Requirements Summary matrix set forth in Basic Contract Appendix A.

11.0 SCHEDULE: The effort will begin within thirty (30) days after receipt of contract award and completed within 12 months after contract award. The final report for this task order will be delivered within 30 calendar days of the end of the technical performance.

Example 3:

Manufacturing Engineering Assessments for Letterkenny Army Depot

1.0 PURPOSE

The purpose of this effort is to provide manufacturing engineering support for development efforts for Letterkenny Army Depot. This includes 2 manufacturing assessments including (1) MML viton over-molded cable facilitation requirements and (2) integration of temperature/tolerance controls into existing milling machining centers. This support also includes providing a sample work instruction for a MML fishplate to be used as a template for future work.

2.0 APPLICABLE DOCUMENTS

Applicable top level documents are identified by number, version, title, date, and category in the Document Summary List (DSL), an attachment to the Basic Contract. The document versions specified on the DSL take precedence over the generic references (without revision letters) cited in the PWS.

The contractor shall prepare and deliver documentation in accordance with (IAW) the quantities and schedules specified in section 3.1.1 of this PWS.

3.0 PERFORMANCE REQUIREMENTS

The work required by this task order shall be performed IAW this PWS in accordance with the terms and conditions of the basic contract.

3.1 Program Management

Perform Program Management IAW paragraph 3.1 of the basic PWS on efforts that support Letterkenny Army Depot.

3.1.1 Program Management Deliverables

Prepare a Task Order Progress Report – Monthly Progress Report IAW A005.

Prepare a Task Order Monthly Financial Report IAW A003.

Prepare a Task Order Final Report IAW A006.

3.2 Manufacturing Assessments

In accordance with paragraph 3.2.1 of the basic PWS, the contractor shall perform manufacturing assessments at Letterkenny Army Depot. The contractor shall assess manufacturing technology needs by reviewing manufacturing and processing operations and defining process requirements.

3.2.1 Assessment of MML Viton Over-molded Cable Facilitation Requirements

Contractor shall provide end-to-end process (from procurement of raw material/equipment to finished vulcanized cables to meet drawings/performance specifications) for the Army’s Multi-Mission Launcher (MML). Material of interest: Fluorocarbon (FKM) elastomer pre AMS3216, Viton®. Areas of consideration shall include but not be limited to: control factors for production, equipment required, equipment facility requirements, documentation and certification requirements, planetary machinery to contra-helically wind wiring, quality control and testing of final product, and personnel training.

3.2.1.1 Deliverables: Draft report for review to include itemized facilities and equipment requirements, cost, schedule, skillset, return on investment, and an electronic email copy of mentioned draft. Upon draft approval, contractor shall have 20 working days to provide 6 (six) hard copies and 1 (one) electronic copy on CD/DVD media of final report IAW A006.

3.2.2 Assessment of integration of temperature/tolerance controls into existing milling machining centers

Milling Machining Centers include Ingersoll Master Speed, Haas VF-09, Haas VF-11, and the Haas EC-1600. Contractor shall determine a process to maintain constant work temperature (contractor shall determine and provide temperature variance required) of machined components. Final machined product must meet drawing tolerance requirements when LEAD Quality Assurance (QA) verifies at 68 degrees Fahrenheit.

3.2.2.1 Deliverables: Draft report for review to include itemized facilities and equipment requirements, cost, schedule, skillset, return on investment, and an electronic email copy of mentioned draft. . Upon draft approval, contractor shall have 10 working days to provide 6 (six) hard copies and 1 (one) electronic copy on CD/DVD media of final report IAW A006.

3.3 Manufacturing Process Development – MML Fishplate

In accordance with paragraph 3.2.2 of the basic PWS, the contractor shall perform manufacturing process development at Letterkenny Army Depot. The manufacturing process shall be evaluated, analyzed, and developed on a continuing basis during project development and execution. The process evaluation shall be conducted in order to determine, among other possible items, optimal methods, lower costs, reduced lead times, and quality improvements that will enhance the product for the Warfighter.

The contractor shall create generic work instructions for fabrication of a MML Fishplate. Contractor shall provide written detailed, process steps in the creation of generic work instructions (i.e. a work instruction template) and resources required. Sample work instruction requirements: LEAD work instruction format, achieve manufacturing drawing specification (OEM) final product with recommended existing/modified/new equipment at LEAD, provide gap analysis of: QSP, EVMS, SOW and industry best practices, provide sample work instruction process breakdown for LEAD to generate in-house other work instructions for similar complex parts (manpower, hours, gap analysis, critical controls, requirements, etc.)

3.3.1 Deliverables: Draft report for review to include sample work instruction of mentioned part, work instruction template, cost, schedule, skillset, return on investment, and an electronic email copy of mentioned draft. . Upon draft approval, contractor shall have 10 working days to provide 6 (six) hard copies and 1 (one) electronic copy on CD/DVD media of final report IAW A006.

4.0 TRAVEL

Travel is anticipated for the execution of this task order.

For Section 3.2.1 of the PWS - There may be visits required for assessment of at least four major manufacturing machines. Contractor will also need to investigate companies where these machines are currently being used for active production. Multiple trips may be required for a comparative study of different makes, models, and features of the required machines and to compare different approaches to the process methodology.

For Section 3.2.2 of the PWS – There may be visits required to investigate machine enclosure manufacturers and machine temperature control manufacturers. Contractor will also need to investigate companies where these machine enclosures and controls are being used in active production and to compare which would best suit the needs of the Depot.

For Section 3.3 of the PWS – Travel is for visits to a manufacturing facility where Fishplates are currently being fabricated. It is estimatd that it may take approximately three or four days to machine the part.

No OCONUS travel is authorized or is anticipated in performance of this PWS. All travel must be approved in advance and in writing by the COR.

5.0 SECURITY

The contractor will not be required to have access to classified information or classified manufacturing locations. The contractor shall not use foreign national employees to perform the efforts of this task.

6.0 INFORMATION ASSURANCE/ANTI-TERRORISM/OPERATIONS SECURITY

Contractor employees shall not support IA/AT/OPSEC functions and will not be required to access Government networks under this contract. The contractor will require only intermittent access to federally-controlled facilities. Prior to these visits, appropriate and necessary visitor information will be provided to the facility in the proper and required format.

7.0 GOVERNMENT FURNISHED PROPERTY (GFP): N/A

8.0 GOVERNMENT FURNISHED INFORMATION (GFI)

Contractor will be receiving Government drawings, specifications, and Bill of Material as required during the performance of this project.

9.0 PERFORMANCE OBJECTIVES/METRICS

The Government’s assessment of the contractor’s performance in achieving performance objectives shall utilize the standards, acceptable quality levels, and surveillance methods described in the Performance Requirements Summary matrix set forth in Basic Contract Appendix A.

10.0 SCHEDULE

The technical effort for this task order shall be initiated within 30 days after contract award and technical effort completed 4 months after contract award. MML Cable Technical effort (PWS 3.2.1) shall be completed 4 months after contract award. Milling machine Temp assessment (PWS 3.2.2) shall be completed 2 months after contract award. Work Instructions for MML Fishplate (PWS 3.3) shall be completed 4 months after contract award. The final report for this task order shall be delivered within 30 calendar days of the end of the technical performance.

Example 4:

Manufacturing Engineering Support for Improved Data Modem Production Line Readiness

1.0 PURPOSE: The Improved Data Modem (IDM) front panel assembly production line at Letterkenny Army Depot is currently in a low production state. In order to maintain readiness in preparation for future increased production levels, the Letterkenny Army Depot (LEAD) and it’s development partner AMRDEC Software Engineering Directorate (SED) requires the production process to be maintained at a capable state. The purpose of this effort is to provide manufacturing engineering support on the IDM production line including the machines and test equipment during this period of low production requirements.

2.0 APPLICABLE DOCUMENTS: Applicable top level documents are identified by number, version, title, date, and category in the Document Summary List (DSL), an attachment to the Basic Contract. The document versions specified on the DSL take precedence over the generic references (without revision letters) cited in the PWS.

The contractor shall prepare and deliver documentation in accordance with (IAW) the quantities and schedules specified in section 3.1.1 of this PWS.

3.0 PERFORMANCE REQUIREMENTS: The work required by this task order shall be performed IAW this PWS in accordance with the terms and conditions of the basic contract.

3.1 Program Management

Perform Program Management IAW paragraph 3.1 of the basic PWS on efforts that support AMCOM LEAD and AMRDEC SED. This support is required to assist with maintaining manufacturability of the IDM front panel assembly.

3.1.1 Program Management Deliverables

Prepare a Task Order Progress Report – Monthly Progress Report IAW A005.

Prepare a Task Order Monthly Financial Report IAW A003.

Prepare a Task Order Final Report IAW A006.

3.2. Manufacturing Process Analysis and Development

In accordance with paragraph 3.2.2 of the basic PWS, the contractor shall implement the following actions:

3.2.1 Manufacturing Analysis: The contractor shall evaluate the current production state of the manufacturing and test equipment and, in conjunction with LEAD and SED, prepare a plan to produce a quantity of 4 IDM front panels each quarter of calendar year 2016. The contractor shall define a manufacturing process for these special runs.

3.2.2 Process Development: The contractor shall assist LEAD in developing and implementing a manufacturing process during these short production cycles. The manufacturing process shall be evaluated, analyzed, and developed on a continuing basis during project development and execution.

3.3 Process Demonstration

In accordance with paragraph 3.2.3 of the basic PWS, the contractor shall assist LEAD in this Front Panel manufacturing process. In order to demonstrate the success of the assembly operation, the front panels shall be assembled to a known good IDM chassis then undergo testing to include the environmental chamber and the vibration table testing functions. The contractor shall support LEAD operator production readiness by providing general operating and test conditions and debug efforts on an as needed basis for IDMs that don’t pass functional testing.

3.4 Implementation of Manufacturing Solution for IDM

In accordance with paragraph 3.2.4 of the basic PWS, the contractor will implement the optimal production process to effectively keep equipment and LEAD Operators in a state of readiness to produce IDMs. Additionally, the contractor shall support the assembly process by providing required hardware and components, kitting of the materials, training operators, support performance of equipment repairs, and support daily startup and shutdown processes.

3.4.1 Implementation Deliverables for IDM

· 12 IDM front panels + 4 spares that meet quality requirements for a total of 16 front panels.

· Quarterly update reports to be contained in the appropriate Monthly report as to the equipment readiness, any repairs required and any issues uncovered during the short production runs.

4.0 TRAVEL: Travel will be required in the performance of this PWS to include periodic meetings with LEAD and SED.. No OCONUS travel is authorized or is anticipated in performance of this PWS. All travel must be approved in advance and in writing by the COR.

5.0 SECURITY: The contractor will not be required to have access to classified information or classified manufacturing locations. The contractor shall not use foreign national employees to perform the efforts of this task.

6.0. INFORMATION ASSURANCE/ANTI-TERRORISM/OPERATIONS SECURITY: Contractor employees shall not support IA/AT/OPSEC functions and will not be required to access Government networks under this contract. The contractor will require only intermittent access to federally-controlled facilities. Prior to these visits, appropriate and necessary visitor information will be provided to the facility in the proper and required format.

7.0 GOVERNMENT FURNISHED PROPERTY (GFP): N/A

8.0 GOVERNMENT FURNISHED INFORMATION (GFI): Contractor will be receiving Government Technical Data for IDM components from AMRDEC SED engineers.

9.0 PERFORMANCE OBJECTIVES/METRICS: The Government’s assessment of the contractor’s performance in achieving performance objectives shall utilize the standards, acceptable quality levels, and surveillance methods described in the Performance Requirements Summary matrix set forth in Basic Contract Appendix A.

10.0 SCHEDULE: The manufacturing engineering support shall be completed 12 months after contract award. The final report for this task order shall be delivered within 30 calendar days of the end of the technical performance.

Example 5:

Manufacturing Engineering Support for Anti-Personnel Weapon Systems.

BACKGROUND

A current U.S. Army Aviation and Missile Research, Development, and Engineering Center (AMRDEC) effort is underway to improve the lethality of anti-personnel weapons through improved dispersion of flechettes. Additional improvements that will improve lethality include better velocity retention and an anticipated higher percentage of flechettes on target. The flechette warhead could be transitioned to the Hydra 70 rocket system or to the Guided Multiple Launch Rocket System (GMLRS) Alternative Warhead via the PEO M&S.

The AMRDEC directs activities for the development of new and improved missile weapon systems and strives to reduce the cost of production procurement of these devices where possible. A portion of the effort being developed consists of automated packaging of flechettes into sabots and a separate portion into the loading of sabots into warheads.

PURPOSE

The purpose of this proposed effort is to investigate processes and technologies to automatically package flechettes, identify sources to provide automatic packaging technologies, select a vendor and provide a prototype packaging system. Expected benefits include improved manufacturing processes, enhanced packaging, improved performance and lower production costs.

SCOPE

AMRDEC has requested assistance in investigating the most efficient way to package an improved flechette design. Effective dispersion of the flechette requires precision manufacturing and packaging of the device. The contractor shall evaluate potential manufacturing processes for prototype and low rate initial production (LRIP) quantities, with a forward view to automated manufacturing processes and technologies that can be implemented.

Task 1 – Conduct an investigation into the manufacturing technologies that could be utilized to perform automatic packaging of flechettes into a sabot. Identify sources of automated technology that are candidates for manufacture of an automated flechette packaging system.

Task 2 – Down select from the field of potential suppliers of automated equipment to a smaller number for the purpose of soliciting quotations for supply of an automated flechette packaging system. Evaluate quotations for technical and financial merit to ultimately select a supplier to design and manufacture a system.

Task 3 –Work with the selected supplier to develop a concept design for the automated flechette packaging system. The contractor and the selected supplier shall consult with AMRDEC personnel to review concept designs before approving progression to a final design specification.

Task 4 – Work with the selected supplier to complete design, define operational characteristics, develop manufacturing prints and produce an automated flechette packaging system that loads flechettes to a defined warhead weight tolerance to be provided by AMRDEC.

Task 5 – Investigate and develop methodologies for loading sabots containing flechettes into the warhead.

Task 6 – Investigate similar Army sabot manufacturing processes and provide potential alternate vendors.

DELIVERABLES

Program plans shall be approved by AMRDEC/MS&T prior to initiation of technical support. Monthly reports shall be prepared and a final report (in lieu of the last monthly report) shall also be prepared. Monthly reports shall include reporting on task and sub-task status, current actions, planned activities and issues/concerns.

The following CDRLs shall be submitted as required by the basic contract:

DI A001 – Monthly Technical Reports DI A002 – Monthly Financial Reports DI A003 – Task Order Final Report

SCHEDULE

The engineering support shall be initiated within 30 days after contract award and completed one year after task order award. The final report for this task order shall be delivered within 30 calendar days of the end of the technical performance.