Atch 9 Past-Present Performance Questionnaire.pdf

Source Selection Information – See FAR 2.101 and 3.104 (When filled-in, this Document becomes CUI//SP-SSEL)

HTC71123RW003

Attachment 9

Past/Present Performance Questionnaire

Company Name of Offeror:

Section 1: Contract Identification

Instructions: This section is to be filled out by the Offeror. Once completed, Offeror sends to the Past/Present Performance Reference requesting they complete Sections 2 through 4.

1. Contractor Name on Awarded Contract:

2. Contractor Performing Services:

3. Contract Number, if applicable:

4. Contract Type (FFP, CPFF, etc.):

5. Contract Title:

6. Period of Performance:

7. Overall Dollar Value:

8. Brief Description of Work Performed. (Please identify if it was international or domestic transportation, liner or charter services, and any complexities).

9. Quantities of Breakbulk per Voyage:

10. Containers per Voyage:

11. Total Number of Voyages:

12. Frequency of Voyages:

13. Location of Services Performed:

14. Identity the Prime Contractor’s role during performance if contract performance was accomplished by a subcontractor:

Source Selection Information – See FAR 2.101 and 3.104 (When filled-in, this Document becomes CUI//SP-SSEL)

Attachment 9

Section 2: Past/Present Performance Reference Information

Instructions: The remaining sections are to be filled out by the Past/Present Performance Reference. Once completed, the Past/Present Performance Reference sends to USTRANSCOM Acquisition Office via E-mail to shanda.l.lyman.civ@mail.mil and sarah.l.albers2.civ@mail.mil.

Please indicate “Performance Survey” in the subject.

1. Customer or Agency Name:

2. Name:

3. Position/Title:

4. Phone/Fax Number:

5. Email:

6. Contract Performance Data assessed in Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System

(CPARS):

Section 3: Performance Information

Instructions: Choose the term that most accurately describes the Contractor’s performance or situation.

The results of this survey will aid the Government in determining whether there is a reasonable expectation that the Contractor will successfully perform the required effort under the Naval Station Guantanamo Bay, Cuba – 2 Sealift Transportation Services acquisition.

Past/Present Performance Reference may be contacted to clarify comments or ratings. In order for the government to review and assess the Contractor’s past/present performance rating, please use the following ratings to describe the Offeror’s performance on your contract or project:

Exceptional - Performance met all contractual requirements and exceeded many to your company’s (or agency’s) benefit. Problems, if any, were negligible and were resolved in a timely, highly effective manner.

Very Good - Performance met all contractual requirements and exceeded some to your company’s (agency’s) benefit. There were a few minor problems that the Contractor resolved in a timely, effective manner.

Satisfactory - Performance met contractual requirements. There were some minor problems and corrective actions taken by the Contractor were satisfactory.

Marginal - Performance did not meet some contractual requirements. There were problems, some of a serious nature, for which corrective action was only marginally effective or was not fully implemented.

Unsatisfactory - Performance did not meet most contractual requirements. There were serious problems and the Contractor’s corrective actions were ineffective.

mailto:shanda.l.lyman.civ@mail.mil mailto:sarah.l.albers2.civ@mail.mil

Source Selection Information – See FAR 2.101 and 3.104 (When filled-in, this Document becomes CUI//SP-SSEL)

Attachment 9

Unknown - No record of past/present performance or the record is inconclusive.

NOTE: If you have rated this Contractor on this particular contract/project in CPARS or some other evaluation system accessible to the Government, you may indicate that past/present performance information on this contract/project is available in the appropriate system and include a copy of that rating in lieu of the following questionnaire.

TECHNICAL CAPABILITY

U ns at is fa ct or y

M ar gi na l

Sa tis fa ct or y

Ve ry

G oo d

E xc ep tio na l

U nk no w n

1. Contractor provided on-time delivery of shipments and consistently met contract schedule.

2. Contractor provided operational reports in a timely manner.

3. Contractor was capable of electronically receiving orders, including increased/decreases to orders.

4. Contractor was able to receive electronic cancellations of previously ordered service.

5. Contractor provided accurate and timely shipment status reports.

6. Contractor provided service per advertised schedules.

7.

Contractor provided service to ports of call indicated in their advertised schedule without deviation.

8. Contractor provided frequency of service as advertised in their schedules.

9. Contractor was flexible in responding to customer requirements.

10. Contractor provided transportation service without loss of cargo.

11. Contractor provided transportation service without damage to cargo.

12. Contractor met customer’s Required Delivery Date

(RDD).

Source Selection Information – See FAR 2.101 and 3.104 (When filled-in, this Document becomes CUI//SP-SSEL)

Attachment 9

OVERALL PERFORMANCE

U ns at is fa ct or y

M ar gi na l

Sa tis fa ct or y

Ve ry

G oo d

E xc ep tio na l

U nk no w n

1. Overall Performance of the Contractor

Section 4: Narrative Description

Instructions: Please use the text box below each item to discuss the Contractor’s performance.

1. Please discuss each and every response for which you indicated Marginal or Unsatisfactory in response to the questions above (use additional sheets, if necessary).

2. Government Contracts Only: Has/was this contract been partially or completely terminated for default or convenience, or are there any pending terminations?

If yes, please explain (e.g., inability to meet cost, performance, or delivery schedules, etc.)

3. Explain the Contractor’s greatest strengths and your rationale for why you would award a future contract to them.

4. Would you have any reservations about soliciting this Contractor in the future or having them perform one of your critical and demanding programs?

5. Please provide any additional comments concerning this Contractor’s performance, as desired.