Appendix A1-2.docx

Appendix A Microwave System Replacement Qualifications

STATE BUILDINGS PROGRAMS

PREQUALIFICATION SUBMITTAL/EVALUATION FORM

DESIGN/BUILD LUMP SUM (LS) SERVICES

Name of Team:____________________________________________________________________ Name of Project:___________________________________________________________________ Evaluator No:_________________________________________ Date: _______________________

RFP REFERENCE

MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS Y ____ N ____

If the minimum requirements (including letter from surety) have not been met, specify the reason(s): __________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Acknowledgement and Attestation included: Y _____ N _____

SCORE

Weight2 x Rating3 = Score

1. QUALIFICATIONS OF THE FIRM(S)1

· Qualifications of the team x

· Organizational structure/lines of authority x

· Subcontractor selection and management x

· Colorado workforce x

· Safety/Employee support x

2. QUALIFICATIONS OF THE MANAGEMENT TEAM MEMBERS1

· Qualifications and relevant experience of the architect/engineer x

· Qualifications and relevant experience of the construction manager/general contractor x

· Qualifications and relevant experience of in-house staff x

· Location/Access x

3. PROJECT MANAGEMENT APPROACH1

· Approach to successful D/B Services

a. Cost effectiveness x

b. Schedule effectiveness x

c. Quality effectiveness x

· Competitively Bid/Self Performed Work x

4. PRIOR PROJECT EXPERIENCE/SUCCESS1

· Project #1 x

· Project #2 x

· Project #3 x

· Related experience of the team x

5. MISCELLANEOUS1

· Claims/litigation history x

· Apprenticeship Training Program x

· Other x

TOTAL SCORE:

NOTES:

1. Criteria: Agencies/Institutions are encouraged to include additional criteria that reflect unique characteristics of the project under each category to help determine the submitter’s overall qualifications.

2. Weights: Agency/Institutions to assign weights, using whole numbers, to all criteria on evaluation forms for inclusion into RFQ document and prior to evaluations.

3. Ratings: Evaluator to assess the strength of each firms qualifications and assign a numerical rating of 1 to 5 with 5 being the highest rating. (Use whole numbers)

4. Total Score: Includes the sum of all criteria. Note: a passing score (as a percentage of the total points available) is optional and should be assigned by the agency/institution prior to evaluation.

Appendix A1 Microwave Replacement

STATE BUILDINGS PROGRAMS

ORAL INTERVIEWS/COST PROPOSALS EVALUATION FORM

DESIGN/BUILD LUMP SUM (LS) SERVICES

Name of Team:__________________________________________________________________ Name of Project:_________________________________________________________________ Evaluator No:_________________________________Date:______________________________

SCORE

Weight2 x Rating3 = Score

1. QUALIFICATIONS 1

x

2.ENGINEERING AND SYSTEM DESIGN1

x

3. PROJECT MANAGEMENT 1

x

EQUIPMENT AND INSTALLATION

x

SOFTWARE AND INSTALLATION

x

CUTOVER PLAN

HARDWARE AND SOFTWARE WARRANTY & MAINTENANCE

5. MISCELLANEOUS

· Craft Labor Capabilities x

· Apprenticeship Training Program x

· Other x

TOTAL SCORE:

1. Criteria: Agencies/Institutions are encouraged to include additional criteria that reflect unique characteristics of the project under each category to help determine the submitter’s overall qualifications.

2. Weights: Agency/Institutions to assign weights, using whole numbers, to all criteria on evaluation forms for inclusion into RFQ document and prior to evaluations.

3. Ratings: Evaluator to assess the strength of each firms qualifications and assign a numerical rating of 1 to 5 with 5 being the highest rating. (Use whole numbers)

4. Total Score: Includes the sum of all criteria. Note: a passing score (as a percentage of the total points available) is optional and should be assigned by the agency/institution prior to evaluation.

IPD D/B LS RFP

Rev. 7/2015 Appendix A2

STATE BUILDINGS PROGRAMS

SUBMITTAL AND ORAL INTERVIEW RANKING MATRIX

QUALIFICATIONS 60%/COST 40%

TEAM

QUALIFICATIONS1

AVERAGE

QUALS2

QUALS SCORE3

COST

SCORE4

QUALS

& COST SCORE5

RANK6

1. Insert total score from each evaluator's ORAL INTERVIEW/ COST PROPOSALS/EVALUATION FORMS. (Note that the use of the Matrix for the PREQUALIFICATION SUBMITTAL EVALUATION does not consider cost proposals only qualifications). DO NOT combine the scores of the two evaluation forms.

2. Add all evaluators’ total scores and divide by the number of evaluators to determine the average score for each team’s qualifications.

3. The highest score for qualifications on the evaluation form is to receive 40 points and the other team scores are to be determined as a percentage of the 70 points. To score each average qualification score, use the example formula.

Assume the highest score is 400.

Scoring of Qualifications

4. Determine score for each team’s sealed cost proposal with the lowest cost being equivalent to a score of 40 points. To score each cost, use the example formula.

Assume the lowest cost was $100,000.

Scoring of Costs

5. Add the average qualification score to the cost score to determine cumulative qualifications and cost score.

6. Numerically rank all teams with the highest scoring team being the most qualified.