AOCACB24R0128 A04.pdf

Document Number: AOCACB24R0128 Page 1 of 4

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES

1 4

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NUMBER

3. EFFECTIVE DATE

01/17/2025

4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NUMBER 5. PROJECT NUMBER (If applicable)

9901CODE

Architect of the Capitol Design and Construction Acquisition Division Ford House Building Room H2-263 2nd and D Streets SW Washington, DC 20515

6. ISSUED BY CODE7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than Item 6)

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NUMBER

AOCACB24R0128

CODE FACILITY CODE

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (Number, street, country, state and ZIP Code) (X)

X 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

12/05/2024

10A. MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT/ORDER

NUMBER

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

X XThe above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offers is extended, is not extended, Offers must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended, by one of the following methods: (a) By completing items 8 and 15, and returning ____copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted; or (c) By separate letter or electronic communication which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment your desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by letter or electronic communication, provided each letter or electronic communication makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO MODIFICATION OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NUMBER AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

CHECK ONE A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE CONTRACT

ORDER NUMBER IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(b).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return _______ copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

See Section: M.1 Amendment 04 Terms.

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print) 16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print) John Lingamfelter Contracting Officer

(Signature of person authorized to sign)

15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR 15C. DATE SIGNED

By (Signature of Contracting Officer)

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 16C. DATE SIGNED

NSN 7540-01-152-8070

Previous edition unusable

STANDARD FORM 30 (REV.

11/2016) Prescribed by GSA FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

Document Number: AOCACB24R0128 Page 2 of 4

Table of Contents

Section Description Page Number

J List of Attachments J.1 List of Attachments

M Evaluation Factors for Award M.1 Amendment 04 Terms:

Document Number: AOCACB24R0128 Page 3 of 4

Section J - List of Attachments

J.1 List of Attachments

Attachment Number Title Number of Pages Date 1 Blanket NDA for eBuilder Team

(Template) 1 N/A

2 Non-Disclosure Agreement for Contract Employees

2 N/A

3 Certificate of Liability Insurance (Sample)

1 N/A

4 Confined Space Policy-Tunnel Projects-Utility Distribution System-Standard Operating Procedure (June 2011)

52 June 2011

5 SOP Capitol Power Plant- Badging and Site Access Policy and Procedures

10 4 October 2013

6 USCP Request for Check of Criminal History-Form CP-491

1 January 2021

7 Pricing Schedule CM IDIQ Template (Rate Only) Amended 1-16-25

1 January 16, 2025

8 Pricing Schedule CM IDIQ Template (With Hours) Amended 1-16-25

3 January 16, 2025

9 Section L INSTRUCTIONS CONDITIONS Amended 1-16-25

5 January 16, 2025

10 Section M EVALUATION

FACTORS FOR AWARD

Amended 1-16-25

4 January 16, 2025

11 Section H - Special Contract Procedures

4 N/A

12 Order 42-4 Security of Controled Unclassified Information

17 6 May 2016

13 Past Performance Questionnaire 6 N/A 14 Statement of Work 2024

Amended 1-16-25 23 January 16, 2025

15 AOCACB24R0128 RFIs-AOC Response 1-16-2025

36 January 16, 2025

Section M - Evaluation Factors for Award

M.1 Amendment 04 Terms:

The purpose of this amendment is as follows:

• Provide and incorporate Attachment 15 titled “AOCACB24R0128 RFIs-AOC Response 1-16-2025”.

• Replace Attachment 7 titled: “Pricing Schedule CM IDIQ Template (Rate Only)” with the attached Attachment 7 Titled:

“Pricing Schedule CM IDIQ Template (Rate Only) Amended 1-16-25”, Changes are in red font.

Document Number: AOCACB24R0128 Page 4 of 4

• Replace Attachment 8 titled: “Pricing Schedule CM IDIQ Template (With Hours)” with the attached Attachment 8 Titled:

“Pricing Schedule CM IDIQ Template (With Hours) Amended 1-16-25”, Changes are in red font.

• Replace Attachment 9 titled: “Section L - Instruction, Conditions, and Notices to Offerors" with the attached Attachment 9 Titled: “Section L INSTRUCTIONS CONDITIONS Amended 1-16-25”, Changes are in red font.

• Replace Attachment 10 titled: “Section M - Evaluation Factors for Award" with the attached Attachment 10 Titled:

“Attachment 10 Section M EVALUATION FACTORS FOR AWARD Amended 1-16-25”, Changes are in red font.

• Replace Attachment 14 titled: “Statement of Work" with the attached Attachment 14 Titled: “Attachment 14 - Statement of Work 2024 Amended 1-16-25”, Changes are in red font.

• Update Section J.1 List of Attachments with amended and added attachments noted above.

• Revise maximum ordering amount from $50million to $20 million in accordance with 216-19 Order Limitations (Oct

1995) (b)(1) and (2).

Construction Management Services IDIQ Pricing Schedule FY25-33

Contractor Name:

Base (4/1/25-3/31/26) Opt 1 (4/1/26-3/31/27) Opt 2 (4/1/27-3/31/28) Opt 3 (4/1/28-3/31/29) Opt 4 (4/1/29-3/31/30) Opt 5 (4/1/230-

3/31/31) Opt 6 (4/1/31-3/31/32) Opt 7 (4/1/32-3/31/33)

FAR52.217-8 Extension

Option

Item No. Description Base Rate ($/Hr) Option 1 Rate

($/Hr)

Option 2 Rate

($/Hr)

Option 3 Rate

($/Hr)

Option 4 Rate

($/Hr)

Option 5 Rate

($/Hr)

Option 6 Rate

($/Hr)

Option 7 Rate

($/Hr)

6 months FAR52.217-

8 Option Rate ($/Hr)

0001 Executive Program Manager 0002 Senior Construction Manager

0003 Construction Manager

0004 Senior Scheduler / Analyst

0005 Senior Claims Analyst

0006 Senior Commissioning Manager

0007 Senior Program Manager

0008 Project Architect - Manager

0009 Project Engineer - Manager

0010 General Engineer

0011 Elevator Engineer

0012 Project Controls Engineer

0013 Safety / OSHA Inspector

0014 Cost Estimator

0015 Architectural Inspector

0016 Mechanical Inspector

0017 Electrical Inspector

0018 Structural Inspector

0019 MEP Inspector

0020 General Inspector

0021 Elevator Inspector

0022 Concrete / Masonry Inspector

0023 CAD Draftsmen

0024 Administrative Assistant

Item No. Description Hours Base Rate ($/Hr) Base Line Total Option 1 Rate

($/Hr) Opt 1 Line Total

Option 2 Rate

($/Hr) Opt 2 Line Total

0001 Executive Program Manager 100 -$ -$ -$

0002 Senior Construction Manager 3000 -$ -$ -$

0003 Construction Manager 3000 -$ -$ -$

0004 Senior Scheduler / Analyst 500 -$ -$ -$

0005 Senior Claims Analyst 500 -$ -$ -$

0006 Senior Commissioning Manager 500 -$ -$ -$

0007 Senior Program Manager 1500 -$ -$ -$

0008 Project Architect - Manager 100 -$ -$ -$

0009 Project Engineer - Manager 100 -$ -$ -$

0010 General Engineer 100 -$ -$ -$

0011 Elevator Engineer 100 -$ -$ -$

0012 Project Controls Engineer 3000 -$ -$ -$

0013 Safety / OSHA Inspector 3000 -$ -$ -$

0014 Cost Estimator 500 -$ -$ -$

0015 Architectural Inspector 1000 -$ -$ -$

0016 Mechanical Inspector 1000 -$ -$ -$

0017 Electrical Inspector 1000 -$ -$ -$

0018 Structural Inspector 500 -$ -$ -$

0019 MEP Inspector 1000 -$ -$ -$

0020 General Inspector 3000 -$ -$ -$

0021 Elevator Inspector 500 -$ -$ -$

0022 Concrete / Masonry Inspector 500 -$ -$ -$

0023 CAD Draftsmen 500 -$ -$ -$

0024 Administrative Assistant 500 -$ -$ -$

Total -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$

Base (4/1/25-3/31/26) Opt 1 (4/1/26-3/31/27) Opt 2 (4/1/27-3/31/28)

Item No. Description

0001 Executive Program Manager 0002 Senior Construction Manager

0003 Construction Manager

0004 Senior Scheduler / Analyst

0005 Senior Claims Analyst

0006 Senior Commissioning Manager

0007 Senior Program Manager

0008 Project Architect - Manager

0009 Project Engineer - Manager

0010 General Engineer

0011 Elevator Engineer

0012 Project Controls Engineer

0013 Safety / OSHA Inspector

0014 Cost Estimator

0015 Architectural Inspector

0016 Mechanical Inspector

0017 Electrical Inspector

0018 Structural Inspector

0019 MEP Inspector

0020 General Inspector

0021 Elevator Inspector

0022 Concrete / Masonry Inspector

0023 CAD Draftsmen

0024 Administrative Assistant

Total

Option 3 Rate

($/Hr) Opt 3 Line Total

Option 4 Rate

($/Hr) Opt 4 Line Total

Option 5 Rate

($/Hr) Opt 5 Line Total2

Opt 3 (4/1/28-3/31/29) Opt 4 (4/1/29-3/31/30) Opt 5 (4/1/230-3/31/31)

Item No. Description

0001 Executive Program Manager 0002 Senior Construction Manager

0003 Construction Manager

0004 Senior Scheduler / Analyst

0005 Senior Claims Analyst

0006 Senior Commissioning Manager

0007 Senior Program Manager

0008 Project Architect - Manager

0009 Project Engineer - Manager

0010 General Engineer

0011 Elevator Engineer

0012 Project Controls Engineer

0013 Safety / OSHA Inspector

0014 Cost Estimator

0015 Architectural Inspector

0016 Mechanical Inspector

0017 Electrical Inspector

0018 Structural Inspector

0019 MEP Inspector

0020 General Inspector

0021 Elevator Inspector

0022 Concrete / Masonry Inspector

0023 CAD Draftsmen

0024 Administrative Assistant

Total

Option 6 Rate

($/Hr) Opt 6 Line Total3

Option 7 Rate

($/Hr) Opt 7 Line Total4

6 months FAR52.217-

8 Option Rate ($/Hr)

6 months

FAR52.217-8 Line

Total

Opt 6 (4/1/31-3/31/32) Opt 7 (4/1/32-3/31/33) FAR52.217-8 Extension Option

INSTRUCTIONS, CONDITIONS,

AND NOTICES TO OFFEROR

SECTION L

AND NOTICES TO OFFERORS

L.1 PROPOSAL COMPOSITION

.1 Proposals shall be submitted in two volumes. Volume 1, technical proposal, and Volume 2, price proposal. Submit each volume in a separate and searchable Adobe Acrobat file. The Technical Proposal whose content and arrangement shall be as described in article L.2 entitled, “INSTRUCTIONS FOR PREPARING THE TECHNICAL PROPOSAL” of this section, and a Price Proposal, which shall be prepared in detail as described and set forth in the article L.3 entitled, “INSTRUCTIONS FOR PREPARING THE PRICE PROPOSAL” of this section.

.2 This solicitation is for the Indefinite Quantity/Indefinite Delivery (IDIQ) Multiple Award Contract for Construction Management Services (CMS) for the Architect of the Capitol (AOC), Washington, D.C. There will be two (2) award tracks (unrestricted and small business). The Government intends to award up to or around two (2) IDIQs for CM services under the unrestricted track and up to or around two (2) IDIQs under the small business track for a total of up to or around four (4) IDIQs under this solicitation. The Government intends to award without discussions (except clarifications as described in AOC Order 34-1, Section 9.1.11).

Therefore, the offeror’s proposal should be clear and complete and contain the Offeror’s best terms from a price and technical standpoint. The Government reserves the right to conduct discussions if deemed necessary.

If it is determined discussions are necessary, a competitive range determination will be made based on the adjectival rating of evaluation factor 1 Corporate Experience and Expertise. Unsuccessful Offerors may request a pre or post-award debriefing within three (3) days after the date on which the Offeror(s) received notification of the contract award. There will be no point-by-point comparisons with other Offerors’ proposals.

.3 The Technical Proposal and the Price Proposal submitted by any offeror shall each be identified with a cover letter entitled “SUBMISSION OF OFFERS” and submitted in the following number of copies:

.1 Technical Proposal - One electronic (.pdf) copy via e-mail to Darwin.thomas@aoc.gov. The proposal should be typed, double-spaced, with one-inch margins, unreduced in size, on 8-1/2" by 11" paper, not exceeding 25 pages exclusive of resumes, teaming agreements, and past performance questionnaires. Proposals shall be read-only format, using searchable PDF files, and each factor and attachment shall be bookmarked.

.2 Price Proposal - One electronic (.pdf) copy via e-mail to Darwin Thomas at:

Darwin.thomas@aoc.gov.

.3 Technical and Price Proposal information may be submitted in a single e-mail to Darwin Thomas.

However, the technical and price proposal must each remain separate (.pdf) files.

.4 Proposals are due no later than January 29, 2025, at 5:00 p.m. local time to the contract specialist at email: Darwin.thomas@aoc.gov and jonathan.cornett@aoc.gov. Questions concerning this procurement action must be submitted via email no later than December 12, 2024, at 2:00 p.m. local time.

.4 Each offeror may submit one or more proposals; however, each proposal shall be configured as described above, shall be considered on its own merits as to the completeness of submission and shall not share required documentation, or other requirements of submission with any other proposal submitted by the same offeror.

mailto:Darwin.thomas@aoc.gov mailto:jonathan.cornett@aoc.gov

L.2 INSTRUCTIONS FOR PREPARING THE TECHNICAL PROPOSAL - SOURCE

SELECTION PROCEDURES

.1 The Technical Proposal shall be organized in accordance with the following format to facilitate evaluation by the Government.

.1 Corporate Experience and Expertise

.2 Management Approach; and

.3 Key Personnel.

.4 Past Performance

Evaluation Factors. Evaluation Factors are listed below in descending order of importance:

.1 Factor 1: Corporate Experience and Expertise:

The offeror shall provide a narrative describing the experience and qualifications of the offeror in managing and providing CM Services on IDIQ/Task Order Contracts similar in scope, size, and complexity and which involved tasks similar to those described in Section C (Attachment 14) of the SOW (e.g., Construction Management services and Inspection services) completed by the offeror during the last five years or are presently on-going. The Offeror shall provide a listing of four past projects/contracts of similar scope, size and complexity which involved similar tasks, identified in its narrative, completed by the offeror during the last five years or are presently on-going. The AOC will not evaluate more than 6 projects. For each project/contract listed, provide the following:

.1 Contract Number;

.2 Start Date/Completion Date (Dates - Month/Year);

.3 Project/Contract Description;

.4 Client Agency;

.5 Technical Point of Contact;

.6 Current Phone Number and Facsimile Number for Point of Contact;

.7 Amount of Contract (Award Amount and Final Amount); and .8 Relevance of Experience to This Project.

Similar Scope, Size and Complexity: The selected offeror shall demonstrate the capacity to accomplish at least four individual contracts and/or task orders with a combined minimum value of $500,000 simultaneously. The four individual contracts and/or task orders shall demonstrate at least six months of concurrent services as identified in the period of performance.

.2 Factor 2: Management Approach

The offeror shall provide an executive summary which addresses the way it will organize and manage the staff resources it will assign to undertake tasks performed under this contract providing key management functions and managerial authority, including an organizational diagram. The offeror shall include whether or not it plans to use subcontractors, include the names of subcontractors it proposes to use, and identify by discipline the services it anticipates it will subcontract.

.3 Factor 3: Key Personnel The Offeror shall provide resumes for the following individuals:

.1 Construction Executive (1 individual) .2 Senior Construction Managers (3 individuals) .3Construction Manager (3 individuals)

.4 Senior Scheduler/Analyst (1 Individual) .5 Senior Claims Analyst (1 Individual), and .6 Senior Commissioning Manager (1 Individual).

The resumes shall document recent and relevant experience within the past five years, shall be a maximum of four pages, and include the following information:

.1 A list of projects/contracts and the level of involvement;

.2 A list of three references who can provide appropriate feedback regarding the technical capabilities, including a contact name, company, address and current telephone and facsimile numbers;

.3 Position and years with the Offeror, and if less than 5 years with the Offeror, position and years with previous employer;

.4 Beginning and ending month and year for each position.

.5 List relevant education, training and skills to include at a minimum that for Prolog, E- Builder, Primivera, and MS Project software.

Teaming Agreements (No page limit)

Teaming is NOT required in order for an Offeror to submit a proposal, and/or be awarded an AOC CMS IDIQ Contract. However, Offerors may consider teaming as a means to more fully meet the array of requirements and resources potentially required by AOC under the CMS IDIQ Contract. If the Offeror is proposing as a Core team, the proposal must include duly executed teaming agreements by the parties of the Offeror’s team.

Letters of commitment are acceptable examples of teaming agreements and are considered teaming agreements for the purpose of responses to this solicitation. If submitted, letters of commitment shall include, at a minimum:

(1) signatures of the principals and/or owners of the respective parties;

(2) statements on the division of tasks, relationship of the parties, and responsibilities of parties; and

(3) statements on the handling of disputes.

Teaming agreements and/or letters of commitment must state that they are valid and in effect for a period of not less than five (5) years from the submission of the offer. Offerors must submit a statement in this proposal section indicating an understanding that AOC will evaluate the data received from the team and if an award is made based upon this information, AOC will not allow substitutions of the AOC Construction Management IDIQ Contract Core team members or the addition of new Core team members except as specified in Section H, Teaming Arrangements.

Rules concerning the makeup of teams in the unrestricted track: For evaluation purposes, the core team is one (1) prime plus up to four (4) other businesses. The Core Team must remain together for the life of the contract (base period and option) except for extraordinary circumstances and with the Contracting Officer’s consent.

Rules concerning the makeup of teams in the small business track: For evaluation purposes, the core team is one (1) prime plus up to four (4) other businesses. The core team shall consist of one (1) small business prime plus up to four (4) other businesses. The Core Team must remain together for the life of the contract (base period and option) except for extraordinary circumstances and with the Contracting Officer’s consent.

The Offeror shall propose fully burdened hourly rates for each labor category. Burdened rate for each team member shall include the proportional costs for the Construction Executive (CEx) and task order management. The rates will apply to the core team members, if applicable. The fully burdened hourly rates will not change after the contract award when a team member is removed or added. If the Offeror is not proposing as a team, the response in this Section shall so indicate.

.4 Factor4: Past Performance

The Government reserves the right to use any source of information available on the Offeror’s past performance to either evaluate past performance or verify information provided by the Offeror. The Offeror shall provide information that demonstrates the Offeror’s past performance. The enclosed “AOC PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE” shall be provided to each of the companies/agencies submitted by the offeror in response to Evaluation Factor 1. The questionnaire(s) must be emailed from the client to Darwin Thomas and Jonathan Cornett by the date and time established for receipt of offers in order to be considered in the evaluation process. A neutral rating will be applied for those projects/contracts for which a questionnaire is not received or past performance information is not relevant.

The Offeror shall identify four (4) contracts and/or task orders with the Federal Government and/or commercial customers that demonstrate recent and relevant past performance. Recent is defined as within the last five years. Relevant is defined as work similar in complexity and magnitude of the work described in this Statement of Work. The offeror may submit no more than four recent and relevant CPARS records for projects with similar scope, size, and complexity to this solicitation.

L.3 INSTRUCTIONS FOR PREPARING THE PRICE PROPOSAL

.1 A firm fixed price shall be entered by each offeror on the Schedule page for each line item (line item pricing, options, and unit prices) which shall represent the cost for performing the work required by this Request for Proposal. The Architect reserves the right to request from each Offeror information regarding the breakdown of all costs that are included in the total price, to include copies of all work sheets used in forming the proposed pricing. Erasures or other changes on any or all submissions shall be initialed by the signer of the proposal or by his duly authorized agent.

.2 In addition, the Representations and Certifications, with applicable information included in the spaces provided shall be included as a part of the Price Proposal.

.3 The Price Proposal will be submitted with the required documents in the following order:

.1 The “SOLICITATION, OFFER, AND AWARD” FORM (original signature required in Block 5);

.2 Section B - The “SCHEDULE” pages;

.3 Section K - The “REPRESENTATIONS AND CERTIFICATIONS”;

.4 Solicitation Fill-ins;

.5 Subcontracting Plan in accordance with AOC52.219-3;

.6 SF3881;

.7 W9; and .8 Attach 2 Price Schedule CMS Labor Categories

END OF SECTION L

EVALUATION FACTORS FOR AWARD Page 1

SECTION M

EVALUATION FACTORS FOR AWARD

M.1 PROPOSAL EVALUATION CRITERIA

.1 The evaluation criteria to be used by the Contract Officer for the selection of a contractor to perform the work specified as defined below. The criteria are divided into technical and price categories which consist of subsections corresponding to those in Section L, Attachment 9, with the article entitled “L.2

INSTRUCTIONS FOR PREPARING THE TECHNICAL PROPOSAL - SOURCE SELECTION

PROCEDURES” and the article entitled “L.3 INSTRUCTIONS FOR PREPARING THE PRICE PROPOSAL” . All evaluation factors, other than price, are considered significantly more important than price. However, as the difference, in technical merit, between the proposals becomes less significant the relative importance of the price will increase.

Basis for Award

The AOC will make a best value tradeoff contract award decision in accordance with AOC Order 34-1, Section 9.1.2.(a). The Government will conduct a competitive source selection. The objective of the source selection is to select the proposal(s) that best meet the requirements of the solicitation and to obtain the best value for the AOC. While the Government will strive for maximum objectivity, the tradeoff process, by its nature, is subjective; therefore, professional judgment is implicit throughout the selection process. The Government intends to award around four (4) IDIQ contracts to the responsible Offerors whose proposals are the most advantageous to the Government, price and other factors considered. There will be two (2) award tracks: unrestricted and small business. Consequently, the procurement schedule and award decisions on one track will not affect the other track. The Government will not award multiple contracts to an offeror that has a significant team role with another offeror, or an offeror with a significant role on one of AOC’s existing Indefinite Delivery Indefinite Quantity (IDIQ) contracts, excluding the current Construction Management IDIQ. The Government intends to award around two (2) IDIQ contracts under each track. Within each track, the source selections will be conducted as separate and distinct evaluations. The Government intends to make awards without discussions. In an effort to streamline the proposal evaluation process the Government reserves the right to suspend the evaluation of a proposal if, during evaluation, any evaluation factor is rated unacceptable. However, if it is determined to be in the best interest of the Government to enter discussions, the Government reserves the right to revisit those proposals that were previously suspended prior to establishing the competitive range. If a competitive range is established the range will be based on the adjectival rating of evaluation factor 1, Corporate Experience and Expertise.

Evaluation Factors: Factors 1 through 4 are listed in descending order of importance. The Government award decision is based on Factors 1 through 5. Factors 1 through 4, when combined, are significantly more important than Factor 5 Price. The Government will assemble a technical evaluation panel (TEP) for the assignment of a technical rating of outstanding, good, acceptable, marginal, and unacceptable for each proposal based solely on the merits of the technical proposal. There will be no consideration of pricing data during the technical evaluation.

Factors 1 through 4, adjectival rating system is as follows:

EVALUATION FACTORS FOR AWARD Page 2

Table 1 Adjectival Rating System Adjectival Rating Description Outstanding The proposal provides a very clear, comprehensive and detailed response which meets all requirements and may include significant strengths with no deficiencies or significant weaknesses. The risk of unsuccessful performance is very low as the proposal demonstrates a clear understanding of the requirements and can be expected to result in outstanding performance.

Good The proposal provides a sound response which meets all requirements and may include strengths with no deficiencies and few weaknesses. The risk of unsuccessful performance is low as the proposal demonstrates an understanding of the requirements and can be expected to result in satisfactory performance.

Acceptable The proposal provides a response which is capable of meeting all requirements but may include both strengths and weaknesses with no deficiencies Strengths are not outweighed by the weaknesses. The risk of unsuccessful performance is moderate as the proposal demonstrates a general understanding of the requirements and can be expected to result in satisfactory performance.

Marginal The proposal provides a response which does not meet all requirements and may include strengths, weaknesses, and/or deficiencies. Strengths are outweighed by the weaknesses and/or deficiencies. The risk of unsuccessful performance is high as the proposal does not demonstrate an understanding of the requirements and can be expected to result in unsatisfactory performance.

Unacceptable The proposal provides a response that does not meet all requirements and may include significant weaknesses and/or deficiencies which far outweigh any strengths. The risk of unsuccessful performance is very high as the proposal does not demonstrate an understanding of the requirements and will result in unsatisfactory performance.

The rating guidelines definitions for Factors 1 through 4 are listed as follows:

Table 2 Strengths/Weaknesses/Deficiencies Rating Definition Significant Strength An aspect of an Offeror’s proposal that has appreciable merit or appreciably exceeds specified performance or capability requirements in a way that will be appreciably advantageous to the Government during contract performance.

Strength Any aspect of a proposal which meets or exceeds a requirement and increases the probability of successful performance of the contract

Weakness A flaw in the proposal that increases the risk of unsuccessful contract performance.

Significant Weakness

A flaw that appreciably increases the risk of unsuccessful contract performance

Deficiency A material failure of a proposal to meet a Government requirement or a combination of weaknesses in a proposal that increases the risk of unsuccessful contract performance to an unacceptable level.

.2 TECHNICAL CRITERIA. Each Offeror’s proposal will be evaluated in accordance with the technical criteria listed below to determine whether it is responsive to the requirements of the RFP and are therefore acceptable.

EVALUATION FACTORS FOR AWARD Page 3

.1 Evaluation Factors. Evaluation Factors are listed below in descending order of importance:

.1 Factor 1: Corporate Experience and Expertise

The Offeror’s experience will be evaluated to determine the extent of its experience and qualifications in managing and providing CM Services on contracts and/or task orders similar in scope, size and complexity during the last five years. Additional consideration will be given to Offerors whose experience as a prime contractor is most extensive on contracts and/or task orders providing the same services (e.g., Construction Management services and Inspection Services) specified in this requirement.

Similar Scope, Size and Complexity: The selected offerors shall demonstrate the capacity to accomplish at least four (4) individual contracts and/or task orders of a combined minimum value of $500,000 simultaneously.

.2 Factor 2: Management Approach

The Offeror’s management plan will be evaluated to determine whether it provides an executive summary clearly defining key management functions and authorities, whether the proposed organizational structure ensures adequate management of all work. The plan must also address whether it adequately details the use of subcontractors, or teaming partners, and its capability to supply personnel upon award. The Government will evaluate the strength of the organization, structure, and staffing to execute the entire scope of work. Additional consideration will be given to offeror’s whose management plan demonstrates innovative management techniques appropriate for statement of work requirements, willingness to train/develop personnel that are unfamiliar with the Government operations, and/or demonstrates a willingness to mitigate the loss of productivity due to personnel shortages.

.3 Factor3: Key Personnel

The Government will evaluate the required information to determine how well the Offeror identifies and demonstrates that its key personnel meet or exceed the experience required by this solicitation (see Section C). The resumes of your Key Personnel will be evaluated to determine the level of their qualifications and ability to perform the duties required by this solicitation. Each key personnel should indicate the minimum qualifications of Section B to be considered acceptable.

Additional consideration will be given to the Offeror whose proposed personnel have the most relevant education, training, and skills. The resume will also be evaluated to determine the extent of successful participation in similar projects within the past five years. taking into consideration degree of client satisfaction for each project. Additional consideration will be given to Offerors whose key personnel relevant experience are extensive and highly successful.

.4 Factor 4: Past Performance

EVALUATION FACTORS FOR AWARD Page 4

The Government reserves the right to use any source of information available on the Offeror’s past performance to either evaluate past performance or verify information provided by the Offeror. The Offeror shall provide information that demonstrates the Offeror’s past performance. The enclosed “AOC PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE” shall be provided to each of the companies/agencies submitted by the offeror in response to Evaluation Factor 2. The questionnaire(s) must be emailed from the client to Darwin Thomas and Mike Chiodi by the date and time established for receipt of offers in order to be considered in the evaluation process.

A neutral rating will be applied for those projects/contracts for which a questionnaire is not received or past performance information is not available.

The Offeror shall identify four (4) contracts and/or task orders with the Federal Government and/or commercial customers that demonstrate recent and relevant past performance. Recent is defined as within the last five years. Relevant is defined as work similar in complexity and magnitude of the work described in this Statement of Work. The offeror may submit no more than four recent and relevant CPARS records for projects with similar scope, size, and complexity to this solicitation.

.3 FACTOR 5: PRICE CRITERIA. Price criterion measures not only actual dollars but also analyzes the realism and reasonableness of the Offeror’s proposed price and its position in the range of all prices. The price proposals will be evaluated as follows:

.1 Completeness: For completeness, offerors must provide unit prices for all listed items. Incomplete proposals (without required unit prices) may render an offeror’s proposal ineligible for award.

.2 Reasonableness: The proposed prices will be evaluated for reasonableness. Analysis of price proposals will be performed using one or more of the techniques defined in FAR 15.404 in order to determine price reasonableness. Reasonableness must represent a price to the Government a prudent person would pay in the conduct of competitive business. Normally, price reasonableness is established through adequate price competition, but may also be determined through price analysis techniques as described in FAR 15.404.

.3 Realism: Proposed pricing will be evaluated for price realism. Proposed pricing will be evaluated to ensure adequate understanding of the requirement and to ensure proposed pricing does not pose a risk to performance.

.4 Balance: Offeror’s proposals will be reviewed for balance. An offeror’s proposal will be determined balanced if there is an absence of unbalanced pricing. The Government will evaluate any supporting information provided by the offeror explaining variances that appear unbalanced.

END OF SECTION M

SECTION C

DESCRIPTION/SPECIFICATIONS/WORK STATEMENT

January 16, 2025

TABLE OF CONTENTS

ARTICLE

NUMER ARTICLE NAME

PAGE

NO.

C.1 SCOPE OF WORK

C.2 EXTENT OF SERVICES

C.3 DEFINITIONS

C.4 REFERENCE MATERIALS

C.5 GENERAL REQUIREMENTS

C.6 INFORMATION MANAGEMENT

C.7 PROGRESS REPORTS AND RECORDS

C.8 CONSTRUCTION SITE OFFICE FACILITIES

C.9 CONTRACTOR PERSONNEL STAFFING AND ASSIGNMENTS

C.10 ACCEPTANCE AND QUALIFICATIONS

C.11 SPECIAL PERSONNEL QUALIFICATIONS

C.12 FAILURE TO PROVIDE QUALIFIED PERSONNEL

C.13 ORIENTATION OF PERSONNEL

C.14 PROCUREMENT PHASE SERVICES

C.15 CONSTRUCTION PHASE SERVICES

C.16 CLAIMS SERVICES

C.17 POST CONSTRUCTION SERVICES

C.18 ADDITIONAL SERVICES

C.19 CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT PERSONNEL

C.20 QUALITY ASSURANCE SURVEILLANCE PLAN (QASP)

RFP No. AOC CM/PM Support Services IDIQ Page 2

SECTION C

DESCRIPTION/SPECIFICATIONS/WORK STATEMENT

C.1 SCOPE OF WORK

1.1 The scope of the professional services includes the following:

1.1.1 The Construction Management Services (CMS) Contractor shall provide construction management services for projects performed by third party contractors, or by AOC in-house forces.

The projects are typically located anywhere on the U.S Capitol Campus, Manassas, Virginia, Northern Virginia, Fort Meade, Maryland and the Blue Plains Complex located in S.E Washington, D.C.

1.1.2 The construction management activities or services required under this contract includes:

1.1.2.1 Construction Management

1.1.2.2 Inspection

1.1.2.3 Scheduling

1.1.2.4 Claims Analysis/Claims Defense

1.1.2.5 Quality Control/Quality Assurance

1.1.2.6 Testing and Inspection

1.1.2.7 Preparation of Change Order packages, including estimates and review of contractor’s proposed value engineering.

1.1.2.8 Administrative Office Support

1.1.3 In addition, the CMS Contractor will be responsible, as required, to supply certain classes of personnel to be selected by the AOC for assignments. These may be individuals or teams of people supplied to work on projects. Classifications of individuals or teams include construction-industry specific specialties such as:

1.1.3.1 Project Manager

1.1.3.2 Construction Manager

1.1.3.3 Inspector

1.1.3.4 Project Control Engineer

1.1.3.5 Administrative Assistant

1.1.3.6 Scheduler/Planner

1.1.3.7 Claims Analyst

C.2 EXTENT OF SERVICES

2.1 Construction Phase Services. These services may include: Cost evaluation services for designs and construction proposals, risk analysis and evaluation including assessment reporting, quality assurance services, monitoring the submittal review process including maintenance of submittal logs; review and monitoring of project schedules for construction progress with emphasis on milestone completion dates, phasing requirements, work flow, material deliveries, test dates, etc.; assisting in problem resolution and handling of disputed issues (including development of Government’s position, etc.); maintaining marked up sets of project plans and specifications for future as-built drawings; performing routine inspections of construction as work proceeds, taking action to identify work that does not conform to the contract requirements, and notifying the COR when work requires correction; compiling, through site inspections, lists of defects and omissions related to the work performed and providing these lists to the COR for transmission to the Contractor for correction through E-Builder as directed; review of construction contractor payment requests (including preparation of necessary forms for payment processing by AOC); monitoring

RFP No. AOC CM/PM Support Services IDIQ Page 3 project financial data and budgetary cost accounting (Maintain spread sheets indicating project fund allowances, obligations, payments, balances, planned expenditures, etc.); administration of construction contract change orders (drafting proposal requests, preparing cost estimates, reviewing cost proposals, assisting AOC in negotiations, preparing change order packages for processing); scheduling, conducting, and documenting regular progress meetings with all interested parties to review project status, discuss problems, and resolve issues; scheduling, conducting, and documenting (prepare minutes, etc. for distribution) construction related project meetings; monitoring construction contractor compliance with established safety standards (note and report unsafe working conditions, failures to adhere to safety plan required by construction contract); monitoring construction contractor's compliance with contract labor standards (including performing site labor interviews, collecting, reviewing, and maintaining weekly payrolls for all project contractors and subcontractors, reporting potential wage violations to AOC personnel); coordination of construction activities with AOC Superintendent’s Offices and occupying agency personnel; monitoring the design and construction clarification process and, when appropriate, reminding the Associate A/E and other parties involved of the need for timely actions; facilitation of partnering activities; participation in all “Partnering” activities during construction (workshops, meetings, etc.); preparing special reports and regular project status reports; providing for progress and final photographs of project work; perform site surveys using a registered surveyor (establish building lines, elevations, approaches, utility locations, etc.); provide regular schedule analysis support including contractor schedule evaluation reporting; provide drafting services with CAD support (as-built drawings, survey layouts, utility plans); provide assistance in obtaining permits; perform hazardous material assessments and monitoring of hazardous material abatement work; and provide cost estimating assistance and as necessary these services may also include: establishing temporary field offices; setting up job files, working folders, and record keeping systems; maintaining organized construction files; scheduling and conducting preconstruction meetings; handling/preparing project correspondence to respond to the parties involved with each project, confirm verbal discussions/directives, document actions taken and decisions made, etc.; preparing and maintaining daily reports for project activities noting events affecting construction progress (weather, manpower, site equipment, work performed, etc.).

2.2 Commissioning Services. These services shall include providing professional and technical expertise for start-up, calibration, and certification of a facility or operating systems within a facility. The CMS Contractor shall be able to provide any level of commissioning needed from total support to specialty services. Commissioning services may require start-up planning, forecasting start-up duration, estimating start-up costs, determining start-up objectives, organizing start-up teams and team assignments, testing building system components, conducting performance tests, obtaining O&M material, plus conducting, scheduling and supervising O&M training. All such work must be authorized in advance by the Government.

2.3 Testing Services: The CMS Contractor may be tasked to provide the services of an independent testing agency/laboratory to perform project specific quality control testing and inspection services. The services may include, but are not limited to, testing/inspection of soils, concrete, precast concrete connections, steel, steel decking, applied fireproofing, roofing, curtain walls/glazing, and elevator installations. All such work must be authorized in advance by the Government. In relation to procurement of an independent testing agent/laboratory, the following provisions shall apply:

2.3.1 When and as applicable (consult the COR), obtain and evaluate up to three bids/offers from qualified laboratories or firms, and make recommendations for awards to the COR.

2.3.2 Offers for testing services shall typically be structured on a fixed unit price basis.

2.3.3 Testing services shall be coordinated with on-going work at the individual project sites for efficient performance and so as not to delay work in progress.

2.3.4 The CMS Contractor shall monitor all independent testing services procured under this contract, and immediately notify the COR in writing of any inadequate processes and materials not meeting construction requirements.

RFP No. AOC CM/PM Support Services IDIQ Page 4

2.3.5 Independent testing service agents, including testing laboratories, must be pre-qualified by the American Council of Independent Laboratories and be capable of demonstrating that they specialize in the types of inspections and tests to be performed.

2.4 Claims Services. The CMS Contractor may be tasked to provide Claims Services when and as required by the Government for specific projects. Claims services will be obtained using the applicable hourly rate(s) (see the article entitled, “Schedule of Items” of Section B). For definition purposes, Claims Services apply to providing technical support (not legal assistance) in handling disputed matters once a contractor has made written demand for payment or other relief under the contract and submitted it to the Contracting Officer for decision in accordance with the disputes provision of the construction contract. A claim does not arise solely upon the occurrence of a dispute or controversy. In relation to Claims Services, the CMS Contractor shall review disputes and claims from the Associate Architect/Engineer and construction contractor(s) and render all assistance that the Government may require, including the following:

2.4.1 Furnishing reports with supporting information necessary to resolve disputes or defend against the claims.

2.4.2 Preparation and assembly of appeal files.

2.4.3 Participation in meetings or negotiations with claimants.

2.4.4 Appearance in legal proceedings.

2.4.5 Preparation of cost estimates for use in claims negotiations.

2.4.6 Preparation of risk assessments/analyses relative to claim exposures.

2.4.7 Preparation of findings of fact and any other documentation required by the

Government.

2.5 The CMS contractor may be required to provide additional services including provision of specialty consultants and expertise, unique services after final contract settlement, special studies, updates to AOC documents, certification of services, provision of equipment, support for AOC briefings, surveys, drafting services, shop drawing review and constructability reviews.

C.3 DEFINITIONS

3.1 Associate Architects/Engineers (A/Es). The professional services contractors responsible for designing the projects. The A/Es may perform other services during the construction phases, which are not included in the task orders for the CMS Contractor, the construction contractors, or other firms associated with the project.

3.2 Construction Manager Services (CMS) Contractor. The CMS Contractor is the Contractor selected to assist AOC by performing required work in the Procurement, Construction Phases, Claims and Miscellaneous Services as specified in the contract. In providing the project services described in the contract, the CMS Contractor shall maintain a working relationship with architect-engineers, construction contractors, and other contractors supporting the Government. Nothing in this contract shall be construed to mean that the CMS Contractor assumes any of the contractual responsibilities or duties of the architects/engineers or construction contractors. The construction contractors are solely responsible for construction means, methods, sequences and procedures used in the construction of the projects, and for related performance in accordance with their contracts with the Government. The architects/engineers are solely responsible for the project designs and shall perform all design-related services in accordance with their contracts with the Government.

3.3 Construction Manager/Contracting Officer's Representative (COR). These are AOC employees assigned as COR. Name, address, and telephone number of the COR shall be provided at the time of contract award and the duties thereby delegated to that person. Any subsequent change to the individual or the individual’s responsibilities will be confirmed in writing by the Contracting Officer. In no instance will the COR be delegated authority to order any change in the contractor’s performance which would affect cost or

RFP No. AOC CM/PM Support Services IDIQ Page 5 schedule. The COR for the contract may or may not be the same individual assigned as COR on individual task orders as issued.

3.4 E-Builder. E-Builder is the AOC’s current Project Management Information Software (PMIS).

The government reserves the right to change its PMIS at any given time during the contract period. If a PMIS change is adopted during the contract period, the CMS shall insert the new PMIS name in place oof E-Builder. The CMS may be required by the government to use multiple PMIS platforms during the contract period.

3.5 Home Office Area. This term means the cities/states/counties in which the CMS Contractor's active office(s) is/are located. If the CMS Contractor's active office(s) is/are located in metropolitan areas consisting of more than one county, the metropolitan area shall be considered the Home Office Area.

3.6 Key Personnel. The following personnel are considered “Key Personnel”; Construction Executive (1 individual), Senior Construction Managers (3 individuals), Construction Manager (3 individuals), Senior Scheduler/Analyst (1 Individual), Senior Claims Analyst (1 Individual), and the Senior Commissioning Agent (1 Individual). See the articles entitled, “INSTRUCTIONS FOR PREPARING THE TECHNICAL PROPOSAL” in Section L and “PROPOSAL EVALUATION CRITERIA” in Section M. If the CMS Contractor wishes to change key personnel during the contract, the suggested replacement must be approved by the Contracting Officer per “KEY PERSONNEL” in Section G. An individual task order may require an individual designated as a key person. The task order key person will among other things act as a liaison between any subcontractors utilized under the task order and the AOC. All Personnel shall have the minimum experience identified under Labor Categories in

“DEFINITIONS”.

3.7 Level of Effort. The CMS Contractor is totally responsible for its performance and deliverables.

The Government may require that work be accelerated at certain times to preserve its obligations for accomplishment of the projects. If necessary, this may include issuing contract modifications to the CMS Contractor to provide additional man-hours at specific disciplines/labor categories and rates.

3.8 Local Office. The active production office to be utilized by the CMS Contractor. All management, communications, and control associated with the projects must be through this office.

3.9 Management Level. Includes persons vested with authority for decision-making, establishing commitments for the firm, documentation approvals, manpower and equipment assignments, etc.

3.10 Miscellaneous Services. This term refers to performance of services associated with Additional Services, Other Services, and Testing and Claims Services in support of this contract. Advance approval by the AOC is required. These services may be required by the COR and issued by task order(s).

3.11 Project Manager (PM). These are AOC employees assigned to the projects as representatives of the AOC.