Attachment 9 Draft Section L Scenario.docx

Air Base Air Defense Section L Draft Technical Approach Scenario

1 Subfactor One (Scenario)

The offeror shall present an oral presentation that contains the information necessary to address the technical criteria of the scenario in section 4.2.3.1.3 . The presentation shall be in an orderly format and be consistent with the evaluation criteria for award set forth in this solicitation. The offeror shall include the criteria in section 4.2.3.1.1 in its solution, and clearly provide a solution that will meet or exceed the Success Criteria in section 4.2.3.1.2. The offeror shall also demonstrate that it has a thorough understanding and knowledge of the scenario and solution to the scenario, and present as specific as possible the actual methodologies that will be used to meet or exceed the Success Criteria in section 4.2.3.1.2.

4.2.3.1.1 The scenario presentation shall include:

· An Operations View (OV) of a base defense network that will be able to respond and counter the threat

· An overall detail list of the systems that will be used with a brief description of each system. This can include currently available Commercial Off The Shelf (COTS) systems or any other systems that could be modified or available within the next three years

· A list of potential software tool/systems that would be employed to maintain and operate the system

· A manpower estimate to include required personnel to maintain and operate the system and a brief explanation of the their required skillset

· One (1) simplified cost estimate of this system to include 1 year of operations and maintenance. Only 1 slide is authorized for the cost estimate. This cost estimate is only to ensure the solution will be realistic to implement, and will not be used for the Pricing Factor evaluation

4.2.3.1.2 Success Criteria:

· No small Unmanned Aircraft Systems (sUAS) are able to penetrate the perimeter of the base fence line

· All cruise missiles are detected within 100 kilometer (km) of the base

· All cruise missiles are identified/categorized within 50 km of the base

· All cruise missiles are engaged/destroyed within 5 km of the base

· System must be realistic and feasible to implement

· Must cost less than $15M to procure, and $7M to operate and maintain the capability per location every year

· Must be sustained by no more than 10 personnel and operated by no more than 12 personnel. This includes 24/7/365 days a year operation

4.2.3.1.3 Scenario: A United States Air Force Base located within Germany has received multiple intelligence reports that it is expected to come under attack from multiple airborne threats. Details of the threats are as follows:

Attack 1:

· Within the first hour the base is expecting air intrusions by 15 separate UAS. It is anticipated that the UAS systems will be of a Dà-Jiāng Innovations (DJI) variant

· These UAS have the potential to threaten the base from any direction, but will not be able to achieve an altitude greater than the current capability of a DJI drone

· No more than 3 UAS will penetrate the same section of the base at the same time

Attack 2:

· Within the second hour the base is expecting an attack by 5 cruise missiles

· The cruise missiles are of the AS-23A variant

· These cruise missiles all have the potential to arrive within 30 seconds of each other

· The cruise missiles will strike various locations on the base

Assumptions:

· The system will be employed on a Main Operating Base (MOB) and all standard infrastructure available on a base can be utilized (power, fiber, water, facilities, base security)

· The MOB fence line fits within a 10 km diameter circle

· The system can be operated by Air Force personnel with a five skill level training equivalent