A00819-608460.pdf
PDF 3 MB Posted
- Attached to
- 608460 HADLEY FAP No. NHP(BRR-ON)-003S(813)X Bridge Replacement, H-01-005, Bay Road (Route 47) ove
- Solicitation number
- BD-25-1030-0H100-0H002-116001
- Issued by
- Hampshire County, Massachusetts
About this file
This document is a Bridge Inspection Report prepared by the Massachusetts Department of Transportation (MassDOT) Highway Division for a bridge located in Hadley, Massachusetts. The report, dated October 5, 2023, provides a comprehensive assessment of the State Route 47 Bay Road bridge over the Fort River, which was originally built in 1935. The inspection covers various structural elements including the deck, superstructure, substructure, and channel protection, with detailed observations of the bridge's condition, potential deficiencies, and recommended maintenance actions.
The inspection reveals multiple areas of concern, including minor to moderate deterioration across various bridge components. Specific issues include longitudinal cracking in the wearing surface, spalling and exposed rebar in the deck and curbs, settlement of approach sidewalks, erosion of embankments, debris accumulation in the channel, and structural weaknesses in pile bents and bracing. The bridge's overall condition is rated as satisfactory (condition rating 5 for deck, superstructure, and substructure), but the report suggests several areas requiring maintenance and potential repair. The inspection also notes traffic safety concerns, particularly with approach guardrails and transitions that are considered old, loose, weak, and substandard.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| A00844-608460.pdf | ||
| HADLEY-608460-130088-A-1.pdf | ||
| A00828-608460.pdf | ||
| A00820-608460.pdf | ||
| A00841-608460.pdf | ||
| 608460 - Bid Tabulations.pdf | ||
| 608460 - Notice to Contractors.pdf | ||
| A00804-608460.pdf | ||
| HADLEY-608460-130088-A-2.pdf | ||
| A00834-608460.pdf | ||
| 608460 Bid Items.txt | TXT text file | |
| A00801-608460~1.pdf | ||
| Link to Bid Opening 9-3-2025~2.pdf | ||
| A00826-608460.pdf | ||
| BIDS OPENED - Wednesday - September 3-2025.pdf | ||
| A00802-608460.pdf | ||
| A00846-608460.pdf | ||
| A00810-608460.pdf | ||
| A00831-608460.pdf | ||
| 608460 - Updated Plan Holders List.pdf | ||
| A00875-608460.pdf | ||
| A00808-608460.pdf | ||
| A00818-608460.pdf | ||
| A00811-608460.pdf | ||
| 608460 - Plan Holders List~1.pdf | ||
| A00829-608460.pdf |
Show all 26
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Massachusetts Department Of Transportation Highway Division Proposal No. 608460-130088
A00819 - 1
DOCUMENT A00819
BRIDGE INSPECTION REPORT
Massachusetts Department Of Transportation Highway Division
A00819 - 2
THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
1. Abutments
3. Pile Bents
2. Piers or Bents
Dive Cur
OVERHEAD SIGNS
(Attached to bridge)
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
DEFDECK SUPERSTRUCTURE SUBSTRUCTURE
1.
2.
3.
4.
a.
b.
c.
d.
e.
f.
g.
6.
7.
8.
5.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
Year Painted
COLLISION DAMAGE: Please explain
LOAD DEFLECTION: Please explain
LOAD VIBRATION: Please explain
CURB REVEAL
ITEM 58
(In millimeters)
APPROACHES DEF
DEF
(Y/N) a.
b.
c.
a.
b.
c.
Any Cracks:
(Y/N)
(Y/N)
COLLISION DAMAGE:
UNDERMINING (Y/N) If YES please explain
SCOUR: Please explain
I-60 (Dive Report):
Any Fracture Critical Member:
93B-U/W (DIVE) Insp a.
b.
c.
d.
e.
f.
g.
DEF DEF
X=UNKNOWN N=NOT APPLICABLE H=HIDDEN/INACCESSIBLE R=REMOVED
ITEM 59 ITEM 60
RTN(1)7-96
h.
i.
j.
k.
a.
b.
c.
d.
e.
f.
g.
h.
i.
a.
b.
c.
d.
e.
I-60 (This Report):
l.
m.
j.
k.
d.
STRUCTURES INSPECTION FIELD REPORT2-DIST B.I.N. BR. DEPT. NO.
CITY/TOWN 8.-STRUCTURE NO. 41-STATUS 90-ROUTINE INSP. DATE
MEMORIAL NAME/LOCAL NAME 27-YR BUILT 106-YR REBUILT YR REHAB'D (NON 106)
06-FEATURES INTERSECTED 26-FUNCTIONAL CLASS
43-STRUCTURE TYPE 22-OWNER 21-MAINTAINER
WEATHER TEMP. (air)
TEAM LEADER
07-FACILITY CARRIED
TEAM MEMBERS107-DECK TYPE
1PAGE OF
)None ( Minor ( Moderate ( Severe ()))
)None ( Minor ( Moderate ( Severe ()))
)None ( Minor ( Moderate ( Severe ()))
)None ( Minor ( Moderate ( Severe ()))
)None ( Minor ( Moderate ( Severe ()))
DIST. BRIDGE INSPECTION ENGINEER
MASSACHUSETTS DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
ROUTINE INSPECTION02 12J
H-01-005
11-Kilo. POINT
HADLEY H01005-12J-DOT-NBI 010.621 A:OPEN OCT 5, 2023
M. Barrett
Urban Arterial
A. Power
201 : Concrete continuous Slab State Highway Agency
State Highway Agency
1 : Concrete Cast-in-Place J. LENARES
5 5 5
Wearing Surface 6 M-P Stringers N - 5
Deck Condition 5 M-P Floorbeams N - Pedestals N N -
Bridge Seats N H - Stay in Place Forms N - Floor System Bracing N - Backwalls N N -
Curbs 6 - Girders or Beams N - Breastwalls N 5 M-P
N N - N - Trusses - General N - Wingwalls
Median N 5 M-P N
Slope Paving/Rip-Rap
6 - Upper Chords
Sidewalks Pointing N N -
Lower Chords N - N N - Parapets N -
Footings
Web Members N - Timber Piles N H -
Railing 6 - Scour N 5 M-P Lateral Bracing N -
N - Settlement N 7 -
Anti Missile Fence Sway Bracings N - N N -
Drainage System 6 - Portals N - N N -
Lighting Standards N - N End Posts N -
6 M-P N N -
Utilities Pin & Hangers N Pedestals
- Caps N N -
Deck Joints N - Conn Plt's, Gussets & Angles N - Columns N N -
Cover Plates N N N N - -
Stems/Webs/Pierwalls -
Pointing N N -
N - Bearing Devices N - Footing N N -
Diaphragms/Cross Frames N - Piles N N - N -
N N N
Rivets & Bolts - Scour -
Settlement N N E W -
Welds N - N N - 215 240
Member Alignment 7 - N N -
Paint/Coating N 5
N 6 - Concrete Slab 5
Pile Caps M-P
Appr. pavement condition 6 M-P Piles N 5 M-P
Diagonal Bracing N 6 - Appr. Roadway Settlement 7 - Horizontal Bracing N 6 -
Appr. Sidewalk Settlement 5 M-P Fasteners N 6 -
XN - N
N X
X
X Condition of Welds N - X
Condition of Bolts N - N 7 5 Condition of Signs N -
N 03/24/2016
ST 47 BAY RD 1935 0000 0000
WATER FORT RIVER
Overcast 23°C
N
A00819 - 3
RATING If YES please give priority:
HIGH ( MEDIUM ( LOW ( )))
CLEARANCE POSTING
Out of service - beyond corrective action.
ITEM 61 (This Report):
DEFECTS
Excellent condition.
No problem noted.
Some minor problems.
Major deterioration or section loss present in critical structural components or obvious vertical or horizontal movement affecting structure stablility.
Bridge is closed to traffic but corrective action may put it back in light service.
Structural elements show some minor deterioration.
All primary structural elements are sound but may have minor section loss, cracking, spalling or scour.
Advanced section loss, deterioration, spalling or scour.
Loss of section, deterioration, spalling or scour have seriously affected primary structural components. Local failures are possible. Fatigue cracks in steel or shear cracks in concrete may be present.
Advanced deterioration of primary structural elements. Fatigue cracks in steel or shear cracks in concrete may be present or scour may have removed substructure support. Unless closely monitored it may be necessary to close the bridge until corrective action is taken.
REASON:
Recommend for Rating or Rerating (Y/N):
Date:
Rating Report (Y/N):
CHANNEL &
CHANNEL PROTECTION
RTB(2)04-07
ACCESSIBILITY
Lift Bucket
Ladder
Boat
Waders
Inspector 50
Rigging
Staging
Traffic Control
RR Flagger
Police
Other:
(Y/N/P)
DEF
ITEM 36 TRAFFIC SAFETY
36 COND
A. Bridge Railing
B. Transitions
C. Approach Guardrail
D. Approach Guardrail Ends
ITEM 61
WEIGHT POSTING Not Applicable
Actual Posting
Recommended Posting
Waived Date:
Signs In Place
EJDMT Date:
(Y=Yes,N=No, NR=NotRequired) Legibility/ Visibility
At bridge Other Advance
STREAM FLOW VELOCITY:
ITEM 61 (Dive Report):
93b-U/W INSP. DATE:
PLANS (Y/N):
TOTAL HOURS
Signs In Place
Legibility/ Visibility
Not
Actual Field Measurement
Posted Clearance inft
List of field tests performed:
S= Severe/Major Deficiency
C-S= Critical Structural Deficiency -
M= Minor Deficiency
CATEGORIES OF DEFICIENCIES:
URGENCY OF REPAIR:
DEFICIENCY:
I = Immediate-
A = ASAP-
P = Prioritize-
At bridge Advance
(For Items 58, 59, 60 and 61)
Dive Cur DEF
Deficiencies which are more extensive in nature and need more planning and effort to repair. Examples include but are not limited to: Moderate to major deterioration in concrete, Exposed and corroded rebars, Considerable settlement, Considerable scouring or undermining, Moderate to extensive corrosion to structural steel with measurable loss of section, etc.
Deficiencies which are minor in nature, generally do not impact the structural integrity of the bridge and could easily be repaired. Examples include but are not limited to: Spalled concrete, Minor pot holes, Minor corrosion of steel, Minor scouring, Clogged drainage, etc.
A defect in a structure that requires corrective action.
[Shall be prioritized by District Maintenance Engineer or the Responsible Party (if not a State owned bridge) and repairs made when funds and/or manpower is available].
[Action/Repair should be initiated by District Maintenance Engineer or the Responsible Party (if not a State owned bridge) upon receipt of the Inspection Report].
A deficiency in a structural element of a bridge that poses an extreme unsafe condition due to the failure or imminent failure of the element which will affect the structural integrity of the bridge.
C-H= Critical Hazard Deficiency A deficiency in a component or element of a bridge that poses an extreme hazard or unsafe condition to the public, but does not impair the structural integrity of the bridge. Examples include but are not limited to: Loose concrete hanging down over traffic or pedestrians, A hole in a sidewalk that may cause injuries to pedestrians, Missing section of bridge railing, etc.
[Inspector(s) immediately contact District Bridge Inspection Engineer (DBIE) to report the Deficiency and to receive further instruction from him/her].
meterinft
SERIOUS
CRITICAL
"IMMINENT" FAILURE
FAILED
NOT APPLICABLE
CODE CONDITION
G
G
G
F
F
P
P
C
C
N
EXCELLENT
VERY GOOD
GOOD
SATISFACTORY
FAIR
POOR
Needed Used
B.I.N. BR. DEPT. NO.CITY/TOWN 8.-STRUCTURE NO. INSPECTION DATE
(Y=Yes,N=No, NR=Not Required)
2PAGE OF
DEFICIENCY REPORTING GUIDE
Inspection data at time of existing rating
I 58: I 59: I 60: Date :
(V.C.R.)
TAPE#:
(Y/N):
1.
2.
3.
5.
6.
7.
8.
4.
CONDITION RATING GUIDE
Tidal ( High ( Moderate ( Low ( None ( )))))
3S2 SingleH 3
6 -
N N 3 S-P
N N 3 S-P N N
N 6 - 3 S-P Y Y
N 6 - X P Y
N 5 M-P N N
N N N 7 -
P Y N N -
N N N 6 - P Y
N 6 -
N N - N N
Y X
N
X
Y N
5 5 5
N N N N
N N N N
00/00/0000 00/00/0000
0 0
0 0
6 6
03/24/2016
06/01/2021
N S N S
E W E W
E W
12J H01005-12J-DOT-NBIHADLEY OCT 5, 2023H-01-005
10/31/2017
Channel Scour
Fender System
Aggradation
Rip-Rap/Slope Protection
Utilities
Vegetation
Debris
Embankment Erosion
A00819 - 4
PAGE
REM.(2)7-96
REMARKS
12J H01005-12J-DOT-NBI
3 23
HADLEY OCT 5, 2023
OF
B.I.N. BR. DEPT. NO.CITY/TOWN 8.-STRUCTURE NO. INSPECTION DATE
H-01-005
BRIDGE ORIENTATION
Bridge carries State Route 47, north and south, over the Fort River which flows from east to west.
Per the 7/1/2018 Rating Report, the 7 bents and 8 spans are numbered from south to north. The piles are numbered from west to east. See Sketches 1 - 3.
GENERAL REMARKS
Traffic Control:
Two Police Officers are needed a one-lane, alternating traffic set-up if the UBIU (Aspen 62) is to be utilized.
Water Level:
Previous reports note that the water level fluctuates by up to 10' at this structure. High water levels may prevent streambed inspection by above water inspection team.
ITEM 58 - DECK
Item 58.1 - Wearing Surface Hot mix asphalt (HMA) Wearing Surface has minor longitudinal cracking and a core hole in the southbound lane. See Photo 1.
Northbound Lane:
• 20' from north end, there is a pothole, 8" long x 14" wide x 2" deep.
• 25' from north end, there is a patched pothole 18" diameter. See Photo 2.
Item 58.2 - Deck Condition Deck Underside has minor cracking with rust staining and efflorescence, delaminations, and scaling/spalling with corroded rebar. Several various concrete patches in all Spans. See Sketch 4 and Photos 3 & 4.
Item 58.4 - Curbs East & West Curbs have reflective placards along the interior face.
East & West Curbs have some scattered hairline cracking with rust staining and efflorescence.
East Curb:
• 15' from the north end, spalled area with exposed rebar, 4' long x 6" high x 4" deep. See Photo 5.
• 60' from the north end, delaminated area 6" wide x 14' long with cracking and rust staining.
Item 58.6 - Sidewalks Sidewalk Surface had scattered transverse cracking up to 1/8" wide.
Sidewalk Underside has random transverse hairline cracks with efflorescence, delaminations and scaling.
East Fascia Sidewalk Support Beam has some deterioration to the vertical and horizontal faces.
See Photo 6.
See Sketch 4 for sidewalk beam & sidewalk underside defects.
Item 58.8 - Railing Railing consists of three 4" wide x 6" high concrete rails, the top of which is 3' high off the sidewalk, and 10" x 10" x 3'-3" high concrete posts.
A00819 - 5
REMARKS
12J H01005-12J-DOT-NBI
4 23
HADLEY OCT 5, 2023
OF
B.I.N. BR. DEPT. NO.CITY/TOWN 8.-STRUCTURE NO. INSPECTION DATE
H-01-005
Railings have minor chips and spalls.
East Railing, south end, has moderate vegetation growth.
Item 58.10 - Drainage System Bridge Deck Underside around the drain holes has scaling and spalling, with severe corrosion to the old and new drain pipes. See Sketch 4 & Photo 4.
Item 58.12 - Utilities Concrete Supports for the utility pipe are cracked, delaminated, and spalled with exposed and corroded rebars. See Sketch 4 & Photo 7.
Bridge has retro-fit galvanized steel utility hangers and U-bolts in all spans except for 1, & 6 - 8. Hanger bolts of the Span 4 retro fit are loose.
In Spans 1, 4, 5, 7, & 8, the insulation wrap is falling off the pipe. Some new insulation and insulation protection installed on the utility pipe in Spans 3 - 6.
APPROACHES
Approaches a - Appr. pavement condition South Approach:
• Transverse cracking and slight breakup at the deck interface.
• Southbound lane has minor segregation.
North Approach:
• Moderate transverse & longitudinal cracking up to 0.3" wide.
• A few small areas of broken pavement, and a patched pothole 18" wide x 4" long x 2" deep.
• Two patched cores holes in the Southbound Lane near the right wheel path.
• Pothole adjacent to the deck end, southbound lane, near centerline, 8" long x 18" wide x 1.5 deep.
See Photo 8.
Approaches c - Appr. Sidewalk Settlement North HMA approach sidewalk has 3" of settlement. See Photo 9.
South HMA approach sidewalk has 2" of settlement.
ITEM 59 - SUPERSTRUCTURE
Item 59.15 - Concrete Slab Refer to Item 58.2. - Deck Condition.
ITEM 60 - SUBSTRUCTURE
Item 60.1 - Abutments Item 60.1.d - Breastwalls North & South Breastwalls have large spalled areas along the top edges.
North Breastwall:
• West corner, top is spalled with exposed rebar, 2' wide x 1.3' high x up to 2" deep.
• Center section, top is spalled, 25' wide x 1' high x up to 2" deep.
A00819 - 6
REMARKS
12J H01005-12J-DOT-NBI
5 23
HADLEY OCT 5, 2023
OF
B.I.N. BR. DEPT. NO.CITY/TOWN 8.-STRUCTURE NO. INSPECTION DATE
H-01-005
South Breastwall, top is spalled with exposed rebar and minor efflorescence, 39' wide x up to 4" deep x up to 2' high. See Photo 10.
Item 60.1.f - Slope Paving/Rip-Rap Some of the Rip-Rap on both slopes have been mortared during a previous repair project.
North Slope has broken off due to river erosion and has settled, up to 8". See Photo 11.
South Slope has broken off due to river erosion and has settled, up to 1".
Item 60.1.j - Scour Mortared Rip-Rap settlement mentioned in Item 60.1.f - Slope Paving/Rip Rap is indicative of scour.
Item 60.3 - Pile Bents Item 60.3.a - Pile Caps Some efflorescence leaching through the deck slab and onto the concrete caps.
Caps have cracking and delamination:
Bent 3, under the sidewalk, has a small delamination 1' high x 1' wide.
Bent 4, over Pile 5, there is a 0.05" wide vertical crack.
Bent 5:
• Over Pile 9, there is a diagonal crack up to 0.15" wide x 18" long.
• Over Pile 5 there is a 0.05" wide vertical crack.
Bent 6, over Pile 5 - 7, has vertical cracking up to 0.05" wide .
Bent 7, over Pile 5 & 6, has vertical cracking up to 0.05" wide .
Item 60.3.b - Piles Tops of the timber piles are embedded in the concrete caps.
Bents 2 - 6 bottoms of the timber piles have been encased in a concrete filled steel jacket.
Steel angles holding the jackets closed on the upstream end of Bents 3 & 5 have been damaged/crushed.
Exterior piles (1 & 9) on each bent have severe deterioration due to increased element exposure.
Bents 1 & 7 are on the abutment slopes, above the average low to high watermarks. These timber piles are unprotected, but are in fair to good condition. See Photo 11.
Bents 2 - 6, Piles have been encased with a fiberglass form and then grouted 2' below the mud line to the bottom of the bracing with the previous metal jackets remaining. See Photo 12.
Timber piles are weathered with minor scattered delaminations, minor checking up to 1" deep and have creosote loss:
Bent 3
A00819 - 7
REMARKS
12J H01005-12J-DOT-NBI
6 23
HADLEY OCT 5, 2023
OF
B.I.N. BR. DEPT. NO.CITY/TOWN 8.-STRUCTURE NO. INSPECTION DATE
H-01-005
• Pile 9, has a 1.25" wide x 8' high split for the full-height above the metal jacket and 3 reinforcing steel collars near the top. The splitting and collars on this pile have been noted on inspection reports since 1977. See Photo 13.
• Top of Pile 1, has a minor check 4" wide x 18" high x 1" deep.
Bent 4, Pile 7, has two checks with penetrations up to 2", one near the pier cap interface, the other at the lower section of the exposed pile near the jacket interface.
Bent 5:
• Pile 1, is in poor condition having rot and soft, punky wood on the west half of the pile for the full height of exposure, with several checks with up to 4" penetration in this area. See Photo 14.
• Pile 7, has one check with up to 2" penetration.
• Pile 9, at the concrete cap - 85% of the top of the pile is not in contact with the cap and the connection pin has moderate corrosion. See Photo 15.
Bent 6:
• Pile 1, is in poor condition having rot and soft, punky wood on the west half of the pile for the full height of exposure. There are several spits with up to 2" penetration in this area.
• Pile 5, has one check 3' long x up to 2" penetration.
• Pile 9, east side has a 1/8" thick depth of splintering and delaminating wood, and a few scattered checks with up to 1" penetration.
Item 60.3.c - Diagonal Bracing Bent 1, at the upstream end of the lower upstream diagonal brace there is heavy decay, up to 1' deep.
Bent 6, at the end of the upper downstream diagonal brace there is a 4' long crack up to 0.4" wide.
Item 60.3.d - Horizontal Bracing Bridge has severe decay & splitting to the horizontal bracing:
• Bent 3, between Pile 6 & 7.
• Bent 4, between Pile 4 & 5.
• Bent 5, between Pile 8 & 9.
Horizontal bracing is missing at Bent 6, between Pile 2 & 3. See Photo 16.
Item 60.3.e - Fasteners Bent 3, Column 9, top collars have moderate surface rust. See Photo 13.
Bent 6, top of Column 6 at the diagonal brace connection, has a missing bolt.
ITEM 61 - CHANNEL AND CHANNEL PROTECTION
Item 61.1 - Channel Scour Channel has minor scour at the noses of Bents 3, 4, & 5.
Channel has increased depth at the upstream ends of Spans 4, 5, & 6.
Item 61.2 - Embankment Erosion Upstream & Downstream Embankments have erosion with exposed roots and downed trees.
See Photo 17.
A00819 - 8
REMARKS
12J H01005-12J-DOT-NBI
7 23
HADLEY OCT 5, 2023
OF
B.I.N. BR. DEPT. NO.CITY/TOWN 8.-STRUCTURE NO. INSPECTION DATE
H-01-005
Item 61.3 - Debris Channel has random timber debris throughout:
• Heavy debris along the south face of Bent 3. See Photo 18.
• Moderate to heavy debris across the upstream end of the structure typically spanning from bent to bent in Spans 3 - 6. See Photo 19.
Item 61.6 - Rip-Rap/Slope Protection Grouted Rip-Rap at either abutment is shifted due to erosion.
Item 61.7 - Aggradation Channel has aggregation within Span 3 as well as a vegetated landmass at the Southwest Embankment which appears to partially overtop during high flows. See Photo 18.
TRAFFIC SAFETY
Item 36a - Bridge Railing Refer to Item 58.8. - Railing.
Item 36b - Transitions Northwest Approach has steel W-beam approach guardrail not attached to the concrete endpost on steel H-posts.
Southwest Approach has steel W-beam approach guardrail bolted to the concrete endpost, on steel H-posts with plastic offset blocks.
Northeast & Southeast Approaches have older steel beam guardrails that are not attached to the concrete endposts, concrete or timber posts, and single strand cable wires attached to a metal collars that are around the concrete endposts. Transitions are old, loose, weak, and substandard. See Photo 20.
Item 36c - Approach Guardrail Southwest Approach guardrail consists of steel W-beam guardrail on steel H-posts with plastic offset blocks.
Northwest Approach guardrail consists of steel W-beam guardrail on steel H-posts.
Northeast Approach guardrail consists of a single strand cable wire above a single panel steel beam on concrete posts. There are also two sections of W-Beam. One section starts on the third post from the bridge and has two panels on concrete posts. The second section starts on the 15th post from the bridge and has 5 panels on steel posts. In several locations, the metal railing is not attached to the posts and the cable is loose. See Photo 21.
Southeast Approach guardrail consist of a single strand cable wire above a single panel steel beam with concrete and/or timber posts. There are also three sections of W-Beam that starts on the fourth, and only, timber post from the bridge. In several locations, the metal railing is not attached to the posts and the cable is loose.
Item 36d - Approach Guardrail Ends Southwest Approach guardrail has a tangent guardrail end.
Southeast, Northeast, & Northwest Approaches have steel terminal ends that are low to the ground.
See Photo 22.
A00819 - 9
REMARKS
12J H01005-12J-DOT-NBI
8 23
HADLEY OCT 5, 2023
OF
B.I.N. BR. DEPT. NO.CITY/TOWN 8.-STRUCTURE NO. INSPECTION DATE
H-01-005
Sketch / Photo Log Sketch 1 : Plan Sketch 2 : Elevation Sketch 3 : Cross Section Sketch 4 : Plan View - Defects Photo 1 : Wearing Surface has minor longitudinal cracking and an unfilled core hole in the Southbound
Lane.
Photo 2 : Northbound Lane, 20' from north end, there is a pothole, 8" long x 14" wide x 2" deep and 25' from north end, there is a patched pothole 18" diameter.
Photo 3 : Span 3, west deck edge & deck underside have scaling, spalling, cracking and delaminations.
Photo 4 : Deck Underside, Span 4, west end has spalling and exposed rebar.
Photo 5 : East Curb is spalled with exposed rebar.
Photo 6 : East Sidewalk Support Beam, Span 7, has cracking and spalling with exposed rebar.
Photo 7 : Span 5, utility line supports are deteriorated and replaced.
Photo 8 : North Approach has transverse & longitudinal cracks, minor pavement breakup at the deck edge and a pothole at the deck end near the centerline.
Photo 9 : North HMA Approach Sidewalk has 3" of settlement.
Photo 10 : South Breastwall has severe deterioration at the bridge seat. North Breastwall is in similar condition.
Photo 11 : North Slope Paving has settled up to 8" adjacent to Bent 7, Pile 4.
Photo 12 : Pile Bents 2 - 6 are in the channel and have been encased with a fiberglass form and grouted
2' below the mud line to the bottom of metal jackets.
Photo 13 : Bent 3, Pile 9, has a wide split at the top of the pile with a steel collar that is corroded.
Photo 14 : Bent 5, Pile 1 is in poor condition with several checks.
Photo 15 : Bent 5, Pile 9, has minimal contact with the pier cap above. Pile to cap connection pin is starting to corrode.
Photo 16 : Bent 6 has a missing horizontal bracing between Pile 2 and Pile 3.
Photo 17 : Upstream Northeast Embankment has erosion with several downed trees.
Photo 18 : Channel has a heavy debris build-up along the south face of Bent 3. Aggradation in Span 3.
Photo 19 : Channel has moderate to heavy debris caught at the upstream end of the piers. Some debris is under the waterline in this photo.
Photo 20 : Southeast Approach transition is old, loose, weak, and substandard.
Photo 21 : Northeast Approach guardrail is nonconforming.
Photo 22 : Southeast Approach end post is low to the ground.
A00819 - 10
A00819 - 11
A00819 - 12
A00819 - 13
A00819 - 14
Wearing Surface has minor longitudinal cracking and an unfilled core hole in the Southbound Lane.
Northbound Lane, 20' from north end, there is a pothole, 8" long x 14" wide x 2" deep and 25' from north end, there is a patched pothole 18" diameter.
OCT 5, 2023HADLEY H-01-005
Photo 2:
12J H01005-12J-DOT-NBI
PHOTOS
B.I.N. BR. DEPT. NO.CITY/TOWN 8.-STRUCTURE NO. INSPECTION DATE
PAGE 13 23OF
Photo 1:
A00819 - 15
Span 3, west deck edge & deck underside have scaling, spalling, cracking and delaminations.
Deck Underside, Span 4, west end has spalling and exposed rebar.
OCT 5, 2023HADLEY H-01-005
Photo 4:
12J H01005-12J-DOT-NBI
PHOTOS
B.I.N. BR. DEPT. NO.CITY/TOWN 8.-STRUCTURE NO. INSPECTION DATE
PAGE 14 23OF
Photo 3:
A00819 - 16
East Curb is spalled with exposed rebar.
East Sidewalk Support Beam, Span 7, has cracking and spalling with exposed rebar.
OCT 5, 2023HADLEY H-01-005
Photo 6:
12J H01005-12J-DOT-NBI
PHOTOS
B.I.N. BR. DEPT. NO.CITY/TOWN 8.-STRUCTURE NO. INSPECTION DATE
PAGE 15 23OF
Photo 5:
A00819 - 17
Span 5, utility line supports are deteriorated and replaced.
North Approach has transverse & longitudinal cracks, minor pavement breakup at the deck edge and a pothole at the deck end near the centerline.
OCT 5, 2023HADLEY H-01-005
Photo 8:
12J H01005-12J-DOT-NBI
PHOTOS
B.I.N. BR. DEPT. NO.CITY/TOWN 8.-STRUCTURE NO. INSPECTION DATE
PAGE 16 23OF
Photo 7:
A00819 - 18
North HMA Approach Sidewalk has 3" of settlement.
South Breastwall has severe deterioration at the bridge seat. North Breastwall is in similar condition.
OCT 5, 2023HADLEY H-01-005
Photo 10:
12J H01005-12J-DOT-NBI
PHOTOS
B.I.N. BR. DEPT. NO.CITY/TOWN 8.-STRUCTURE NO. INSPECTION DATE
PAGE 17 23OF
Photo 9:
A00819 - 19
North Slope Paving has settled up to 8" adjacent to Bent 7, Pile 4.
Pile Bents 2 - 6 are in the channel and have been encased with a fiberglass form and grouted 2' below the mud line to the bottom of metal jackets.
OCT 5, 2023HADLEY H-01-005
Photo 12:
12J H01005-12J-DOT-NBI
PHOTOS
B.I.N. BR. DEPT. NO.CITY/TOWN 8.-STRUCTURE NO. INSPECTION DATE
PAGE 18 23OF
Photo 11:
A00819 - 20
Bent 3, Pile 9, has a wide split at the top of the pile with a steel collar that is corroded.
Bent 5, Pile 1 is in poor condition with several checks.
OCT 5, 2023HADLEY H-01-005
Photo 14:
12J H01005-12J-DOT-NBI
PHOTOS
B.I.N. BR. DEPT. NO.CITY/TOWN 8.-STRUCTURE NO. INSPECTION DATE
PAGE 19 23OF
Photo 13:
A00819 - 21
Bent 5, Pile 9, has minimal contact with the pier cap above. Pile to cap connection pin is starting to corrode.
Bent 6 has a missing horizontal bracing between Pile 2 and Pile 3.
OCT 5, 2023HADLEY H-01-005
Photo 16:
12J H01005-12J-DOT-NBI
PHOTOS
B.I.N. BR. DEPT. NO.CITY/TOWN 8.-STRUCTURE NO. INSPECTION DATE
PAGE 20 23OF
Photo 15:
A00819 - 22
Upstream Northeast Embankment has erosion with several downed trees.
Channel has a heavy debris build-up along the south face of Bent 3.
Aggradation in Span 3.
OCT 5, 2023HADLEY H-01-005
Photo 18:
12J H01005-12J-DOT-NBI
PHOTOS
B.I.N. BR. DEPT. NO.CITY/TOWN 8.-STRUCTURE NO. INSPECTION DATE
PAGE 21 23OF
Photo 17:
A00819 - 23
Channel has moderate to heavy debris caught at the upstream end of the piers. Some debris is under the waterline in this photo.
Southeast Approach transition is old, loose, weak, and substandard.
OCT 5, 2023HADLEY H-01-005
Photo 20:
12J H01005-12J-DOT-NBI
PHOTOS
B.I.N. BR. DEPT. NO.CITY/TOWN 8.-STRUCTURE NO. INSPECTION DATE
PAGE 22 23OF
Photo 19:
A00819 - 24
Northeast Approach guardrail is nonconforming.
Southeast Approach end post is low to the ground.
OCT 5, 2023HADLEY H-01-005
Photo 22:
12J H01005-12J-DOT-NBI
PHOTOS
B.I.N. BR. DEPT. NO.CITY/TOWN 8.-STRUCTURE NO. INSPECTION DATE
PAGE 23 23OF
Photo 21:
A00819 - 25
Report Date: June 13, 2025 Code
Code
Code
Code
Classification
Field Posting
Misc.
Rating Loads
Appraisal
Load Rating and Posting
Condition
Inspections
State Information
Geometric Data
Age and Service
Structure Type and Material
Identification
Navigation Data
Accessibility (Needed/Used)
Jointless bridge type:
FHWA Select List= Y (6/21/2017)
BDEPT#=
B.I.N= AASHTO=12J 048.0
Town=
(35) Structure Flared
(33) Bridge Median -
C) Type of deck protection -
B) Type of membrane -
A) Type of wearing surface -
(107) Deck Structure Type -
(40) Navigation Horizontal Clearance
(116) Vert-lift Bridge Nav Min Vert Clear
(39) Navigation Vertical Clearance
Code
(47) Inventory Route Total Horiz Clear
(49) Structure Length
(50) Curb or sidewalk:
(27) Year Built
(106) Year Reconstructed
(42) Type of Service: On -
Under -
(28) Lanes: On Structure
(29) Average Daily Traffic
(30) Year of ADT
(19) Bypass, detour length
(108) Wearing Surface / Protective System:
(43) Structure Type Main:
(46) Number of approach spans
(45) Number of spans in main unit
(44) Structure Type Appr:
(99) Border Bridge Structure No. #
(8) Structure Number
(16) Latitude
(5) Inventory Route
(2) State Highway Department District
(3) County Code (4) Place code
(6) Features Intersected
(7) Facility Carried
(9) Location
(11) Kilometerpoint
DEG
(17) Longitude
(98) Border Bridge State Code Share %
Code
Code
Code
Code
Code
Code
Code
Under structure
(109) Truck ADT %
(48) Length of maximum span
Left Right
(51) Bridge Roadway Width Curb to Curb
(52) Deck Width Out to Out
(32) Approach Roadway Width (w/shoulders)
Code
(34) Skew DEG
(10) Inventory Route MIN Vert Clear
(53) Min Vert Clear Over Bridge Rdwy
(54) Min Vert Underclear ref
(55) Min Lat Underclear RT ref
(56) Min Lat Underclear LT
(38) Navigation Control -
(111) Pier Protection Code
(12) Base Highway Network
(13) LRS Inventory Route & Subroute
MIN SEC
DEG MIN SEC
(112) NBIS Bridge Length
(37) Historical Significance
(22) Owner -
(100) Defense Highway
(21) Maintain -
(20) Toll -
(110) Designated National Network
(103) Temporary Structure
(102) Direction of Traffic -
(101) Parallel Structure
(26) Functional Class -
(104) Highway System
(105) Federal Lands Highways
KM
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
H0100512JDOTNBI
N
131000470 2
015 27690 0
WATER FORT RIVER
ST 47 BAY RD 3
.1 M S JCT MIDDLE ST. 01
0010.621 01
42 19 57.63
72 34 43.27
02 00
017800
2023 03
0004.7
00038.4
00.0 01.4
009.1
011.5
006.1
99.99
09.1
99.99
N 00.00
N 00.0
00.0
000.0
0000.0
Agency Br.No.
Anti-missile fence
Recommended
2 Axle 3 Axle 5 Axle
Actual
Bridge Name
Status Posting DateLEGAL 10/28/21
Acrow Panel Jointless Bridge
(B) Underwater Inspection
(C) Other Special Inspection
(*) Closed Bridge
(A) Fracture Critical Detail
(*) Damage Inspection
(92) Critical Feature Inspection:
MO
MO A)
(93) CFI DATE
(91) Frequency(90) Inspection Date
MO B)
MO C)
MO *)
MO *)
MO *)
(113) Scour Critical Bridges
(36) Traffic Safety Features
(72) Approach Roadway Alignment
(71) Waterway adequacy
(69) Underclearances, vert. and horiz.
(68) Deck Geometry
(67) Structural Evaluation
(41) Structure -
(66) Inventory Rating
(64) Operating Rating
(31) Design Load -
(62) Culverts
Condition
(58) Deck
(59) Superstructure
(60) Substructure
(61) Channel & Channel Protection
(70) Bridge Posting
(63) Operating Rating Method -
(65) Inventory Rating Method -
N
42.5
25.4
A
N
0 0 0 0
10/05/23 24
00 00/00/00
00 03/24/16
00 10/31/17
00 02/26/16
00 00/00/00
02/19/08
H20 Type 3 Type 3S2 Type HS
36.0 42.0 68.0 44.0
23.0 27.0 43.0 27.0
(*) UW Special Inspection MO *)00 00/00/00
(*) Other Inspection (LN Restriction)
Missing Signs
Freeze/Thaw
RANK= 173 H.I.=
MHDL.O.
Y
Y
N
N
Y
000000000000
N
H01005
Hadley
Urban Arterial
2-way traffic
On free road
State Highway Agency
State Highway Agency undetermined
Concrete continuous
Slab INTEGRAL (timber piles)
Other
Concrete Cast-in-Place
Bituminous
Built-up
None
Highway-Ped
Waterway
No median
No navigation control on waterway
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N N Y
H 20=M 18
Open
Load Factor (LF)
Load Factor (LF)
77.4 %
Operating
Inventory
Report Date 06/01/21
Single
N / N Liftbucket
N / N N / N
N / N P / Y
Y / Y N / N
P / Y
N / N Rigging
P / Y
Ladder Staging
Boat Traffic Control
Wader RR Flagperson
Inspector 50 Police
Inspection
Hours: 028
N / N Other
# Stairs On/Adjacent 0 Stair Owner(s)
A00819 - 26
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .