9-UCA Geyser Peak Evaluation ScoreSheet v1.xlsx

XLSX spreadsheet 29 KB Posted May 12, 2026

Attached to: GJ26-149 UCA Geyser Peak Tower Construction and Equipment Shelter Installation
Solicitation number: GJ26-149
Issued by: Tooele County, Utah

About this file

Written by GovTribe AI · May 13, 2026

This is an evaluation scoresheet for the Utah Communications Authority ("UCA") Geyser Peak New Site Build Project RFP, a state procurement for construction and equipment installation services at a remote communications site in Sevier County, Utah (GPS coordinates 38.511960, -111.460180). The project encompasses a multi-discipline off-grid communications tower and shelter installation requiring site preparation, tower foundation and erection (Sabre S3TL with 45-foot northeast leg ice shield and four ground bus bars), modular shelter installation (~12,000 pounds), propane tank and fuel line installation, solar photovoltaic systems (three sectors with twelve panels each), microwave and radio antenna and transmission line systems, ice bridge installation, facility grounding, and comprehensive testing and closeout documentation. Questions are due by May 19, 2026, at noon MT, with proposals due by May 22, 2026, at 10:00 AM MT via the U3P portal. Materials for the project will be picked up from the UCA Warehouse and UDOT Road Shed near Fish Lake (GPS coordinates 38.473200, -111.832516). The substantial completion date is July 31, 2026, requiring contractors to coordinate mobilization, foundation curing, equipment delivery and installation, testing, demobilization, and closeout within the specified timeframe while accounting for USFS coordination, weather conditions, road access limitations, and UCA material procurement dependencies.

The evaluation scoresheet uses a 1,000-point total scoring framework with cost integrated into the technical evaluation pursuant to a written waiver executed under Utah Code 63G-6a-707(7)(b). The technical scoring allocation is 750 points across five criteria: Contractor Experience and Past Performance (200 points), Project Team and Subcontractor Qualifications (100 points), Technical Approach and Work Plan (200 points), Project Schedule achievement (150 points), and Safety and Quality Assurance Program (100 points). Cost constitutes 250 formulaic points calculated by the procurement officer using the statutory formula: Cost Points = 250 × (Lowest Grand Total ÷ Offeror's Grand Total), with cost line items derived from 16 scope-area lump-sum prices submitted in each proposal's Appendix C. Three independent evaluators score technical criteria and provide written justifications; the procurement officer calculates cost points without subjective scoring. The final ranking averages the three evaluators' technical scores, adds calculated cost points, and flags which responsive offerors meet the 800-point minimum threshold required by RFP Section 12, with the highest-ranked offeror meeting the threshold receiving the award recommendation.

View the file

Other files

File	Type	Posted
10-ATTACHMENT I - GEYSER PEAK LIST OF UCA PROVIDED PARTS.pdf	PDF	May 12, 2026
3-ATTACHMENT F - ICE BRIDGE.pdf	PDF	May 12, 2026
12-ATTACHMENT E - SHELTER FOUNDATION.pdf	PDF	May 12, 2026
5-ATTACHMENT J - GROUNDING EXAMPLE.pdf	PDF	May 12, 2026
13-ATTACHMENT K - GEO TECHNICAL REPORT.pdf	PDF	May 12, 2026
6-ATTACHMENT H - REQUIRED PHOTOS.pdf	PDF	May 12, 2026
4-ATTACHMENT D - TOWER.pdf	PDF	May 12, 2026
7-ATTACHMENT C - SOLAR DESIGN.pdf	PDF	May 12, 2026
14-ATTACHMENT A - GEYSER DRIVE ROUTE AND SITE PHOTOS.pdf	PDF	May 12, 2026
1-ATTACHMENT B - GEYSER SITE LAYOUT.pdf	PDF	May 12, 2026
2-UCA Geyser Peak New Site Build RFP v1.docx	DOCX document	May 12, 2026
8-ATTACHMENT G - ANTENNA SYSTEM.pdf	PDF	May 12, 2026
11-TERMS AND CONDITIONS.docx	DOCX document	May 12, 2026

Show all 13

On GovTribe

Work with this file

Download the original file
Contacts named in this file
Similar government files
Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Try for free Login

Text version

The file's text, extracted by GovTribe without its formatting.

Instructions

UCA Geyser Peak New Site Build Project — Evaluation Score Sheet
Overview
This workbook captures committee evaluation of proposals submitted under the UCA Geyser Peak New Site Build Project RFP. The scoring framework is 1,000 points total, with cost integrated into the technical evaluation under the waiver authority of Utah Code § 63G-6a-707(7)(b). The Procurement Official has executed a written waiver, which is on file with the UCA Procurement Unit and is reproduced in Section 9 of the RFP.
Scoring Framework — 1,000 Points Total
Component	Max Points	Scored By
1. Contractor Experience and Past Performance	200	Each evaluator
2. Project Team and Subcontractor Qualifications	100	Each evaluator
3. Technical Approach and Work Plan	200	Each evaluator
4. Project Schedule — July 31, 2026 Completion	150	Each evaluator
5. Safety and Quality Assurance Program	100	Each evaluator
Cost Proposal (formulaic, integrated)	250	Procurement Officer (Cost_Calculation tab)
TOTAL POSSIBLE	1000
Workflow
1. The procurement officer fills in the Offerors tab with the names of each responsive offeror.
2. Each evaluator opens their dedicated tab (Evaluator_1, Evaluator_2, Evaluator_3) and scores each offeror against the five technical criteria (Criteria 1–5, total 750 points possible per offeror). Evaluators provide written justification for each score.
3. Cost is NOT scored subjectively. The procurement officer enters each offeror's 16 line-item lump sums into the Cost_Calculation tab (one column per offeror). The workbook auto-sums the line items into a Grand Total and applies the statutory formula: Cost Points = 250 × (Lowest Grand Total ÷ Offeror's Grand Total). The tab also captures the offeror's stated Grand Total from the bottom row of Appendix C and flags any inconsistency with the computed sum for procurement-officer attention.
4. The Summary tab averages the technical scores across all three evaluators, adds the calculated cost points, totals out of 1,000, flags whether each offeror meets the 800-point threshold, and assigns a Rank.
5. Each evaluator must sign and date their tab. All tabs together comprise the evaluation record retained under UCA's records-retention obligations.
Color Conventions
Blue text	Hardcoded inputs (evaluator scores, cost line-item prices entered by procurement officer)
Black text	Formulas and calculations
Green text	Cross-sheet references
Yellow fill	Cells requiring input
Statutory Authority
Utah Code § 63G-6a-707(7)(a) ordinarily requires that evaluation committee members not have access to cost information until after technical scoring is recommended. Subsection (7)(b) permits a procurement official to waive that prohibition by signing a written statement of best interest. The UCA Procurement Official has executed that waiver for this procurement; the waiver is on file with the UCA Procurement Unit and is set forth in Section 9 of the RFP. Accordingly, cost is integrated into the overall evaluation as the 250-point Cost component.

Offerors

Offeror Roster
The Procurement Officer fills in the responsive offerors below. Evaluator and Cost_Calculation tabs pull offeror names from this sheet automatically. Add or remove rows as needed; if you change the number of offerors, update the references in the other tabs.
Offeror #	Offeror Name (Firm)	Notes
Offeror 1	[Enter Offeror 1 Firm Name]
Offeror 2	[Enter Offeror 2 Firm Name]
Offeror 3	[Enter Offeror 3 Firm Name]
Offeror 4	[Enter Offeror 4 Firm Name]
Offeror 5	[Enter Offeror 5 Firm Name]

Evaluator_1

	Evaluator 1 — Technical Scoring (Geyser Peak)
	Evaluator Name:	[Enter evaluator name]
	Evaluator Role / Title:
	Date of Evaluation:
	Signature:
	Instructions: Score each offeror against each criterion in the range 0 to the Max for that criterion. Provide written justification in the row immediately below each score row. Yellow cells require your input. The Subtotal row at the bottom auto-calculates. Do not score cost — cost is calculated separately by the procurement officer in the Cost_Calculation tab.
	Criterion	Max	[Enter Offeror 1 Firm Name]	[Enter Offeror 2 Firm Name]	[Enter Offeror 3 Firm Name]	[Enter Offeror 4 Firm Name]	[Enter Offeror 5 Firm Name]
	1. Contractor Experience and Past Performance — Multi-Discipline Site Builds
Unknown Author: Comparable off-grid or solar-powered communications site builds; new tower erection, modular shelter set, solar PV, propane, A&L, sweep/PIM, L3 Harris-compliant grounding; 5+ projects in past 5 years; USFS land experience helpful.	200
	Justification / Notes
	2. Project Team and Subcontractor Qualifications
Unknown Author: Org chart with project manager, on-site superintendent, lead tower-erection foreman, sweep/PIM technician, Utah-licensed LP gas plumber (with license number), concrete subcontractor (if used), and electrical/PV lead. Climber/rescue, RF awareness, OSHA 10/30, first aid/CPR.	100
	Justification / Notes
	3. Technical Approach and Work Plan
Unknown Author: Approach to each scope area: site prep, tower foundation (ACI 318-14, 4,500 psi, cylinder test), tower erection (Sabre S3TL with ice shield at 45' on NE leg and 4 ground bus bars), shelter foundation and set, propane plumbing, solar sectors, ice bridge, A&L (MW + radio with TTA, polyphasers, tape coding), sweep/PIM methodology, L3 Harris-compliant grounding.	200
	Justification / Notes
	4. Project Schedule — July 31, 2026 Substantial Completion
Unknown Author: Schedule showing mobilization, foundation cure, tower erection, shelter delivery/offload, solar, propane, A&L, grounding, sweep/PIM, alignment, demob, closeout. USFS coordination, weather, road conditions, and UCA material pickup dependencies.	150
	Justification / Notes
	5. Safety and Quality Assurance Program

Unknown Author: Written safety plan, daily JHA/JSA, climber rescue plan, remote-site communications protocol; 3-yr EMR; 3-yr OSHA 300 recordables; QA for multi-discipline construction including grounding QC and L3 Harris manual protocol.

Unknown Author: Comparable off-grid or solar-powered communications site builds; new tower erection, modular shelter set, solar PV, propane, A&L, sweep/PIM, L3 Harris-compliant grounding; 5+ projects in past 5 years; USFS land experience helpful.

Unknown Author: Org chart with project manager, on-site superintendent, lead tower-erection foreman, sweep/PIM technician, Utah-licensed LP gas plumber (with license number), concrete subcontractor (if used), and electrical/PV lead. Climber/rescue, RF awareness, OSHA 10/30, first aid/CPR.

Unknown Author: Approach to each scope area: site prep, tower foundation (ACI 318-14, 4,500 psi, cylinder test), tower erection (Sabre S3TL with ice shield at 45' on NE leg and 4 ground bus bars), shelter foundation and set, propane plumbing, solar sectors, ice bridge, A&L (MW + radio with TTA, polyphasers, tape coding), sweep/PIM methodology, L3 Harris-compliant grounding.	100
	Justification / Notes
	TECHNICAL SUBTOTAL (max 750)	750	0	0	0	0	0

Evaluator_2

	Evaluator 2 — Technical Scoring (Geyser Peak)
	Evaluator Name:	[Enter evaluator name]
	Evaluator Role / Title:
	Date of Evaluation:
	Signature:
	Instructions: Score each offeror against each criterion in the range 0 to the Max for that criterion. Provide written justification in the row immediately below each score row. Yellow cells require your input. The Subtotal row at the bottom auto-calculates. Do not score cost — cost is calculated separately by the procurement officer in the Cost_Calculation tab.
	Criterion	Max	[Enter Offeror 1 Firm Name]	[Enter Offeror 2 Firm Name]	[Enter Offeror 3 Firm Name]	[Enter Offeror 4 Firm Name]	[Enter Offeror 5 Firm Name]
	1. Contractor Experience and Past Performance — Multi-Discipline Site Builds
Unknown Author: Comparable off-grid or solar-powered communications site builds; new tower erection, modular shelter set, solar PV, propane, A&L, sweep/PIM, L3 Harris-compliant grounding; 5+ projects in past 5 years; USFS land experience helpful.	200
	Justification / Notes
	2. Project Team and Subcontractor Qualifications
Unknown Author: Org chart with project manager, on-site superintendent, lead tower-erection foreman, sweep/PIM technician, Utah-licensed LP gas plumber (with license number), concrete subcontractor (if used), and electrical/PV lead. Climber/rescue, RF awareness, OSHA 10/30, first aid/CPR.	100
	Justification / Notes
	3. Technical Approach and Work Plan
Unknown Author: Approach to each scope area: site prep, tower foundation (ACI 318-14, 4,500 psi, cylinder test), tower erection (Sabre S3TL with ice shield at 45' on NE leg and 4 ground bus bars), shelter foundation and set, propane plumbing, solar sectors, ice bridge, A&L (MW + radio with TTA, polyphasers, tape coding), sweep/PIM methodology, L3 Harris-compliant grounding.	200
	Justification / Notes
	4. Project Schedule — July 31, 2026 Substantial Completion
Unknown Author: Schedule showing mobilization, foundation cure, tower erection, shelter delivery/offload, solar, propane, A&L, grounding, sweep/PIM, alignment, demob, closeout. USFS coordination, weather, road conditions, and UCA material pickup dependencies.	150
	Justification / Notes
	5. Safety and Quality Assurance Program

Unknown Author: Approach to each scope area: site prep, tower foundation (ACI 318-14, 4,500 psi, cylinder test), tower erection (Sabre S3TL with ice shield at 45' on NE leg and 4 ground bus bars), shelter foundation and set, propane plumbing, solar sectors, ice bridge, A&L (MW + radio with TTA, polyphasers, tape coding), sweep/PIM methodology, L3 Harris-compliant grounding.	100
	Justification / Notes
	TECHNICAL SUBTOTAL (max 750)	750	0	0	0	0	0

Evaluator_3

	Evaluator 3 — Technical Scoring (Geyser Peak)
	Evaluator Name:	[Enter evaluator name]
	Evaluator Role / Title:
	Date of Evaluation:
	Signature:
	Instructions: Score each offeror against each criterion in the range 0 to the Max for that criterion. Provide written justification in the row immediately below each score row. Yellow cells require your input. The Subtotal row at the bottom auto-calculates. Do not score cost — cost is calculated separately by the procurement officer in the Cost_Calculation tab.
	Criterion	Max	[Enter Offeror 1 Firm Name]	[Enter Offeror 2 Firm Name]	[Enter Offeror 3 Firm Name]	[Enter Offeror 4 Firm Name]	[Enter Offeror 5 Firm Name]
	1. Contractor Experience and Past Performance — Multi-Discipline Site Builds
Unknown Author: Comparable off-grid or solar-powered communications site builds; new tower erection, modular shelter set, solar PV, propane, A&L, sweep/PIM, L3 Harris-compliant grounding; 5+ projects in past 5 years; USFS land experience helpful.	200
	Justification / Notes
	2. Project Team and Subcontractor Qualifications
Unknown Author: Org chart with project manager, on-site superintendent, lead tower-erection foreman, sweep/PIM technician, Utah-licensed LP gas plumber (with license number), concrete subcontractor (if used), and electrical/PV lead. Climber/rescue, RF awareness, OSHA 10/30, first aid/CPR.	100
	Justification / Notes
	3. Technical Approach and Work Plan
Unknown Author: Approach to each scope area: site prep, tower foundation (ACI 318-14, 4,500 psi, cylinder test), tower erection (Sabre S3TL with ice shield at 45' on NE leg and 4 ground bus bars), shelter foundation and set, propane plumbing, solar sectors, ice bridge, A&L (MW + radio with TTA, polyphasers, tape coding), sweep/PIM methodology, L3 Harris-compliant grounding.	200
	Justification / Notes
	4. Project Schedule — July 31, 2026 Substantial Completion
Unknown Author: Schedule showing mobilization, foundation cure, tower erection, shelter delivery/offload, solar, propane, A&L, grounding, sweep/PIM, alignment, demob, closeout. USFS coordination, weather, road conditions, and UCA material pickup dependencies.	150
	Justification / Notes
	5. Safety and Quality Assurance Program

Unknown Author: Approach to each scope area: site prep, tower foundation (ACI 318-14, 4,500 psi, cylinder test), tower erection (Sabre S3TL with ice shield at 45' on NE leg and 4 ground bus bars), shelter foundation and set, propane plumbing, solar sectors, ice bridge, A&L (MW + radio with TTA, polyphasers, tape coding), sweep/PIM methodology, L3 Harris-compliant grounding.	100
	Justification / Notes
	TECHNICAL SUBTOTAL (max 750)	750	0	0	0	0	0

Cost_Calculation

Cost Calculation — Line-Itemized (Procurement Officer Only)
Per the § 63G-6a-707(7)(b) waiver, cost is integrated into the evaluation at 250 points. Cost is not scored subjectively. Enter each offeror's Lump Sum Price for each of the 16 scope-area line items from Appendix C of their proposal (one column per offeror). The workbook auto-sums the line items into the COMPUTED GRAND TOTAL row. Also enter each offeror's STATED GRAND TOTAL (the figure they wrote on the bottom row of Appendix C); the consistency check row will flag any mismatch for your attention per RFP Section 9. The COST POINTS row applies the formula: Cost Points = 250 × (Lowest Computed Grand Total ÷ Offeror's Computed Grand Total). If you elect to score an offeror at zero cost points due to a material inconsistency (RFP Section 9), overwrite their COST POINTS cell with 0 and add a note.
Item	Scope Area	[Enter Offeror 1 Firm Name]	[Enter Offeror 2 Firm Name]	[Enter Offeror 3 Firm Name]	[Enter Offeror 4 Firm Name]	[Enter Offeror 5 Firm Name]
1	Site Preparation and Minor Grading
2	Tower Foundation (ACI 318-14, 4,500 psi, cylinder testing)
3	Tower Erection (Sabre S3TL, ice shield at 45' on NE leg, 4 tower ground bus bars)
4	Shelter Foundation (23'-3" x 14' x 6" pad with footing and grounding conduit)
5	Shelter Pickup, Transport, and Installation (~12,000 lb modular shelter)
6	Propane Tank Installation (1,000-gal tank on 2x 4'x4' pads)
7	Propane Fuel Line and Sensor Line (qualified Utah LP gas plumber)
8	Ice Bridge Installation (24" x 10' section)
9	Solar Installation (3 sectors x 12 panels; conduit and wiring)
10	A&L — Microwave (6' dish at 40' centerline, LMR-400, ground kits)
11	A&L — Radio System (RX/TX panels, TTA, polyphasers, coax, tape coding)
12	Sweep Testing — All Coaxial Lines
13	PIM Testing — TX Line
14	Site Grounding — Exterior (L3 Harris T4618 Rev F)
15	Mobilization, Demobilization, Travel, Lodging, Per Diem
16	Closeout Package (Attachment H photos, sweep/PIM, cylinder test, as-builts)
	COMPUTED GRAND TOTAL (sum of items 1–16)
	OFFEROR'S STATED GRAND TOTAL (from Appendix C bottom row)
	Internal Consistency Check (Computed vs Stated, within $1)
	COST POINTS (Max 250)
	Notes (consistency exceptions, scoring overrides, etc.)
Procurement Officer:
Signature:
Date:

Summary

Evaluation Summary and Final Ranking — Geyser Peak
Final scores: average of the three evaluators' technical subtotals (out of 750), plus the calculated cost score (out of 250), for a total out of 1,000. The 'Meets Threshold?' column flags whether the offeror cleared the 800-point minimum required by RFP Section 9. The Rank column auto-assigns rank by Total score (1 = highest). The recommended award per RFP Section 12 is the responsive offeror with Rank 1, subject to meeting the 800-point threshold.
Offeror #	Offeror Name	Evaluator 1 Tech (750)	Evaluator 2 Tech (750)	Evaluator 3 Tech (750)	Average Tech (750)	Cost Points (250)	TOTAL (1000)	Meets Threshold (≥800)?	Rank
Offeror 1	[Enter Offeror 1 Firm Name]	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.00
Offeror 2	[Enter Offeror 2 Firm Name]	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.00
Offeror 3	[Enter Offeror 3 Firm Name]	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.00
Offeror 4	[Enter Offeror 4 Firm Name]	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.00
Offeror 5	[Enter Offeror 5 Firm Name]	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.00
Note: To view offerors in rank order, click on the Rank column header (J) and use Excel's Sort & Filter → Sort Smallest to Largest. The Rank column auto-assigns rank by Total score (1 = highest). The recommended award per RFP Section 12 is the responsive offeror with Rank 1, subject to meeting the 800-point threshold.

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated May 13, 2026.