Exhibit 1 eMITS Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ) - Amendment 02.pdf

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE INSTRUCTIONS

(Updated May, 2018)

Sections 1-3 provide for contract-related descriptive information and identification of the evaluator.

Section 4 lists the major work elements within the Performance Work Statement (PWS). Please provide feedback on whether or not the contractor performed within the listed PWS elements. “Did not Perform” means that the specific PWS element was not performed under the contract.

Section 5 evaluates the contractor’s technical, schedule, and cost performance and management. (Additional pages may be used for comments if desired). If you cannot answer any questions, please circle “N/A” for Not Rated.

The following definitions are offered for your use in assigning a performance rating for each of the factors in Sections 5 and 6:

Exceptional

(E)

Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being evaluated was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.

Very Good

(VG)

Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being evaluated was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor was effective.

Satisfactory

(S)

Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory.

Marginal

(M)

Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being evaluated reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions. The contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.

Unsatisfactory

(U)

Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains a serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

Not applicable Not Rated

Section 6 provides for evaluation of the contractor’s management of cost and award/incentive fee history.

NASA IT Procurement Office RETURN THIS QUESTIONNAIRE TO BY July 11, 2022. Gisela Moreno, Contracting Officer &

Cory Rasnic, Contract Specialist gisela.a.moreno@nasa.gov Cory.t.rasnic@nasa.gov

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

1. Contract Information

A. Name of Company/Division Being Evaluated:_____________________

B. Address:_____________________________________________

C. Contractor Cage Code and/or DUNS number

D. Contract Number:_______________________________________

E. Contract Type:_________________________________________

F. Period of Performance (including options): From:______ To:_______

G. Total Contract Value:_____________________________________

H. Award Information: Competitive: Yes___ No___ Basis of Selection: Technical___ Cost/Price___ Other (specify)_________________________

2. Description of Contract

Brief ly describe the services provided under this contract:

During the contract performance being evaluated, this firm was the:

Prime Contractor____ Significant Subcontractor ____ Team Member ____ Other (describe)____________________________________________

Does a corporate or business relationship exist between the firm being evaluated and your organization?

Yes ___ No ___. If yes, please describe: ___________________________

3. Evaluator Information

Name: _____________________________________________________ Title: _______________________________________________________ Agency/Company: ____________________________________________ E-mail Address: _______________________________________________ Phone: ______________ Date Questionnaire Completed: _____________ Role in Program/Contract: ______________________________________ Length of Involvement in this Program/ Contract: _____________________

This form contains Source Selection Information when completed. See FAR 3.104. 3

4. PWS Survey: Please check the appropriate blocks (Performed or Did Not Perform)

PWS ELEMENT

PERFORMED

DID NOT

PERFORM

a) Operating geographically distributed television studios; creating and producing live telecasts and recorded programs suitable for broadcast on a national scale; and around-the-clock program distribution to cable, satellite, and internet television systems.

b) Managing a national brand through digital communications including but not limited to social media, graphics, video, and audio (e.g., podcasts, radio, etc.)

c) Cataloging still and motion imagery as well as acquisition, processing, and distribution of them.

d) Managing invest/divest decisions in conjunction with Enterprise Architecture and Governance.

e) Leading change across an organization.

f) Creation of IT services catalog and delivery of IT services to a variety of disparate (i.e., geographical, business units, scientific technical, and mission focus) customers.

g) Project Management of complex IT solutions requiring management of subcontracts and vendor solutions.

This form contains Source Selection Information when completed. See FAR 3.104. 4

5. General Performance Survey

NO PERFORMANCE QUESTIONS PERFORMANCE RATING

(Please Circle)

QUALITY

1. Quality of services and support provided E VG S M U N/A

2. Timely identification and mitigation of risks E VG S M U N/A

3. Ability to identify and correct performance def iciencies in a timely manner E VG S M U N/A

4. Demonstrated understanding and compliance with mission safety requirements E VG S M U N/A

Comment:

SCHEDULE

5. Timeliness, quality, and accuracy of schedule estimates and reporting E VG S M U N/A

6. Ability to meet/exceed schedule milestones E VG S M U N/A

COST

7. Ability to establish realistic cost estimates and adhere to estimated costs E VG S M U N/A

8. Ability to anticipate, identify and control cost growth. E VG S M U N/A

BUSINESS/MANAGEMENT

9. Communicating/interfacing with Government and overall responsiveness to Government requests E VG S M U N/A

10. Ability to effectively manage the contract including subcontractor performance, if applicable E VG S M U N/A

11.

Ability to recruit and retain highly skilled personnel, including ability to fill key vacancies in a timely manner.

E VG S M U N/A

12. Adequacy of Contractor’s system(s) for processing task orders and/or changes. E VG S M U N/A

This form contains Source Selection Information when completed. See FAR 3.104. 5

Section 6:

What is the Contract Value:

Initial Value Current Value Estimated Cost: $___________ $____________

Fee: $___________ $____________

Total Value: $___________ $_____________

What are the total contract expenditures to date (cost/fees to date based on invoices, reports, etc)?

What is the Annual Contract Value to Date (The current contract expenditures to date divided by the number of years of performance to date)?

For example (note, these example numbers may not relate to this specific procurement):

Assume your contract is a current five-year contract, is still ongoing, and the latest cost report reflects a cost/fee of $43,500,000 through the first 2 years and 4 months (to date). In this example, current/total Contract Expenditures incurred to Date are $43,500,000 and associated period of performance for those expenditures, expressed in years, is 2.33 years.

Therefore, the Average Annual Cost/Fee Incurred to Date: $18,669,528 ($43,500,000/2.33 years)

Was there a cost overrun? ( ) Yes ( ) No If yes, please explain:

If this was an award fee contract, what are the individual and/or average ratings of performance by your organization? Please attach any available award fee letters or database entries.

Please comment on particularly strong/weak points of Contractor’s performance (technical, schedule, and/or cost). If the Overall Contract Performance Rating below is less than Exceptional, please provide some explanation in this section on why a higher rating was not provided.

This form contains Source Selection Information when completed. See FAR 3.104. 6

Overall Contract Performance Rating (circle one)

Exceptional Very Good Satisfactory Marginal Unsatisfactory

If less than Exceptional-Performance Rating, please explain:

Please add any other comments you may feel are pertinent.

Rater’s Signature Date