RFP Cover Letter and Clarifications.pdf

February 13, 2020

PS20

TO: Potential Offerors

SUBJECT: Request for Proposal (RFP) 80MSFC20R0036 for the Marshall Engineering Technicians and Trades Support (METTS III) Acquisition, George C. Marshall Space Flight Center (MSFC)

The solicitation for the METTS III acquisition at NASA MSFC has been released. All offerors should review Attachment A, Clarifications to All Potential Offerors, and Attachment B, Summary of Changes Between Draft and Final Solicitation, listing the changes to the draft solicitation posted on December 12, 2019. The changes identified in Attachment B are the result of comments and questions received from industry and internal reviews performed by NASA and represent significant changes; however, the listing is not intended to be all inclusive.

Offerors are cautioned to carefully review the solicitation in its entirety. Grammatical, typographical, and other non-substantive changes have been made throughout the document.

Offeror's are notified that a procurement sensitivity "blackout notice" letter for this acquisition was distributed to all applicable MSFC employees with the release of the solicitation to industry. Effective immediately, with the exception of the designated point of contact below, all employees are prohibited from communicating with industry concerning this procurement.

This ‘blackout’ period of communication will continue until the contract has been awarded and the evaluation board is released from its responsibilities.

All questions regarding the solicitation shall be submitted via email to the individual noted in the provision MSFC 52.205-90, Designated Point of Contact. The due date for receipt of questions from industry is 2 p.m., Central Time, February 24, 2020. Interested parties are requested to submit any comments or questions utilizing the same format as provided in Attachment A to this letter. Any questions submitted by this deadline will be answered as an amendment to the solicitation. As part of any resultant proposals, offerors shall acknowledge receipt of all solicitation amendments, if any.

An Industry Day Briefing was conducted on December 19, 2019, 8:00 a.m., Central Time.

Attendance at the briefing was neither required nor a prerequisite for proposal submission and will not be considered in the evaluation. Information presented at the briefing, as well as a list of attendees, was posted to beta.sam.gov.

In addition to other eligibility requirements which may be specified in this solicitation, offerors should ensure compliance with System for Award Management registration requirements (see FAR 4.1102(a)), and equal employment opportunity (see FAR 22.802(b) and 22.805(a)) and veterans’ employment (see FAR 22.1302(b) and 22.1303(c)) reporting requirements, as applicable.

National Aeronautics and Space Administration

George C. Marshall Space Flight Center Marshall Space Flight Center, AL 35812

Potential offerors are responsible for downloading their own copy of the solicitation in its entirety. Further, it is the offeror's responsibility to monitor beta.sam.gov for any amendments to the solicitation.

Thank you for your continued interest in the METTS III acquisition.

X PS20/Hervie B. Williford Contracting Officer

Enclosures:

Attachment A, Clarifications to All Potential Offerors Attachment B, Summary of Changes Between Draft and Final Solicit

(PS60 Rev. 2017-09-18)

Attachment A-1

ATTACHMENT A – CLARIFICATIONS TO ALL POTENTIAL OFFERORS

Section Question Answer

1 B, SUPPLIES OR

SERVICES AND

PRICES/COSTS,

ESTIMATED COST AND

FEE, pages B-2, B-3, B-4

Clause reads “The estimated cost of this contract is $ To Be Proposed (TBP) (base period only)”

- Does the Government intend for Offerors to provide proposed estimated cost for the base period only, or for all Mission Services CLINs for the base period and all option years?

The estimated cost to be reflected in paragraph (a) of the ESTIMATED COST AND FEE clause shall reflect only the base period value for CLIN 001 Mission, as no contract options will have been exercised at the time of award. The table in the clause captures the potential overall estimated cost and fees for all contract periods.

2 H, SPECIAL CONTRACT

REQUIREMENTS, MSFC

52.223-90 ASBESTOS

MATERIAL (AUG 2015),

page H-4

Can we get access to provided links?

http://ais.ndc.nasa.gov/default.aspx

The inventory of asbestos-containing material, their condition, and approximate location are not considered necessary for proposal preparation. Upon the effective date of the contract, the contractor will have access to this information via the specified link.

3 H, SPECIAL CONTRACT

REQUIREMENTS, MSFC

52.223-96 MEDICAL

SERVICES (SEP 2018);

MSFC 52.223-97

MANDATORY AND

REQUIRED TRAINING

(JUN 2016), pages H-5, H-6

The following links appear broken and are not accessible. Will the Government please provide working links?

https://explornet.msfc.nasa.gov/groups/safet y-health-and-environmental-she https://explornet.msfc.nasa.gov/docs/DOC- 15683

The information provided at the specified link in Clause MSFC 52.223-96 is not considered necessary for proposal preparation. Upon the effective date of the contract, the contractor will have access to this information via the specified link.

The information provided via the specified link relates to mandatory/required training.

Attachment L-4, Historical Training and Certifications, is revised to reflect both tables normally accessed via this link. The link will be available to the successful Offeror upon contract award.

Attachment A-2

4 I, CONTRACT CLAUSES,

FAR 52.223-3

HAZARDOUS MATERIAL

IDENTIFICATION AND

MATERIAL SAFETY

DATA ALTERNATE I,

pages I-23, I-24

Will an electronic database meet the requirement for providing SDSs for hazardous material?

MSFC maintains the electronic database of Safety Data Sheets (SDSs) related to all hazardous materials and chemicals on-site.

5 I, CONTRACT CLUASES,

FAR 52.223-3

HAZARDOUS MATERIAL

IDENTIFICATION AND

MATERIAL SAFETY

DATA ALTERNATE I,

pages I-23, I-24

Can SDSs be provided during the Phase-In period or must they be provided with the proposal? Please confirm that SDSs can be provided during phase in/as procurement occurs.

Upon the effective date of the contract, the contractor will be required to submit Safety Data Sheets (SDSs) for hazardous materials and chemicals purchases as they occur, for entry into MSFC’s electronic database.

6 ATTACHMENT J-1,

PERFORMANCE WORK

STATEMENT (PWS),

Section 1.11 Safety, Health, and Environmental (SHE), paragraph (l), page J-1-11

1. Is there historical data available on previously submitted Air Emissions Report?

2. What equipment is currently operated under an Air Permit?

3. Does facility hold a permit under the Aerospace NESHAP?

4. Do paints, coatings, cleaning etc., require tracking?

Question 1: Historical Air Emissions data is provided in Attachment L-5, Background and Historical Data, WBS 1.11, Safety, Health, and Environmental.

Question 2: Air Emissions Data reporting (gallons of propane) is required for the 10K Pad Building and East Test Area facilities’ burnstacks.

Question 3: MSFC has a Major Source Operating Permit (Title V Permit) under the Alabama Department of Environmental Management (ADEM) Administrative Code 335-3 which is renewed every five years.

Question 4: Paints, coatings, cleaning etc.

are tracked with barcodes through MSFC’s

Attachment A-3 proactive procurement process for contractor purchases.

7 ATTACHMENT J-1,

PERFORMANCE WORK

STATEMENT (PWS),

Section 2.10 Special Test Equipment (STE) Design Support, paragraph (f), page J-1-23

Is the Government providing the PTC KeyShot and 3D printer software? It was not included in the list of software on page 99.

The Government will provide the necessary software, to include PTC KeyShot, to perform requested services associated with the 3D printer. Attachment J-1, Performance Work Statement, Section 2.10, paragraph (f) is revised for clarification.

8 ATTACHMENT J-2, DATA

PROCUREMENT

DOCUMENT (DPD), Item 15., Data Preparation Information, page J-2-8

Please provide access to all listed MSFC Explornet documents. Error messages appear for all listed links “Unable to open…Cannot locate internet server or proxy server” https://explornet.nasa.gov/docs/DOC-38150

The information provided via the specified link in the Data Procurement Document, Section 2.3.5, relates to Documentum electronic submission instructions, which will be necessary for the contractor’s submission of electronic documentation once behind the NASA firewall. Therefore, these instructions are unnecessary for preparation of the Offeror’s proposal.

9 ATTACHMENT J-2, DATA

PROCUREMENT

DOCUMENT (DPD), Data Requirements Description

(DRD) 1670EE-001,

Environmental Compliance Report, page J-2-18

Is there any historical data available? Historical Environmental Compliance data is provided in Attachment L-5, Background and Historical Data, WBS 1.11, Safety, Health, and Environmental, to reflect a listing of items reported on the Environmental Compliance Report for the last reporting period of October 2018 through September 2019.

10 ATTACHMENT J-2, DATA

PROCUREMENT

DOCUMENT (DPD), DRD

1670SA-001, On-site Safety, Is there historical data available on incident injury rates?

The historical contract specific incident injury rates are considered sensitive and unnecessary for the preparation of the proposal, including preparation of the

Attachment A-4

Health, and Environmental (SHE) Plan, page J-2-65

Offeror’s Safety, Health, and Environmental (SHE) plan.

11 ATTACHMENT J-2, DATA

PROCUREMENT

DOCUMENT (DPD), Data Requirements Description (DRD) 1670SA-001, On-site Safety, Health, and Environmental (SHE) Plan, page J-2-69

Is there an industrial wastewater pretreatment facility that will be operated as part of this contract? If so, is there any historical data on volume and pollutant concentrations, permit limits? What are the operating hours (24/7/365 or normal working hours)? Is operator certification required? Will the Government please confirm that this is a service to be provided under METTS contract or is it provided by

AECOM/URS

The operation of an industrial wastewater pretreatment facility is not within the scope of this contract.

12 ATTACHMENT J-2, DATA

PROCUREMENT

DOCUMENT (DPD), Data Requirements Description (DRD) 1670SA-001, On-site Safety, Health, and Environmental (SHE) Plan, page J-2-69

Are storm water inspections required?

Periodic sampling? Is historical data available? Will the Government please confirm that this is a service to be provided under METTS contract or is it provided by

AECOM/URS?

Storm water inspections are not within the scope of this contract.

13 ATTACHMENT J-6,

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

LOCAL AREA AND

COLLECTIVE

BARGAINING

AGREEMENT (CBA)

WAGE

DETERMINATIONS, page J-6-11

If a Collective Bargaining Agreement is renegotiated in the middle of the term of the government contract, will the Government allow a request for equitable adjustment or should the contractor anticipate the adjustment as part of our price proposal?

A request for equitable adjustment will not be allowed. The Offeror shall anticipate any adjustment as part of the cost proposal.

14 ATTACHMENT J-6,

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Will the government reimburse for line items that are included in the CBA, for example, Without regard to the requirements of any CBA, the estimated cost of line items (e.g., Attachment A-5

LOCAL AREA AND

COLLECTIVE

BARGAINING

AGREEMENT (CBA)

WAGE

DETERMINATIONS, page J-6-11 safety gear? Or should the contractor include these anticipated expenses in its price proposal?

safety gear) are reflected as part of materials in the Attachment L-1, Excel Pricing Model, Tab A plug number for materials which will be applied to all cost proposal indefinite-delivery, indefinite-quantity (IDIQ) calculated values and against which the Offeror’s materials burden will be applied.

Therefore, Offerors shall not propose separate costs for these items.

15 ATTACHMENT J-9,

APPLICABLE

REGULATIONS,

PROCEDURES, AND

DOCUMENTS, paragraph (c), page J-9-1

The link to NASA and Center directives in paragraph (c) (i.e., https://nodis3.gsfc.nasa.gov) does not appear to be active. Is the link correct?

Attachment J-9, Applicable Regulations, Procedures, and Documents, paragraph (c), is revised to provide an additional link to provide access to applicable documents.

16 L, INSTRUCTIONS,

CONDITIONS, AND

NOTICES TO OFFERORS

OR RESPONDENTS,

Provision 1852.215-81

PROPOSAL PAGE

LIMITATIONS (APR 2015),

pages L-6, L-7, L-8, L-9

The Draft RFP does not address the inclusion of a glossary/acronym guide. Will the Government allow for the inclusion of a non-page counted glossary/acronym guide in each volume?

No. Offerors may only submit a glossary/acronym guide as numbered pages within page-limited volumes.

17 L, INSTRUCTIONS,

CONDITIONS, AND

NOTICES TO OFFERORS

OR RESPONDENTS,

Provision 1852.215-81

PROPOSAL PAGE

LIMITATIONS (APR 2015),

Volume III - Past Performance, page L-7

The volume is limited to 42 pages; however, a page limit breakdown is not provided. Can the Government clarify any additional page count breakdown for the Past Performance Volume?

No additional page count breakdown will be provided. Allocation of narrative and table data within the 42-page limitation is at the Offeror’s discretion.

Attachment A-6

18 L, INSTRUCTIONS,

CONDITIONS, AND

NOTICES TO OFFERORS

OR RESPONDENTS,

Provision VOLUME I –

MISSION SUITABILITY

FACTOR INSTRUCTIONS

(AUG 2019), paragraph (c), page L-17

In the Mission Suitability volume: Will the Government please state whether the required Compliance Matrix [page L-18 (c)] is included in the 110 page limitation?

Yes, the compliance matrix is included within the Mission Suitability page limitation.

19 L, INSTRUCTIONS,

CONDITIONS, AND

NOTICES TO OFFERORS

OR RESPONDENTS,

Provision VOLUME I –

MISSION SUITABILITY

FACTOR INSTRUCTIONS

(AUG 2019), paragraph (d)(1)(iii), page L-18

Paragraph (iii) of the instruction requires Offerors to provide an approach that demonstrates an understanding of METTS III technical discipline areas and lists PWS requirements 2.1, 2.3, 2.5, 2.6, 2.8, 2.16, 2.18, 3.2 and 3.4.

- Is the Government’s instruction for Offerors to address only those listed PWS areas, or is that the minimum requirement?

- Is the Government’s instruction to address the PWS areas only at the second level, e.g.

PWS 2.16 Propellant and Pressurant Operations and Systems, rather than at the third level where applicable, e.g. PWS 2.16.1, Valve and Component Servicing and PWS 2.16.2 Propellants and Pressurants Delivery Systems (PPDS)?

The provision entitled Volume I – Mission Suitability Factor Instructions, paragraph (d)(1) Subfactor 1: Management and Technical Approach, requires a description of the proposed technical approach which demonstrates an understanding of only those PWS areas specified in item (iii) of this paragraph.

Item (iii) of the paragraph is revised to reflect an updated listing of the applicable PWS sections to be addressed at the identified level.

20 L, INSTRUCTIONS,

CONDITIONS, AND

NOTICES TO OFFERORS

OR RESPONDENTS,

Paragraph (i)(A) requires the submission of Attachment L-9, Key Personnel Position Description and Resume.

Attachment L-9 will not be excluded from the page count.

Attachment A-7

Provision VOLUME I –

MISSION SUITABILITY

FACTOR INSTRUCTIONS

(AUG 2019), paragraph (d)(2)(i)(A), page L-21

- Will the Government exclude Attachment L-9 from the page count of Mission Suitability?

21 L, INSTRUCTIONS,

CONDITIONS, AND

NOTICES TO OFFERORS

OR RESPONDENTS,

VOLUME I – MISSION

SUITABILITY FACTOR

INSTRUCTIONS (AUG

2019), paragraph (d)(2)(xi), page L-28

Paragraph (ii)(vii) states, “Offerors shall also include copies of all information utilized from salary surveys and other sources in order to allow for a complete understanding of, and to establish traceability to, the proposed labor rate ranges. The surveys shall be included in this volume after the last numbered page (i.e., page 130).”

- Will the Government confirm this information will be excluded from page count?

Confirmed. In accordance with 1852.215-81, Proposal Page Limitations, paragraphs (a) and (c), copies of applicable salary surveys or other salary information do not count against the Mission Suitability page limitation.

22 L, INSTRUCTIONS,

CONDITIONS, AND

NOTICES TO OFFERORS

OR RESPONDENTS,

VOLUME II -- COST

FACTOR INSTRUCTIONS,

paragraph (a)(6), page L-29

It is unclear where Attachment L-11 is to be included in the Proposal. Can the Government clarify where, within the proposal, the SF 1408 is intended to be submitted?

In accordance with Volume II, Cost Factor Instructions, paragraph (a)(6), the SF1408, Preaward Survey of Prospective Contractor- Accounting System (Attachment L-11), shall be submitted as part of Volume II – Cost.

23 L, INSTRUCTIONS,

CONDITIONS, AND

NOTICES TO OFFERORS

OR RESPONDENTS,

VOLUME II -- COST

FACTOR INSTRUCTIONS,

paragraph (b)(2)(i)(A), page L-31

Paragraph (i)(A) states, “Offerors shall also include copies of all information utilized from salary surveys and other sources in order to allow a complete understanding of how each survey/source was utilized to establish direct labor rates.” This information is also requested in Volume I, Mission Suitability, Section (b)(2)(ii)(vii).

The requirement for supporting salary surveys or other salary information will not be removed from Mission Suitability volume.

Attachment A-8

- Will the Government consider removing this requirement from Volume I, Mission Suitability?

24 L, INSTRUCTIONS,

CONDITIONS, AND

NOTICES TO OFFERORS

OR RESPONDENTS,

VOLUME II -- COST

FACTOR INSTRUCTIONS,

paragraph (b)(2)(iii), page L-

In reference to “The Offeror and all applicable subcontractors shall perform … a cost and/or price analysis of each subcontractor’s cost proposal ...”, is it the correct interpretation that applicable subcontractors are required to perform a cost and/or price analysis on their own cost proposal?

All subcontractors which are required to submit a cost volume (i.e., those subcontractors with a value of $5 million or greater over the life of the contract) shall provide a copy of a cost and/or price analysis of any respective applicable subcontractor’s cost proposal.

25 L, INSTRUCTIONS,

CONDITIONS, AND

NOTICES TO OFFERORS

OR RESPONDENTS,

VOLUME II -- COST

FACTOR INSTRUCTIONS,

paragraph (b)(3)(ii)(C), page L-37

In reference to Attachment L-1 Tab C, are applicable subcontractors also required to input data for all labor categories, even ones not assigned to them?

Subcontractors are required only to input labor categories assigned to them by the Offeror.

26 L, INSTRUCTIONS,

CONDITIONS, AND

NOTICES TO OFFERORS

OR RESPONDENTS,

VOLUME III – PAST

PERFORMANCE FACTOR

INSTRUCTIONS, paragraph (b), page L-39

As written, only the current incumbent contractor will have highly-relevant METTS past performance. We believe the intent is to ensure that the past performance is within the past five years and that at least one-year of performance has occurred. We therefore recommend that statement be revised to “Performance of referenced contracts shall be limited to that which occurred within five years of the due date for receipt of proposals. Additionally, each referenced

The solicitation is revised to indicate that each referenced contract shall have a minimum of one year of performance within the five year period.

Attachment A-9 contract shall have a minimum of one year of completed performance.”

27 L, INSTRUCTIONS,

CONDITIONS, AND

NOTICES TO OFFERORS

OR RESPONDENTS,

VOLUME III – PAST

PERFORMANCE FACTOR

INSTRUCTIONS, paragraph (c), page L-39 &

M, EVALUATION

FACTORS FOR AWARD,

VOLUME III – PAST

PERFORMANCE FACTOR

EVALUATION, page M-5

DRFP Section L-40 (c) states that the Managing Partner of a JV must provide two relevant past performance references. DRFP M-5 (d) indicates past performance records of a joint venture will be evaluated on individual members of a joint venture.

Can the Government please clarify whether past performance records of non-Managing Partners of a joint venture will be accepted for evaluation?

The RFP recommends (as indicated by use of the word should) that the managing partner of a JV submit two past performance references. The Offeror, at its discretion, may also choose to submit references for the non-managing partner within the five reference limit.

28 L, INSTRUCTIONS,

CONDITIONS, AND

NOTICES TO OFFERORS

OR RESPONDENTS,

VOLUME III – PAST

PERFORMANCE FACTOR

INSTRUCTIONS, paragraph (c), page L-39 &

M, EVALUATION

FACTORS FOR AWARD,

VOLUME III – PAST

PERFORMANCE FACTOR

EVALUATION, page M-5

Many 8(a) companies do not have past performance references meeting the criteria specified in the DRFP. The SBA’s Mentor/Protégé program is intended to provide the resources, infrastructure and expertise of a large company as a means for a capable but smaller 8(a) company to participate and successfully execute larger contracts, such as METTS III. Therefore, we respectfully request that the Government consider waiving the past performance requirement (DRFP Section L-40 (c)) for the Managing Partner of a JV, if it can be reasonably demonstrated that through an SBA-approved Mentor/Protégé Agreement sufficient past performance capabilities exist for the Mentor to meet the criteria.

In accordance with Volume III – Past Performance Factor Instructions, paragraph (c), it is recommended that the Offeror submit two relevant past performance references for the managing joint venture partner. See Volume III, paragraph (c), “two relevant past performance references should be provided by the joint venture managing partner (i.e., the Section 8(a) protégé).

(emphasis added). See 13 CFR 124.513(c). Also, in accordance with Volume III, an Offeror may submit referenced contracts for individual JV partners, which includes mentors. Individual members of the joint venture will be held to those relevancy thresholds established for the Offeror. The mentor’s and protégé’s past

Attachment A-10

We respectfully request that you consider providing clarification prior to the suspense date for Q&A (January 6) to provide small firms the information pertinent to allow bid/no-bid determination.

performance will be considered relative to their proposed respective role(s) under this effort.

The solicitation is revised to clarify the applicable relevancy thresholds for members of the joint venture.

29 L, INSTRUCTIONS,

CONDITIONS, AND

NOTICES TO OFFERORS

OR RESPONDENTS,

VOLUME III – PAST

PERFORMANCE FACTOR

INSTRUCTIONS, paragraph (d)(2), page L-40

The DRFP contains the following statement “In order to receive past performance credit for a PWS area, the Offeror or subcontractor, as applicable, must be assigned at least 25 percent of the total WYE personnel, as indicated in the PWS assignment table(s) below, in that specific PWS area.”

Will the Government please state whether:

a. The Offeror or subcontractor must plan to perform at least 25 percent of the work for the specified PWS area on the METTS III contract, or

b. The Offeror or subcontractor must have performed at least 25 percent of the work in the referenced PWS area for the past performance contract being cited?

The first answer is correct. The Performance Work Statement (PWS) assignment tables provided in Volume III – Past Performance Factor Instructions, Section II, paragraph (2) and (3) (to be submitted by the Offeror as part of the Past Performance volume) reflect the assignment (i.e., anticipated workshare) of those PWS elements specified therein, by company. In order for the Offeror to receive past performance credit for a particular PWS area, the party with past performance in that PWS area (whether the Offeror or subcontractor) must be assigned at least 25 percent of the total anticipated WYE workshare for that PWS area.

30 L, INSTRUCTIONS,

CONDITIONS, AND

NOTICES TO OFFERORS

OR RESPONDENTS,

VOLUME IV – CONTRACT

It is unclear whether the Draft Government Property Management Plan, Draft Organizational Conflict of Interest Plan, and the Draft On-Site Safety, Health, and Environmental (SHE) Plan may be submitted separately as individual files.

Yes. The Draft Government Property Management Plan, Draft Organizational Conflict of Interest Plan, and the Draft On- Site Safety, Health, and Environmental (SHE) Plan may be submitted as separate electronic files within each USB electronic

Attachment A-11

INSTRUCTIONS, paragraph (d), page L-48

Can the Draft Government Property Management Plan, Draft Organizational Conflict of Interest Plan, and the Draft On- Site Safety, Health, and Environmental (SHE) Plan be submitted separately as separate files?

drive. Hard copies of each plan shall be submitted as part of Volume IV – Contract, which is separately bound.

31 ATTACHMENT L-1,

EXCEL PRICING MODEL 1

& ATTACHMENT L-2,

EXCEL PRICING MODEL

2, pages L-1-1, L-2-1

REFERENCE: The solicitation and price matrices show 108 labor categories. The customer indicated there would be 118 physicals per year on page 322 for the “mission”, but the customer also indicated 130 physicals per year on page 322 for the “IDIQ.” What is the difference on page 322 between “Mission” table and “IDIQ” table?

REFERENCE: Attachment L1 Tab A, customer stated 130 physicals per year in the “ODC” table, and customer stated 160 physicals per year in the “IDIQ” table. What is the difference in Attachment L1 Tab A between the “ODC” table and the “IDIQ” table?

REFERENCE: Attachment L2 Tab J, each year shows 185 work year equivalent employees, so again, the question becomes which employees should receive the physicals and how many employees are we expected to have?

As a result, we are unable to determine if we need 118, 130, or 160 physicals per year and which employees/labor categories will require those physicals?

All physicals (approximately 248 physicals) will be performed as indefinite-delivery, indefinite-quantity (IDIQ) effort. As a result, the solicitation’s Excel Pricing Model is revised to remove the references to physicals from the Mission component, and add these physicals to the IDIQ component by inserting an associated plug number dollar value which will be multiplied by the Offeror’s physical burden rate and/or fee reflected in both the EPM and Attachment J- 4, Indefinite-Delivery Indefinite-Quantity (IDIQ), Table J-4-3, Contract Other Direct Cost (ODC) Burden and Fee Rates.

Attachment A-12

Please clarify WHICH employees/labor categories and the TOTAL NUMBER of employees require physicals.

32 ATTACHMENT L-1,

EXCEL PRICING MODEL

1, Tab D

ATTACHMENT L-2,

EXCEL PRICING MODEL

2, Tabs E & F

In Tab D the production factor starts with 2088 hours in Years, 1, 2, 4, & 5, but only 2080 hours in year 3. There appears to be a discrepancy in year 3? Please clarify.

Tabs E & F show 9 years for input, but the other tabs are only 5 years? There appears to be a discrepancy in year 3? Please clarify.

The number of productive hours applicable to each contract year fluctuate based on variables such as when a contract year begins, weekend start, leap years, etc.

Attachment L-1, Excel Pricing Model, Tabs E and F have been updated to reflect the five year contract period.

33 ATTACHMENT L-5,

BACKGROUND AND

HISTORICAL DATA, page L-5-7

WBS 2.4 and 3.4 Fabrication and Assembly of R&D Space Flight and Associated Hardware

“The following data is provided to show the current number of seats the Government procures and provides for various software applications used in accomplishing the work defined in the PWS. The table below shows the seat availability. These seats are used by both Contractor and civil service personnel.”

The Government provided historical data for how many seats are available for each software system. Will the Government allow the contractor to use these seats at no cost?

Yes. These seats will be provided at no-cost to the contractor.

34 M, EVALUATION

FACTORS FOR AWARD,

Provision VOLUME I –

MISSION SUITABILITY

FACTOR EVALUATION

Will the Government please provide a more detailed breakdown of what specific areas and weight for evaluation scoring specifically for Subfactor 1 and Subfactor 2?

Mission Suitability volume subfactors have been structured to indicate meaningful discriminators. In accordance with NFS 1815.304-70(a), subdivision (i.e., scoring) below the subfactor level is prohibited.

Attachment A-13

(AUG 21 2019), paragraph (d), page M-2

35 Purchase Order, TERMS

AND CONDITIONS, MSFC

52.211-94 PERIOD OF

PERFORMANCE (MAY

2017), page PO-10

The Draft RFP states, “The period of performance for this contract is from 08/17/2020 through 09/30/2020.”

- The current dates provided for Period of Performance is less than 60 days. Will the Government provide an updated Period of Performance timeframe?

The phase-in purchase order period of performance accurately reflects the 45-day phase-in period.

36 Industry Day Briefing Charts, Slide 14

Slide 14, sub-bullet 2 under Physicals states that “required certification physicals will be paid for by the Contractor.” Slide 38 indicates that the costs of physicals are a billable ODC cost.

Will the government please clarify whether or not the costs for certification physicals are a billable contract cost?

The Excel Pricing Model has been revised to reflect that costs for certification physicals are a reimbursable expense accounted for under IDIQ effort.

37 Industry Day Briefing Charts, Slide 38

Will the government please clarify whether or not required training and certifications are a billable cost under the METTS III contract?

All non-labor costs associated with required contractor training and certifications will be accounted for as IDIQ costs as reflected in the Excel Pricing Model, and are therefore a reimbursable item. Labor costs are accounted for as either Mission or IDIQ costs.

Attachment B-1

ATTACHMENT B – SUMMARY OF CHANGES BETWEEN DRAFT AND FINAL SOLICITATION

Index Section

From To

1 B, SUPPLIES OR SERVICES

AND PRICES/COSTS, table in Clause ESTIMATED COST AND FEE, paragraphs (a) and (b), page B-2

The estimated cost of this contract is $ To Be Proposed (TBP) (base period only). The maximum available award fee, excluding base fee, if any, is $ TBP (base period only).

The base fee is $ 0. Total estimated cost, base fee, and maximum award fee are $ TBP (base period only).

*Note: The Contractor shall invoice fee at the percentage delineated in Attachment J-4, Indefinite-Delivery, Indefinite-Quantity (IDIQ) Rates, Table J-4-3, Contract Other Direct Costs (ODC) Burden and Fee Rates, based on the ODC costs expended during the invoicing period. The Contractor shall not be entitled to invoice for the balance of the fixed fee unless the full estimated cost of the ODC task order is expended for the contract period.

Column *Fixed Fee on ODC (If Applicable)

(a) The estimated cost of this contract is $ To Be Proposed (TBP) (CLIN 001 Mission base period only). The maximum available award fee, excluding base fee, if any, is $ TBP (CLIN 001 Mission base period only).

The base fee is $ 0. Total estimated cost, base fee, and maximum award fee are $ TBP (CLIN 001 Mission base period only).

(b) The Contractor’s invoiced fee shall represent the percentage, as delineated in Attachment J-4, Indefinite-Delivery, Indefinite-Quantity (IDIQ) Rates, Table J-4- 3, Contract Other Direct Costs (ODC) Burden and Fee Rates, of ODC costs expended during the invoicing period. The Contractor is only entitled to fee for costs actually expended.

Column Fixed Percentage Fee on ODC (If Applicable)

2 B, ATTACHMENT J-2,

ATTACHMENT J-4,

ATTACHMENT L-1 Tab A, pages B-2, B-3, B-4, J-2-34, J- 4-4, Fixed Fee on ODC

ODC Fixed Fee

Global change to Fixed Percentage Fee on

ODC

Global change to ODC Fixed Percentage Fee

Attachment B-2

3 B, SUPPLIES OR SERVICES

AND PRICES/COSTS, table in Clause ESTIMATED COST AND FEE, rows FEE PERIOD 1-10 TOTALS under the *FIXED FEE on ODC column, pages B-2, B-3, B-4

AFP 1 TOTALS

AFP 2 TOTALS

AFP 3 TOTALS

AFP 4 TOTALS

AFP 5 TOTALS

AFP 6 TOTALS

AFP 7 TOTALS

AFP 8 TOTALS

AFP 9 TOTALS

AFP 10 TOTALS

FEE PERIOD 1 TOTALS

FEE PERIOD 2 TOTALS

FEE PERIOD 3 TOTALS

FEE PERIOD 4 TOTALS

FEE PERIOD 5 TOTALS

FEE PERIOD 6 TOTALS

FEE PERIOD 7 TOTALS

FEE PERIOD 8 TOTALS

FEE PERIOD 9 TOTALS

FEE PERIOD 10 TOTALS

4 B, SUPPLIES OR SERVICES

AND PRICES/COSTS, table in Clause ESTIMATED COST AND FEE, rows FEE PERIOD 1-10 TOTALS under the *FIXED FEE on ODC column, pages B-2, B-3, B-4

$TBP $TBD

5 E, INSPECTION AND

ACCEPTANCE, table in Clause 1852.246-71

GOVERNMENT

CONTRACT QUALITY

ASSURANCE FUNCTIONS

(OCT 1988), Item, page E-1

All Services All Requirements

6 F, DELIVERIES OR

PERFORMANCE, Clause

MSFC 52.237-91 PLACE OF

PERFORMANCE (JUL

2018), page F-1

The Contractor shall perform the work under this contract at Marshall Space Flight Center and at such other locations as may be approved in writing by the Contracting Officer.

The Contractor shall perform the work under this contract at Marshall Space Flight Center, Michoud Assembly Facility, and at such other locations as may be approved in writing by the Contracting Officer.

Attachment B-3

7 G, CONTRACT

ADMINISTRATION DATA,

page G-1

Deleted 1852.227-70 NEW

TECHNOLOGY—OTHER THAN A

SMALL BUSINESS FIRM OR

NONPROFIT ORGANIZATION (APR

2015)

8 G, CONTRACT

ADMINISTRATION DATA,

Clause 1852.216-76 AWARD

FEE FOR SERVICE

CONTRACTS (JUN 2018),

page G-2

Below the clause, the following reference is added: (See Section B, Estimated Cost and Fee clause).

9 H, SPECIAL CONTRACT

REQUIREMENTS, Clause

MSFC 52.223-97,

MANDATORY AND

REQUIRED TRAINING

(JUN 2016), pages H-5, H-6

MSFC 52.223-97 MANDATORY AND

REQUIRED TRAINING (JUN 2016)

MSFC 52.223-97 MANDATORY AND

REQUIRED TRAINING (NOV 2019)

10 I, CONTRACT CLAUSES,

page I-5

Added 52.246-26 REPORTING

NONCONFORMING ITEMS (DEC 2019).

11 I, CONTRACT CLAUSES,

Clause 52.223-3

HAZARDOUS MATERIAL

IDENTIFICATION AND

MATERIAL SAFETY DATA

(JAN 1997) ALTERNATE I

(JUL 1995), paragraph (b), page I-23

Added TBP under Material (If none, insert None).

12 J, LIST OF ATTACHMENTS,

ATTACHMENT J-1,

PERFORMANCE WORK

Deleted Section 1.3.2 Installation Accountable Government Property

(IAGP).

Attachment B-4

STATEMENT (PWS), Section 1.3, page J-1-6

13 J, LIST OF ATTACHMENTS,

ATTACHMENT J-1,

PERFORMANCE WORK

STATEMENT (PWS), Section

2.10 Special Test Equipment

(STE) Design Support, paragraph (f), page J-1-23

(f) Utilize software to include PTC KeyShot to perform requested services associated with the organization’s 3D printer.

(f) Utilize Government-provided software to include PTC KeyShot to perform requested services associated with the organization’s 3D printer.

14 J, LIST OF ATTACHMENTS,

ATTACHMENT J-1,

PERFORMANCE WORK

STATEMENT (PWS), Section 2.11, paragraph (c), page J-1-

Serve as a Tier-3 function to provide specialized skills supporting product development, complex issues, and problem resolutions for users, and provide data as required.

Provide specialized skills supporting product development, complex issues, and problem resolutions for users, and provide data as required.

15 J, LIST OF ATTACHMENTS,

ATTACHMENT J-1,

PERFORMANCE WORK

STATEMENT (PWS), Section 2.16.2, paragraphs (b), (f), (cc), pages J-1-27, J-1-30

(b) Operate, maintain…MPR 8710.1 MSFC Requirements for Ground-Space Pressure Vessel and Pressurized Systems (PVS) or NASA approve equivalent and applicable NASA Standards.

(f) Obtain capabilities…comply with all applicable NASA, ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code-Section IX, and national…performed.

(cc) Prepare…asset evaluation every year …rotation schedule:

(b) Operate, maintain… MPR 8710.1 MSFC Requirements for Ground-Space Pressure Vessel and Pressurized Systems (PVS), MSFC-STD-3535 Standard for Propellants and Pressurants used for Test and Test Support Activities at SSC and MSFC, MPR 8710.1 MSFC Requirements for Ground-Based Pressure Vessels and Pressurized Systems (PVS), NASA- STD-8719.17 NASA Requirements for Ground-based Pressure Vessels and Pressurized Systems (PVS).

(f) Obtain capabilities…comply with ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel

Attachment B-5

Code-Section IX, and national…performed.

(cc) Prepare…asset evaluation of one facility every year…rotation schedule:

16 J, LIST OF ATTACHMENTS,

ATTACHMENT J-1,

PERFORMANCE WORK

STATEMENT (PWS), Section 3.4, paragraph (d), page J-1-35

Added paragraph (d) Provide tool crib operations as required.

17 J, LIST OF ATTACHMENTS,

PERFORMANCE WORK

STATEMENT (PWS), Section 3.13, page J-1-37

Metals Engineering… electronic inventory systems.

Metals Engineering…electronic inventory systems. Reference PWS Attachment J-12, Work Order Chart, column EM for tool crib designation.

18 J, LIST OF ATTACHMENTS,

PERFORMANCE WORK

STATEMENT (PWS), Section 3.15, page J-1-37

The Nonmetallic…below.

Reference PWS Attachment J-12, Work Flow Chart, column EM for tool crib designation.

The Nonmetallic…below.

Provide tool crib operations as required.

19 J, LIST OF ATTACHMENTS,

ATTACHMENT J-2, DATA

PROCUREMENT

DOCUMENT, Data Requirements Description (DRD) 1670MA-002, Task Order Plan (TOP), Item 11, page J-2-33

INITIAL SUBMISSION: No later than five calendar days after receipt of Task Order Request (TOR)

INITIAL SUBMISSION: No later than ten calendar days after receipt of Task Order Request (TOR)

Attachment B-6

20 J, LIST OF ATTACHMENTS,

ATTACHMENT J-2, DATA

PROCUREMENT

DOCUMENT, Data Requirements Description (DRD) 1670MA-002, Task Order Plan (TOP), Item 12, page J-2-33

SUBMISSION FREQUENCY: No later than five days of Task Order Request (TOR) or modification request of an existing Task Order Plan; as required

SUBMISSION FREQUENCY: No later than ten days after Task Order Request (TOR) or modification request of an existing Task Order Plan

21 J, LIST OF ATTACHMENTS,

ATTACHMENT J-2, DATA

PROCUREMENT

DOCUMENT, Data Requirements Description

(DRD) 1670MA-004,

Financial Management Report (533M), Item 11, page J-2-37

INITIAL SUBMISSION: No later than seven working days following the end of the Contractor’s accounting month after the first month of performance

INITIAL SUBMISSION: No later than ten working days following the end of the Contractor’s accounting month after the first month of performance

22 J, LIST OF ATTACHMENTS,

ATTACHMENT J-2, DATA

PROCUREMENT

DOCUMENT, Data Requirements Description

(DRD) 1670MA-004,

Financial Management Report (533M), Item 12, page J-2-37

SUBMISSION FREQUENCY: No later than seven working days following the end of the contractor’s accounting month

SUBMISSION FREQUENCY: No later than ten working days following the end of the contractor’s accounting month

23 J, LIST OF ATTACHMENTS,

ATTACHMENT J-2, DATA

PROCUREMENT

DOCUMENT, Data Requirements Description (DRD) 1670MA-010, Monthly

SUBMISSION FREQUENCY: Monthly; no later than 10 calendar days following the end of each month

SUBMISSION FREQUENCY: Monthly; no later than ten working days following the end of the contractor’s accounting month

Attachment B-7

Cost Report, Item 12, page J- 2-46

24 J, LIST OF ATTACHMENTS,

ATTACHMENT J-3, WORK

BREAKDOWN

STRUCTURE (WBS), Section 1.0, page J-3-1

Deleted 1.3.2 Installation Accountable Government Property (IAGP).

25 J, LIST OF ATTACHMENTS,

ATTACHMENT J-5, LABOR

CATEGORY

DESCRIPTIONS, Table J-5.1, Section 1, category Data Analyst, row Q/E, pages J-5-3, J-5-4

Bachelor’s degree in a related field from an accredited institution is desired. One year of experience in a related field is desired.

Computer proficiency in MS Office suite of products and internet research capabilities is desired.

One year of experience in a related field is required. Computer proficiency in MS Office suite of products and internet research capabilities is required. Bachelor’s degree in a related field from an accredited institution is desired.

26 J, LIST OF ATTACHMENTS,

ATTACHMENT J-5, LABOR

CATEGORY

DESCRIPTIONS, Table J-5.1, Section 1, category General Manager, row Q/E, pages J-5-

Bachelor’s degree in a related field from an accredited institution or 8 years of experience in a related field is required.

Bachelor’s degree in a related field from an accredited institution and 8 years of experience in a related field is required.

27 J, LIST OF ATTACHMENTS,

ATTACHMENT J-5, LABOR

CATEGORY

DESCRIPTIONS, Table J-5.1, Section 1, category Manager II, row Q/E, page J-5-6

Propulsion Test Department Manager:

• Minimum of 10 years of experience managing a multi…customer requirements and schedules.

• Minimum of 10 years of experience dealing…non-CBA personnel.

Propulsion Test Department Manager:

• Minimum of 8 years of experience managing a multi…customer requirements and schedules.

• Minimum of 5 years of experience dealing…non-CBA personnel.

28 J, LIST OF ATTACHMENTS,

ATTACHMENT J-5, LABOR

CATEGORY

DESCRIPTIONS, Table J-5.1, 3 or more years of directly related experience is desired.

3 or more years of directly related experience is required.

Attachment B-8

Section 1, category Test Coordinator, row Q/E, page J- 5-14

29 J, LIST OF ATTACHMENTS,

ATTACHMENT J-5, LABOR

CATEGORY

DESCRIPTIONS, Table J-5.1, Section 3, page J-5-44

Section title is revised to reflect removal of CBA reference.

30 J, LIST OF ATTACHMENTS,

ATTACHMENT J-5, LABOR

CATEGORY

DESCRIPTIONS, Table J-5.1, Section 4, category Metal Cleaner, Immersion, row Q/E, WGE, page J-5-54

Three (3) years experience in a related field is desired. Must have basic understanding of typical surface treatment solutions.

Basic understanding of typical surface treatment solutions is required. Three (3) years experience in a related field is desired.

31 J, LIST OF ATTACHMENTS,

ATTACHMENT J-5, LABOR

CATEGORY

DESCRIPTIONS, Table J-5.1, Section 4, category Painter, Aerospace, row Q/E, WGE, page J-5-54

Five (5) years experience in a related field is desired.

Five (5) years experience in a related field is required.

32 J, LIST OF ATTACHMENTS,

ATTACHMENT J-6,

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

LOCAL AREA WAGE

DETERMINATIONS

ATTACHMENT J-6, DEPARTMENT OF

LABOR LOCAL AREA AND

COLLECTIVE BARGAINING

AGREEMENT (CBA) WAGE

DETERMINATIONS

ATTACHMENT J-6, DEPARTMENT OF

LABOR LOCAL AREA WAGE

DETERMINATIONS

33 J, LIST OF ATTACHMENTS,

ATTACHMENT J-6,

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

LOCAL AREA WAGE

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR LOCAL

AREA WAGE DETERMINATION is updated with the latest revision.

Attachment B-9

DETERMINATIONS, pages J-6-1 through J-6-10

34 J, LIST OF ATTACHMENTS,

ATTACHMENT J-9,

APPLICABLE

REGULATIONS,

PROCEDURES, AND

DOCUMENTS

Attachment J-9 is replaced in its entirety.

35 K, REPRESENTATIONS,

CERTIFICATIONS, AND

OTHER STATEMENTS OF

OFFERORS OR

RESPONDENTS, pages K-1, through K-5

52.204-8 ANNUAL REPRESENTATIONS

AND CERTIFICATIONS (OCT 2018)

52.204-8 ANNUAL REPRESENTATIONS

AND CERTIFICATIONS (JAN 2020)

36 K, REPRESENTATIONS,

CERTIFICATIONS, AND

OTHER STATEMENTS OF

OFFERORS OR

RESPONDENTS, pages K-5, K-6

52.204-24 REPRESENTATION

REGARDING CERTAIN

TELECOMMUNICATIONS AND VIDEO

SURVEILLANCE SERVICES OR

EQUIPMENT (AUG 2019)

52.204-24 REPRESENTATION

REGARDING CERTAIN

TELECOMMUNICATIONS AND VIDEO

SURVEILLANCE SERVICES OR

EQUIPMENT (DEC 2019)

37 K, REPRESENTATIONS,

CERTIFICATIONS, AND

OTHER STATEMENTS OF

OFFERORS OR

RESPONDENTS, page K-6

Added 52.204-26 COVERED

TELECOMMUNICATIONS EQUIPMENT

OR SERVICES—REPRESENTATION

(DEC 2019)

38 L, INSTRUCTIONS,

CONDITIONS, AND

NOTICES TO OFFERORS

OR RESPONDENTS,

Provision - 1852.215-81, PROPOSAL PAGE

1852.215-81 PROPOSAL PAGE

LIMITATIONS (APR 2015) replaced in its entirety.

Attachment B-10

LIMITATIONS (APR 2015),

pages L-6, L-7, L-8

39 L, INSTRUCTIONS,

CONDITIONS, AND

NOTICES TO OFFERORS

OR RESPONDENTS,

Provision – 1852.245-81, LIST OF AVAILABLE

GOVERNMENT PROPERTY

(JAN 2011), paragraph (c), page L-11

(See beta.SAM.gov for listing of Installation-Accountable Government Property (IAGP)

(See beta.SAM.gov for listing of Installation-Accountable Government Property (IAGP); Clause referenced in paragraph (b) is not applicable)

40 L, INSTRUCTIONS,

CONDITIONS, AND

NOTICES TO OFFERORS

OR RESPONDENTS,

Provision – MSFC 52.205-90

DESIGNATED POINT OF

CONTACT (NOV 2018),

paragraph (b), page L-12

(b) Questions… no later than January 6, 2020, 2:00 p.m., Central Time.

(b) Questions… no later than February 24, 2020, 2:00 p.m., Central Time.

41 L, INSTRUCTIONS,

CONDITIONS, AND

NOTICES TO OFFERORS

OR RESPONDENTS

and

M, EVALUATION

FACTORS FOR AWARD

subcontractors Global change to proposed subcontractors.

42 L, INSTRUCTIONS,

CONDITIONS, AND

NOTICES TO OFFERORS

OR RESPONDENTS,

Provision VOLUME I -

(b) The volume… approach to effectively and efficiently accomplish…

(b) The volume… approach to effectively accomplish...

Attachment B-11

MISSION SUITABILITY

FACTOR INSTRUCTIONS

(AUG 2019), paragraph (b), page L-17

43 L, INSTRUCTIONS,

CONDITIONS, AND

NOTICES TO OFFERORS

OR RESPONDENTS,

Provision VOLUME I -

MISSION SUITABILITY

FACTOR INSTRUCTIONS

(AUG 2019), paragraph (d)(1)(iii), page L-18

(iii) A demonstrated understanding of the various METTS III technical discipline areas (i.e., PWS 2.1, PWS 2.3, PWS 2.5, PWS

2.6, PWS 2.8, PWS 2.16, PWS 2.18, PWS

3.2, PWS 3.4) which will allow for successful execution of the technical requirements in Attachment J-1, Performance Work Statement.

(iii) A demonstrated understanding of only the following METTS III technical discipline areas: PWS 2.1, PWS 2.1.1, PWS

2.1.2, PWS 2.3, PWS 2.5, PWS 2.6, PWS

2.16, PWS 2.16.1, PWS 2.16.2, PWS 2.18,

PWS 2.18.1, PWS 2.18.2, PWS 2.18.3, PWS

2.18.4, PWS 3.2, PWS 3.8, and PWS 3.14, which will allow for successful execution of the technical requirements in Attachment J- 1, Performance Work Statement.

44 L, INSTRUCTIONS,

CONDITIONS, AND

NOTICES TO OFFERORS

OR RESPONDENTS,

Provision VOLUME I -

MISSION SUITABILITY

FACTOR INSTRUCTIONS

(AUG 2019), paragraph (d)(1)(xiii)(D), page L-19

(D) Provision of official communication to the Government.

(D) Official communication to the Government.

45 L, INSTRUCTIONS,

CONDITIONS, AND

NOTICES TO OFFERORS

OR RESPONDENTS,

Provision VOLUME I -

MISSION SUITABILITY

FACTOR INSTRUCTIONS

(A) through (K)

Renumbered to (A) through (I).

Attachment B-12

(d)(1)(xvi), page L-20

46 L, INSTRUCTIONS,

CONDITIONS, AND

NOTICES TO OFFERORS

OR RESPONDENTS,

Provision VOLUME I -

MISSION SUITABILITY

FACTOR INSTRUCTIONS

(AUG 2019), paragraph (d)(1)(xvi)(A), page L-20

(A) The method by which on-going work will be transitioned to the new contract with minimal impact.

(A) The method by which on-going work will be transitioned to the new contract with minimal impact in order to ensure completeness and continuity of operations and product development.

47 L, INSTRUCTIONS,

CONDITIONS, AND

NOTICES TO OFFERORS

OR RESPONDENTS,

Provision VOLUME I -

MISSION SUITABILITY

FACTOR INSTRUCTIONS

(AUG 2019), paragraph (d)(1)(xvi)(E), page L-20

(E) The comprehensive schedule of Phase-in …this follow-on effort.

(E) The comprehensive schedule of Phase-in…this follow-on effort including a description of the Phase-in schedule, key milestones, meetings, and the methodology for identifying and resolving issues.

48 L, INSTRUCTIONS,

CONDITIONS, AND

NOTICES TO OFFERORS

OR RESPONDENTS,

Provision VOLUME I -

MISSION SUITABILITY

FACTOR INSTRUCTIONS

(AUG 2019), paragraph (d)(1)(xvii)(C), page L-21

(C) The approach for achieving accreditation to ISO/IEC 17025: 2017.

(C) The approach for achieving accreditation to ISO/IEC 17025: 2017 in the name of Marshall Space Flight Center (MSFC).

49 L, INSTRUCTIONS,

CONDITIONS, AND

Deleted the following rows:

PWS 1.3.1 Procurement of Property

Attachment B-13

NOTICES TO OFFERORS

OR RESPONDENTS,

Provision VOLUME I -

MISSION SUITABILITY

FACTOR INSTRUCTIONS

(AUG 2019), paragraph (d)(2)(ii)(A), Performance Work Statement (PWS) Mission Services WYE Assignment Matrix, page L-22

PWS 1.3.2 Installation Accountable Governent Property (IAGP)

50 L, INSTRUCTIONS,

CONDITIONS, AND

NOTICES TO OFFERORS

OR RESPONDENTS,

Provision VOLUME I -

MISSION SUITABILITY

FACTOR INSTRUCTIONS

(AUG 2019), paragraph (d)(2)(ii)(A), Performance Work Statement (PWS) Mission Services WYE Assignment Matrix, pages L- 22, L-23, L-24

Added the following rows:

PWS 1.3 Property PWS 2.4.1 Fabrication Outsource and Facility Operations PWS 2.4.2 Precision Cleaning PWS 2.4.3 Precision Assembly PWS 2.19 Support Functions

51 L, INSTRUCTIONS,

NOTICES TO OFFERORS

OR RESPONDENTS,

Provision VOLUME I -

MISSION SUITABILITY

FACTOR INSTRUCTIONS

Added one row - PWS 3.19 Support Functions

Attachment B-14

(d)(2)(ii)(B), PWS IDIQ Assignment Matrix, page L-26

52 L, INSTRUCTIONS,

CONDITIONS, AND

NOTICES TO OFFERORS

OR RESPONDENTS,

Provision VOLUME I -

MISSION SUITABILITY

FACTOR INSTRUCTIONS

(AUG 2019), paragraphs (d)(2)(iii) – (xi), pages L-26, L-27, L-28

(ii)(D) - (vii)

Renumbered to (iii) - (xi).

53 L, INSTRUCTIONS,

NOTICES TO OFFERORS

OR RESPONDENTS,

Provision VOLUME I -

MISSION SUITABILITY

FACTOR INSTRUCTIONS

(AUG 2019), paragraph (d)(2)(vi), page L-26

(G) The approach for effectively working with applicable unions and Collective Bargaining Agreement(s) (CBA). Refer to Attachment J-6… Trades Council CBA.

(vi) The approach for effectively working with incumbent employees covered by CBAs. Refer to Attachment J-6… Trades Council CBA.

54 L, INSTRUCTIONS,

CONDITIONS, AND

NOTICES TO OFFERORS

OR RESPONDENTS,

Provision VOLUME I -

MISSION SUITABILITY

FACTOR INSTRUCTIONS

(AUG 2019), paragraph (d)(2)(viii)(D), page L-27

(4) Methodology and rationale…labor rate ranges for each labor…retain qualified employees.

(D) Methodology and rationale… labor rates and ranges for each labor… retain qualified employees.

Attachment B-15

55 L, INSTRUCTIONS,

CONDITIONS, AND

NOTICES TO OFFERORS

OR RESPONDENTS,

Provision VOLUME I -

MISSION SUITABILITY

FACTOR INSTRUCTIONS

(AUG 2019), paragraph (d)(2)(viii)(G), page L-27

(viii) Any deviations from existing Union Collective Bargaining Agreements (CBAs), a comparison of the Offeror’s proposed pay and benefits versus existing agreements, and associated risks/mitigations for proposed areas of notable change. Included in the Offeror’s response shall be a rationale of any deviations having the potential to cause issues with the affected labor union employees.

(G) Whether the Offeror plans to continue the practice of using CBAs with local trade unions or transition to Department of Labor local area wage determinations and its approach in doing so.

56 L, INSTRUCTIONS,

CONDITIONS, AND

NOTICES TO OFFERORS

OR RESPONDENTS,

Provision VOLUME I -

MISSION SUITABILITY

FACTOR INSTRUCTIONS

(AUG 2019), paragraph (d)(2)(x), page L-28

(vi) (i.e. page 130) (x) (i.e. page 110)

57 L, INSTRUCTIONS,

CONDITIONS, AND

NOTICES TO OFFERORS

OR RESPONDENTS,

Provision VOLUME I -

MISSION SUITABILITY

FACTOR INSTRUCTIONS

(AUG 2019), paragraph (d)(2)(xi), page L-28

(vii) (i.e. page 130) (xi) (i.e. page 110)

58 L, INSTRUCTIONS,

CONDITIONS, AND

NOTICES TO OFFERORS

In accordance with FAR 16.301-3, Limitations…shall be determined adequate

In accordance with FAR 16.301-3, Limitations…shall have an adequate

Attachment B-16

OR RESPONDENTS,

Provision VOLUME II –

COST FACTOR

INSTRUCTIONS, paragraph (a)(6), page L-29 for identifying…cost reimbursement contract.

accounting system for identifying…cost reimbursement contract.

59 L,…