Final_Attachments_A_and_B.docx
DOCX document 97 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Consolidated Program Support Services (CPSS) Project Coordination (PC) Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- 80MSFC19R0011
About this file
This presolicitation synopsis announces a draft request for proposal for project coordination support services under the Consolidated Program Support Services acquisition at the National Aeronautics and Space Administration Marshall Space Flight Center. The solicitation seeks project coordination services including general program support, office information technology management, and support for space act agreements and enhanced use leases. The contract will provide mission services for Marshall Space Flight Center including locations at NASA's Space Science and Technology Center and Michoud Assembly Facility, and allow for additional support through indefinite delivery, indefinite quantity task orders to Marshall and other NASA centers. The total contract period is anticipated as one base year and seven option years. The acquisition is set aside for women-owned small businesses. The draft RFP is expected to be released on or about July 30, 2019, with comments due on or about August 14, 2019.
Attachment A- Clarifications to All Potential Offerors Attachment B- Summary of Changes Between Draft and Final Solicitation
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
Show all 34
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
ATTACHMENT A – CLARIFICATIONS TO ALL POTENTIAL OFFERORS
| Index |
| Section |
| Question |
| Answer |
| 1 |
| Section B – Supplies or Services and Prices/Costs; Attachment J-1, Section 4.0, Technical Requirements, and Section 5.0, Other Directs Costs; and Section I Clause 1852.216-80 TASK ORDERING PROCEDURE ALTERNATE II |
| Under the IDIQ arrangement, will other Centers issue their own task plan requests and resulting task orders, or will that process be completely managed by MSFC personnel? |
Will the other Centers IDIQ Task Orders have their own Contract Line Identification Number (CLIN) or will those values be collected under a single MSFC CLIN?
It is anticipated that each Center will be able to issue task orders, managed through MSFC.
No, each Center will not have their own CLIN. There is one CLIN for Mission Services and one CLIN for IDIQ. Refer to MSFC 52.216-92, Matrix Of Contract Line Items (CLINs), in the solicitation.
| 2 |
| Section F, Page F-1, MSFC 52.237-91 PLACE OF PERFORMANCE |
Section 4.1.18, Page J-1-6 Based on the broad nature of the cited section (Section F; Place of Performance) will the government allow the successful offeror to bid new/ additional Labor Categories and rates for future requirements not costed in the CPSS PC proposal or the EPM? Would the Government consider additional labor categories for management support?
The provision of additional labor categories other than those delineated in Attachment J-3, Labor Category Descriptions, is considered unnecessary. Managerial support should utilize existing labor categories, including that of the Program Manager, and account for other managerial costs in accordance with the offeror’s customary business and accounting practices.
| 3 |
| Page J-1-2 |
3.0 MANAGEMENT AND REPORTING REQUIREMENTS
Given that the Service Labor Categories are specific to Program Manager and Project Coordinators, where should the contractor include the estimate for the resources required to perform the work described in 3.0? Are they already included in the estimated WYE provided in Attachment J-1A, if so, which requirement and labor category includes the effort for 3.0?
See response to question 2 above.
| 4 |
| Referenced Documents |
| Will the Government make referenced documents available as soon as possible? |
| Referenced documents can be accessed using the links provided in Attachment J-5, Applicable Regulations, Procedures, and Documents, in the solicitation. |
| 5 |
| Section G |
| Will resumes be required along with submission of responding to RFP? Resumes regarding the technical personnel (e.g. project coordinator 1, 2, 3, 4, Program Manager, etc.)? |
| Resumes and names of personnel are not requested and should not be provided. |
| 6 |
| Section H |
| Please clarify why specific center clauses are included for some Centers and not others. It is the government's intent for the contractor to follow the unique requirements of each Center when called out but follow MSFC when not specified? |
| All known Center-specific clauses have been included in the solicitation. The Contractor will be required to abide by the policies and procedures of place of performance (i.e., Center). |
| 7 |
| Section H (H-22) |
| Given the potential for substantial IDIQ work at other Centers, are Associate Contractor Agreements (ACA) anticipated to be required for other NASA Centers? |
| Any additional ACAs will be identified prior to IDIQ Task Order award. |
| 8 |
| J-1 PWS 4.3 and 4.3.1 Space Act Agreements and Enhanced User Leases. |
| Does the scope also include support to Cooperative Research and Development Agreements (CRADA) and other types of partnerships and agreements? |
| Attachment L-3, Past Performance Questionnaire, references CRADA as an example of non-FAR based acquisitions and is not intended to demonstate current Attachment J-1, PWS requirements. Rather, the reference is provided as an example of similar work. |
| 9 |
| J-1 PWS §4.1.3, p. J-1-5 |
| Would the Government please clarify if there are current data tracking, project tracking, and collaboration tools being used, or if the vendor must recommend or create such tools? |
| Each program or project uses its own Government-provided database and tools (e.g., Integrated Collaboration Environment (ICE) tools such as Windchill, Cradle, Wiki pages, Excel spreadsheets, SharePoint). |
| 10 |
| Attachment J-1A: Mission Labor Requirements |
| What are the total number of hours per WYE for each labor category, 1920 or 1888? |
| The total number of productive hours per contract period are determined by the Offeror based on its customary business and accounting practices. |
| 11 |
| p. L-9 |
| Can we assume ADOBE PDF is an acceptable format to include documents of this nature, especially those with signatures? |
| NFS 1852.215-81, Proposal Page Limitations, paragraph (b)(2) has been revised to indicate that Offerors may provide information requested as part of the non-page limited Price volume in its native format. |
| 12 |
| p. L-12 |
| Does the government intend to release a list of contracts that it considers in conflict with this effort? |
| No such contracts have been identified. |
| 13 |
| Section L, Page L-8, 1852.215-81 PROPOSAL PAGE LIMITATIONS |
| If the offeror submits these 2 documents in advance of the complete Volume IV submittal should they be resubmitted to make a complete Volume IV? Should a reference be included in the complete Volume IV that states the documents were previously submitted, or are there other instructions the offeror should follow? |
| Resubmissions of previously provided documentation are not required unless updates are necessary and provided by the required due date and time. Proposal submissions may indicate previous submission. |
| 14 |
| Section L 1852.215-81 PROPOSAL PAGE LIMITATIONS |
| Are there any exceptions to the page limitations (such as for cover page, table of contents, compliance matrix, and list of acronyms)? |
Are there any exceptions to the 12-point font size rule (such as for graphics and pictures)?
In accordance with NFS 1852.215-81, Proposal Page Limitations, paragraph (c), there are no exclusions to the established page limitations with the exception of the attachments specified therein.
No.
| 15 |
| Attachment L-1 EPM |
| Pricing the JSC. Should it be broken down to White Sands and JSC? What percentage of work will be at the different locations? |
| Pricing is requested only for JSC as there are no known requirements at White Sands. Therefore, an anticipated percentage of work between these locations is not available. |
| 16 |
| Attachment L-1 EPM Tabs B-1 MSFC and Tab B-2 MAF |
| If prime and major subcontractors are to complete Tabs B-1 and B-2, then please clarify if the prime and subcontractors shall modify the number of WYEs to reflect the number of WYEs allocated to the prime and subcontractor respectively? |
| The purpose of Tab A-2 is to account for subcontractor allocation of WYEs and associated price. When utilized correctly, the Tab will allow for the accounting of all WYEs as required by Attachment J-1A, Mission Labor Requirements. |
| 17 |
| L-1 EPM Tabs B-1 MSFC and Tab B-2 MAF |
| How should WYEs assigned to subcontractors in support of MSFC and MAF mission requirements that do not meet the threshold for major subcontractor be accounted for within the EPM? |
| WYEs for subcontractors not required to submit price volumes are accounted for within the Offerer's WYEs as reflected within the B Tabs. |
| 18 |
| Attachment L-1 Excel Pricing Model |
| Please confirm what EPM Tabs are to be completed by major subcontractors. |
| Offerors shall complete all Tabs in their EPM. Subcontractors with a Mission Services value exceeding $20M over the life of the contract shall complete only the A and B Tabs of their EPM in accordance with Volume II – Price Factor Instructions, Section 3. |
| 19 |
| L |
1) Section L Volume II – Price Factor Instructions
2) Section M Volume II – Price Factor Evaluation
| Will the Government consider adding language to Section M stating that the Government reserves the right to perform a price realism assessment on both the Mission Services and IDIQ calculated price and to remove any Offeror’s proposal that is unrealistically low? |
| In accordance with Section M, Price Factor Evaluation, paragraph (a), the Government will perform price analysis in accordance with FAR 15.404-1. |
| 20 |
| p. J-1-1; p. J-1-13 MSFC-4 |
| While J-1-1 states mission services is only at MSFC (including MAF and NSSTC), MSFC-4 on page J-1-13 states work will be performed at NASA HQ. Is NASA HQ included in the locations for Mission Services? |
| If the requiring organization is located at MSFC, the effort is reflected as an MSFC requirement in Attachment J-1, Appendix A, though contractor personnel may be assigned to a location other than MSFC (e.g., an MSFC requirement may be performed at NASA HQ). If the requiring organization is located at NASA HQ, the effort will be reflected as a NASA HQ requirement in an IDIQ task order. Mission requirements are MSFC (including MAF) only and all other Centers' requirements will be incorporated as IDIQ task orders. |
| 21 |
| Section I |
FAR 52.232-1 SUBMISSION OF VOUCHERS/INVOICES FOR PAYMENT
| What is the monthly invoice amount for the Mission Services FFP? For example, is it the total Mission Services FFP divided by 12 or some other basis? What is the monthly invoice amount for the IDIQ task order to be based on? |
| This will be determined during Phase-in as part of the post award conference. |
| 22 |
| Attachment J-3 |
| Would the Government consider increasing the number of years of experience desired for all labor categories? |
Would the Government consider substituting experience worked in lieu of education requirements?
Would the Government consider substituting education for years of experience?
The education and experience levels delineated in Attachment J-3, Labor Category Descriptions, are "desired" provided the employee is fully capable of performing the tasks described in the "Job Description" column.
| 23 |
| Section L, Volume III – Past Performance Factor Instructions |
| Will the Government reduce the number of past performance records required of the prime offeror from two to one? |
| In accordance with Volume III - Past Performance Factor Instructions, paragraph (b), two of the requested references "should" be for the offeror. |
| 24 |
| Section L, Volume III – Past Performance Factor Instructions |
| Will the Government consider increasing the period of performance applicability to within 5 years? |
| The use of a 3 year period is consistent with NFS 1815.304-70(d)(2)(i). |
| 25 |
| Section L, Volume III – Past Performance Factor Instructions |
| For Joint Ventures, the evaluation requirement specifies, “two past performances from the managing partner.” Given that this is a small business procurement, will the Government consider decreasing that requirement to 1 past performance from the Managing Partner? |
| The provision of two past performance references for the Joint Venture management partner is requested though not mandatory. |
| 26 |
| Section L Volume III - Past Performance Factor Instructions |
| Section L Volume III Past Performance Instruction States “Performance of referenced contracts shall be limited to that which occurred within three years of the due date for receipt of proposals. Additionally, each referenced contract shall have a minimum performance of six months within the three-year period. Performance of any effort outside the three-year period will not be evaluated.” Does this mean that within the past 3 years, at least 6 months of performance must have been completed? For example, a contract that ended on November 2, 2016 (which is within 3 years of October 24, 2019) would not be eligible because 6 months of work was not performed during this 3-year period? |
For an eligible effort, will the years of the contract or task order outside the three-year period be evaluated? For example, will the Government evaluate the first two years of an on-going contract that began five years ago? Or only the last three years?
In accordance with Volume III – Past Performance Factor Instructions, paragraph (b), only that portion of a relevant referenced contract or subcontract which falls within the established three-year window will be considered. The annualized size value of the referenced contract or subcontract will likewise be established.
| 27 |
| Section L, Volume III – Past Performance Factor Instructions (b) |
| Can the Government clarify that the criteria for major subcontractor in the Past Performance volume is 15% or more of FFP Mission Services contract value while the requirements for a full subcontractor price volume are based on a subcontract value exceeding $15M over the life of the contract. |
It is possible that a subcontractor might meet one definition but not the other?
The thresholds for submission of subcontractor price volumes and past performance references are mutually exclusive.
Note that the requirement for a subcontractor price volume is $20M over the life of the contract.
| 28 |
| Section L, Volume III – Past Performance Factor Instructions Section II (b) |
| Please clarify the intent of the PWS WYE Assignment Matrix. |
| The purpose of this table is to allow the Government to assess the relevancy of referenced contracts or subcontracts relative to the assignment of work. |
Note that the solicitation is revised to clarify that the data is only required for those firms for which referenced contracts and subcontracts were provided.
| 29 |
| Section L, Volume III – Past Performance Factor Instructions Section II (a) |
| Please clarify the intent of the Past Performance Contract Summary Matrix. |
| The purpose of this table is to allow the Government to assess the magnitude of the work performed for each PWS area described for each referenced contract or subcontract. |
| 30 |
| Section L |
| Will the Government consider a different numbering approach throughout Section L for each of the Volume submittals? |
| See Section L, Volume I- Mission Suitability Factor Instructions, paragraph (d). As an example, the Offeror's description of its proposed organizational structure might be labeled Volume I, MA-1 (1). |
| 31 |
| Section L |
ACQUISITION APPROACH
| Is it a single award for everything, or within the IDIQ section will there be multiple awards within that part of the solicitation? |
| In accordance with Section L, Acquisition Approach, paragraph (b), the Government intends to make one award to a Women-Owned Small Business as a result of this solicitation. This includes all Mission Service and IDIQ requirements. |
| 32 |
| Purchase Order |
| Please clarify how offerors should understand the Purchase Order Performance Work Statment "Government furnished facilities may be available on a limited basis during the phase-in period in Bldg TBD." |
| Based on Government availability of facilities during the time of phase-in, a limited amount of space (i.e. office, conference room) may be available. Such availability cannot be determined at this time; however, further refinement will be assessed in phase-in. |
| 33 |
| Attachment L-1 |
EPM
| Is it the Government’s intention to ask the contractor for additional FBLR based on new locations as they are identified? |
| It is not the Government's intent to add FBLRs for alternative locations at this time. Alternative locations may be added at CO discretion, if needed based upon future requirements. |
| 34 |
| Government-provided Task Order Management System |
| Does the Government intend to provide any additional information on the Government-provided Task Order Management System? |
| See attached “Automated Task Order Management System User Guide” and “Task Order Routing Process” on FBO.gov |
Attachment A-9
ATTACHMENT B – SUMMARY OF CHANGES BETWEEN DRAFT AND FINAL SOLICITATION
This attachment delineates changes made to the draft solicitation, which was posted to FedBizOpps on July 25, 2019. The changes are a result of comments and questions received from industry and internal reviews. These changes represent all significant changes, but are not intended to be all-inclusive. Grammatical, typographical, and other non-substantive changes have been corrected throughout the RFP.
| Index |
| Section |
| Clause or Provision |
| From |
| To |
| 1 |
| A-1 |
| Table of Contents |
| N/A |
| 52.216-91 SUPPLIES AND/OR SERVICES TO BE PROVIDED AND TYPE OF CONTRACT (JUN 2017) |
| 2 |
| A-4 |
| Table of Contents |
| N/A |
| 52.204-25 PROHIBITION ON CONTRACTING FOR CERTAIN TELECOMMUNICATIONS AND VIDEO SURVEILLANCE SERVICES OR EQUIPMENT (AUG 2019) |
| 3 |
| A-6 |
| Table of Contents |
| N/A |
| 1852.215-84 OMBUDSMAN (NOV 2011) ALTERNATE I |
| 4 |
| A-7 |
| Table of Contents |
| N/A |
| 1852.225-71 RESTRICTION ON FUNDING ACTIVITY WITH CHINA (FEB 2012) |
52.204-24, REPRESENTATION REGARDING CERTAIN TELECOMMUNICATIONS AND VIDEO SURVEILLANCE SERVICES OR EQUIPMENT (AUG 2019)
| 5 |
| B-2 |
| MSFC 52.216-91 SUPPLIES AND/OR SERVICES TO BE PROVIDED AND TYPE OF CONTRACT (JUN 2017) |
| The contract type is firm-fixed-price (FFP) for Project Coordination (PC)... |
| The contract type is firm-fixed-price (FFP) with performance-based deductions, for Project Coordination (PC)... |
| 6 |
| F-1 |
| MSFC 52.211-94 PERIOD OF PERFORMANCE (MAY 2017) |
| The period of performance for this contract is from 12/01/2021 through 11/30/2021 |
| The period of performance for this contract is from 12/01/2020 through 11/30/2021 |
| 7 |
| I-2 |
| 52.204-25 PROHIBITION ON CONTRACTING FOR CERTAIN TELECOMMUNICATIONS AND VIDEO SURVEILLANCE SERVICES OR EQUIPMENT (AUG 2019) |
| N/A |
| 52.204-25 PROHIBITION ON CONTRACTING FOR CERTAIN TELECOMMUNICATIONS AND VIDEO SURVEILLANCE SERVICES OR EQUIPMENT (AUG 2019) |
| 8 |
| I-5 |
| 1852.215-84 OMBUDSMAN (NOV 2011) ALERNATIVE I (JUN 2000) |
| N/A |
| 1852.215-84 OMBUDSMAN (NOV 2011) ALERNATIVE I (JUN 2000) |
| 9 |
| I-16 |
| 1852.216-80 TASK ORDERING PROCEDURE (OCT 1996) ALTERNATE II (APR 2018); Page I-15 |
| (c) Within 5 calendar days after receipt of the Contracting Officer’s request,…. |
| (c) Within 10 calendar days after receipt of the Contracting Officer’s request,…. |
| 10 |
| I-17 |
| 1852.225-71 RESTRICTION ON FUNDING ACTIVITY WITH CHINA |
| N/A |
| 1852.225-71 RESTRICTION ON FUNDING ACTIVITY WITH CHINA |
| 11 |
| J-1-1 |
| 2.0 Scope |
| The following sections of this PWS include: |
Section 3.0 Management and Reporting Requirements Section 4.0 Technical Requirements Section 5.0 Other Direct Costs The following sections of this PWS include:
Section 3.0 Management and Reporting Requirements Section 4.0 Technical Requirements Section 5.0 Other Direct Costs Appendix A MSFC Mission Services Requirements
| 12 |
| J-1-3 |
| 3.1.3 |
| Utilize the Government-provided Task Order Management System for responding to task order requests and submit task order progress reports in accordance with NFS 1852.216-80, Task Ordering Procedure-Alternate II. |
| Utilize the Government-provided Task Order Management System for responding to task order requests in accordance with NFS 1852.216-80, Task Ordering Procedure-Alternate II. |
| 13 |
| J-1-3 |
| 3.2 Data Deliverables |
| Management Plan |
- IT Security Management
- IT Security Plan Management Plan
| 14 |
| J-1-4 |
| 4.0 Technical Requirements |
| In addition to the Mission Service requirements, IDIQ requirements may be performed under this PWS Section via task orders. Task orders will be initiated, implemented, and administered in a Government-provided Task Order Management System. |
| In addition to the Mission Service requirements, IDIQ requirements may be performed under this PWS Section via task orders. Task orders will be initiated, implemented, and administered in a Government-provided Task Order Management System. The following personnel are authorized to issue orders under this contract. All designated personnel are employed by NASA MSFC unless otherwise indicated: |
Contracting Officer, MSFC Contracting Officer, TBD
| 15 |
| J-1-6 |
| 4.1.16 |
| 4.1.16 Provide database management for programs and projects including, but not limited to: verifying security permissions; scanning documents; loading data; setting up and organizing folders and files for efficient and logical data storage, data retrieval, and archiving; and assisting program and project personnel needing access to the information. |
| 4.1.16 Provide database development and maintenance for programs and projects including, but not limited to: building the database framework, creating folder and file structures, organizing the structure for efficiency and logical data storage, providing proper linkage to other tools and/or databases, and applying and verifying proper security and permission settings. |
4.1.17 Provide database management for programs and projects including, but not limited to: scanning documents; loading data; setting up and organizing, retrieving, and achiving data; and assisting program and project personnel needing access to the information.
| 16 |
| J-1-6 |
| 4.1.18 |
| 4.1.18 Perform other coordination functions not otherwise provided for on other contracts for the customer as needed in order to successfully conduct daily business. |
| 4.1.18 was deleted. Remaining sections moved up and renumbered. |
| 17 |
| J-1-7 |
| 4.2 Office Information Technology Management Support |
| The scope of this work area is to provide Office Information Technology Management (OITM) support. The Contractor shall provide these services based on the needs of the programs, projects, and organizations. |
| The scope of this work area is to provide Office Information Technology Management (OITM) support. The OITM coordinator function provides support to the organization with maintaining visibility and insight into the organization’s current IT inventory, coordinating IT service requests and IT service/product purchases, and assisting the Office of Chief Information Officer (OCIO) in preparing and maintaining up-to-date records regarding IT acquisitions. The OITM interfaces with OCIO management and personnel. The Contractor shall provide these services based on the needs of the programs, projects, and organizations. |
| 18 |
| J-1-8 |
| 4.2.7 |
| 4.2.7 Provide support to the Computer Security Officer (CSO). |
| 4.2.7 “Provide support to the Computer Security Officer (CSO), who is responsible for IT Security policies for the Center. |
| 19 |
| J-1-10 |
| 5.0 Other Direct Costs |
| 5.2 ODC |
| 5.2 Material |
| 20 |
| J-1-11 - J-1-32 |
| Appendix A |
Added place of performance to each MSFC requirement in Appendix A to clarify location of Contractor support.
| 21 |
| J-1-12 |
| MSFC-1 |
MSFC-1 Place of Performance
This requirement provides support to the SLS Program Office located at MSFC. Support for this requirement is on-site at MSFC, Redstone Arsenal, Hunstville, AL.
| 22 |
| J-1-13 |
| MSFC-2 |
MSFC-2 Place of Performance
This requirement provides support to the SLS Program SE&I and Chief Engineer’s Offices. Support for this requirement is on-site at MSFC, Redstone Arsenal, Hunstville, AL.
| 23 |
| J-1-14 |
| MSFC-3 |
MSFC-3 Place of Performance
This requirement provides support to the SLS Program SE&I Office. Support for this requirement is on-site at MSFC, Redstone Arsenal, Huntsville, AL.
| 24 |
| J-1-14 |
| MSFC-4 |
MSFC-4 Place of Performance
This requirement provides support for the SLS Program Office. Support for this requirement is on-site at MSFC, Redstone Arsenal, Huntsville, AL and NASA HQ, Washington, D.C.
| 25 |
| J-1-15 |
| MSFC-5 |
MSFC-5 Place of Performance
This requirement provides support for the SLS Program Operations & Strategic Communications Office. Support for this requirement is on-site at MSFC, Redstone Arsenal, Huntsville, AL.
| 26 |
| J-1-15 |
| MSFC-6 |
MSFC-6 Place of Performance
This requirement provides support to the SLS Program Operations & Strategic Communications Office. Support for this requirement is on-site at MSFC, Redstone Arsenal, Huntsville, AL.
| 27 |
| J-1-16 |
| MSFC-7 |
MSFC-7 Place of Performance
This requirement provides support to the SLS Program Operations & Strategic Communications Office. Support for this requirement is on-site at MSFC, Redstone Arsenal, Huntsville, AL.
| 28 |
| J-1-17 |
| MSFC-8 |
MSFC-8 Place of Performance
This requirement provides support to the SLS Stages Element Office. Support for this requirement is on-site at MSFC, Redstone Arsenal, Huntsville, AL.
| 29 |
| J-1-18 |
| MSFC-9 |
MSFC-9 Place of Performance
This requirement provides support for the MSFC Engineering Test Lab. Support for this requirement is on-site at MSFC, Redstone Arsenal, Huntsville, AL.
| 30 |
| J-1-18 |
| MSFC-10 |
MSFC-10 Place of Performance
This requirement provides support for the MSFC Engineering Test Lab. Support for this requirement is on-site at MSFC, Redstone Arsenal, Huntsville, AL.
| 31 |
| J-1-19 |
| MSFC-11 |
MSFC-11 Place of Performance
This requirement provides support for the MSFC Engineering Systems Requirement & Design Definitions Branch. Support for this requirement is on-site at MSFC, Redstone Arsenal, Huntsville, AL.
| 32 |
| J-1-19 |
| MSFC-12 |
MSFC-12 Place of Performance
This requirement provides support for the MSFC Engineering Main Propulsion Systems Branch. Support for this requirement is on-site at MSFC, Redstone Arsenal, Huntsville, AL.
| 33 |
| J-1-20 |
| MSFC-13 |
MSFC-13 Place of Performance
This requirement supports the MSFC Engineering Propulsion Department. Support for this requirement is on-site at MSFC, Redstone Arsenal, Huntsville, AL.
| 34 |
| J-1-21 |
| MSFC-14 |
MSFC-14 Place of Performance
This requirement provides support for the MSFC Engineering ACO. Support for this requirement is on-site at MSFC, Redstone Arsenal, Huntsville, AL.
| 35 |
| J-1-21 |
| MSFC-15 |
MSFC-15 Place of Performance
This requirement provides support for the MSFC Engineering Directorate. Support for this requirement is on-site at MSFC, Redstone Arsenal, Huntsville, AL.
| 36 |
| J-1-21 |
| MSFC-16 |
MSFC-16 Place of Performance
This requirement supports MSFC Propulsion Department. Support for this requirement is on-site at MSFC, Redstone Arsenal, Huntsville, AL
| 37 |
| J-1-22 |
| MSFC-17 |
MSFC-17 Place of Performance
This requirement supports the MSFC Engineering Resource Management Office. Support for this requirement is on-site at MSFC, Redstone Arsenal, Huntsville, AL.
| 38 |
| J-1-23 |
| MSFC-18 |
MSFC-18 Place of Performance
This requirement provides support to the MSFC Engineering Space Systems Department. Support for this requirement is on-site at MSFC, Redstone Arsenal, Huntsville, AL.
| 39 |
| J-1-24 |
| MSFC-19 |
MSFC-19 Place of Performance
This requirement supports the MSFC MAF organization. Support for this requirement is located on-site at MAF, New Orleans, LA.
| 40 |
| J-1-25 |
| MSFC-20 |
MSFC-20 Place of Performance
This requirement supports the MSFC MAF organization. Support for this requirement is on-site at MAF, New Orleans, LA.
| 41 |
| J-1-25 |
| MSFC-21 |
MSFC-21 Place of Performance
This requirement supports the MSFC HEDO Office. Support for this requirement is on-site at MSFC, Redstone Arsenal, Huntsville, AL.
| 42 |
| J-1-25 |
| MSFC-22 |
| This requirement provides support to the HEDO Office at both the directorate and organizational level, including program and project management within the HEDO Office. For this requirement, the Contractor shall perform the requirements in Sections 4.1, General Project Coordination Support and 4.2, Office Information Technology Management Support. The Contractor shall work with the HEDO OITM. This support includes direct report level management off-sites, directorates “All-Hands” coordination and facilitation, project coordination and integration, meeting support, reporting, research of NASA’s IT policies and initiatives, integration, floor space management, organizational special events, and other functions necessary for the successful operation of the HEDO Office. The Contractor shall interact with senior HEDO Office personnel, MSFC OCIO personnel, senior executive personnel at MSFC, and other Centers, including Component Facilities and Technical & Service Support Centers...... |
Along with the general OITM support, Tthe Contractor shall serve as the organization’s Supervisor’s Safety Web Page (SSWP) administrator. The Contractor shall also act as the back-up to the OITM forassist with SharePoint Administration and organization of Outlook distribution lists.
This requirement provides support to the HEDO Office at both the directorate and organizational level, including program and project management within the HEDO Office. For this requirement, the Contractor shall perform the requirements in Sections 4.1, General Project Coordination Support. This support includes direct report level management off-sites, directorates “All-Hands” coordination and facilitation, project coordination and integration, meeting support, reporting, integration, floor space management, organizational special events, and other functions necessary for the successful operation of the HEDO Office. The Contractor shall interact with senior HEDO Office personnel, senior executive personnel at MSFC, and other Centers
The Contractor shall serve as the organization’s Supervisor’s Safety Web Page (SSWP) administrator. The Contractor shall also assist with SharePoint Administration and organization of Outlook distribution lists.
| 43 |
| J-1-26 |
| MSFC-22 |
MSFC-22 Place of Performance
This requirement supports the MSFC HEDO Office. Support for this requirement is on-site at MSFC, Redstone Arsenal, Huntsville, AL.
| 44 |
| J-1-26 |
| MSFC-23 |
MSFC-23 Place of Performance
This requirement supports the MSFC HEDO LAS Project. Support for this requirement is on-site at MSFC, Redstone Arsenal, Huntsville, AL.
| 45 |
| J-1-27 |
| MSFC-24 |
MSFC-24 Place of Performance
This requirement supports the MSFC HEDO Office. Support for this requirement is on-site at MSFC, Redstone Arsenal, Huntsville, AL.
| 46 |
| J-1-27 |
| MSFC-25 |
MSFC-25 Place of Performance
This requirement supports the MSFC HEDO Office. Support for this requirement is on-site at MSFC, Redstone Arsenal, Huntsville, AL.
| 47 |
| J-1-28 |
| MSFC-26 |
MSFC-26 Place of Performance
This requirement supports the MSFC HEDO PMOD. Support for this requirement is on-site at MSFC, Redstone Arsenal, Huntsville, AL.
| 48 |
| J-1-28 |
| MSFC-27 |
MSFC-27 Place of Performance
This requirement supports the MSFC ISS Office. Support for this requirement is on-site at MSFC, Redstone Arsenal, Huntsville, AL.
| 49 |
| J-1-29 |
| MSFC-28 |
MSFC-28 Place of Performance
This requirement supports the MSFC HEDO Office. Support for this requirement is on-site at MSFC, Redstone Arsenal, Huntsville, AL.
| 50 |
| J-1-30 |
| MSFC-29 |
MSFC-29 Place of Performance
This requirement supports the MSFC STO. Support for this requirement is on-site at MSFC NSSTC, University of Alabama in Huntsville (UAH) Campus, Huntsville, AL.
| 51 |
| J-1-31 |
| MSFC-30 |
MSFC-30 Place of Performance
This requirement supports the MSFC STO. Support for this requirement is on-site at MFSC NSSTC, UAH Campus, Huntsville, AL.
| 52 |
| J-1-31 |
| MSFC-31 |
MSFC-31 Place of Performance
This requirement supports the MSFC STO. Support for this requirement is on-site at MSFC NSSTC, UAH Campus, Huntsville, AL.
| 53 |
| J-1-32 |
| MSFC-32 |
MSFC-32 Place of Performance
This requirement supports the MSFC STO SERVIR Project. Support for this requirement is on-site at MSFC NSSTC, UAH Campus, Huntsville, AL.
| 54 |
| J-1-32 |
| MSFC-33 |
MSFC-33 Place of Performance
This requirement supports the MSFC STO IXPE Project. Support for this requirement is on-site at MSFC NSSTC, UAH Campus, Huntsville, AL.
| 55 |
| J-1-33 |
| MSFC-34 |
MSFC-34 Place of Performance
This requirement supports the MSFC STO Technology Development and Transfer Office. Support for this requirement is located at MSFC NSSTC, UAH Campus, Huntsville, AL.
| 56 |
| J-1-33 |
| MSFC-35 |
MSFC-35 Place of Performance
This requirement supports the MSFC STO Technology Transfer Branch. Support for this requirement is on-site at MSFC NSSTC, UAH Campus, Huntsville, AL.
| 57 |
| J-1-34 |
| MSFC-36 |
MSFC-36 Place of Performance
This requirement supports the MSFC STO Centennial Challenges Program. Support for this requirement on-site at MSFC NSSTC, UAH Campus, Huntsville, AL.
| 58 |
| J-1-34 |
| MSFC-37 |
MSFC-37 Place of Performance
This requirement supports the MSFC STO Technology Transfer Branch. Support for this requirement is on-site at MSFC NSSTC, UAH Campus, Huntsville, AL.
| 59 |
| J-1-35 |
| MSFC-38 |
MSFC-38 Place of Performance
This requirement supports the MSFC STO Technology Transfer Branch. Support for this requirement is on-site at MSFC NSSTC, UAH Campus, Huntsville, AL.
| 60 |
| J-1-35 |
| MSFC-38 |
| This requirement provides project coordination support to the Technology Transfer Branch with the Exploration Technologies and Systems Development Division. For this requirement, the Contractor shall perform the requirements in Section 4.1, General Project Coordination Support. The Contractor support for this effort will be off-site (NSSTC). The Contractor shall interact with senior branch personnel at MSFC and other Centers, including Component Facilities and Technical & Service Support Centers. |
| This requirement provides project coordination support to the Technology Transfer Branch with the Exploration Technologies and Systems Development Division. For this requirement, the Contractor shall perform the requirements in Section 4.1, General Project Coordination Support. The Contractor shall interact with senior branch personnel at MSFC and other Centers, including Component Facilities and Technical & Service Support Centers. |
| 61 |
| J-1-36 |
| MSFC-39 |
MSFC-39 Place of Performance
This requirement supports the MSFC STO. Support for this requirement is on-site at MSFC NSSTC, UAH Campus, Huntsville, AL.
| 62 |
| J-1-36 |
| MSFC-40 |
MSFC-40 Place of Performance
This requirement supports the MSFC STO PMPO. Support for this requirement is on-site at MSFC NSSTC, UAH Campus, Huntsville, AL.
| 63 |
| J-1-37 |
| MSFC-41 |
MSFC-41 Place of Performance
This requirement supports the MSFC STO. Support for this requirement is on-site at MSFC NSSTC, UAH Campus, Huntsville, AL.
| 64 |
| J-1-37 |
| MSFC-42 |
Deleted requirement.
| 65 |
| J-1A-1 to J-1A-10 |
| Attachment J-1A Mission Labor Requirements |
| per Option Period |
| per Base and Option Period |
| 66 |
| J-1A-1 |
| Mission Labor Requirements for PM |
| PWS Reference: "ALL" |
| PWS Reference: "3.0 Management and Reporting Requirements" |
| 67 |
| J-1A-7 |
| MSFC-30 |
| 4.1 General Project Coordination Support |
| 4.1 General Project Coordination Support |
4.3 Space Act Agreement and Enhanced Use Leases Support
| 68 |
| J-1A-9 |
| MSFC-42 |
Deleted
| 69 |
| J-1A-10 |
| Total WYE |
Deleted "Total WYE" row.
| 70 |
| J-1A and EPM Tab B-1 |
| Mission Labor Requirements and Excel Pricing Model |
Updated J-1, J-1A, and EPM for new and deleted requirements
| 71 |
| J-2-17 |
| DRD 11. Initial Submission |
| Prepare and submit the Management Plan which includes an IT Management Plan and an IT Security Plan in accordance with… |
| Prepare and submit the Management Plan which includes an IT Security Management Plan in accordance with… |
| 72 |
| J-2-17 |
| DRD 15.3 Contents (e) |
| This shall include the IT Security Management Plan which includes an IT Security Plan in accordance with NFS 1852.204-76. |
| This shall include the IT Security Management Plan in accordance with NFS 1852.204-76. |
| 73 |
| J-2-18 |
| DRD 11. Initial Submission |
| 2 weeks prior to |
| ten (10) business days prior to |
| 74 |
| J-2-23 |
| DRD 1656MA-004 Progress Report |
| INITIAL SUBMISSION: Monthly Progress Report no later than ten (10) calendar days after the first full month of the contract effective date. Quarterly Progress Report no later than ten (10) calendar days after the first full quarter of the contract effective date. |
| INITIAL SUBMISSION: Progress Reports shall be submitted monthly, no later than ten (10) calendar days after the first full month of the contract effective date. |
| 75 |
| J-2-23 |
| DRD 1656MA-004 Progress Report |
| SUBMISSION FREQUENCY: After the initial submission of the Progress Reports, subsequent Progress Reports shall be submitted no later than ten (10) calendar days after each reporting period. |
| SUBMISSION FREQUENCY: After the initial submission of the Progress Reports, subsequent Progress Reports shall be submitted no later than ten (10) calendar days after each month. |
| 76 |
| J-2-23 |
| DRD 1656MA-004 Progress Report |
| REMARKS: A separate report shall be submitted for Mission Services (segregated per Center) and each active indefinite-delivery, indefinite-quantity (IDIQ) task order (segregated per requiring organization and a compiled file per center). |
| REMARKS: A separate report shall be submitted for Mission Services (segregated per requiring organization) and each active indefinite-delivery, indefinite-quantity (IDIQ) task order (segregated per requiring organization and a compiled file per Center). |
| 77 |
| J-2-23 |
| DRD 1656MA-004 Progress Report |
| CONTENTS: |
Monthly Progress Reports shall include the necessary information to assess status and identify problems that need resolution for accomplishment of contract efforts, including an evaluation of the Contractor’s performance for each of the Performance Elements (PEs) identified in Attachment J-8 of the contract. Monthly Progress Report shall reflect performance against the following Performance Elements (PEs):
CONTENTS:
a. Progress Reports shall include the necessary information to assess status of performance and accomplishments and identify problems that need resolution for accomplishment of contract efforts, including an evaluation of the Contractor’s performance for each of the Performance Elements (PEs) identified in Attachment J-8 of the contract. Progress Reports shall reflect performance against the following Performance Elements (PEs):
| 78 |
| J-2-24 |
| DRD 1656MA-004 Progress Report |
| Quarterly Progress Reports shall include the necessary information to assess status and identify problems related to the Technical, Business, and Management areas that need resolution for accomplishment of contract efforts. Quarterly Progress Report shall contain the following sections: |
| b. Progress Reports shall also include the necessary information to assess status and identify problems related to the Technical, Business, and Management areas that need resolution for accomplishment of contract efforts. Progress Report shall contain the following sections: |
| 79 |
| J-2-24 |
| DRD 1656MA-004 Progress Report |
| a. The Technical section shall contain the following per the PWS level outlined in the contract: |
| 1. The Technical section shall contain the following per Mission requirements as outlined in Appendix A of Attachment J-1 and per each IDIQ task order: |
| 80 |
| J-2-24 |
| DRD 1656MA-004 Progress Report |
| b. The Business section shall contain the following per the PWS level outlined in the contract: |
| 2. The Business section shall contain the following per the Mission requirements as outlined in Appendix A of Attachment J-1 and per each IDIQ task order: |
| 81 |
| J-2-24 |
| DRD 1656MA-004 Progress Report |
| 1. Mission Services firm-fixed price (FFP) and WYE per Center and remaining IDIQ Contract Line Item Number (CLIN) values (current values, ceiling value, and delta value) for the contract period. |
2. For FFP Mission Services break out the FFP labor by the Attachment J-1, Performance Work Statement Appendix A, Center Specific Mission PP&C Requirements for a specific “requirement number” per month and cumulative by contract period.
3. For FFP task orders the break out of the firm fixed price labor and ODC (e.g. travel, training) by the task order number per month and cumulative by contract period.
4. For Time and Material (T&M) task orders, the break out of the actual labor (hours and cost) and ODC (travel, training, etc.) per month and cumulative by contract period. Include an estimate for the remaining months of the contract period.
(a) Mission Services firm-fixed price (FFP) and remaining IDIQ Contract Line Item Number (CLIN) values (current values, maximum value, and delta value) for the contract period.
(b) For FFP Mission Services break out the FFP labor by the Attachment J-1, Performance Work Statement Appendix A, Center Specific Mission Requirements for a specific “requirement number” per month and cumulative by contract period.
(c) For FFP task orders the break out of the FFP labor and ODC (e.g. travel, training) by the task order number per month and cumulative by contract period.
(d) A business summary for each CLIN at the individual participating NASA Center level.
(e) A summary of Mission Services FFP and IDIQ task order price for each CLIN at the NASA Agency level.
| 82 |
| J-5-1 |
| Applicable Regulations, Procedures, and Documents (b) |
| (6) Marshall Interim Directives (MIDs) |
(7) Marshall Policy Directives (MPDs)
(8) Marshall Procedural Requirements (MPRs)
(9) Marshall Work Instructions (MWIs)
(10) Organizational Work Instructions (OWIs)
(6) Marshall Policy Directives (MPDs)
(7) Marshall Procedural Requirements (MPRs)
(8) Marshall Interim Directives (MIDs)
(9) Marshall Work Instructions (MWIs)
(10) Organizational Work Instructions (OWIs)
| 83 |
| J-8-1 |
| CONSEQUENCES OF CONTRACTOR’S FAILURE TO PERFORM |
| A. The Contractor is responsible for fulfilling the performance requirements of this contract. The Government will deduct from the Contractor’s invoice or otherwise withhold payment for items of nonconforming service. The Government may apply an inspection technique that covers all or part of the work to either assess the Contractor’s performance or determine the amount of payment due or both. The defect rate for the purposes of assessing the Contractor’s performance will be the sum of all defects identified during the course of the work, expressed as a per defect basis for the monthly reporting period. Monthly reviews will be held to communicate Contractor’s performance. If required, deductions will be administered on a semi-annual basis. If the quality level does not meet or exceed the Acceptable Performance Level (APL) in the PRS, the Contractor’s quality control is considered unsatisfactory. Failure to consistently maintain adequate quality control can result in termination for default. |
| A. The Contractor is responsible for fulfilling the performance requirements of this contract. The Government will deduct from the Contractor’s invoice or otherwise withhold payment for items of nonconforming service, both mission services and indefinite-delivery indefinite-quantity (IDIQ). The Government may apply surveillance techniques that cover all or part of the work to either assess the Contractor’s performance or determine the amount of payment due or both. The defect rate for the purposes of assessing the Contractor’s performance will be the sum of all defects identified during the course of the work, expressed as a per defect basis for the monthly reporting period. Monthly reviews will be held to communicate Contractor’s performance (including a status of any deductions for the monthly performance period). Monthly reviews may either be conducted in-person or virtually as determined by the Government during contract performance. The Contractor shall apply any deductions in the form of a credit to the following month’s invoice. Such deductions, if applicable, will be reflected by modification to the contract. If the quality level does not meet or exceed the Acceptable Performance Level (APL) in the PRS, the Contractor’s quality control is considered unsatisfactory. Failure to consistently maintain adequate quality control can result in termination for default. |
| 84 |
| J-8-1 |
| CONSEQUENCES OF CONTRACTOR’S FAILURE TO PERFORM |
| B. The Government will provide the Contractor written or verbal notice of deficiencies prior to deduction for non-performed or unsatisfactory work. Therefore: |
| B. The Government will provide the Contractor written notice of deficiencies prior to any deductions for non-performed or unsatisfactory work. Therefore: |
| 85 |
| J-8-2 |
| CONSEQUENCES OF CONTRACTOR’S FAILURE TO PERFORM |
| E. Where the Government exercises its options in B.1.b or B.2.b, the Contractor’s original inspection results shall not be modified upon re-inspection. Instead, any payment reduction shall be offset by a credit for satisfactory re-performance. |
| E. Where the Government exercises its options in B.1.b or B.2.b, the Contractor’s original surveillance results shall not be modified upon assessment. Instead, any payment reduction shall be offset by a credit for satisfactory re-performance. |
| 86 |
| J-8-2 |
| CONSEQUENCES OF CONTRACTOR’S FAILURE TO PERFORM REQUIRED SERVICES FOR INDEFINITE-DELIVERY, INDEFINITE-QUANTITY (IDIQ) WORK |
| CONSEQUENCES OF CONTRACTOR’S FAILURE TO PERFORM REQUIRED SERVICES FOR INDEFINITE-DELIVERY, INDEFINITE-QUANTITY (IDIQ) WORK |
A. The Contractor is responsible for fulfilling the performance requirements of this contract. The Government will withhold payment for any IDIQ work that does not conform to the requirements specified. The Government will provide the Contractor written notice of deficiencies by copy of an evaluation report or other applicable documentation.
Deleted
| 87 |
| J-8-2 |
| CONSEQUENCES OF CONTRACTOR’S FAILURE TO PERFORM |
| B. Should the Government be required to perform the deficient service by other means, the Government will reduce the contract payment by the actual cost of the other means that accomplished the service. |
| F. Additional remedies available to the Government for the Contractor’s failure to perform (or other deficiency), whether single or multiple occurance, are those as described in MSFC Clause 52.237-92, Deductions For Failure To Meet Acceptable Performance Levels, as contained in Section B of this contract. |
| 88 |
| J-8-2 |
| CONSEQUENCES OF CONTRACTOR’S FAILURE TO PERFORM |
| C. The Government’s exercise of rights under this clause shall not preclude either single occurrences of such nonperformance or unsatisfactory performance or multiple occurrences of nonperformance or unsatisfactory performance, regardless of whether deductions were taken, from being grounds for termination in accordance with the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) clause 52.249-8, Default (Fixed Price Supply and Service), in Section I of this contract. |
| Deleted |
| 89 |
| J-8-3 |
| PERFORMANCE REQUIREMENTS SUMMARY (PRS), PE 1 |
| For each new staff position and vacancy positions the following deductions will be applied: $5,000 for exceeding the initial 14 calendar days, plus an additional $5,000 for exceeding 30 days, and an additional $2,500 for each additional 7 calendar day period the position or vacancy remains unfilled. |
| Deleted |
| 90 |
| J-8-3 |
| PERFORMANCE REQUIREMENTS SUMMARY (PRS), PE 1 |
Added clarification in deduction schedule to clarify deductions.
| 91 |
| J-8-3 |
| INSTRUCTIONS FOR UTILIZING THE PRS |
| DRD 1656MA-004, Monthly Progress Report. |
| DRD 1656MA-004, Progress Report. |
| 92 |
| J-8-3 |
| PERFORMANCE REQUIREMENTS SUMMARY (PRS), PE 1 |
| New staff positions filled in accordance with the required labor category within 14 calendar days after written authority from the Contracting Officer (CO). |
| New staff positions filled in accordance with the required labor category within 30 calendar days after written authority from the Contracting Officer (CO). |
| 93 |
| J-8-4 |
| PERFORMANCE REQUIREMENTS SUMMARY (PRS), PE 2 |
| Monitors will semi-annually distribute... |
| Monitors will annually distribute... |
| 94 |
| J-8-4 |
| PERFORMANCE REQUIREMENTS SUMMARY (PRS), PE 2 |
Added clarification in deduction schedule to clarify deductions and to reference definitions.
| 95 |
| J-8-4 |
| PERFORMANCE REQUIREMENTS SUMMARY (PRS), PE 3 |
Added definition of "An error" Added clarification in deduction schedule to clarify deductions.
| 96 |
| J-8-4 |
| PERFORMANCE REQUIREMENTS SUMMARY (PRS), PE 4 |
Added clarification in deduction schedule to clarify deductions.
| 97 |
| J-8-4 |
| PERFORMANCE REQUIREMENTS SUMMARY (PRS), PE 5 |
Added clarification in deduction schedule to clarify deductions.
| 98 |
| J-8-6 |
| DEFINITIONS |
Added DEFINITIONS section.
| 99 |
| J-10 |
| SUMMARY OF TASK ORDER AWARDS |
| Value |
| Firm Fixed Price Value |
| 100 |
| K-1 |
| 52.204-8 ANNUAL REPRESENTATIONS AND CERTIFICATIONS (OCT 2018) |
| The small business size standard is 1,000 employees |
| The small business size standard is 1,250 employees |
| 101 |
| K-5 |
| 52.204-24 REPRESENTATION REGARDING CERTAIN TELECOMMUNICATIONS AND VIDEO SURVEILLANCE SERVICES OR EQUIPMENT (AUG 2019) |
| N/A |
| 52.204-24 REPRESENTATION REGARDING CERTAIN TELECOMMUNICATIONS AND VIDEO SURVEILLANCE SERVICES OR EQUIPMENT (AUG 2019) |
| 102 |
| L-6 |
| 52.216-1 TYPE OF CONTRACT (APR 1984) |
| indefinite quantity (IDIQ) component resulting from this solicitation |
| indefinite- quantity (IDIQ) component, including performance-based deductions, resulting from this solicitation |
| 103 |
| L-8 |
| 1852.215-81 PROPOSAL PAGE LIMITATIONS (APR 2015) (a) Page Limit |
| 42 pages |
| 55 pages |
| 104 |
| L-9 |
| 1852.215-81 PROPOSAL PAGE LIMITATIONS (APR 2015) |
| * NOTE: Requested 2 weeks prior to required due date for proposals; however, delivery is not required until the proposal due date. |
*NOTE: Hand delivery will only be accepted at the identified location in MSFC 52.205-90, Designated Point of Contact, between 10:00 a.m. and 2:00 p.m. Central Time, on October 18, 2019. Early submission of proposal material such as that described in paragraph (b) below, or all proposal materials required by this provision if submitted together, may be hand delivered only between 10:00 a.m. and 2:00 p.m. Central Time, October 4, 2019
| 105 |
| L-9 |
| 1852.215-81 PROPOSAL PAGE LIMITATIONS (APR 2015) |
| (2) Submit proposals in Microsoft Office 2010 or later formats (i.e., Microsoft Word for narrative and Microsoft Excel for the pricing models). Offerors shall not embed sound or video files into the proposal volumes. |
| (2) Submit proposals in Microsoft Office 2010 or later formats (i.e., Microsoft Word for narrative and Microsoft Excel for the pricing models). Supplemental documentation provided as part of the non-page limited Cost/Price volume (e.g., financial statements, indirect rate letters, audit reports, letters of credit, disclosure statements, pre-award accounting system SF 1408s) may be provided in their native format (e.g., Adobe, .pdf). Offerors shall not embed sound or video files into the proposal volumes. |
| 106 |
| L-12 |
| MSFC 52.205-90 DESIGNATED POINT OF CONTACT (NOV 2018) |
| August 14, 2019 |
| September 24, 2019 |
| 107 |
| L-15 |
| MSFC 52.215-91 DUE DATE FOR RECEIPT OF PROPOSALS OR QUOTATIONS (NOV 2018) (a) III and IV |
| (Requested two weeks prior) |
| *Requested October 10, 2019 |
| 108 |
| L-15 |
| MSFC 52.215-91 DUE DATE FOR RECEIPT OF PROPOSALS OR QUOTATIONS (NOV 2018) |
| *NOTE: Hand delivery will be accepted at the identified location in MSFC 52.205-90, Designated Point of Contact, between 9:00 a.m. and 2:00 Central Time, on the scheduled due date. However, early delivery of proposal material such as that described in paragraph (b) below, or all proposal materials required by this provision if submitted together, may be hand delivered upon coordination with the point of contact specified in the above referenced provision. |
| *NOTE: Hand delivery will only be accepted at the identified location in MSFC 52.205-90, Designated Point of Contact, between 10:00 a.m. and 2:00 p.m. Central Time, on the scheduled due date. Early submission of proposal material such as that described in paragraph (b) below, or all proposal materials required by this provision if submitted together, may be hand delivered between 10:00 a.m. and 2:00 p.m. Central Time. |
| 109 |
| L-15 |
| MSFC 52.215-91 DUE DATE FOR RECEIPT OF PROPOSALS OR QUOTATIONS (NOV 2018) |
| Plan, and a list of all NASA contracts |
| Plan, and a list of all current NASA contracts |
| 110 |
| L-15 |
| MSFC 52.215-91 DUE DATE FOR RECEIPT OF PROPOSALS OR QUOTATIONS (NOV 2018) |
| ...before the specified due date. |
| ...before the specified due date and time. |
| 111 |
| L-17 |
| VOLUME I- MISSION SUITABILITY FACTOR INSTRUCTIONS (MA-1) General Management Approach (3) |
| …assignment of work, lines of authority,… |
| …assignment of work by company (to be provided in the PWS Mission Services WYE Assignment Matrix provided below) to account for all WYEs required by Attachment J-1A, Mission Labor Requirements, lines of authority,… |
| 112 |
| L-17 |
This is the start of the file's text. The full file is on GovTribe.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .