Attachment H - Contract Historical Data.pdf

PDF 68 KB Posted

Attached to
Systems Engineering Advanced Services (SEAS) II Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
80GSFC20R0037
Issued by
National Aeronautics and Space Administration Goddard Space Center

About this file

This pre-solicitation notice describes a follow-on Systems Engineering Advanced Services II contract to provide systems engineering support to NASA Goddard Space Flight Center and Wallops Flight Facility. The indefinite delivery indefinite quantity single award contract seeks to acquire mission and instrument systems engineering, guidance navigation and control systems engineering, attitude control systems analysis and software development, and spacecraft propulsion and fluid systems engineering design through task orders over five years with potential for six additional months. The total potential value is $387 million. The 8(a) set-aside requires proposals by November 2020 with award by June 2021. Offerors must have a top secret facility clearance and the North American Industry Classification System code is 541715 with a size standard of 1,000 employees. An electronic library provides supporting documents and questions should be directed to the identified email address.

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Other files attached to Systems Engineering Advanced Services (SEAS) II, newest first.
File Type Posted
SEAS II-SF30 Amendment 3 signed.pdf PDF
SEAS II- Amendment 3 page 2.pdf PDF
FINAL RFP Amend 02 - Enclosure CC.pdf PDF
FINAL RFP Amend 2 - Enclosure DD - 4.6.21.pdf PDF
SEAS II Procurement Questions and Responses Set 2 Final.pdf PDF
SEAS II Final RFP Questions and Responses Set 1.pdf PDF
SEAS II Amend 1 Page 2.pdf PDF
SEAS II Final RFP Cover Letter.pdf PDF
SEAS II Attachment B - IDIQ Cost-Type Rate Matrix.pdf PDF
SEAS II Attachment H - Contract Historical Data.pdf PDF
SEAS II Attachment K - IAGP Cover Page.pdf PDF
SEAS II Attachment L - GFP GSFC Document 1 Revised.pdf PDF
SEAS II Enclosure DD - Contract Historical Data.pdf PDF
SF33.pdf PDF
SEAS II RFP Attachment G - OCI Plan Cover Page.pdf PDF
SEAS II Attachment J - IT Security Applicable Docs List.pdf PDF
SEAS II Attachment K - IAGP at GSFC.pdf PDF
Enclosure BB - Representative Task Orders Final.pdf PDF
SEAS II Exhibits 2-11 Cover Page.pdf PDF
SEAS II Exhibit 12 Past Performance Questionnaire.pdf PDF
SEAS II Basic RFP Final.pdf PDF
SEAS II Attachment C- Financial Management Reporting.pdf PDF
SEAS II Attachment I - PIV Attachment.pdf PDF
SEAS II Enclosure AA - Quality Assurance Surveillance Plan.pdf PDF
SEAS II Enclosure CC - GPM.pdf PDF
SEAS II Enclosure EE - IT Security Management Plan.pdf PDF
SEAS II Exhibits 1A-1C Cover Page.pdf PDF
Exhibits 1A-1C GPM SEAS II RFP.pdf PDF
SEAS II DRFP Final Responses.pdf PDF
Attachment A - SEAS II Draft Statement of Work.pdf PDF
Attachment D - DD 254.pdf PDF
Attachment E - Safety and Health Plan Cover Page.pdf PDF
Attachment K - IAGP Cover Page.pdf PDF
Attachment B - IDIQ Cost-Type Rate Matrix.pdf PDF
Attachment L - GFP GSFC Document 1 Revised.pdf PDF
SEAS II DRFP Cover Letter FINAL.pdf PDF
SEAS II-DRFP GPM Exhibits 1A-1C.pdf PDF
Attachment G - OCI Plan Cover Page.pdf PDF
Attachment I - PIV Attachment.pdf PDF
Attachment J - IT Security Applicable Docs List.pdf PDF
Attachment L - GFP WFF Document 2.pdf PDF
Attachment F - Quality Assurance Plan Cover Page.pdf PDF
Attachment M - IT Security Plan Cover Page.pdf PDF
Attachment L - GFP Cover Page.pdf PDF
Enclosure CC - GPM Final.pdf PDF
SEAS II Basic DRFP.pdf PDF
Exhibits 2-11 Cover Page.pdf PDF
SEAS II DRFP GPM Exhibits 2-11.pdf PDF
Exhibit 12 Past Performance Questionnaire.pdf PDF
Enclosure BB - Representative Task Orders.pdf PDF
Show all 50

Systems Engineering Advanced Services (SEAS) II has more files on GovTribe.

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

ATTACHMENT H

CONTRACT HISTORICAL DATA

MARCH 2015

DRFP 80GSFC20R0037

CONTRACT No.: TBD

Contract TBD Attachment H

(03/2015)

CONTRACT HISTORICAL DATA

NASA may issue a competitive solicitation for a follow-on effort for services similar to those provided under this contract. As part of this follow-on competition, NASA may include historical labor category descriptions, work year equivalents (WYEs), weighted average direct labor rates, and other information from this contract in the follow-on solicitation for use by all potential offerors. Including this data in the solicitation is intended to ensure a comprehensive and fair evaluation of competitive proposals and increase the probability that realistic pricing is provided in future proposals submitted. Minimizing the potential risk for unrealistic or unsubstantiated pricing materially reduces the risk that cost/price could become an inappropriate discriminator among competing offerors.

Based on the written request from the Contracting Officer, the Contractor shall provide all of the following historical data from this contract within 30 days this request:

(1) All labor resources employed under this contract in the last twelve months, by

Contract Labor Category as specified in Attachment B, Direct Labor Rates, Indirect Rates and Fee Matrices. For each labor category, provide the number of WYEs or the total labor hours incurred for that position over the preceding 12 months, the current weighted average wage rate (unburdened “straight time” rate), and the average seniority level;

(2) For each labor category , identify the most recent date that wages were escalated and provide the percentage by which wages were escalated;

(3) For each labor category, identify whether the category is “exempt,” “non-exempt,” or “union” as governed under the Service Contract Labor Standards;

(4) For each labor category, provide a brief position description in sufficient detail to indicate the duties of each category and any minimum education and experience requirements.

Example Table of Requested Data

Labor Category

Number of *WYE by Labor Category

**Current Weighted Avg.

Unburdened Hourly Rate for this Category

Average Seniority for this Category

Date and Amount of Last Rate Escalation

Identification “Exempt,”

“Non-Exempt,” or “Union”

Engineer 4 9 $18.20 18 months April 2005 (2.8%) Exempt

*1 WYE equals the total Contractor’s Productive Work Year Hours. Example: Four contractor employees each working 1,000 hours per year, divided by the total Contractor’s Productive Work Year Hours, equals the Contractor’s Number of FTEs.

**Straight time labor rates only, not bid rates or burdened rates

Contract TBD Attachment H

(03/2015)

(5) Actual non-labor (i.e. other direct costs (ODCs)) expenditures for the prior twelve months, delineated by each of the following cost elements: materials, equipment, travel, supplies, and any other individual recurring ODCs based on an established cost estimating relationships (e.g. computer usage, program management, depreciation, administrative support.);

(6) Estimate of the number of WYEs, including associated labor category titles/descriptions, for those personnel currently supporting this contract that are accounted for as indirect. This may include administrative employees (e.g., accounting or clerical personnel), management employees and/or technical employees (e.g. computer support personnel);

(7) Provide the Contractor’s Productive Work Year Hours for exempt and non-exempt employees; and

(8) The information required in (1) through (7) above shall be provided for the prime contractor and all significant subcontractors. Significant subcontractors are those subcontractors that have performed at least “TBD” percent of the cumulative contract effort (in terms of dollars) as of the time of the Contracting Officer’s request for this data. A single, consolidated response for the prime contractor and all significant subcontractors is preferred, wherein labor rate data is a total contract average by position (and labor categories where both the prime and subcontractor are providing labor for that position are weighted averages). If such a consolidated response is not feasible due to restrictions over disclosure of company-sensitive cost data between the prime and any subcontractors, then an alternative approach should be discussed with the Contracting Officer at the time of the request for this data.

(End of Attachment)

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .