8 PPQ.pdf
PDF 224 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Dyess AFB MACC Request for Proposals Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- FA4661-20-R-0001
About this file
This document contains a past performance questionnaire and details of a related federal contract opportunity. The past performance questionnaire is a template for evaluating offerors on a Multiple Award Construction Contract seeking construction services at Dyess Air Force Base. It requests performance ratings and supporting information on categories such as management, quality control, scheduling, and subcontracting management. Offerors are required to return the completed questionnaire by May 5, 2020 to be considered in proposal evaluations. The related federal contract opportunity is solicitation number FA4661-20-R-0001 for the Dyess AFB MACC IDIQ. Services sought include construction, and the submission deadline is included with proposal instructions in attachment two of the solicitation. A site visit will be held on April 17, with registration due by April 9. Proposals will be evaluated based on factors in the same attachment. The notice provides updates on amendments and encourages reviewing the site frequently for changes.
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
Show all 31
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
For Official Use Only When completed, this document is Source Selection Information IAW FAR 2.101 and 3.104.
Attachment 8: Past Performance Questionnaire
For Official Use Only Page 1 of 7
The 7th Contracting Squadron in Dyess AFB is in the process of competitively selecting a source for the base’s Multiple Award Construction Contract. One of the considerations in proposal evaluation is the verification of the offerors' past performance on contracts or other work efforts which reflect the offeror's ability to perform on the proposed effort. We depend on information received from organizations such as yours, which have had first-hand experience with the offeror, for the evaluation of the offeror's performance on those contracts or work efforts.
Our areas of interest regarding the offeror are summarized in the enclosed questionnaire. In order to meet the acquisition milestones, we request your written response no later than 2:00 PM CST 5 May 2020. This schedule will allow us sufficient time to analyze the data prior to the start of negotiations. Please return the questionnaire via email to 7CONS.Team.SourceSelection@us.af.mil. Your completed questionnaire will become a part of the official source selection records and kept confidential. Questions or comments may be emailed to the previously mentioned e-mail.
Your assistance is greatly appreciated and your prompt response will be one of the keys to the successful and timely completion of this Source Selection.
MERRY SARGENT-GREEN, GS-14, DAF
Contracting Officer http://farsite.hill.af.mil/reghtml/regs/far2afmcfars/fardfars/far/02.htm#P10_602 http://farsite.hill.af.mil/reghtml/regs/far2afmcfars/fardfars/far/03.htm#P41_5836 mailto:7CONS.Team.SourceSelection@us.af.mil
For Official Use Only Page 2 of 7
Section 1: Contract Identification
A. Contractor (Company/Division):
B. Contractor Cage Code:
C. Contract Number:
D. Contract Type (e.g., FFP, FPIF, CPIF, CPFF, etc.):
E. Program Title:
F. Brief Program Description:
G. Program Phase (e.g., Engineering & Manufacturing Development (EMD)):
H. Period of Performance
1. Original Schedule (assuming all options exercised):
Beginning Date _________ through ____________
2. Current Schedule (assuming all options exercised):
Beginning Date _________ through ____________
3. Reason for difference (if applicable):
I. Contract Dollar Value
1. Original maximum contract dollar value (assuming all options exercised): $
2. Current maximum contract dollar value (assuming all options exercised): $
3. Reasons for difference between original and current contract dollar value (if applicable):
J. Description of work performed:
K. Was this a competitively awarded contract? ☐ Yes ☐ No
L. Contractor’s Role: ☐ Prime Contractor ☐ Subcontractor ☐ Key Personnel
Note: If offeror holds or has held other contracts with your agency/organization in the last three (3) years, please complete separate Past Performance Questionnaire forms for those contracts as well.
Section 2: Customer or Agency Identification
A. Customer or agency name:
B. Customer or agency description (if applicable):
For Official Use Only Page 3 of 7
C. Geographic description of work performed under this contract (i.e., local, nationwide, worldwide, other Commands):
Section 3: Respondent Identification
A. Respondent’s name:
B. Respondent’s title:
C. Respondent’s phone/fax number/e-mail address:
D. Length of time (number of years/months) respondent worked on subject contract and description of responsibility/position/role:
E. Other suggested points of contact:
Section 4: Performance Information
In the table below, indicate your rating for the contractor’s performance by placing an “X” in the appropriate block to the right of each question. Provide supporting information for each response in the space provided. Attach additional pages if more space is needed. The performance rating scale is defined as follows:
Code Performance Rating
E EXCEPTIONAL – Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many requirements to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.
V VERY GOOD – Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some requirements to the
Government’s benefit. The contractual performance being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.
S SATISFACTORY – Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory.
M MARGINAL – Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions or the contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.
U UNSATISFACTORY – Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance being assessed contains serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.
For Official Use Only Page 4 of 7
N/A NOT APPLICABLE – Unable to provide a rating. Contract did not include performance for this aspect, performance was not observed, or information was not available. Do not know.
Note: The following are SAMPLE questions. Past Performance evaluation teams MUST construct a simple and concise Past Performance Questionnaire, tailored to seek out key information tied to the significant aspects of the planned acquisition. Avoid questions that can be answered with a “yes” or “no” but instead include probing and direct questions to draw out the required information desired.
The Contractor: E V S M U N/A
1. Provided experienced managers and supervisors with the technical and administrative abilities needed to meet contract requirements.
SUPPORTING INFORMATION:
2. Demonstrated the ability to hire, maintain, and replace, if necessary, qualified personnel during the contract period.
3. Delegated authority to project managers and supervisors commensurate with contract requirements.
4. Home office participated in solving significant local problems.
5. Followed approved quality control plan.
6. Provided effective quality control and/or inspection procedures to meet contract requirements.
7. Corrected deficiencies in timely manner and pursuant to their quality control procedures.
For Official Use Only Page 5 of 7
8. Provided timely resolution of contract discrepancies.
9. Identified problems as they occurred.
10. Suggested alternative approaches to problems.
11. Displayed initiative to solve problems.
12. Developed realistic progress schedules.
13. Met established project schedules.
14. Provided timely resolution of deficiency.
15. Was responsive to contract changes.
16. Provided adequate project supervision.
For Official Use Only Page 6 of 7
17. Paid subcontractors/suppliers in a timely manner.
18. Provided accurate and complete line item cost proposals including all aspects of work required for each task.
19. Cooperated with Government personnel after award.
20. How would you rate the contractor's overall performance on this contract?
21. Was the contractor ever issued a cure or show cause notice under the referenced contract?
If yes, explain.
EXPLANATION:
☐ Yes
☐ No
22. Would you award another contract to this contractor? If not, explain.
EXPLANATION:
☐ Yes
☐ No
IF THIS WAS A GOVERNMENT CONTRACT:
Did this contract include FAR 52.219-9, Small Business Subcontracting Plan?
☐ Yes ☐ No
If yes, did the contractor comply with the clause? Please explain.
Did this contract include FAR 52.219-8, Utilization of Small Business Concerns?
For Official Use Only Page 7 of 7
☐ Yes ☐ No
If yes, did the contractor comply with the clause? Please explain.
Additional remarks:
[click and pick the date]
Respondent’s Signature Date
Thank you for your prompt response and assistance!
Please return this completed questionnaire to:
E-Mail to: 7CONS.Team.SourceSelection@us.af.mil http://farsite.hill.af.mil/reghtml/regs/far2afmcfars/fardfars/far/03.htm#P41_5836
| 2020-04-03T15:55:45-0500 | |
| SARGENTGREEN.MERRY.K.1138303361 |
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .