Amendment_002_70Z08718RPJT90000.pdf

PDF 61 KB Posted

Attached to
USCG Air Station Kodiak Construction Services For Design/Build Repairs to the Hangar I Fire Protection Systems
Solicitation number
70Z08718RPJT90000
Issued by

About this file

Amendment 0002

View the file

Other files

Show all 15

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

Offers must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended, by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing items 8 and 15, and returning or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment your desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT 1. CONTRACT ID CODE

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE 4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO. 5. PROJECT NO. (If applicable)

7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than Item 6) CODE

STANDARD FORM 30 (REV. 10-83)

Prescribed by GSA FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

FACILITY CODE

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION

NO.

9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

10A. MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offers is extended, is not extended.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required) copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

13. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO MODIFICATION OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

CHECK ONE A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE CONTRACT ORDER NO.

IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(b).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15C. DATE SIGNED

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

16C. DATE SIGNED

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

PAGE OF PAGES

6. ISSUED BY CODE

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., street, county, State and ZIP Code) (X)

CODE

15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of person authorized to sign)

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

(Signature of Contracting Officer)

NSN 7540-01-152-8070

Previous edition unusable

USCG Air Station Kodiak Construction Services For Design/Build Repairs to the Hangar I Fire Protection Systems

SEE CONTINUATION PAGES

USCGCEU JUNEAU DET SEATTLE

915 SECOND AVE, RM 2664

SEATTLE, WA 98174-1011

ALL PROSPECTIVE OFFERORS

SAME AS BLOCK 6

70Z08718RPJT900

01/04/2018

12/14/2017 x

70Z08718RPJT900 Q&A Set #1, Questions 1-10.

Q1. Would you please confirm the date of the site visit, January 9 or 10?

A1. The Site Visit is occurring on both days. The contractor may attend either day or both days. However, if the contractor chooses to attend only one day they will have less time to view the hangar and walk the spaces.

See Amendment 0001 Section L.6.

Q2. May we submit an alternate equipment type, vs. Kingfisher?

A2. Alternate equipment is not permitted. Non-addressable King-Fisher Fire Alarm Control Panels are required.

Q3. Should we register now through RapidGate, to save time in the event we receive this award?

A3. Registering through Rapid Gate prior to contract award is a business decision to be made by the contractor. The Government will not reimburse for any costs associated with responding to the solicitation.

Q4. Please confirm that it is permissible for the Representative Construction Project to have been completed by a subcontractor that is part of the Prime Contractor’s Team? The information below (FACTOR 1) shows that subcontractor experience is permissible, but the PPQ information suggests otherwise.

A4. The experience and past performance are separate evaluation factors. If you are providing the past performance as a subcontractor then a PPQ will need to be submitted.

Please see Amendment 0001 for updated of Sections L & M.

Q5. Will there be a site visit or do we need to schedule it up.

A5. See Amendment 0001 Section L.6. A site visit has been scheduled.

Q6. Specification 0018 00, Section 1.8.A indicates; “available record drawings for the existing building structure including foundations are provided in the RFP”. These drawings could not be located; please provide.

A6. Delete these words from the Specification 0018 00, Section 1.8.A: “Available record drawings for the existing building structure including foundations are provided in this

RFP.”

See Section 0011110 CR 1.2 B, for additional information regarding drawings.

Q7. Specification 00 18 00, Section 1.8.C – Confirm that most recent UFC’s (and other codes by reference) as published on www.wbdg.org <http://www.wbdg.org> as of

12.14.2017 are applicable.

A7. This website may be one source for this information. We cannot confirm the completeness, accuracy or applicability of what resides there.

Q8. Specification 00 18 00, Section 1.8.A.4 and Section 1.8.D.3.a – please confirm whether an 18” thick concrete raft foundation for the vertical foam concentrate bladder tank, isolated from the adjacent existing slab on grade would be acceptable, or if the Owner is expecting a driven pile foundation for this small section of interior slab.

A8.Means and methods to achieving the contract requirements are to be determined by the contractor. The existing slab and underlying soils condition, and suitability for structural support is unknown. Voids have been discovered below the exiting slab in other locations in the Hangar.

Q9. Prior to the site visit, will you provide structural drawings, to include sections and elevations?

A9. No additional drawings will be provided.

Q10. Buried fire lines call for ductile iron pipe and during the last several years they have been using HDPE pipe and that is what base standards call for that were in bid packet.

What shall the buried fire lines be Ductile Iron or HDPE?

A10: Per Specification Section 0011110 CR 1.7, the RFP Specification takes precedence over RFP Attachments (reference specifications).

SECTION 1.4 001800 D E.1.a. requires ductile. The explanation is: ductile iron is required due to potential soil contamination, and ADEC preference for ductile vs HDPE in this situation.

File details come from the government source that posted it.