7-Evaulation Scoresheet USBE-JB26216-RFP.xlsx
XLSX spreadsheet 16 KB Posted
- Attached to
- USBE Scholarship Granting Organization
- Solicitation number
- USBE-JB26216-RFP
- Issued by
- Utah
About this file
This is an evaluation scoresheet for a Request for Proposals (RFP) issued by the Utah State Board of Education (USBE) to select a Scholarship Granting Organization (SGO) to administer the special needs scholarship program under Utah Code 53E-7-4-1 et seq. and Board Rule R277-626-1 et seq. The RFP solicitation number is USBE-JB26216-RFP, and the resulting contract will be awarded to a single responsive and responsible offeror with the highest evaluation score. The contract term is five years, with USBE reserving the right to terminate at any time in accordance with the State of Utah Standard Terms and Conditions. The evaluation process consists of three stages: Stage 1 contains nine mandatory minimum requirements covering incorporation documentation, IRS 501(c)(3) status, student eligibility and award methodology, scholarship application processes, FBI Rapback system enrollment, performance rating compliance, reporting requirements, conflict of interest confirmation, and fiscal soundness documentation. Stage 2 comprises scoreable technical criteria weighted across two categories—Experience & Qualification (15.4% combined weight) and Solution (69.3% combined weight)—with a total of 650 possible points and a minimum passing threshold of 487.5 points (75%). Stage 3 consists of an optional presentation component at USBE's discretion with a maximum of 50 points and a 75% minimum passing threshold of 37.5 points.
The evaluation framework uses a 0-10 scoring scale where 0 indicates the proposed solution does not meet requirements, 5 indicates satisfactory meeting of requirements, and 10 indicates the solution measurably exceeds requirements and expectations. Offerors must demonstrate experience and qualifications of key personnel and board members, fiscal soundness through either three years of similar state performance, audited financial statements, or performance bond capability, and submit a comprehensive implementation plan addressing management, marketing, conflict of interest, and data protection. Critical scoring elements include the methodology for verifying student eligibility and award allocation (100 points), the scholarship application and award process (100 points), the implementation plan (150 points), and the plan for compliance with restricted fund use and financial responsibilities under UCA 53E-7-405 (200 points). All mandatory Stage 1 requirements must be satisfied on a pass/fail basis before technical scoring occurs, and offerors must maintain compliance with FBI Rapback system monitoring, quarterly and semi-annual reporting schedules, and performance violation provisions throughout the contract period.
View the file
Other files
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
SGO Scoresheet
| Scholarship Granting Organization |
| USBE-JB26216-RFP |
| RFP EVALUATION SCORESHEET |
| Scores will be assigned from 0-10 as follows: | |||
| Firm Name: | 0 = the proposed solution does not meet requirements and expectations as described in the request for proposal. | ||
| 5 = the proposed solution satisfactorily meets requirements and expectations as described in the request for proposal | |||
| 10 = the proposed solution measurably exceeds requirements and expectations as described in the request for proposal | |||
| Stage 1 Minimum Mandatory Requirements | RFP Section | Evaluation (Pass/Fail) | |
| 1 | Offeror shall submit incorporation documentation filed with the State of Utah, including list of board members and employees. | Files | |
| 2 | Offeror shall submit IRS determination letter granting 501(c)(3) chartable/exempt status. | Files | |
| 3 | Offeror shall submit methodology for determining student eligibility and award. | Files | |
| 4 | Offeror shall submit scholarship application and award process. | Files | |
| 5 | Offeror must agree to have all employees enroll in the FBI Rapback system through USBE and submit to ongoing monitoring. | Files | |
| 6 | Offeror must agree to a performance rating system, including compliance with violation provisions of 53E-7-404(4). | Files | |
| 7 | Offeror must agree to submit quarterly reports for the first two years, semi-annual reports for the following year, and annually thereafter (at a time identified by USBE, to ensure available for Public Education Appropriation requirements). | Files | |
| 8 | Offeror must confirm no conflict of interest, including no affiliation or association with any receiving school. | Files | |
| 9 | Offeror must submit required documentation to demonstrate fiscal soundness, including surety bond at request of USBE. | Files |
Stage 2 Scoreable Technical Criteria RFP Section Evaluator Score (0-10) Criteria Weight % of Tech Criteria Points Possible Points Earned
| Category A-Experience & Qualification | ||||||
| 1 | Offeror shall submit experience and resumes of key personnel and board members | Technical Criteria | 5 | 7.7% | 50.0 | 0.0 |
| 2 | Offeror shall demonstrate fiscal soundness by one of the following: |
o Successfully performing similar functions in another state for at least 3 years o Audited financial statements, if less than 3 years comparable experience
| o If not previously performing services, ability to provide performance bond prior to contract execution | Technical Criteria | 5 | 7.7% | 50.0 | 0.0 | |||||
| 3 | NON-SCORED- List of all claims of non-performance or breach by customers in excess of $5,000, including all pending litigation matters (including civil, criminal, or appellate) or criminal convictions in the past 5 years for the company and all principals. | Technical Criteria | ||||||||
| Category B Solution | ||||||||||
| 4 | Offeror’s methodology for verifying student eligibility and award | Technical Criteria | 10 | 15.4% | 100.0 | 0.0 | ||||
| 5 | Offeror’s scholarship application and award process | Technical Criteria | 10 | 15.4% | 100.0 | 0.0 | ||||
| 6 | Offeror shall submit an implementation plan that shall contain, at a minimum: |
o Management plan, including key milestones o Marketing plan to solicit donations and students for scholarships o Conflict of interest plan
| o Data protection plan | Technical Criteria | 15 | 23.1% | 150.0 | 0.0 | |||||
| 7 | Offeror shall demonstrate how it will ensure compliance with restricted use of funds and reimbursements if required. Offeror shall submit its plan to comply with SGO financial responsibility as outlined in UCA 53E-7-405. | Technical Criteria | 20 | 30.8% | 200.0 | 0.0 |
| Stage 2 Score Threshold | Points possible | Required Points percentage | Min Points required | Points earned | Percent earned | Evaluation |
| 650.0 | 75% | 487.5 | 0.0 | 0.0% | Fail |
Stage 3 Presentation (if held at USBE option) Evaluator Score (0-10) Criteria Weight % of Stage 3 points Points Possible Points Earned
| Presentation/ Demonstration of solution (optional at discretion of USBE) | |||||
| - Offerors who meet the mandatory minimum criteria may be invited to present their system. The presentation date and time will be sent to vendors invited to present. Presentations are anticipated to be 30-60 minutes | 5 | 100.0% | 50.0 | 0.0 |
| Stage 3 Score Threshold | Points possible | Required Points percentage | Min Points required | Points earned | Percent earned | Evaluation |
| 50.0 | 75% | 37.5 | 0.0 | 0.0% | Fail |
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .