7-Evaulation Scoresheet USBE-JB26216-RFP.xlsx

XLSX spreadsheet 16 KB Posted

Attached to
USBE Scholarship Granting Organization
Solicitation number
USBE-JB26216-RFP
Issued by
Utah

About this file

This is an evaluation scoresheet for a Request for Proposals (RFP) issued by the Utah State Board of Education (USBE) to select a Scholarship Granting Organization (SGO) to administer the special needs scholarship program under Utah Code 53E-7-4-1 et seq. and Board Rule R277-626-1 et seq. The RFP solicitation number is USBE-JB26216-RFP, and the resulting contract will be awarded to a single responsive and responsible offeror with the highest evaluation score. The contract term is five years, with USBE reserving the right to terminate at any time in accordance with the State of Utah Standard Terms and Conditions. The evaluation process consists of three stages: Stage 1 contains nine mandatory minimum requirements covering incorporation documentation, IRS 501(c)(3) status, student eligibility and award methodology, scholarship application processes, FBI Rapback system enrollment, performance rating compliance, reporting requirements, conflict of interest confirmation, and fiscal soundness documentation. Stage 2 comprises scoreable technical criteria weighted across two categories—Experience & Qualification (15.4% combined weight) and Solution (69.3% combined weight)—with a total of 650 possible points and a minimum passing threshold of 487.5 points (75%). Stage 3 consists of an optional presentation component at USBE's discretion with a maximum of 50 points and a 75% minimum passing threshold of 37.5 points.

The evaluation framework uses a 0-10 scoring scale where 0 indicates the proposed solution does not meet requirements, 5 indicates satisfactory meeting of requirements, and 10 indicates the solution measurably exceeds requirements and expectations. Offerors must demonstrate experience and qualifications of key personnel and board members, fiscal soundness through either three years of similar state performance, audited financial statements, or performance bond capability, and submit a comprehensive implementation plan addressing management, marketing, conflict of interest, and data protection. Critical scoring elements include the methodology for verifying student eligibility and award allocation (100 points), the scholarship application and award process (100 points), the implementation plan (150 points), and the plan for compliance with restricted fund use and financial responsibilities under UCA 53E-7-405 (200 points). All mandatory Stage 1 requirements must be satisfied on a pass/fail basis before technical scoring occurs, and offerors must maintain compliance with FBI Rapback system monitoring, quarterly and semi-annual reporting schedules, and performance violation provisions throughout the contract period.

View the file

Other files

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

SGO Scoresheet

Scholarship Granting Organization
USBE-JB26216-RFP
RFP EVALUATION SCORESHEET
Scores will be assigned from 0-10 as follows:
Firm Name:0 = the proposed solution does not meet requirements and expectations as described in the request for proposal.
5 = the proposed solution satisfactorily meets requirements and expectations as described in the request for proposal
10 = the proposed solution measurably exceeds requirements and expectations as described in the request for proposal
Stage 1 Minimum Mandatory RequirementsRFP SectionEvaluation (Pass/Fail)
1Offeror shall submit incorporation documentation filed with the State of Utah, including list of board members and employees.Files
2Offeror shall submit IRS determination letter granting 501(c)(3) chartable/exempt status.Files
3Offeror shall submit methodology for determining student eligibility and award.Files
4Offeror shall submit scholarship application and award process.Files
5Offeror must agree to have all employees enroll in the FBI Rapback system through USBE and submit to ongoing monitoring.Files
6Offeror must agree to a performance rating system, including compliance with violation provisions of 53E-7-404(4).Files
7Offeror must agree to submit quarterly reports for the first two years, semi-annual reports for the following year, and annually thereafter (at a time identified by USBE, to ensure available for Public Education Appropriation requirements).Files
8Offeror must confirm no conflict of interest, including no affiliation or association with any receiving school.Files
9Offeror must submit required documentation to demonstrate fiscal soundness, including surety bond at request of USBE.Files

Stage 2 Scoreable Technical Criteria RFP Section Evaluator Score (0-10) Criteria Weight % of Tech Criteria Points Possible Points Earned

Category A-Experience & Qualification
1Offeror shall submit experience and resumes of key personnel and board membersTechnical Criteria57.7%50.00.0
2Offeror shall demonstrate fiscal soundness by one of the following:

o Successfully performing similar functions in another state for at least 3 years o Audited financial statements, if less than 3 years comparable experience

o If not previously performing services, ability to provide performance bond prior to contract executionTechnical Criteria57.7%50.00.0
3NON-SCORED- List of all claims of non-performance or breach by customers in excess of $5,000, including all pending litigation matters (including civil, criminal, or appellate) or criminal convictions in the past 5 years for the company and all principals.Technical Criteria
Category B Solution
4Offeror’s methodology for verifying student eligibility and awardTechnical Criteria1015.4%100.00.0
5Offeror’s scholarship application and award processTechnical Criteria1015.4%100.00.0
6Offeror shall submit an implementation plan that shall contain, at a minimum:

o Management plan, including key milestones o Marketing plan to solicit donations and students for scholarships o Conflict of interest plan

o Data protection planTechnical Criteria1523.1%150.00.0
7Offeror shall demonstrate how it will ensure compliance with restricted use of funds and reimbursements if required. Offeror shall submit its plan to comply with SGO financial responsibility as outlined in UCA 53E-7-405.Technical Criteria2030.8%200.00.0
Stage 2 Score ThresholdPoints possibleRequired Points percentageMin Points requiredPoints earnedPercent earnedEvaluation
650.075%487.50.00.0%Fail

Stage 3 Presentation (if held at USBE option) Evaluator Score (0-10) Criteria Weight % of Stage 3 points Points Possible Points Earned

Presentation/ Demonstration of solution (optional at discretion of USBE)
- Offerors who meet the mandatory minimum criteria may be invited to present their system. The presentation date and time will be sent to vendors invited to present. Presentations are anticipated to be 30-60 minutes5100.0%50.00.0
Stage 3 Score ThresholdPoints possibleRequired Points percentageMin Points requiredPoints earnedPercent earnedEvaluation
50.075%37.50.00.0%Fail

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .