Amendment 0003_signed.pdf
PDF 599 KB Posted
- Attached to
- MSP District Janitorial Services, Various Locations Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- 697DCK-23-R-00006
About this file
This document provides details on Amendment 0003 for the MSP District Janitorial Services solicitation issued by the Department of Transportation Federal Aviation Administration Southwestern Region. The solicitation seeks janitorial services at various locations and was originally issued with number 697DCK-23-R-00006. Amendment 0003 provides revisions to the terms of the solicitation but does not change the required services. Offerors are required to acknowledge the amendment in any proposal submitted by the response date, which remains unchanged. The award date and other contractual details also remain as originally published in the initial solicitation.
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Amendment 0002_signed.pdf | ||
| Amendment 0001_signed.pdf | ||
| Attachment 1 - ZMP ARTCC and CCF Site Specific SOW.pdf | ||
| Attachment 5 - Service Contract Act Combined Wage Determination.pdf | ||
| Attachment 6 - Customer Satisfaction Survey.pdf | ||
| Attachment 4 - Section B Pricing Spreadsheet-Minneapolis District Janitorial.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| Attachment 2 - MSP District ATCTs Site Specific SOWs.pdf | ||
| Attachment 3 - MSP District Administrative Facilities Site Specific SOWs.pdf | ||
| 697DCK-23-R-00006.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
| ������������ | � |
| ������� | � |
� �������������������� ����������������� �!""#$%!&#'()���*���*���+*���,������������� -���,,����.������ /����01�2�����+�1��3�2����0���� ��4�����,����4�25���221���67 ����� 8����*���2������67��� �9:;'<�:;!=��:'>�?(
@����*�����������22��,�������������A9BC�D:<'':C�%9E=:FC�G:!:'�!=H�I�J�K9H'(
L����*���*�����,�2�M�������������L6���������GNN��ONP�QQ(�R���*���,���������,���������+����������R6���������GNN��ONP�QS(����� ,���M��7������TTU��V�
���������W��XX���
�YZ�[\]̂Z�_̀a\ZbZc�d]efgfh[hf]_�fd�[aZ_cZc�[d�dZh�i]bhY�f_��hZa��/����YZ�Y]̀b�[_c�c[hZ�djZgfifZc�i]b�bZgZfjh�]i��iiZbd�iiZbd�à dh�[gk_]leZcmZ�bZgZfjh�]i�hYfd�[aZ_caZ_h�jbf]b�h]�hYZ�Y]̀b�[_c�c[hZ�djZgfifZc�f_�hYZ�d]efgfh[hf]_�]b�[d�[aZ_cZcn�\o�]_Z�]i�hYZ�i]ee]lf_m�aZhY]cdp�q[r�6o�g]ajeZhf_m�hZad�@�[_c���n�[_c�bZh̀b_f_m fd�ZshZ_cZcn� fd�_]h�ZshZ_cZc�
�)������1����4�������������������������� �<'tE$<'HB(TuU��V�
�������XX���
����W�������� � U���������� �� ��V�� ����������U��
��v�����������TwUqsr ����3�2��3��4���������2��221����1�21������p��G"'%$ F�!E:;9<$:F(���3���3��4�2�2���,���3�������*��/�����*��������3����������6���3���6�.���1*6�������������+�������2�*���,���������,M�����3����*���2�����.���3��4�2��DE%;�!D�%;!=x'D�$=�"!F$=x�9 $%'C�����3�2�21��M�*����M��4���*�����2���������������1�21��������3���1�3����7��,p�����3����G"'%$ F�:F"'�9 �>9H$ $%!:$9=�!=H�!E:;9<$:F(!""<9"<$!:$9=�H!:'C�':%B(��2���,���3�������*��/�� �U���X������y �]_hb[gh]b� fd�_]hn� fd�bZz̀fbZc�h]�dfm_�hYfd�c]g̀aZ_h�[_c�bZh̀b_
����������������*��R��
�/����2����������,��*���*���+*���,����������<x!=$�'H�&F��K��D'%:$9=�;'!H$=xDC�$=%#EH$=x�D9#$%$:!:$9=�%9=:<!%:�DE&�'%:�>!::'<��;'<'� '!D$&#'Br dZj[b[hZ�eZhhZb�]b�hZeZmb[a�lYfgY�f_gècZd�[�bZiZbZ_gZ�h]�hYZ�d]efgfh[hf]_�[_c�[aZ_caZ_h�_̀a\Zb���,��M1����,�7�1��������M��4�*�������6�������.�������3���M������2�4������,����3�����������,��,,��2�����������3��3�1�����������2����,����*�7���21M����������������,�7�1���,,������i�\o�f̂bh̀Z�]i�hYfd�[aZ_caZ_h�o]̀�cZdfbZ�h]�gY[_mZ�[_�]iiZb�[ebZ[co�d̀\afhhZcn�d̀gY�gY[_mZ�a[o�\Z�a[cZ�\o�hZeZmb[a�]b�eZhhZbn�jb]̂fcZc�Z[gY�hZeZmb[a�]b�eZhhZb�a[kZd�bZiZbZ_gZ�h]�hYZ�d]efgfh[hf]_�[_c�hYfd�[aZ_caZ_hn�[_c�fd�bZgZf̂Zc�jbf]b�h]�hYZ�]jZ_f_m�Y]̀b�[_c�c[hZ�djZgfifZc�g]jfZd�]i�hYZ�[aZ_caZ_h��q\r�6o�[gk_]leZcmf_m�bZgZfjh�]i�hYfd�[aZ_caZ_h�]_�Z[gY�g]jo�]i�hYZ�]iiZb�d̀\afhhZc��]b�qgr�6o�� �{�
�{ g]jfZd�h]�hYZ�fdd̀f_m�]iifgZ�
}£�|£�|}|~qsr
����������¥}}}~�����������������������¦�������¦����������������������¤���������������������§�¦��̈��̈��������������¦�������������©������§�̈��̈����������������|��|}|~�����ª}}̈����§��¤��«����������������������¬®�}}}{���}}}~������������������«��¦�̄����̈��̈����§°̈±²³́�³µ�̈°±µ³±¶·̧¹°ª�{}�}{�|}|~�º³�}¢�~}�|}|» �5�����*����������M���,�����������4��,,������OF"'�9<�"<$=:(�������*���������M���,�2�4�����OF"'�9<�"<$=:( ����������2�4��� �56������������1�3����7���6������������+�,,���� �5��������2�4����G$x=!:E<'�9 �"'<D9=�!E:;9<$�'H�:9�D$x=( �G$x=!:E<'�9 �K9=:<!%:$=x�� $%'<(�°̧°·��°́ ²́¼�sgZjh�[d�jb]̂fcZc�YZbZf_n�[ee�hZbad�[_c�g]_cfhf]_d�]i�hYZ�c]g̀aZ_h�bZiZbZ_gZc�f_��hZa�L��]b��R�n�[d�YZbZh]i]bZ�gY[_mZcn�bZa[f_d�̀_gY[_mZc�[_c�f_�ìee�i]bgZ�[_c�ZiiZgh�
Carpet Ceramic Tile Vinyl Concrete Painted Steel Location Total SqFt % Sq Ft % Sq Ft % Sq Ft % Sq Ft % Sq Ft Appleton Air Traffic Control Tower (ATW ATCT) 1,500 15% 228 1% 20 49% 735 - 33% 500 Bismarck Air Traffic Control Tower (BIS ATCT) 5,300 85% 4,505 6% 300 9% 500 - - Bismarck System Support Center & Airports District Office (BIS SSC & ADO):8,000 95% 7,600 5% 400 - - - Columbus Work Center (OLU WC) 2,710 15% 407 85% 2,304 - - - Fargo Air Traffic Control Tower (FAR ATCT) 5,300 32% 1,700 42% 2,220 - 26% 1,378 - Fargo System Support Center (FAR SSC) 1,849 44% 815 56% 1,035 - - - Grand Forks System Support Center (GFK SSC) 3,200 89% 2,848 3% 88 - 8% 253 - Grand Island Air Traffic Control Tower (GRI ATCT) 1,298 43% 560 - 57% 740 - - Grand Island System Support Center (GRI SSC) 5,671 80% 4,537 20% 1,134 - - - OMA CWO (Consolidated Weather Observers) WC 160 100% 160 - - - - Omaha R90 Traffic Route OMA R90 TRACON 13,516 26% 3,500 - 21% 2,850 53% 7,166 - Omaha System Support Center (OMA SSC) 1,874 24% 450 - 76% 1,424 - - Omaha Air Traffic Control Tower (OMA ATCT) 5,640 38% 2,126 - 50% 2,818 12% 696 - QHO LRR, Long Range Radar 3,400 12% 400 88% 2,992 - - - Rochester Air Traffic Control Tower (RST ATCT) 4,426 69% 3,054 27% 1,180 4% 185 - - Rosemount (TSC TSOG) 3,700 65% 2,400 8% 300 24% 900 - - Sioux City Air Traffic Control Tower (SUX ATCT) 7,500 57% 4,275 - 40% 2,986 3% 216 - DSM ATCT, Des Moines Air Traffic Control Tower 7,249 62% 4,494 8% 559 30% 2,161 - - DSM SSC, Des Moines System Support Center 7,985 22% 1,757 8% 664 10% 820 4% 324 - DLH ATCT, Duluth Air Traffic Control Tower 7,357 56% 4,120 4% 295 40% 2,919 - - FAR FSDO, Fargo Flight Systems District Office 6,100 95% 5,795 5% 305 0% - 0% - - FOD SSC, Fort Dodge System Support Center 4,421 24% 1,061 12% 545 12% 528 - - FSD ATCT, Sioux Falls Air Traffic Control Tower 7,749 55% 4,262 - 40% 3,100 5% 387 - GFK ATCT, Grand Forks Air Traffic Control Tower 3,470 42% 1,457 - 29% 1,000 29% 1,023 - GRB ATCT, Green Bay Air Traffic Control Tower 9,445 48% 4,516 - 52% 4,911 - - LNK ATCT, Lincoln Air Traffic Control Tower 7,221 82% 5,921 7% 481 11% 816 - - LSE ATCT, La Crosse Air Traffic Control Tower 1,305 42% 548 24% 315 - - 34% 450 MQT SSC, Marquette Air Traffic Control Tower 957 82% 785 - 18% 173 - - PLN SSU, Pelston System Support Unit 538 22% 119 - 78% 419 - - ZMP CCC, Minneapolis Child Care Center ZMP ARTCC, Minneapolis Air Route Traffic Control Center Please see SOW for specific breakouts
Please see SOW for specific breakouts
| Amendment 0003.pdf |
| Sq Ft Breakout.pdf |
| 2023-08-22T12:00:26-0400 | |
| RENEA O REDDISH |
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .