RFP_693JF718R000029_for_Amendment_0005_04-04-19_Pg_91.pdf
PDF 120 KB Posted
- Attached to
- MARAD NSMV Vessel Construction Management (VCM)
- Solicitation number
- 693JF718R000029
About this file
This document outlines the evaluation factors for a request for proposal for vessel construction management services. The government will evaluate proposals to manage the construction of the National Security Multi-Mission Vessel through the Maritime Administration. Offerors must meet mandatory eligibility requirements including United States citizenship and experience constructing or managing the construction of a coastwise endorsed vessel within the last seven years. Technical capability, past performance, and price will be evaluated with subfactors under technical capability including the proposed technical, management, shipyard selection, and oversight approaches. The combined technical/risk rating method will assess risk along with strengths and weaknesses to determine technical ratings.
RFP 693JF718R000029 Amendment 0005 Pg 91 replacement page
View the file
Other files
Show all 24
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
RFP# 693JF718R000029, Page 91 (Amendment 0005)
SECTION M: Evaluation Factors for Award
M.1 EVALUATION OF PROPOSALS
The Government will evaluate all proposals received by the due date in accordance with the evaluation factors and sub-factors set forth below.
M.2 MANDATORY ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS
The Government will evaluate the Affidavit of United States Citizenship, and supporting documents, submitted by the Offeror to substantiate the Offeror meets the citizenship requirements to receive a coastwise endorsement. See 46 USC § 12112 and the United States Coast Guard’s implementing regulations at 46 CFR Part 67, Documentation of Vessels, generally, as well as 46 CFR § 67.19, Coastwise Endorsement.
The Government will evaluate the Certification of Documented Coastwise Endorsement Vessel submitted in the Executive Summary volume to evaluate whether the Offeror has, within the last seven years, constructed, or managed the construction of, a vessel(s) of comparable size, scope or complexity that was documented with a coastwise endorsement.
FAILURE OF THE OFFEROR TO MEET BOTH MANDATORY REQUIREMENTS WILL
ELIMINATE A PROPOSAL FROM FURTHER CONSIDERATION
M.3 EVALUATION FACTORS
Factor 1: Technical Capability
Sub-Factor A: Technical Approach Sub-Factor B: Management Approach Sub-Factor C: Shipyard Selection Approach Sub-Factor D: Shipyard Oversight Approach
Factor 2: Past Performance Factor 3: Price
M.4 FACTOR 1 – TECHNICAL CAPABILITY
The Government will rate the Offerors’ Technical Capability using the ‘Combined Technical/Risk Rating Method’ below. The combined technical/risk rating includes consideration of risk in conjunction with the significant strengths, strengths, weaknesses, significant weaknesses, uncertainties, and deficiencies in determining technical ratings. Combined technical/risk evaluations will use the ratings listed in Table 2.1.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .