Bridge_Inspection_Report_5460-075P_GRSM_Institute_Bridge.pdf
PDF 3 MB Posted
- Solicitation number
- 693C73-18-B-000011
About this file
Bridge Inspection Report_5460-075P_GRSM Institute Bridge
View the file
Other files
Show all 25
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
BRIDGE INSPECTION REPORT
GRSM INSTITUTE BRIDGE
GRSM INSTITUTE ENTRANCE RD OVER MIDDLE PRONG LITTLE RIVER
GREAT SMOKY MOUNTAINS NATIONAL PARK
LE
STRUCTURE NO. 5460-075P
INSPECTION TYPE: ROUTINE
INSPECTION DATE: 5/17/16
Report prepared by: ND
Federal Highway Administration FLH Office of Bridges and Structures 21400 Ridgetop Circle Sterling, VA 20166 703-404-6201 https://bridge.flhd.fhwa.dot.gov http:https://bridge.flhd.fhwa.dot.gov
STRUCTURE NO. 5460 075P
GRSM INSTITUTE BRIDGE INSPECTION DATE: 5/17/16
STRUCTURE SUMMARY
BRIDGE IDENTIFICATION AND DESCRIPTION
MAIN SPAN MATERIAL: ....... NO. OF MAIN SPANS:
STEEL
MAIN SPAN TYPE: ............... NO. OF APPR. SPANS: ........ STRINGER/MULTI-BEAM or GIRDER
# OF BEAMS, MAIN SPAN: .. STRUCT. TOTAL LENGTH: .. 2
DECK TYPE: ......................... MAX. SPAN LENGTH: .......... WOOD OR TIMBER
WEARING SURFACE: .......... DECK WIDTH: ......................NONE
ABUT. FOUNDATIONS: ........ CURB TO CURB WIDTH: ..... SPREAD FTG ON BEARING MAT'L
PIER FOUNDATION(S): ........ N/A YEAR BUILT:
ABUTMENT / PIER MAT'L: ... CONCRETE YEAR RECONSTRUCTED: ..
PROJ./PLAN REF. NO: ......... SKEW ANGLE:
NPS ROAD CLASS:
000000000000 / NONE
FRACTURE CRITICAL:
STRUCTURE HISTORY: ...... 1982-MAJOR RECONSTRUCTION/SUPERSTRUCTURE.
2 - CONNECTOR ROAD
LOCATION
62.2 FT (19.0 M)
62.2 FT (19.0 M)
12.3 FT (3.7 M)
11.1 FT (3.4 M)
0 °
YES
GREAT SMOKY MOUNTAINS NATIONAL PARK MILE POINT: ..................... 4.38 (KM PT 7.05)
STATE: ................................. TENNESSEE LOCATION: 0.1 MILES TO NPS ROUTE 128
FACILITY CARRIED: ............ GRSM INSTITUTE ENTRANCE RD
FEATURE INTERSECTED: .. MIDDLE PRONG LITTLE RIVER
STRUCTURE EVALUATION SUMMARY
This weathering steel beam bridge is in good condition overall. Problems include deteriorated elastomeric bearing pads, a loose section of railing at the southwest corner, undermining of the west abutment footing, and missing object markers and "One Lane Bridge" signs at both approaches.
Corrective measures should be taken as outlined in this report to help prevent the possible development of more serious or costly problems in the future.
INSPECTION TEAM: G. GOODLIN, H. SALAD
CONDITION ASSESSMENT:
GARY J. GOODLIN, FIELD TEAM LEADER 703-404-6253
REPORT REVIEW:
MARCUS MILLER, P.E., BRIDGE INSPECTION ENGINEER 703-404-6252
REPORT APPROVAL: DATE: 9/30/16
JORGOMAI CEESAY, PH.D., P.E., BIP SUPERVISORY ENGINEER 703-404-6244
RECOMMENDATIONS AND ESTIMATED COSTS STRUCTURE NO. 5460 075P
226 PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT D
A (Critical) - Structure is closed, in imminent danger of collapse, or presents a critical safety hazard.
B (Major) - Structure exhibits severe deterioration, presents a safety hazard, or is designated a high priority due to age and/or condition.
C (Moderate) - Structure is deficient, functionally obsolete, or requires substantial repairs to prevent a serious deficiency or unsafe condition.
D (Minor) - Structure is generally in good condition. Preventative maintenance may be required.
E (Special) - Structure is under construction or reconstruction.
ITEM
NO.
MAINTENANCE RECOMMENDATIONS
(GENERALLY NOT FLHP ELIGIBLE)
QTY. UNIT COST
UNIT
ESTIMATE
COST
PRELIM.
222.7 INSTALL TYPE 3 REFLECTIVE OBJECT MARKERS AND "ONE LANE BRIDGE" SIGNS
AT BRIDGE APPROACHES.
6 EA
222.3 SECURE LOOSE SECTION OF SOUTHWEST APPROACH RAIL. 1 LS
PRELIM. MAINTENANCE TOTAL :
ITEM
REHABILITATION/RECONSTRUCTION
QTY. UNIT
UNIT
COST ESTIMATES
PRELIM. COST
NO (TYPICALLY NEEDED WITHIN 5 YEARS)
REHAB. RECONSTR.
222.4 REPAVE WEST APPROACH. 1 LS
59.1 REPLACE ELASTOMERIC BEARING PADS AT BOTH ABUTMENTS. 1 LS
60.9 INJECT GROUT INTO UNDERMINED AREA OF WEST ABUTMENT
FOOTING AND PLACE ADDITIONAL RIPRAP.
1 LS
CONTRACT COSTS FOR MOBILIZATION, TRAFFIC CONTROL, AND
DESIGN CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING (70% TOTAL REHAB COST)
PLUS PARK LOCATION FACTOR.
1 LS
PRELIM. REHABILITATION/RECONSTRUCTION TOTAL :
PRELIMINARY ESTIMATE TOTAL* :
(*Includes typical contract costs for mobilization, traffic control, and design/construction engineering; but does not include detour bridges, work beyond the bridge limits, or work not listed above. Estimates are approximate and are for preliminary planning purposes only; they should not be used as a complete or final engineers estimate.)
REMARKS: Cost estimates assume that recommended actions will be combined with similar work being performed on other structures.
FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 5460 075P
CONDITION RATING CODES FOR ITEMS 58 - 62, 222, 223
N
NOT APPLICABLE
EXCELLENT CONDITION
VERY GOOD CONDITION - no problems noted.
GOOD CONDITION - some minor problems.
SATISFACTORY CONDITION - structural elements show some minor deterioration.
FAIR CONDITION - all primary structural elements are sound but may have minor section loss, cracking, spalling, or scour.
POOR CONDITION - advanced section loss, deterioration, spalling, or scour.
SERIOUS CONDITION - loss of section, deterioration, spalling, or scour have seriously affected primary structural components. Local failures are possible.
Fatigue cracks in steel or shear cracks in concrete may be present.
CRITICAL CONDITION - advanced deterioration of primary structural elements. Fatigue cracks in steel or shear cracks in concrete may be present or scour may have removed substructure support. Unless closely monitored it may be necessary to close the structure until corrective action can be taken.
“IMMINENT” FAILURE CONDITION - major deterioration or section loss present in critical structural components or obvious vertical or horizontal movement affecting structure stability. Structure is closed to traffic but corrective action may return structure to light service.
FAILED CONDITION - out of service; beyond corrective action.
CONDITION RATING CODE EQUIVALENTS FOR SUB-ELEMENTS
G = GOOD (CODES 7 - 9) F = FAIR (CODES 5 - 6) P = POOR (CODES 0 - 4)
58. DECK 7
DECK SLAB1. G
EXPANSION JOINTS2. N
WEARING SURFACE3. N
RIDEABILITY4. G
CURBS, SIDEWALKS, AND MEDIAN 5. G
PARAPETS AND/OR RAILINGS6. G
DRAINS AND DRAINAGE7. G
UTILITIES8. G
DEFLECTION AND/OR VIBRATION9. G
OTHER10. N
59. SUPERSTRUCTURE 7
BEARING DEVICES1. F
GIRDERS OR BEAMS2. G
ARCH(ES) OR SLAB(S)3. N
FLOOR BEAMS AND STRINGERS4. N
TRUSSES5. N
DIAPHRAGMS AND BRACING6. G
7. PAINT N
FASCIA(E)8. N
DEFLECTION AND/OR VIBRATION9. G
ALIGNMENT10. G
OTHER11. N
60. SUBSTRUCTURE 7
ITEM REFERENCE AND REMARKS
ABUTMENTS
58.1 MINOR ABRASION AND CHECKING OF 2" X 8" (NOMINAL)
NAIL-LAMINATED TIMBER DECK; MINOR SPLINTERING AND
DETERIORATION AT ISOLATED LOCATIONS.
58.5,6 MINOR CHECKING AND SPLITTING OF CURB AND RAILING TIMBERS;
MODERATE ON NORTH SIDE.
MINOR WARPING OF RAILS THROUGHOUT. MINOR TO MODERATE
DECAY THROUGHOUT TOP OF RAIL POSTS. MINOR COLLISION
DAMAGE ON SOUTH RAILING AND CURB AT WEST END.
58.7 MINOR ACCUMULATION OF DEBRIS ALONG CURBLINE AND UNDER
CURBS.
58.8 UTILITY LINE ALONG BOTH SIDES OF DECK.
59.1 BULGING AND CRACKING OF ELASTOMERIC BEARING PADS AT
BOTH ABUTMENTS; PADS ARE SLIDING OUT FROM UNDER STEEL
BEARING PLATES TOWARD STREAM.
59.2,6 A588 WEATHERING STEEL BEAMS AND DIAPHRAGMS; MINOR
CORROSION AND PITTING OF STEEL TYPICAL THROUGHOUT.
59.9 MINOR PERMANENT DEFLECTION OF BEAMS.
60.1 MINOR VERTICAL CRACKING OF EAST ABUTMENT BREASTWALL
WITH STAINING.
60.6 LOOSE STONES AT NORTHEAST WINGWALL.
60.7 LARGE TREE ROOT COMING OUT OF NORTH WEEP HOLE AT EAST
ABUTMENT.
11.
1 0.
9.
8.
7.
6.
5.
4.
3.
2.
1.
12. OTHER
SLOPE PROTECTION
SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION
EROSION AND/OR SCOUR
EXPANSION JOINTS
WEEP HOLES
WINGWALLS
FOUNDATIONS
BACKWALLS AND/OR BULKHEADS
CAPS AND/OR BEARING SEATS
PILE BENTS
BREASTWALLS OR COLUMNS G
N
G
G
G
G
G
N
F
G
N
N
PIER(S)
N 13. WALLS AND/OR COLUMNS
N 14. PILE BENTS
N 15. CAPS AND/OR BEARING SEATS
N 16. FOUNDATIONS
N 17. EROSION AND/OR SCOUR
N 18. SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION
N 19. OTHER
FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 5460 075P
AND REMARKSITEM REFERENCE
61. CHANNEL 7
G 1. ALIGNMENT
G2. EROSION AND/OR SCOUR
N 3. CHANNEL PROTECTION
G 4. WATERWAY OBSTRUCTIONS
N 5. OTHER
SUFF ADEQUACY OF OPENING 6.
7. MEDNORMAL VELOCITY
11 FT. 8. AVERAGE CLEAR OPENING
9. STREAM BED COMPOSITION :
ROCK, SAND, STONES
222. APPROACHES 6
OTHER 9.
ALIGNMENT 8.
SIGNS7.
SETTLEMENT6.
EROSION5.
SURFACING 4.
APPROACH GUARDRAIL 3.
RELIEF JOINTS 2.
APPROACH SLABS 1. N
N
F
F
G
G
N
G
N
223. RETAINING WALL N
OTHER6.
SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION5.
EROSION AND/OR SCOUR 4.
FOUNDATION 3.
WEEP HOLES 2.
WALL1.
36. TRAFFIC AND SAFETY FEATURES
APPROACH GUARDRAIL ENDSD.
APPROACH GUARDRAILSC.
TRANSITIONSB.
BRIDGE RAILINGSA. 1
N N N
60.9 BOTH ABUTMENT FOOTINGS ARE PARTIALLY EXPOSED; HOWEVER,
LARGE BOULDERS SHELTER FOOTINGS. MINOR SCOUR WITH 4" OF
UNDERMINING AT WEST ABUTMENT FOOTING.
222.3 SOUTH TIMBER RAILING AT WEST APPROACH IS LOOSE.
222.4 MINOR RANDOM CRACKING THROUGHOUT WEST APPROACH
PAVEMENT; MINOR POTHOLE AT NORTH SIDE.
222.7 OBJECT MARKERS AND "ONE LANE BRIDGE" SIGNS MISSING AT
BRIDGE APPROACHES.
TRAFFIC SAFETY RATING CODES
N
Does not meet standards or a safety feature is required and none is provided.
Meets currently acceptable standards.
Not applicable or a safety feature is not required.
STRUCTURE NO. 5460 075P
INSPECTION DATE: 5/17/16
TRUCK TYPE
TONS
INVENTORY RATING (NORMAL TRAFFIC)
METRIC TONS METRIC TONSTONS
OPERATING RATING (MAXIMUM LOAD)
H
HS
TYPE 3
TYPE 3S2
TYPE 3-3
DESIGN LOADING:
DATE OF LOAD RATING CALCULATION:
LOAD RATING CONTROLLED BY:
REMARKS:
CAPACITY MEETS OR EXCEEDS DESIGN LOAD
CAPACITY IS LESS THAN DESIGN LOAD
ORIGINAL LOAD RATING CALCULATION APPLICABLE
ORIGINAL LOAD RATING CALCULATION REVISED
BEAM MOMENT CAPACITY
10/10
X
X
STRUCTURE LOAD RATING
GRSM INSTITUTE BRIDGE
UNKNOWN
STRUCTURE INVENTORY AND APPRAISAL STRUCTURE NO. 5460 075P
STRUCTURE IDENTIFICATION
(201) PARK: GREAT SMOKY MOUNTAINS NATIONAL PARK (1) STATE: ....................................... 474 - TENNESSEE (TN)
(202) STRUCTURE NAME: .......... GRSM INSTITUTE BRIDGE (2) STATE HWY. AGENCY DIST:
(203) STRUCTURE KIND: ............1 - BRIDGE (3) COUNTY CODE: ........................ 009 - BLOUNT
(4) CITY/PLACE CODE:
(204) STRUCTURE NUMBER: ..... 5460-075P
(205) NPS REGION: .................... 4 - SOUTHEAST (5) INVENTORY ROUTE:
(206) ROUTE CODE NUMBER: ... 433 (6) FEATURES INTERSECTED:....... MIDDLE PRONG LITTLE RIVE
(207) ROAD SECTION NO: ..........075P (7) FACILITY CARRIED: .................. GRSM INSTITUTE ENTRANCE
(208) NPS ROAD CLASS: ............ 2 - CONNECTOR ROAD (8) STATE STRUCTURE NO: .......... 5460075P0000000
(209) WITHIN NPS BNDRY?: ....... YES (9) LOCATION: ................................ 0.1 MILES TO NPS ROUTE 12
(210) OPERATING UNIT: ............. N. DIST. (10) INV. RTE. - MIN. VERT. CLR: .. 99.99 FT (99.99 M)
(211) PROJECT NO(S): ................ 000000000000 (11) MILE POINT: ............................. 4.38 (KM PT 7.05)
(212) DRAWING NUMBERS: ....... NONE (27) YEAR BUILT:
(21) MAINTAINED BY: ................. 66 - NATIONAL PARK SERVICE (106) YEAR RECONSTRUCTED:
(22) OWNER: ............................... 66 - NATIONAL PARK SERVICE (20) TOLL: ........................................ 3 - FREE ROAD
(37) HISTORICAL DESIGNATION: .. 5 - NOT ELIGIBLE
STRUCTURE DESCRIPTION, FOUNDATION, AND DECK TYPE
(43A) MAIN STR. MATERIAL: ..
(43B) MAIN STR. TYPE:
(45) NO. OF MAIN SPANS:
(48) MAX. SPAN LENGTH:
(49) STRUCTURE LENGTH:
(216A) ABUTMENT #1 FDN:
(216B) ABUTMENT #2 FDN:
(217A) PREDOM. PIER FDN.: ..
(217B) SECOND. PIER FDN: ...
(107) DECK TYPE:
3 - STEEL
02 - STRINGER/MULTI-BEAM or GIRDER
62.2 FT (19.0 M)
62.2 FT (19.0 M)
2 - SPREAD FTG ON BEARING MAT'L
2 - SPREAD FTG ON BEARING MAT'L
6 - N/A
6 - N/A
8 - WOOD OR TIMBER
(44A) APPR. STR. MATERIAL: ........ 0 - OTHER
(44B) APPR. STR. TYPE: ................ 00 - OTHER
(46) NO. OF APPROACH SPANS: .. 0
(108) WEAR SURFACE/PROTECT SYSTEM:
A) TYPE WEARING SURFACE: .. 0 - NONE
B) TYPE MEMBRANE: ................. 0 - NONE
C) TYPE PROTECTION:
0 - NONE
NO(218) IS SALT USED?:
LOAD RATING AND POSTING
(31) DESIGN LOAD:
0 - UNKNOWN (41) LOAD RESTRICTION:
A - OPEN, NO RESTRICTION
(66) INVENTORY RATING: ...... 39.0 TONS (35.4 METRIC TONS) (70) BRIDGE POSTING: .............. 5 - NO POSTING REQUIRED
(64) OPERATING RATING: ...... 65.0 TONS (59.0 METRIC TONS)
INSPECTION DATES
(90) INSPECTION DATE: 5/16 (91) FREQ. OF INSP: 24 MONTHS (92 / 93) CRITICAL FEATURE INSPECTION (CFI):
(219) ADD. STUDIES NEEDED: N - 0 - NONE (A) FRACTURE CRITICAL: ... YES
INSP. EVERY: 24 MONTHS - LAST INSP. : 5/16(220) SPECIAL STUDY TYPE: 0 - NONE
(B) UNDERWATER: .............. NO
(221) SPECIAL STUDY DATE:
INSP. EVERY: MONTHS - LAST INSP. :
(C) SPECIAL INSPECTION: .. NO
INSP. EVERY: MONTHS - LAST INSP. :
STRUCTURE INVENTORY AND APPRAISAL STRUCTURE NO. 5460 075P
GEOMETRY, TRAFFIC, AND NAVIGATIONAL DATA
(16) LATITUDE: ............................. 35°38'27.50" (51) CURB TO CURB WIDTH: ........... 11.1 FT (3.4 M)
(17) LONGITUDE: ......................... 83°41'25.00" (52) DECK WIDTH: ............................ 12.3 FT (3.7 M)
(19) DETOUR LENGTH: ............... 5 MI (8 KM) (32) APPR. ROADWAY WIDTH: ........ 17.0 FT (5.2 M)
(28A) LANES ON STRUCT: .......... 01 (213) APPR. PAVEMENT WIDTH: ..... 17.0 FT (5.2 M)
(28B) LANES UNDER STRUCT: ... 00 LEFT SHOULDER: .................. 0.0 FT (0.0 M)
(42A) SERVICE ON: ..................... 1 - HIGHWAY RIGHT SHOULDER: ................ 0.0 FT (0.0 M)
(42B) SERVICE UNDER: .............. 5 - WATERWAY (33) BRIDGE MEDIAN: ....................... 0 - NO MEDIAN
(29) AVG. DAILY TRAFFIC: .......... 100 (34) SKEW ANGLE: ............................ 0 °
(30) YEAR OF ADT: ...................... 2010 (35) DECK FLARE?: ........................... NO
(114) FUTURE ADT: ..................... 110 (47) TOTAL HORIZ. CLEARANCE: .... 11.1 FT (3.4 M)
(115) YEAR OF FUTURE ADT: ..... 2030 (50) SIDEWALKS:
(101) PARALLEL STRUCTURE: ... N - NONE LEFT : ...................................... 0.0 FT (0.0 M)
(38) NAVIGATION CONTROL?: ... 0 RIGHT : ................................... 0.0 FT (0.0 M)
(39) VERTICAL CLEARANCE: ...... 0.0 FT (0.0 M) (214) BRIDGE RAIL TYPE:
(40) HORIZ. CLEARANCE: ........... 0.0 FT (0.0 M) RAIL CONFIGURATION: ......... 1 - FULL HEIGHT (NO PARAPE
(111) ABUT. OR PIER PROT: ....... MATERIAL: .............................. 7 - TIMBER
DESIGN TYPE: ........................ 1 - CONTINUOUS RAIL
LATERAL UNDERCLEARANCE:
(55) RIGHT: ....................... 0.0 FT (0.0 M) (215) BRIDGE RAIL HEIGHT: ............ 3.42 FT (1.04 M)
(56) LEFT: ......................... 0.0 FT (0.0 M) (53) MIN. VRT. CLEAR. OVER DECK: 99.99 FT (99.99 M)
(54) MIN. VRT. UNDERCLEARANCE: 0.00 FT (0.00 M)
CONDITION AND APPRAISAL DATA, PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS, AND COST
(58) DECK:
(59) SUPERSTRUCTURE:
(60) SUBSTRUCTURE:
(61) CHANNEL:
(62) CULVERT: ........................... N
(222) APPROACHES:
(223) RETAINING WALL: ........... N
(36) TRAFFIC SAFETY FEAT: ... 1NNN
(75A) TYPE OF WORK:
(75B) WORK DONE BY:
(76) IMPROVEMENT LENGTH: ..
(67) STRUCTURAL EVALUATION:
(68) DECK GEOMETRY:
(69) UNDERCLEARANCES:
(71) WATERWAY ADEQUACY:
(72) APPROACH ALIGNMENT:
(113) SCOUR CRITICAL:
(225) PURPOSE OF IMPROVEMENT:
(226) PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT:
(227) MAINTENANCE COST:
(228) REHAB./RECONSTR. COST: ...
(229) CONSTRUCTION COST:
N
4 - Stable; action required to pro
2 - REHAB/RECONSTRUCTION
D - MINOR
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
(230) STRUCTURE HISTORY:
1982-MAJOR RECONSTRUCTION/SUPERSTRUCTURE.
(231) ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS:
(330) ADDITIONAL CONFIG. INFO.:
http:83�41'25.00 http:35�38'27.50
APPENDIX STRUCTURE NO. 5460 075P
PHOTOGRAPHS STRUCTURE NO. 5460 075P
FLOW
PHOTO #1 - LOOKING WEST TOWARD NPS ROUTE 433
PHOTO #2 - SOUTH (UPSTREAM) SIDE
PHOTO #3 - GENERAL TOPSIDE VIEW LOOKING EAST
PHOTO #4 - GENERAL UNDERSIDE VIEW LOOKING EAST
PHOTO #5 - TYPICAL ABRASION AND CHECKING OF TIMBER DECK,
NEAR WEST END SHOWN
PHOTO #6 - SPLINTERING OF DECK AT ISOLATED LOCATIONS, NEAR
WEST END SHOWN
PHOTO #7 - TYPICAL DECAY THROUGHOUT TOP OF RAIL POSTS,
SOUTH RAILING NEAR WEST END SHOWN
PHOTO #8 - GENERAL VIEW OF SOUTH TIMBER RAILING AT WEST
APPROACH; NOTE RAILING IS LOOSE
PHOTO #9 - COLLISION DAMAGE ON SOUTH RAILING AND CURB AT
WEST END
PHOTO #10 - ELASTOMERIC BEARING PADS ARE SLIDING OUT FROM
UNDER STEEL BEARING PLATES; ALSO NOTE BULGING AND CRACKING
OF PADS, SOUTHEAST BEARING SHOWN
PHOTO #11 - TYPICAL BULGING AND CRACKING OF ELASTOMERIC
BEARING PADS, NORTHEAST BEARING SHOWN
PHOTO #12 - GENERAL VIEW OF A588 WEATHERING STEEL BEAMS
PHOTO #13 - GENERAL VIEW OF WEST ABUTMENT; NOTE SCOUR WITH
EXPOSED FOOTING AND UNDERMINING
PHOTO #14 - SCOUR WITH UNDERMINING AT WEST ABUTMENT
FOOTING
STRUCTURE NO. 5460 075PPHOTOGRAPHS
PHOTO #15 - LARGE TREE ROOT COMING OUT OF NORTH WEEP HOLE
AT EAST ABUTMENT
PHOTO #16 - RANDOM CRACKING THROUGHOUT WEST APPROACH
PAVEMENT WITH POTHOLE AT NORTH SIDE
STRUCTURE NO. 5460 075PPHOTOGRAPHS
PHOTO #17 - VIEW FROM BRIDGE LOOKING UPSTREAM
PHOTO #18 - VIEW FROM BRIDGE LOOKING DOWNSTREAM
File details come from the government source that posted it.