Bridge_Inspection_Report_5460-021P_Laurel_Creek_Bridge__4.pdf
PDF 3 MB Posted
- Solicitation number
- 693C73-18-B-000011
About this file
Bridge Inspection Report_5460-021P_Laurel Creek Bridge #4
View the file
Other files
Show all 25
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
BRIDGE INSPECTION REPORT
LAUREL CREEK BRIDGE #4
LAUREL CREEK ROAD OVER LAUREL CREEK
GREAT SMOKY MOUNTAINS NATIONAL PARK
LN
STRUCTURE NO. 5460-021P
INSPECTION TYPE: ROUTINE
INSPECTION DATE: 5/11/14
Report prepared by: EU
Federal Highway Administration Federal Lands Bridge Office Bridge Inspection and Management Program 21400 Ridgetop Circle Sterling, Virginia 20166 http://www.efl.fhwa.dot.gov/FLHBO/BIP http://www.efl.fhwa.dot.gov/FLHBO/BIP
STRUCTURE SUMMARY STRUCTURE NO. 5460-021P
LAUREL CREEK BRIDGE #4 INSPECTION DATE: 5/11/14
BRIDGE IDENTIFICATION AND DESCRIPTION
MAIN SPAN MATERIAL: ....... CONCRETE NO. OF MAIN SPANS:
MAIN SPAN TYPE: ............... ARCH - DECK NO. OF APPR. SPANS:
# OF BEAMS, MAIN SPAN: .. 1 STRUCT. TOTAL LENGTH: .. 47.0 FT (14.3 M)
DECK TYPE: ......................... NOT APPLICABLE MAX. SPAN LENGTH: .......... 47.0 FT (14.3 M)
WEARING SURFACE: .......... NOT APPLICABLE DECK WIDTH: ...................... 33.7 FT (10.3 M)
ABUT. FOUNDATIONS: ........ SPREAD FTG ON BEARING MAT'L CURB TO CURB WIDTH: ..... 29.7 FT (9.1 M)
PIER FOUNDATION(S): ........ N/A YEAR BUILT:
ABUTMENT / PIER MAT'L: ... CONCRETE YEAR RECONSTRUCTED: .. N/A
PROJ./PLAN REF. NO: ......... 000000000000 / NONE SKEW ANGLE: ..................... 32 °
NPS ROAD CLASS: .............. 1 - PRINCIPAL PARK ROAD FRACTURE CRITICAL: ........ NO
STRUCTURE HISTORY: ...... 2006-ROADWAY RESURFACED.
LOCATION
GREAT SMOKY MOUNTAINS NATIONAL PARK MILE POINT: ..................... 3.65 (KM PT 5.87)
STATE: ................................. TENNESSEE LOCATION: 3.6 MI TO N.P.S. ROUTE 16
FACILITY CARRIED: ............ LAUREL CREEK ROAD
FEATURE INTERSECTED: .. LAUREL CREEK
STRUCTURE EVALUATION SUMMARY
This concrete arch structure is in good condition overall. Problems include scour at the northwest and southeast corners of the bridge and moderate to severe sloughing with several undermined trees along the upstream channel banks.
Corrective measures should be taken as outlined in this report to prevent the possible development of more serious or costly problems in the future.
INSPECTION TEAM: W. ROBIN, B. CARPER (GANNETT FLEMING).
CONDITION ASSESSMENT:
WIL ROBIN, P.E., FIELD TEAM LEADER
REPORT REVIEW :
MARCUS MILLER, P.E., SENIOR INSPECTION ENGINEER 703-404-6252
REPORT APPROVAL: DATE: 9/30/14
JORGOMAI CEESAY, PH.D., P.E., BIP SUPERVISORY ENGINEER 703-404-6244
RECOMMENDATIONS AND ESTIMATED COSTS STRUCTURE NO. 5460-021P
A (Critical) - Structure is closed, in imminent danger of collapse, or presents a critical safety hazard.
B (Major) - Structure is seriously deficient or presents a safety hazard, but can remain in service at reduced loads or with frequent inspections.
C (Moderate) - Structure is deficient, functionally obsolete, or requires substantial repairs to prevent a serious deficiency or unsafe condition.
D (Minor) - Structure is generally in good condition. Preventative maintenance may be required.
E (Special) - Structure is under construction or reconstruction.
D226 PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT
ITEM
NO.
MAINTENANCE RECOMMENDATIONS
(GENERALLY NOT FLHP ELIGIBLE)
QTY. UNIT COST
UNIT
ESTIMATE
COST
PRELIM.
58.6 REPOINT MASONRY JOINTS AS NEEDED. 50 LF
60.9 REPAIR SCOUR AT NORTHWEST AND SOUTHEAST CORNERS WITH ENGINEERED
RIPRAP.
5 CY
222.7 INSTALL TYPE 3 REFLECTIVE OBJECT MARKERS AT BRIDGE CORNERS. 4 EA
PRELIM. MAINTENANCE TOTAL :
ITEM
NO.
REHABILITATION/RECONSTRUCTION
(TYPICALLY NEEDED WITHIN 5 YEARS)
QTY. UNIT
UNIT
COST ESTIMATES
PRELIM. COST
REHAB. RECONSTR.
PRELIM. REHABILITATION/RECONSTRUCTION TOTAL :
COST ESTIMATE SUMMARY
PRELIM. MAINTENANCE TOTAL:
PRELIM. REHABILITATION TOTAL:
PRELIM. RECONSTRUCTION TOTAL: ..
TOTAL ITEMIZED COSTS:
PRELIMINARY ESTIMATE TOTAL* :
(*Includes typical contract costs for mobilization, traffic control, and design/construction engineering; but does not include detour bridges, work beyond the bridge limits, or work not listed above. Estimates are approximate and are for preliminary planning purposes only; they should not be used as a complete or final engineers estimate.)
REMARKS: Cost estimates assume that recommended actions will be combined with similar work being performed on other structures.
FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 5460-021P
CONDITION RATING CODES FOR ITEMS 58 - 62, 222, 223
N NOT APPLICABLE 3 SERIOUS CONDITION - loss of section, deterioration, spalling, or scour have seriously affected primary structural components. Local failures are possible.
9 EXCELLENT CONDITION Fatigue cracks in steel or shear cracks in concrete may be present.
8 VERY GOOD CONDITION - no problems noted. 2 CRITICAL CONDITION - advanced deterioration of primary structural elements. Fatigue cracks in steel or shear cracks in concrete may be present
7 GOOD CONDITION - some minor problems. or scour may have removed substructure support. Unless closely monitored it may be necessary to close the structure until corrective action can be taken.
6 SATISFACTORY CONDITION - structural elements show some minor deterioration. 1 “IMMINENT” FAILURE CONDITION - major deterioration or section loss present in critical structural components or obvious vertical or horizontal
5 FAIR CONDITION - all primary structural elements are sound but may have movement affecting structure stability. Structure is closed to traffic but minor section loss, cracking, spalling, or scour. corrective action may return structure to light service.
4 POOR CONDITION - advanced section loss, deterioration, spalling, or scour. 0 FAILED CONDITION - out of service; beyond corrective action.
CONDITION RATING CODE EQUIVALENTS FOR SUB-ELEMENTS
G = GOOD (CODES 7 - 9) F = FAIR (CODES 5 - 6) P = POOR (CODES 0 - 4)
58. DECK N ITEM REFERENCE AND REMARKS
N1. DECK SLAB
N2. EXPANSION JOINTS
G3. WEARING SURFACE
G4. RIDEABILITY
N5. CURBS, SIDEWALKS, AND MEDIAN
F6. PARAPETS AND/OR RAILINGS
G7. DRAINS AND DRAINAGE
N8. UTILITIES
N9. DEFLECTION AND/OR VIBRATION
N10. OTHER
59. SUPERSTRUCTURE 7
N1. BEARING DEVICES
N2. GIRDERS OR BEAMS
G3. ARCH(ES) OR SLAB(S)
N4. FLOOR BEAMS AND STRINGERS
N5. TRUSSES
N6. DIAPHRAGMS AND BRACING
N7. PAINT
G8. FASCIA(E)
G9. DEFLECTION AND/OR VIBRATION
G10. ALIGNMENT
N11. OTHER
60. SUBSTRUCTURE 7
58.3,4, 222.4 PAVEMENT IN GOOD CONDITION.
58.6 MINOR TO MODERATE DETERIORATION OF PARAPET MASONRY
MORTAR JOINTS WITH VEGETATION AND MOSS GROWTH.
SEVERAL AREAS APPEAR TO HAVE BEEN REPOINTED.
59.3,8 MINOR SPALL ON WEST SIDE OF ARCH UNDERSIDE. MINOR
CRACKING WITH LARGE AMOUNTS OF EFFLORESCENCE FLOWING
FROM JOINT BETWEEN STONE MASONRY FASCIA AND CONCRETE
ARCH, BOTH SIDES. MINOR LONGITUDINAL CRACKING WITH
EFFLORESCENCE ELSEWHERE. 12" DIAMETER DELAMINATED AREA
ON EAST SIDE OF ARCH. MINOR MAP CRACKING THROUGHOUT.
60.6 MODERATE DETERIORATION OF MASONRY MORTAR JOINTS; MINOR
EFFLORESCENCE AND VEGETATION GROWTH THROUGHOUT
JOINTS. MINOR VEGETATION AND VINE GROWTH ON EAST
WINGWALLS; MINOR TO MODERATE ON WEST.
60.6,9 MINOR EROSION ALONG NORTHWEST AND SOUTHEAST
WINGWALLS. EXPOSED FOUNDATION ALONG NORTH ABUTMENT.
60.9, 61.1 STREAM APPEARS TO HAVE SHIFTED TO MAKE SKEW OF BRIDGE
INEFFECTUAL. STREAM FLOWS AGAINST NORTHWEST AND
SOUTHEAST CORNERS, RESULTING IN UP TO 1.2' OF SCOUR AT
NORTHWEST AND UP TO 1.0' OF SCOUR AT SOUTHEAST CORNERS.
ABUTMENTS
BREASTWALLS OR COLUMNS1. G
PILE BENTS2. N
CAPS AND/OR BEARING SEATS3. N
BACKWALLS AND/OR BULKHEADS4. N
FOUNDATIONS5. G
WINGWALLS6. G
WEEP HOLES7. N
EXPANSION JOINTS8. N
EROSION AND/OR SCOUR9. F
SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION10. G
SLOPE PROTECTION11. N
OTHER 12. N
PIER(S)
WALLS AND/OR COLUMNS 13. N
PILE BENTS14. N
CAPS AND/OR BEARING SEATS15. N
FOUNDATIONS16. N
EROSION AND/OR SCOUR17. N
SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION18. N
OTHER 19. N
FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 5460-021P
ITEM REFERENCE AND REMARKS
STREAM BED COMPOSITION : 9.
AVERAGE CLEAR OPENING 8.
NORMAL VELOCITY 7.
ADEQUACY OF OPENING 6.
OTHER 5.
WATERWAY OBSTRUCTIONS 4.
CHANNEL PROTECTION3.
EROSION AND/OR SCOUR2.
ALIGNMENT1.
61. CHANNEL 6
F G N F N
MED
SUFF
7 FT.
61.2 MODERATE TO SEVERE SLOUGHING ALONG UPSTREAM CHANNEL
BANKS WITH SEVERAL TREES UNDERMINED.
61.4 FALLEN TREES IN CHANNEL APPROXIMATELY 60' UPSTREAM, AND
40' DOWNSTREAM, WITH MINOR TO MODERATE DEBRIS
ACCUMULATION.
STONES, SILT
222. APPROACHES 7
OTHER 9.
ALIGNMENT 8.
SIGNS7.
SETTLEMENT 6.
EROSION5.
SURFACING4.
APPROACH GUARDRAIL 3.
2. RELIEF JOINTS
APPROACH SLABS1. N
N N G G G N G N
223. RETAINING WALL N
OTHER 6.
SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION5.
EROSION AND/OR SCOUR4.
FOUNDATION3.
WEEP HOLES2.
1. WALL
36. TRAFFIC AND SAFETY FEATURES
APPROACH GUARDRAIL ENDSD.
APPROACH GUARDRAILSC.
TRANSITIONSB.
BRIDGE RAILINGSA. 1
N N N
TRAFFIC SAFETY RATING CODES
N
Does not meet standards or a safety feature is required and none is provided.
Meets currently acceptable standards.
Not applicable or a safety feature is not required.
STRUCTURE LOAD RATING STRUCTURE NO. 5460-021P
TRUCK TYPE
INVENTORY RATING (NORMAL TRAFFIC) OPERATING RATING (MAXIMUM LOAD)
TONS METRIC TONS TONS METRIC TONS
H 15 14 25 23
HS 20 18 33 30
TYPE 3 18 16 30 27
TYPE 3S2 28 25 47 43
TYPE 3-3 34 31 57 52
DESIGN LOADING: UNKNOWN (H15 ASSUMED - SEE REMARKS)
X CAPACITY MEETS OR EXCEEDS DESIGN LOAD
CAPACITY IS LESS THAN DESIGN LOAD
ORIGINAL LOAD RATING CALCULATION APPLICABLE
ORIGINAL LOAD RATING CALCULATION REVISED
DATE OF LOAD RATING CALCULATION:
LOAD RATING CONTROLLED BY:
REMARKS: DESIGN LOADING ASSUMPTION IS BASED ON STRUCTURE TYPE, LOCATION, AGE, AND CONDITION.
STRUCTURE INVENTORY AND APPRAISAL STRUCTURE NO. 5460-021P
STRUCTURE IDENTIFICATION
(201) PARK: GREAT SMOKY MOUNTAINS NATIONAL PARK
(202) STRUCTURE NAME: .......... LAUREL CREEK BRIDGE #4
(203) STRUCTURE KIND: ............ 1 - BRIDGE
(204) STRUCTURE NUMBER: ..... 5460-021P
(205) NPS REGION: .................... 4 - SOUTHEAST
(206) ROUTE CODE NUMBER: ... 15
(207) ROAD SECTION NO: .......... 021P
(208) NPS ROAD CLASS: ............ 1 - PRINCIPAL PARK ROAD
(209) WITHIN NPS BNDRY?: ....... YES
(210) OPERATING UNIT: ............. N. DIST.
(211) PROJECT NO(S):
(212) DRAWING NUMBERS: ....... NONE
(21) MAINTAINED BY: ................. 66 - NATIONAL PARK SERVICE
(22) OWNER: ............................... 66 - NATIONAL PARK SERVICE
(1) STATE:
(2) STATE HWY. AGENCY DIST:
(3) COUNTY CODE:
(4) CITY/PLACE CODE:
(5) INVENTORY ROUTE:
(6) FEATURES INTERSECTED:
(7) FACILITY CARRIED:
(8) STATE STRUCTURE NO:
(9) LOCATION:
(10) INV. RTE. - MIN. VERT. CLR: ..
(11) MILE POINT:
(27) YEAR BUILT:
(106) YEAR RECONSTRUCTED:
(20) TOLL:
(37) HISTORICAL DESIGNATION: ..
474 - TENNESSEE (TN)
155 - SEVIER
164000150
LAUREL CREEK
LAUREL CREEK ROAD
5460021P0000000
3.6 MI TO N.P.S. ROUTE 16
99.99 FT (99.99 M)
3.65 (KM PT 5.87)
N/A
3 - FREE ROAD
3 - POSSIBLY ELIGIBLE
STRUCTURE DESCRIPTION, FOUNDATION, AND DECK TYPE
(43A) MAIN STR. MATERIAL: ..
(43B) MAIN STR. TYPE:
(45) NO. OF MAIN SPANS:
(48) MAX. SPAN LENGTH:
(49) STRUCTURE LENGTH:
(216A) ABUTMENT #1 FDN:
(216B) ABUTMENT #2 FDN:
(217A) PREDOM. PIER FDN.: ..
(217B) SECOND. PIER FDN: ...
(107) DECK TYPE:
1 - CONCRETE
11 - ARCH - DECK
47.0 FT (14.3 M)
47.0 FT (14.3 M)
2 - SPREAD FTG ON BEARING MAT'L
2 - SPREAD FTG ON BEARING MAT'L
6 - N/A
6 - N/A
N - NOT APPLICABLE
(44A) APPR. STR. MATERIAL: ........ 0 - OTHER
(44B) APPR. STR. TYPE: ................ 00 - OTHER
(46) NO. OF APPROACH SPANS: .. 0
(108) WEAR SURFACE/PROTECT SYSTEM:
A) TYPE WEARING SURFACE: .. N - NOT APPLICABLE
B) TYPE MEMBRANE: ................. 0 - NONE
C) TYPE PROTECTION: .............. 0 - NONE
(218) IS SALT USED?: ..................... YES
LOAD RATING AND POSTING
(31) DESIGN LOAD: ................. 0 - UNKNOWN (41) LOAD RESTRICTION: ......... A - OPEN, NO RESTRICTION
(66) INVENTORY RATING: ...... 20.0 TONS (18.1 METRIC TONS) (70) BRIDGE POSTING: .............. 5 - NO POSTING REQUIRED
(64) OPERATING RATING: ...... 33.0 TONS (29.9 METRIC TONS)
INSPECTION DATES
(90) INSPECTION DATE: 5/14 (91) FREQ. OF INSP: 48 MONTHS (92 / 93) CRITICAL FEATURE INSPECTION (CFI):
(219) ADD. STUDIES NEEDED: N - 0 - NONE (A) FRACTURE CRITICAL: ... NO
INSP. EVERY: MONTHS - LAST INSP. : (220) SPECIAL STUDY TYPE: 0 - NONE
(B) UNDERWATER: .............. NO
(221) SPECIAL STUDY DATE: INSP. EVERY: MONTHS - LAST INSP. :
(C) SPECIAL INSPECTION: .. NO
INSP. EVERY: MONTHS - LAST INSP. :
STRUCTURE INVENTORY AND APPRAISAL STRUCTURE NO. 5460-021P
GEOMETRY, TRAFFIC, AND NAVIGATIONAL DATA
(16) LATITUDE: ............................. 35°37'38.60" (51) CURB TO CURB WIDTH: ........... 29.7 FT (9.1 M)
(17) LONGITUDE: ......................... 83°43'34.40" (52) DECK WIDTH: ............................ 33.7 FT (10.3 M)
(19) DETOUR LENGTH: ............... 50 MI (80 KM) (32) APPR. ROADWAY WIDTH: ........ 31.0 FT (9.4 M)
(28A) LANES ON STRUCT: .......... 02 (213) APPR. PAVEMENT WIDTH: ..... 20.0 FT (6.1 M)
(28B) LANES UNDER STRUCT: ... 00 LEFT SHOULDER: .................. 5.0 FT (1.5 M)
(42A) SERVICE ON: ..................... 1 - HIGHWAY RIGHT SHOULDER: ................ 6.0 FT (1.8 M)
(42B) SERVICE UNDER: .............. 5 - WATERWAY (33) BRIDGE MEDIAN: ....................... 0 - NO MEDIAN
(29) AVG. DAILY TRAFFIC: .......... 3060 (34) SKEW ANGLE: ............................ 32 °
(30) YEAR OF ADT: ...................... 2010 (35) DECK FLARE?: ........................... NO
(114) FUTURE ADT: ..................... 3366 (47) TOTAL HORIZ. CLEARANCE: .... 30.4 FT (9.3 M)
(115) YEAR OF FUTURE ADT: ..... 2030 (50) SIDEWALKS:
(101) PARALLEL STRUCTURE: ... N - NONE LEFT : ...................................... 0.0 FT (0.0 M)
(38) NAVIGATION CONTROL?: ... 0 RIGHT : ................................... 0.0 FT (0.0 M)
(39) VERTICAL CLEARANCE: ...... 0.0 FT (0.0 M) (214) BRIDGE RAIL TYPE:
(40) HORIZ. CLEARANCE: ........... 0.0 FT (0.0 M) RAIL CONFIGURATION: ......... 3 - PARAPET ONLY
(111) ABUT. OR PIER PROT: ....... MATERIAL: .............................. 9 - OTHER
DESIGN TYPE: ........................ 1 - CONTINUOUS RAIL
LATERAL UNDERCLEARANCE:
(55) RIGHT: ....................... 99.9 FT (99.9 M) (215) BRIDGE RAIL HEIGHT: ............ 2.25 FT (0.69 M)
(56) LEFT: ......................... 0.0 FT (0.0 M) (53) MIN. VRT. CLEAR. OVER DECK: 99.99 FT (99.99 M)
(54) MIN. VRT. UNDERCLEARANCE: 0.00 FT (0.00 M)
CONDITION AND APPRAISAL DATA, PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS, AND COST
(58) DECK: ................................. N
(59) SUPERSTRUCTURE:
(60) SUBSTRUCTURE:
(61) CHANNEL:
(62) CULVERT: ........................... N
(222) APPROACHES:
(223) RETAINING WALL: ........... N
(36) TRAFFIC SAFETY FEAT: ... 1NNN
(75A) TYPE OF WORK:
(75B) WORK DONE BY:
(76) IMPROVEMENT LENGTH: ..
(67) STRUCTURAL EVALUATION:
(68) DECK GEOMETRY:
(69) UNDERCLEARANCES:
(71) WATERWAY ADEQUACY:
(72) APPROACH ALIGNMENT:
(113) SCOUR CRITICAL:
(225) PURPOSE OF IMPROVEMENT:
(226) PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT:
(227) MAINTENANCE COST:
(228) REHAB./RECONSTR. COST: ...
(229) CONSTRUCTION COST:
N
4 - Stable; action required to pro
1 - MAINTENANCE
D - MINOR
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
(230) STRUCTURE HISTORY:
2006-ROADWAY RESURFACED.
(231) ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS:
(330) ADDITIONAL CONFIG. INFO.:
http:83�43'34.40 http:35�37'38.60
APPENDIX STRUCTURE NO. 5460-021P
PHOTOGRAPHS STRUCTURE NO. 5460-021P
PHOTO #1 - LOOKING SOUTH
FLOW
PHOTO #2 - WEST (DOWNSTREAM) SIDE
PHOTO #3 - GENERAL TOPSIDE VIEW LOOKING SOUTH
PHOTO #4 - GENERAL UNDERSIDE VIEW LOOKING EAST
PHOTO #5 - TYPICAL CONDITION OF MORTAR JOINTS, WEST PARAPET
SHOWN; NOTE VEGETATION GROWTH
PHOTO #6 - CRACKING WITH EFFLORESCENCE ON NORTH WALL
PHOTO #7 - MASONRY FOOTING AT NORTH WALL
PHOTO #8 - CRACKING WITH EFFLORESCENCE ON SOUTH WALL
PHOTO #9 - GENERAL VIEW OF SPALL ON WEST SIDE OF ARCH
UNDERSIDE
PHOTO #10 - SPALL ON WEST SIDE OF ARCH UNDERSIDE
PHOTO #11 - TYPICAL MAP CRACKING OF
ARCH UNDERSIDE
PHOTO #12 - TYPICAL EFFLORESCENCE
ALONG RING STONES, EAST SIDE SHOWN
PHOTO #13 - GENERAL VIEW OF SOUTHWEST WINGWALL; NOTE
VEGETATION GROWTH
PHOTO #14 - GENERAL VIEW OF SOUTHEAST WINGWALL; NOTE MOSS
GROWTH
PHOTO #15 - SCOUR AT NORTHWEST CORNER
PHOTO #16 - SCOUR AT SOUTHEAST CORNER
PHOTO #17 - SLOUGHING ALONG NORTH, UPSTREAM CHANNEL BANK;
NOTE UNDERMINED TREES
PHOTO #18 - SLOUGHING ALONG SOUTH, UPSTREAM CHANNEL BANK;
NOTE UNDERMINED AND LEANING TREES
PHOTO #19 - LOOKING UPSTREAM THROUGH STRUCTURE
PHOTO #20 - LOOKING DOWNSTREAM THROUGH STRUCTURE
File details come from the government source that posted it.