Bridge_Inspection_Report_5460-021P_Laurel_Creek_Bridge__4.pdf

PDF 3 MB Posted

Attached to
Smoky Mountains National Park Project NP-GRSM 15(2), 16(1)
Solicitation number
693C73-18-B-000011
Issued by

About this file

Bridge Inspection Report_5460-021P_Laurel Creek Bridge #4

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
Amendment_0001_-_NP-NATR_2A18,_2B7,_2C6,_2D12.pdf PDF
Results_of_Bid_Opening,_NP-GRSM_15(2),_16(1)_(1.9.18).pdf PDF
Bridge_Inspection_Report_5460-164P_Laurel_Culvert__4.pdf PDF
IFB_Solicitation-GRSM_15(2),16(1).pdf PDF
Bridge_Inspection_Report_5460-017P_West_Prong_Little_River_Bridge.pdf PDF
Bridge_Inspection_Report_5460-023P_Laurel_Culvert__1.pdf PDF
Bridge_Inspection_Report_5460-015P_Tremont_Junction.pdf PDF
Uniguide_Sign_Layout.pdf PDF
Bridge_Inspection_Report_5460-071P_Tremont_Road_Bridge__1.pdf PDF
NEPA_Document_CE.pdf PDF
Bridge_Inspection_Report_5460-016P_Bote_Mountain_Tunnel.pdf PDF
Bridge_Inspection_Report_5460-025P_Laurel_Culvert__3.pdf PDF
Plans-NP-GRSM_15(2)__16(1).pdf PDF
FP14_Eng.pdf PDF
VETS-4212.pdf PDF
Bridge_Inspection_Report_5460-014P_Wye_Bridge.pdf PDF
Bridge_Inspection_Report_5460-020P_Laurel_Creek_Bridge__3.pdf PDF
Bridge_Inspection_Report_5460-024P_Laurel_Culvert__2.pdf PDF
Bridge_Inspection_Report_5460-075P_GRSM_Institute_Bridge.pdf PDF
Bridge_Inspection_Report_5460-022P_Pinkroot_Branch_Bridge.pdf PDF
Bridge_Inspection_Report_5460-072P_Tremont_Road_Bridge__2.pdf PDF
Bridge_Inspection_Report_5460-019P_Laurel_Creek_Bridge__2.pdf PDF
Bridge_Inspection_Report_5460-018P_Laurel_Creek_Bridge__1.pdf PDF
ADV_Bidder's_Qualifications_Form.doc DOC document
Synopsis_-_GRSM_15(2)_16(1).pdf PDF
Show all 25

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

BRIDGE INSPECTION REPORT

LAUREL CREEK BRIDGE #4

LAUREL CREEK ROAD OVER LAUREL CREEK

GREAT SMOKY MOUNTAINS NATIONAL PARK

LN

STRUCTURE NO. 5460-021P

INSPECTION TYPE: ROUTINE

INSPECTION DATE: 5/11/14

Report prepared by: EU

Federal Highway Administration Federal Lands Bridge Office Bridge Inspection and Management Program 21400 Ridgetop Circle Sterling, Virginia 20166 http://www.efl.fhwa.dot.gov/FLHBO/BIP http://www.efl.fhwa.dot.gov/FLHBO/BIP

STRUCTURE SUMMARY STRUCTURE NO. 5460-021P

LAUREL CREEK BRIDGE #4 INSPECTION DATE: 5/11/14

BRIDGE IDENTIFICATION AND DESCRIPTION

MAIN SPAN MATERIAL: ....... CONCRETE NO. OF MAIN SPANS:

MAIN SPAN TYPE: ............... ARCH - DECK NO. OF APPR. SPANS:

# OF BEAMS, MAIN SPAN: .. 1 STRUCT. TOTAL LENGTH: .. 47.0 FT (14.3 M)

DECK TYPE: ......................... NOT APPLICABLE MAX. SPAN LENGTH: .......... 47.0 FT (14.3 M)

WEARING SURFACE: .......... NOT APPLICABLE DECK WIDTH: ...................... 33.7 FT (10.3 M)

ABUT. FOUNDATIONS: ........ SPREAD FTG ON BEARING MAT'L CURB TO CURB WIDTH: ..... 29.7 FT (9.1 M)

PIER FOUNDATION(S): ........ N/A YEAR BUILT:

ABUTMENT / PIER MAT'L: ... CONCRETE YEAR RECONSTRUCTED: .. N/A

PROJ./PLAN REF. NO: ......... 000000000000 / NONE SKEW ANGLE: ..................... 32 °

NPS ROAD CLASS: .............. 1 - PRINCIPAL PARK ROAD FRACTURE CRITICAL: ........ NO

STRUCTURE HISTORY: ...... 2006-ROADWAY RESURFACED.

LOCATION

GREAT SMOKY MOUNTAINS NATIONAL PARK MILE POINT: ..................... 3.65 (KM PT 5.87)

STATE: ................................. TENNESSEE LOCATION: 3.6 MI TO N.P.S. ROUTE 16

FACILITY CARRIED: ............ LAUREL CREEK ROAD

FEATURE INTERSECTED: .. LAUREL CREEK

STRUCTURE EVALUATION SUMMARY

This concrete arch structure is in good condition overall. Problems include scour at the northwest and southeast corners of the bridge and moderate to severe sloughing with several undermined trees along the upstream channel banks.

Corrective measures should be taken as outlined in this report to prevent the possible development of more serious or costly problems in the future.

INSPECTION TEAM: W. ROBIN, B. CARPER (GANNETT FLEMING).

CONDITION ASSESSMENT:

WIL ROBIN, P.E., FIELD TEAM LEADER

REPORT REVIEW :

MARCUS MILLER, P.E., SENIOR INSPECTION ENGINEER 703-404-6252

REPORT APPROVAL: DATE: 9/30/14

JORGOMAI CEESAY, PH.D., P.E., BIP SUPERVISORY ENGINEER 703-404-6244

RECOMMENDATIONS AND ESTIMATED COSTS STRUCTURE NO. 5460-021P

A (Critical) - Structure is closed, in imminent danger of collapse, or presents a critical safety hazard.

B (Major) - Structure is seriously deficient or presents a safety hazard, but can remain in service at reduced loads or with frequent inspections.

C (Moderate) - Structure is deficient, functionally obsolete, or requires substantial repairs to prevent a serious deficiency or unsafe condition.

D (Minor) - Structure is generally in good condition. Preventative maintenance may be required.

E (Special) - Structure is under construction or reconstruction.

D226 PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT

ITEM

NO.

MAINTENANCE RECOMMENDATIONS

(GENERALLY NOT FLHP ELIGIBLE)

QTY. UNIT COST

UNIT

ESTIMATE

COST

PRELIM.

58.6 REPOINT MASONRY JOINTS AS NEEDED. 50 LF

60.9 REPAIR SCOUR AT NORTHWEST AND SOUTHEAST CORNERS WITH ENGINEERED

RIPRAP.

5 CY

222.7 INSTALL TYPE 3 REFLECTIVE OBJECT MARKERS AT BRIDGE CORNERS. 4 EA

PRELIM. MAINTENANCE TOTAL :

ITEM

NO.

REHABILITATION/RECONSTRUCTION

(TYPICALLY NEEDED WITHIN 5 YEARS)

QTY. UNIT

UNIT

COST ESTIMATES

PRELIM. COST

REHAB. RECONSTR.

PRELIM. REHABILITATION/RECONSTRUCTION TOTAL :

COST ESTIMATE SUMMARY

PRELIM. MAINTENANCE TOTAL:

PRELIM. REHABILITATION TOTAL:

PRELIM. RECONSTRUCTION TOTAL: ..

TOTAL ITEMIZED COSTS:

PRELIMINARY ESTIMATE TOTAL* :

(*Includes typical contract costs for mobilization, traffic control, and design/construction engineering; but does not include detour bridges, work beyond the bridge limits, or work not listed above. Estimates are approximate and are for preliminary planning purposes only; they should not be used as a complete or final engineers estimate.)

REMARKS: Cost estimates assume that recommended actions will be combined with similar work being performed on other structures.

FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 5460-021P

CONDITION RATING CODES FOR ITEMS 58 - 62, 222, 223

N NOT APPLICABLE 3 SERIOUS CONDITION - loss of section, deterioration, spalling, or scour have seriously affected primary structural components. Local failures are possible.

9 EXCELLENT CONDITION Fatigue cracks in steel or shear cracks in concrete may be present.

8 VERY GOOD CONDITION - no problems noted. 2 CRITICAL CONDITION - advanced deterioration of primary structural elements. Fatigue cracks in steel or shear cracks in concrete may be present

7 GOOD CONDITION - some minor problems. or scour may have removed substructure support. Unless closely monitored it may be necessary to close the structure until corrective action can be taken.

6 SATISFACTORY CONDITION - structural elements show some minor deterioration. 1 “IMMINENT” FAILURE CONDITION - major deterioration or section loss present in critical structural components or obvious vertical or horizontal

5 FAIR CONDITION - all primary structural elements are sound but may have movement affecting structure stability. Structure is closed to traffic but minor section loss, cracking, spalling, or scour. corrective action may return structure to light service.

4 POOR CONDITION - advanced section loss, deterioration, spalling, or scour. 0 FAILED CONDITION - out of service; beyond corrective action.

CONDITION RATING CODE EQUIVALENTS FOR SUB-ELEMENTS

G = GOOD (CODES 7 - 9) F = FAIR (CODES 5 - 6) P = POOR (CODES 0 - 4)

58. DECK N ITEM REFERENCE AND REMARKS

N1. DECK SLAB

N2. EXPANSION JOINTS

G3. WEARING SURFACE

G4. RIDEABILITY

N5. CURBS, SIDEWALKS, AND MEDIAN

F6. PARAPETS AND/OR RAILINGS

G7. DRAINS AND DRAINAGE

N8. UTILITIES

N9. DEFLECTION AND/OR VIBRATION

N10. OTHER

59. SUPERSTRUCTURE 7

N1. BEARING DEVICES

N2. GIRDERS OR BEAMS

G3. ARCH(ES) OR SLAB(S)

N4. FLOOR BEAMS AND STRINGERS

N5. TRUSSES

N6. DIAPHRAGMS AND BRACING

N7. PAINT

G8. FASCIA(E)

G9. DEFLECTION AND/OR VIBRATION

G10. ALIGNMENT

N11. OTHER

60. SUBSTRUCTURE 7

58.3,4, 222.4 PAVEMENT IN GOOD CONDITION.

58.6 MINOR TO MODERATE DETERIORATION OF PARAPET MASONRY

MORTAR JOINTS WITH VEGETATION AND MOSS GROWTH.

SEVERAL AREAS APPEAR TO HAVE BEEN REPOINTED.

59.3,8 MINOR SPALL ON WEST SIDE OF ARCH UNDERSIDE. MINOR

CRACKING WITH LARGE AMOUNTS OF EFFLORESCENCE FLOWING

FROM JOINT BETWEEN STONE MASONRY FASCIA AND CONCRETE

ARCH, BOTH SIDES. MINOR LONGITUDINAL CRACKING WITH

EFFLORESCENCE ELSEWHERE. 12" DIAMETER DELAMINATED AREA

ON EAST SIDE OF ARCH. MINOR MAP CRACKING THROUGHOUT.

60.6 MODERATE DETERIORATION OF MASONRY MORTAR JOINTS; MINOR

EFFLORESCENCE AND VEGETATION GROWTH THROUGHOUT

JOINTS. MINOR VEGETATION AND VINE GROWTH ON EAST

WINGWALLS; MINOR TO MODERATE ON WEST.

60.6,9 MINOR EROSION ALONG NORTHWEST AND SOUTHEAST

WINGWALLS. EXPOSED FOUNDATION ALONG NORTH ABUTMENT.

60.9, 61.1 STREAM APPEARS TO HAVE SHIFTED TO MAKE SKEW OF BRIDGE

INEFFECTUAL. STREAM FLOWS AGAINST NORTHWEST AND

SOUTHEAST CORNERS, RESULTING IN UP TO 1.2' OF SCOUR AT

NORTHWEST AND UP TO 1.0' OF SCOUR AT SOUTHEAST CORNERS.

ABUTMENTS

BREASTWALLS OR COLUMNS1. G

PILE BENTS2. N

CAPS AND/OR BEARING SEATS3. N

BACKWALLS AND/OR BULKHEADS4. N

FOUNDATIONS5. G

WINGWALLS6. G

WEEP HOLES7. N

EXPANSION JOINTS8. N

EROSION AND/OR SCOUR9. F

SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION10. G

SLOPE PROTECTION11. N

OTHER 12. N

PIER(S)

WALLS AND/OR COLUMNS 13. N

PILE BENTS14. N

CAPS AND/OR BEARING SEATS15. N

FOUNDATIONS16. N

EROSION AND/OR SCOUR17. N

SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION18. N

OTHER 19. N

FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 5460-021P

ITEM REFERENCE AND REMARKS

STREAM BED COMPOSITION : 9.

AVERAGE CLEAR OPENING 8.

NORMAL VELOCITY 7.

ADEQUACY OF OPENING 6.

OTHER 5.

WATERWAY OBSTRUCTIONS 4.

CHANNEL PROTECTION3.

EROSION AND/OR SCOUR2.

ALIGNMENT1.

61. CHANNEL 6

F G N F N

MED

SUFF

7 FT.

61.2 MODERATE TO SEVERE SLOUGHING ALONG UPSTREAM CHANNEL

BANKS WITH SEVERAL TREES UNDERMINED.

61.4 FALLEN TREES IN CHANNEL APPROXIMATELY 60' UPSTREAM, AND

40' DOWNSTREAM, WITH MINOR TO MODERATE DEBRIS

ACCUMULATION.

STONES, SILT

222. APPROACHES 7

OTHER 9.

ALIGNMENT 8.

SIGNS7.

SETTLEMENT 6.

EROSION5.

SURFACING4.

APPROACH GUARDRAIL 3.

2. RELIEF JOINTS

APPROACH SLABS1. N

N N G G G N G N

223. RETAINING WALL N

OTHER 6.

SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION5.

EROSION AND/OR SCOUR4.

FOUNDATION3.

WEEP HOLES2.

1. WALL

36. TRAFFIC AND SAFETY FEATURES

APPROACH GUARDRAIL ENDSD.

APPROACH GUARDRAILSC.

TRANSITIONSB.

BRIDGE RAILINGSA. 1

N N N

TRAFFIC SAFETY RATING CODES

N

Does not meet standards or a safety feature is required and none is provided.

Meets currently acceptable standards.

Not applicable or a safety feature is not required.

STRUCTURE LOAD RATING STRUCTURE NO. 5460-021P

TRUCK TYPE

INVENTORY RATING (NORMAL TRAFFIC) OPERATING RATING (MAXIMUM LOAD)

TONS METRIC TONS TONS METRIC TONS

H 15 14 25 23

HS 20 18 33 30

TYPE 3 18 16 30 27

TYPE 3S2 28 25 47 43

TYPE 3-3 34 31 57 52

DESIGN LOADING: UNKNOWN (H15 ASSUMED - SEE REMARKS)

X CAPACITY MEETS OR EXCEEDS DESIGN LOAD

CAPACITY IS LESS THAN DESIGN LOAD

ORIGINAL LOAD RATING CALCULATION APPLICABLE

ORIGINAL LOAD RATING CALCULATION REVISED

DATE OF LOAD RATING CALCULATION:

LOAD RATING CONTROLLED BY:

REMARKS: DESIGN LOADING ASSUMPTION IS BASED ON STRUCTURE TYPE, LOCATION, AGE, AND CONDITION.

STRUCTURE INVENTORY AND APPRAISAL STRUCTURE NO. 5460-021P

STRUCTURE IDENTIFICATION

(201) PARK: GREAT SMOKY MOUNTAINS NATIONAL PARK

(202) STRUCTURE NAME: .......... LAUREL CREEK BRIDGE #4

(203) STRUCTURE KIND: ............ 1 - BRIDGE

(204) STRUCTURE NUMBER: ..... 5460-021P

(205) NPS REGION: .................... 4 - SOUTHEAST

(206) ROUTE CODE NUMBER: ... 15

(207) ROAD SECTION NO: .......... 021P

(208) NPS ROAD CLASS: ............ 1 - PRINCIPAL PARK ROAD

(209) WITHIN NPS BNDRY?: ....... YES

(210) OPERATING UNIT: ............. N. DIST.

(211) PROJECT NO(S):

(212) DRAWING NUMBERS: ....... NONE

(21) MAINTAINED BY: ................. 66 - NATIONAL PARK SERVICE

(22) OWNER: ............................... 66 - NATIONAL PARK SERVICE

(1) STATE:

(2) STATE HWY. AGENCY DIST:

(3) COUNTY CODE:

(4) CITY/PLACE CODE:

(5) INVENTORY ROUTE:

(6) FEATURES INTERSECTED:

(7) FACILITY CARRIED:

(8) STATE STRUCTURE NO:

(9) LOCATION:

(10) INV. RTE. - MIN. VERT. CLR: ..

(11) MILE POINT:

(27) YEAR BUILT:

(106) YEAR RECONSTRUCTED:

(20) TOLL:

(37) HISTORICAL DESIGNATION: ..

474 - TENNESSEE (TN)

155 - SEVIER

164000150

LAUREL CREEK

LAUREL CREEK ROAD

5460021P0000000

3.6 MI TO N.P.S. ROUTE 16

99.99 FT (99.99 M)

3.65 (KM PT 5.87)

N/A

3 - FREE ROAD

3 - POSSIBLY ELIGIBLE

STRUCTURE DESCRIPTION, FOUNDATION, AND DECK TYPE

(43A) MAIN STR. MATERIAL: ..

(43B) MAIN STR. TYPE:

(45) NO. OF MAIN SPANS:

(48) MAX. SPAN LENGTH:

(49) STRUCTURE LENGTH:

(216A) ABUTMENT #1 FDN:

(216B) ABUTMENT #2 FDN:

(217A) PREDOM. PIER FDN.: ..

(217B) SECOND. PIER FDN: ...

(107) DECK TYPE:

1 - CONCRETE

11 - ARCH - DECK

47.0 FT (14.3 M)

47.0 FT (14.3 M)

2 - SPREAD FTG ON BEARING MAT'L

2 - SPREAD FTG ON BEARING MAT'L

6 - N/A

6 - N/A

N - NOT APPLICABLE

(44A) APPR. STR. MATERIAL: ........ 0 - OTHER

(44B) APPR. STR. TYPE: ................ 00 - OTHER

(46) NO. OF APPROACH SPANS: .. 0

(108) WEAR SURFACE/PROTECT SYSTEM:

A) TYPE WEARING SURFACE: .. N - NOT APPLICABLE

B) TYPE MEMBRANE: ................. 0 - NONE

C) TYPE PROTECTION: .............. 0 - NONE

(218) IS SALT USED?: ..................... YES

LOAD RATING AND POSTING

(31) DESIGN LOAD: ................. 0 - UNKNOWN (41) LOAD RESTRICTION: ......... A - OPEN, NO RESTRICTION

(66) INVENTORY RATING: ...... 20.0 TONS (18.1 METRIC TONS) (70) BRIDGE POSTING: .............. 5 - NO POSTING REQUIRED

(64) OPERATING RATING: ...... 33.0 TONS (29.9 METRIC TONS)

INSPECTION DATES

(90) INSPECTION DATE: 5/14 (91) FREQ. OF INSP: 48 MONTHS (92 / 93) CRITICAL FEATURE INSPECTION (CFI):

(219) ADD. STUDIES NEEDED: N - 0 - NONE (A) FRACTURE CRITICAL: ... NO

INSP. EVERY: MONTHS - LAST INSP. : (220) SPECIAL STUDY TYPE: 0 - NONE

(B) UNDERWATER: .............. NO

(221) SPECIAL STUDY DATE: INSP. EVERY: MONTHS - LAST INSP. :

(C) SPECIAL INSPECTION: .. NO

INSP. EVERY: MONTHS - LAST INSP. :

STRUCTURE INVENTORY AND APPRAISAL STRUCTURE NO. 5460-021P

GEOMETRY, TRAFFIC, AND NAVIGATIONAL DATA

(16) LATITUDE: ............................. 35°37'38.60" (51) CURB TO CURB WIDTH: ........... 29.7 FT (9.1 M)

(17) LONGITUDE: ......................... 83°43'34.40" (52) DECK WIDTH: ............................ 33.7 FT (10.3 M)

(19) DETOUR LENGTH: ............... 50 MI (80 KM) (32) APPR. ROADWAY WIDTH: ........ 31.0 FT (9.4 M)

(28A) LANES ON STRUCT: .......... 02 (213) APPR. PAVEMENT WIDTH: ..... 20.0 FT (6.1 M)

(28B) LANES UNDER STRUCT: ... 00 LEFT SHOULDER: .................. 5.0 FT (1.5 M)

(42A) SERVICE ON: ..................... 1 - HIGHWAY RIGHT SHOULDER: ................ 6.0 FT (1.8 M)

(42B) SERVICE UNDER: .............. 5 - WATERWAY (33) BRIDGE MEDIAN: ....................... 0 - NO MEDIAN

(29) AVG. DAILY TRAFFIC: .......... 3060 (34) SKEW ANGLE: ............................ 32 °

(30) YEAR OF ADT: ...................... 2010 (35) DECK FLARE?: ........................... NO

(114) FUTURE ADT: ..................... 3366 (47) TOTAL HORIZ. CLEARANCE: .... 30.4 FT (9.3 M)

(115) YEAR OF FUTURE ADT: ..... 2030 (50) SIDEWALKS:

(101) PARALLEL STRUCTURE: ... N - NONE LEFT : ...................................... 0.0 FT (0.0 M)

(38) NAVIGATION CONTROL?: ... 0 RIGHT : ................................... 0.0 FT (0.0 M)

(39) VERTICAL CLEARANCE: ...... 0.0 FT (0.0 M) (214) BRIDGE RAIL TYPE:

(40) HORIZ. CLEARANCE: ........... 0.0 FT (0.0 M) RAIL CONFIGURATION: ......... 3 - PARAPET ONLY

(111) ABUT. OR PIER PROT: ....... MATERIAL: .............................. 9 - OTHER

DESIGN TYPE: ........................ 1 - CONTINUOUS RAIL

LATERAL UNDERCLEARANCE:

(55) RIGHT: ....................... 99.9 FT (99.9 M) (215) BRIDGE RAIL HEIGHT: ............ 2.25 FT (0.69 M)

(56) LEFT: ......................... 0.0 FT (0.0 M) (53) MIN. VRT. CLEAR. OVER DECK: 99.99 FT (99.99 M)

(54) MIN. VRT. UNDERCLEARANCE: 0.00 FT (0.00 M)

CONDITION AND APPRAISAL DATA, PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS, AND COST

(58) DECK: ................................. N

(59) SUPERSTRUCTURE:

(60) SUBSTRUCTURE:

(61) CHANNEL:

(62) CULVERT: ........................... N

(222) APPROACHES:

(223) RETAINING WALL: ........... N

(36) TRAFFIC SAFETY FEAT: ... 1NNN

(75A) TYPE OF WORK:

(75B) WORK DONE BY:

(76) IMPROVEMENT LENGTH: ..

(67) STRUCTURAL EVALUATION:

(68) DECK GEOMETRY:

(69) UNDERCLEARANCES:

(71) WATERWAY ADEQUACY:

(72) APPROACH ALIGNMENT:

(113) SCOUR CRITICAL:

(225) PURPOSE OF IMPROVEMENT:

(226) PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT:

(227) MAINTENANCE COST:

(228) REHAB./RECONSTR. COST: ...

(229) CONSTRUCTION COST:

N

4 - Stable; action required to pro

1 - MAINTENANCE

D - MINOR

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

(230) STRUCTURE HISTORY:

2006-ROADWAY RESURFACED.

(231) ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS:

(330) ADDITIONAL CONFIG. INFO.:

http:83�43'34.40 http:35�37'38.60

APPENDIX STRUCTURE NO. 5460-021P

PHOTOGRAPHS STRUCTURE NO. 5460-021P

PHOTO #1 - LOOKING SOUTH

FLOW

PHOTO #2 - WEST (DOWNSTREAM) SIDE

PHOTO #3 - GENERAL TOPSIDE VIEW LOOKING SOUTH

PHOTO #4 - GENERAL UNDERSIDE VIEW LOOKING EAST

PHOTO #5 - TYPICAL CONDITION OF MORTAR JOINTS, WEST PARAPET

SHOWN; NOTE VEGETATION GROWTH

PHOTO #6 - CRACKING WITH EFFLORESCENCE ON NORTH WALL

PHOTO #7 - MASONRY FOOTING AT NORTH WALL

PHOTO #8 - CRACKING WITH EFFLORESCENCE ON SOUTH WALL

PHOTO #9 - GENERAL VIEW OF SPALL ON WEST SIDE OF ARCH

UNDERSIDE

PHOTO #10 - SPALL ON WEST SIDE OF ARCH UNDERSIDE

PHOTO #11 - TYPICAL MAP CRACKING OF

ARCH UNDERSIDE

PHOTO #12 - TYPICAL EFFLORESCENCE

ALONG RING STONES, EAST SIDE SHOWN

PHOTO #13 - GENERAL VIEW OF SOUTHWEST WINGWALL; NOTE

VEGETATION GROWTH

PHOTO #14 - GENERAL VIEW OF SOUTHEAST WINGWALL; NOTE MOSS

GROWTH

PHOTO #15 - SCOUR AT NORTHWEST CORNER

PHOTO #16 - SCOUR AT SOUTHEAST CORNER

PHOTO #17 - SLOUGHING ALONG NORTH, UPSTREAM CHANNEL BANK;

NOTE UNDERMINED TREES

PHOTO #18 - SLOUGHING ALONG SOUTH, UPSTREAM CHANNEL BANK;

NOTE UNDERMINED AND LEANING TREES

PHOTO #19 - LOOKING UPSTREAM THROUGH STRUCTURE

PHOTO #20 - LOOKING DOWNSTREAM THROUGH STRUCTURE

File details come from the government source that posted it.