QandA_01-22-2026.pdf

PDF 109 KB Posted

Attached to
WA FLAP SKAMAN 92135(1), Wind River Road Slide Reconstruction
Solicitation number
69056725B000013
Issued by

About this file

This is a Questions and Answers document for Project No. WA FLAP SKAMAN 92135(1), Wind River Road Slide Reconstruction. The document does not address required products or services, pricing, response dates, or award information, but rather provides clarifications on technical and general contract specifications.

The four questions address specific construction and compliance issues: (1) approval to use Phase 2 Traffic Control Plan during pile installation with closure of northbound lanes, limited to 30 consecutive days, with a new Phase 1A configuration to be included in Amendment A001; (2) confirmation to follow FP-24 Section 403 for Type 1 Asphalt Concrete with distinction noted between Type 1 and Type 2 in Table 403-1; (3) clarification that no HUBZone small business price preference applies under FAR clause 52.219-4 as this is a Total Small Business set-aside; and (4) direction to follow Subsection 257.06(b) requiring MSE wall reinforcement with minimum length of 100% of total wall height, superseding conflicting recommendations from the Supplemental Geotechnical report. Answers were provided between January 12 and January 22, 2026.

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
Bid Tabulation_Wind River Road Slide Reconstruction.pdf PDF
BidSum_WA FLAP SKAMAN 92135(1).pdf PDF
QandA_01-29-2026.pdf PDF
Amendment A006.pdf PDF
QandA_01-28-2026.pdf PDF
QandA_01-27-2026-3.pdf PDF
Amendment A005.pdf PDF
Amendment A004.pdf PDF
QandA_01-27-2026-2.pdf PDF
QandA_01-27-2026.pdf PDF
Amendment A004.pdf PDF
QandA_01-26-2026.pdf PDF
Amendment A003.pdf PDF
QandA_01-23-2026.pdf PDF
Amendment A002.pdf PDF
Interested Vendors list.pdf PDF
QandA_01-14-2026.pdf PDF
Amendment A001.pdf PDF
QandA_01-12-2026.pdf PDF
waa-skaman92135-1_XYZ_final.pdf PDF
waa-skaman92135-1_Project-Name-Change.pdf PDF
GM 16-24 Prelim Geotech Memo WA FLAP SKAMAN 92135-1.pdf PDF
waa-skaman92135-1_WindRiverRoad_SupplementalGeotechReport.pdf PDF
waa-skaman92135-1_construction-limits.pdf PDF
IFB 69056725B000013.pdf PDF
waa-skaman92135-1_xs.pdf PDF
waa-skaman92135-1_clearing_limits.pdf PDF
waa-skaman92135-1_Earthwork.pdf PDF
waa-skaman92135-1_construction-staking-notes.pdf PDF
waa-skaman92135-1_plan_IFB.pdf PDF
waa-skaman92135-1_Physical Data.zip ZIP file
waa-skaman92135-1_proposed-alignment.pdf PDF
waa-skaman92135-1_XYZ_base.pdf PDF
WFLHD Construction Contract Administration.pdf PDF
Show all 34

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

Project No. WA FLAP SKAMAN 92135(1) Project Wind River Road Slide Reconstruction

# General Technical Question Answer Date

1 x

There is not enough horizontal room for 2 way traffic and the drill crane to install the soldier piles. The drill crane requires 25 feet from back of pile hole to the counterbalance of the machine and then an estimated 2 feet for a jersey barrier to be place between machine and traffic. Please see attached drawing. Can the contractor use Phase 2 Traffic Control Plan, Sheet 1 of 2, during the installation of the piles?

Yes, the detour and closure of both northbound lanes can be used during pile installation in Phase 1. Use of the detour during Phase 1 will be limited to 30 consecutive days. An updated plan sheets show a new Phase 1A which includes this configuration will be added in Amendment A001.

1/12/26

2 x We wanted to get some clarification on the HMA spec. Are we to assume that we need to follow FP-14 Section 403 for Type 1?

Follow FP-24 Section 403 for Type 1 Asphalt Concrete. There is a distinction between Type 1 and Type 2 in Table 403-1.

1/14/26

3 x Is there a price preference for HUBZone small business under FAR clause 52.219-4?

No. This is a Total Small Business set-aside per the solicitation document, and no price preference applies for HUBZone concerns.

1/22/26

4 x

Plan sheet H.5 typical MSE wall section declares minimum Grid Length “L” to be 8’ or 70% of H, which ever is greater. Supplemental Geotechnical report, WSP USA Inc 5/23/25, design recommendations for MSE wall (5.2.3) declares “Therefore, WSP recommends that the reinforcement should extend at least 1H feet from the connection pint at the wall facing or 8 feet, whichever is greater.” Which recommendation should be followed?

Follow Subsection 257.06(b), which calls for reinforcement with minimum length of 100% of the total wall height.

1/22/2026

Check General or Technical

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .