6-WK2635-SEL - Attachment D - RFP Evaluation Scoresheet REVISED 12-2-2025.xlsx
XLSX spreadsheet 25 KB Posted
- Attached to
- RFP - Social Emotional Learning Curriculum K-12
- Solicitation number
- WK2635-SEL - Social Emotional Learning Curriculum K-12
- Issued by
- Salt Lake County, Salt Lake City, Utah
About this file
This is an RFP Evaluation Scoresheet for Solicitation #WK2635-SEL, issued by the Salt Lake City School District (SLCSD) to procure a social and emotional learning (SEL) curriculum for grades K-12. The curriculum will be available in both online and hard copy formats and is designed to support the District's Board of Education priority to promote students' social, emotional, and academic learning. The scoresheet establishes the evaluation framework and does not contain specific response dates, due dates, site visits, bidders' meetings, or award dates; these details are referenced in the primary RFP documentation.
The evaluation scoresheet allocates 1,000 total points across technical and price components, with technical evaluation representing 70 percent (700 points) and price evaluation representing 30 percent (300 points). Technical scoring is divided into four categories: Company Experience and Qualifications (10% of technical points), Approach to Scope of Work including five CASEL competencies, Specific Program Needs, and Other Content Requirements (79% of technical points), Value-Added Services (2% of technical points), and References (2% of technical points). A minimum threshold of 70 percent of technical points (490 points) is required for proposals to advance to price evaluation. The cost formula awards full points to the lowest-priced proposal, with other offerors receiving proportional points based on their price relative to the lowest bid; proposals exceeding 200 percent of the lowest price receive no cost points. Individual evaluation criteria are scored on a 0-5 scale, with four mandatory pass/fail requirements addressing student data privacy compliance, interview availability, delivery timeline, and product samples.
View the file
Other files
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Sheet1
| ATTACHMENT D | ||
| SOCIAL EMOTIONAL LEARNING CURRICULUM | ||
| SOLICITATION # WK2635-SEL | ||
| RFP EVALUATION SCORESHEET | ||
| DRAFT: This document is intended to be a draft and should not be returned to the Purchasing Department. Please return this document to the evaluation committee chairperson | ||
| This document is not subject to GRAMA pursuant to Utah Administrative Code R33-7-702(2). | ||
| Score will be assigned as follows: | ||
| 0 = The evaluation committee member could not find a response to this evaluation criteria in the submitted proposal response. | ||
| Firm Name: | ||
| 1 = The proposal response to this evaluation criteria confused the evaluation committee member. | ||
| Evaluator: | ||
| 2 = The proposal response to this evaluation criteria is identified as unsatisfactory because it lacks details or solutions the evaluation committee member believes are necessary. | ||
| Date: | ||
| 3 = The proposal response to this evaluation criteria is identified as being satisfactory, but, if applicable, lacks details or solutions offered by other offerors, as determined valuable by the evaluation committee member. |
4 = The proposal response to this evaluation criteria exceeds the expectations of the evaluation committee, but, if applicable, lacked details or solutions offered by the proposal that received a 5.
5 = The proposal response to this evaluation criteria is identified as the best by the evaluation committee member.
| Minimum Mandatory Requirements | RFP Section | Evaluation (Pass/Fail) | |
| 1 | Compliance to the District Student Data Privacy Terms and Conditions | 2.2 | |
| 2 | Availability for Interviews/Presentation | 2.2 | |
| 3 | Delivery Timeline | 2.2 | |
| 4 | Product Samples | 2.2 |
| Scoreable Technical Criteria | RFP Section | Evaluator Score (0-5) | Criteria Weight | % of Tech Criteria | Points Possible | Points | |||
| Earned | Notes* | ||||||||
| A | Company Experience and Qualification of Key Personnel | 2.3 | |||||||
| 1 | - Qualifications and history of company | 2.3 | 7 | 5.0% | 35 | 0 | |||
| 2 | - Qualifications of key personnel assigned to SLCSD | 2.3 | 3.5 | 2.5% | 18 | 0 | |||
| 3 | - Subcontractors Qualifications and Experence assigned to SLCSD | 2.3 | 3.5 | 2.5% | 18 | 0 | |||
| B | Approach to Scope of Work and Requirements | 2.3 | |||||||
| 1 | Core CASEL Competencies | 2.3 | |||||||
| 1i | - Self Awareness | 2.3 | 8.4 | 6.0% | 42 | 0 | |||
| 1ii | - Self Management | 2.3 | 8.4 | 6.0% | 42 | 0 | |||
| 1iii | - Social Awareness | 2.3 | 8.4 | 6.0% | 42 | 0 | |||
| 1iv | - Relationship Skills | 2.3 | 8.4 | 6.0% | 42 | 0 | |||
| 1v | - Responsible Decision Making | 2.3 | 8.4 | 6.0% | 42 | 0 | |||
| 2 | Specific Program Needs | 2.3 | 7 | 5.0% | 35 | 0 | |||
| a | Describe Solution with Specific Program Needs | 2.3 | 7 | 5.0% | 35 | 0 | |||
| 3 | Other Content Requirements | 2.3 | 32.2 | 23.0% | 161 | 0 | |||
| a | Describe Solution with Other Content Requirements | 2.3 | 32.2 | 23.0% | 161 | 0 | |||
| C | Value-Added Services | 2.3 | 2.8 | 2.0% | 14 | 0 | |||
| D | References | 2.3 | 2.8 | 2.0% | 14 | 0 | |||
| % | 100% | 700 | 0 |
| Required Technical Point Threshold | RFP Section | Min Percent | Min Points Required | Points Earned | Percent Earned | Evaluation |
| 4.2 | 70% | 490.0 | 0.0 | 0% |
| Price Proposal Evaluation | RFP Section | Low Cost Option | Offered Cost | Percent of Total | Points Possible | Points Earned | |
| 3.1 | 30% | 300 | 0.0 | ||||
| * Purchasing will use the following cost formula: The points assigned to each offerors cost proposal will be based on the lowest proposal price. The offeror with the lowest Proposed Price will receive 100% of the price points. All other offerors will receive a portion of the total cost points based on what percentage higher their Proposed Price is than the Lowest Proposed Price. An offeror whose Proposed Price is more than double (200%) the Lowest Proposed Price will receive no points. The formula to compute the points is: Cost Points x (2- Proposed Price/Lowest Proposed Price). | |||||||
| Total Evaluation Points | Percent of Total | Points Possible | Points Earned | ||||
| Total Technical Evaluation Points | 70% | 700 | 0 | ||||
| Total Price Evaluation Points | 30% | 300 | 0 | ||||
| Total Evaluation Points | 100% | 1,000 | 0 |
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .