5-WK2635-SEL - Attachment D - RFP Evaluation Scoresheet.xlsx
XLSX spreadsheet 24 KB Posted
- Attached to
- RFP - Social Emotional Learning Curriculum 9-12
- Solicitation number
- WK2635-SEL - Social Emotional Learning Curriculum 9-12
- Issued by
- Salt Lake County, Salt Lake City, Utah
About this file
This is an RFP Evaluation Scoresheet for the Salt Lake City School District (SLCSD) solicitation WK2635-SEL, which seeks a vendor to provide a social and emotional learning (SEL) curriculum for high school students (grades 9-12) in both online and hard copy formats. The curriculum is intended to support the District's Board of Education priority to promote students' social, emotional, and academic learning. The evaluation scoresheet establishes the framework for assessing vendor proposals against defined technical and pricing criteria.
The evaluation structure allocates 70 percent of total points (700 points) to technical criteria and 30 percent (300 points) to price proposal evaluation. Technical scoring is divided among several categories: Company Experience and Qualifications (10 percent), Approach to Scope of Work including the five CASEL core competencies—Self Awareness, Self Management, Social Awareness, Relationship Skills, and Responsible Decision Making—along with Program Needs and Content Requirements (30 percent), Engaging and Relevant Videos for High School Students (23 percent), Clear and Easy Teacher Implementation (23 percent), Value-Added Services (2 percent), and References (2 percent). Proposals must achieve a minimum threshold of 70 percent of technical points (490 points) to be considered for price evaluation. The cost evaluation formula awards full price points to the lowest-priced proposal, with other proposals receiving points proportionally based on their price relative to the lowest bid; proposals exceeding double the lowest price receive no cost points. Four mandatory pass/fail requirements address District Student Data Privacy compliance, availability for interviews and presentations, delivery timeline, and product samples.
View the file
Other files
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Sheet1
| ATTACHMENT D | ||
| SOCIAL EMOTIONAL LEARNING CURRICULUM | ||
| SOLICITATION # WK2635-SEL | ||
| RFP EVALUATION SCORESHEET | ||
| DRAFT: This document is intended to be a draft and should not be returned to the Purchasing Department. Please return this document to the evaluation committee chairperson | ||
| This document is not subject to GRAMA pursuant to Utah Administrative Code R33-7-702(2). | ||
| Score will be assigned as follows: | ||
| 0 = The evaluation committee member could not find a response to this evaluation criteria in the submitted proposal response. | ||
| Firm Name: | ||
| 1 = The proposal response to this evaluation criteria confused the evaluation committee member. | ||
| Evaluator: | ||
| 2 = The proposal response to this evaluation criteria is identified as unsatisfactory because it lacks details or solutions the evaluation committee member believes are necessary. | ||
| Date: | ||
| 3 = The proposal response to this evaluation criteria is identified as being satisfactory, but, if applicable, lacks details or solutions offered by other offerors, as determined valuable by the evaluation committee member. |
4 = The proposal response to this evaluation criteria exceeds the expectations of the evaluation committee, but, if applicable, lacked details or solutions offered by the proposal that received a 5.
5 = The proposal response to this evaluation criteria is identified as the best by the evaluation committee member.
| Minimum Mandatory Requirements | RFP Section | Evaluation (Pass/Fail) | |
| 1 | Compliance to the District Student Data Privacy Terms and Conditions | 2.2 | |
| 2 | Availability for Interviews/Presentation | 2.2 | |
| 3 | Delivery Timeline | 2.2 | |
| 4 | Product Samples | 2.2 |
| Scoreable Technical Criteria | RFP Section | Evaluator Score (0-5) | Criteria Weight | % of Tech Criteria | Points Possible | Points | |||
| Earned | Notes* | ||||||||
| A | Company Experience and Qualification of Key Personnel | 2.3 | |||||||
| 1 | - Qualifications and history of company | 2.3 | 7 | 5.0% | 35 | 0 | |||
| 2 &3 | - Qualifications of key personnel assigned to SLCSD | 2.3 | 7 | 5.0% | 35 | 0 | |||
| B | Approach to Scope of Work and Requirements | 2.3 | |||||||
| 1 | Core CASEL Competencies | 2.3 | |||||||
| 1i | - Self Awareness | 2.3 | 8.4 | 6.0% | 42 | 0 | |||
| 1ii | - Self Management | 2.3 | 8.4 | 6.0% | 42 | 0 | |||
| 1iii | - Social Awareness | 2.3 | 8.4 | 6.0% | 42 | 0 | |||
| 1iv | - Relationship Skills | 2.3 | 8.4 | 6.0% | 42 | 0 | |||
| 1v | - Responsible Decision Making | 2.3 | 8.4 | 6.0% | 42 | 0 | |||
| 2 | Specific Program Needs | 2.3 | 7 | 5.0% | 35 | 0 | |||
| 3 | Other Content Requirements | 2.3 | 7 | 5.0% | 35 | 0 | |||
| 4 | Engaging and Relevant Videos that Connect with High School Students. | 2.3 | 32.2 | 23.0% | 161 | 0 | |||
| 5 | Clear and Easy Teacher Implementation | 2.3 | 32.2 | 23.0% | 161 | 0 | |||
| C | Value-Added Services | 2.3 | 2.8 | 2.0% | 14 | 0 | |||
| D | References | 2.3 | 2.8 | 2.0% | 14 | 0 | |||
| % | 100% | 700 | 0 |
| Required Technical Point Threshold | RFP Section | Min Percent | Min Points Required | Points Earned | Percent Earned | Evaluation |
| 4.2 | 70% | 490.0 | 0.0 | 0% |
| Price Proposal Evaluation | RFP Section | Low Cost Option | Offered Cost | Percent of Total | Points Possible | Points Earned | |
| 3.1 | 30% | 300 | 0.0 | ||||
| * Purchasing will use the following cost formula: The points assigned to each offerors cost proposal will be based on the lowest proposal price. The offeror with the lowest Proposed Price will receive 100% of the price points. All other offerors will receive a portion of the total cost points based on what percentage higher their Proposed Price is than the Lowest Proposed Price. An offeror whose Proposed Price is more than double (200%) the Lowest Proposed Price will receive no points. The formula to compute the points is: Cost Points x (2- Proposed Price/Lowest Proposed Price). | |||||||
| Total Evaluation Points | Percent of Total | Points Possible | Points Earned | ||||
| Total Technical Evaluation Points | 70% | 700 | 0 | ||||
| Total Price Evaluation Points | 30% | 300 | 0 | ||||
| Total Evaluation Points | 100% | 1,000 | 0 |
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .