6-Evaluation Score Sheet.pdf
PDF 111 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- USBE-MI27052-RFP
- Issued by
- Salt Lake County, Salt Lake City, Utah
About this file
This is an Evaluation Score Sheet for the Utah State Board of Education (USBE) Request for Proposals for Utah Professional Practices Advisory Committee (UPPAC) Investigators (Solicitation # USBE-MI27052-RFP). The RFP seeks to contract with qualified external, independent investigators to serve on a rotating or random basis as hearings are required. USBE anticipates either a single contract award or multiple contract awards to responsive and responsible offerors. The scoresheet indicates that this is a repost solicitation, as USBE has existing contracts for these services but is seeking additional qualified investigators due to increasing demand. Current contractors may submit proposals again if they wish to have additional individuals considered for the contract.
The evaluation scoresheet establishes a technical scoring methodology with four primary criteria weighted as follows: Criterion 1 (10 points, 40% weight), Criterion 2 (7 points, 28% weight), Criterion 3 (5 points, 20% weight), and Criterion 4 (3 points, 12% weight), totaling 250 possible points. Evaluators assign scores from 0–10 based on whether proposed solutions fail to meet requirements (0), satisfactorily meet requirements (5), or measurably exceed requirements (10). A minimum threshold of 75 percent (187.5 points) is required for evaluation approval. Mandatory minimum requirements include agreement to a flat rate cost structure, disclosure of potential conflicts of interest, educational law experience, a writing sample demonstrating understanding of educators facing UPPAC discipline, and investigator experience with protection of student-level data.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 3-PII+Questionnaire (1).xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| 2-GRAMA-business-confidentiality.pdf | ||
| 5-Att. A - USBE Standard TsCs for Goods and Services (rev. 8-2026).docx | DOCX document | |
| 1-Changing+Your+Time+Zone.pptx | PPTX presentation | |
| 8-SCOPE OF WORK.pdf | ||
| 9-RFP Prerequisites Document.pdf | ||
| 4-USBE Contractor COI Form.pdf | ||
| 7-Technical Evaluation Criteria.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Scores will be assigned from 0-10 as follows:
RFP
Section
Evaluation (Pass/Fail)
RFP
Section
Evaluator Score (0-10)
Criteria Weight
% of Tech Criteria
Points Possible Points Earned
1 10 40.0% 100.0 0.0 2 7 28.0% 70.0 0.0 3 5 20.0% 50.0 0.0 4 3 12.0% 30.0 0.0
100.0% 250.0 0.0
Min Percent Min Points Required
Points Earned Percent Earned
Evaluation
75% 187.5 0.0 0.0% Fail
Percent of Total
Points Possible
Points Possible
Points Earned
Minimum Percent
Required
Minimum Points
Required
Evaluation Result
100% 250.0 0.0 75% 187.5 FAIL
100% 250.0 0.0 75% 187.5 FAIL
Writing sample Does not represent educators facing UPPAC discipline
Protect student-level data
Investigator Experience
UTAH PROFESSIONAL PRACTICES ADVISORY COMMITTEE (UPPAC) INVESTIGATORS REPOST
RFP EVALUATION SCORESHEET
Firm Name:
Evaluator:
Date:
0 = the proposed solution does not meet requirements and expectations as described in the request for proposal.
5 = the proposed solution satisfactorily meets requirements and expectations as described in the request for proposal.
10 = the proposed solution measurably exceeds requirements and expectations as described in the request for proposal.
Total Evaluation Points Total Technical Evaluation Points
Total Evaluation Points
Mandatory Minimum Requirements
SOLICITATION # USBE-MI27052-RFP
Scoreable Technical Criteria
NOTE: The requirements and criteria listed in this RFP score sheet may be abbreviated headings. Offerors should refer to the corresponding RFP section for a complete description of criteria.
Required Score Threshold
Agreement to flat rate cost
Potential Conflicts of Interest
Educational Law Experience Writing Sample
Scoresheet
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .