ExhQ_PPQ Ref Check_RLP 5WY0078 Buffalo.docx
DOCX document 47 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- 5WY0078
About this file
This is a Past Performance Reference Check form for RLP 5WY0078, a General Services Administration (GSA) lease solicitation for office, warehouse, and secured wareyard space in Buffalo, Wyoming. The form is a template designed to collect reference information from previous clients or project stakeholders regarding the performance of individuals or firms responding to the solicitation. It requests detailed information about the reference provider's organization, the evaluated individual's role on a specific project, project delivery method, and project duration.
The form employs a comprehensive 0-10 rating scale across six performance categories: Quality of Building and Services (workmanship, materials, appearance, space efficiency, and flexibility); Services (commitment to project, project management methods, problem response); Cost Control (budget commitment and change order handling); Timeliness of Performance (schedule adherence and responsiveness); and Business Relations (team collaboration and problem resolution skills). Additional evaluation criteria include whether claims or mechanics liens were filed, willingness to contract with the individual again, and an overall performance score. Respondents provide narrative explanations for each rating to support their assessments. This template serves as a standardized evaluation mechanism for GSA to assess past performance of contractors or key personnel prior to making lease award decisions for the Buffalo facility, which requires a minimum of 16,018 square feet of office space, 6,242 square feet of warehouse/light industrial space, and at least 19,380 square feet of wareyard, with offers due January 8, 2027 and estimated occupancy in Fall 2028.
View the file
Other files
Show all 22
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
RLP Exhibit Q
Past Performance Reference Check General Services Administration Project 5WY0078 Buffalo, WY
I. The Reference provided below is provided as part of a response to RLP No. 5WY0078 on behalf of (INPUT OFFERING ENTITY NAME):
II. Thank you for your time in providing reference information regarding the performance of (INPUT THE NAME OF THE INDIVIDUAL EVALUATED)
Individual’s ROLE (Developer/AE/GC):
Project Name:
Project Address:
City and State:
Type of Project:
Square Footage:
III. Name of Company/ Government Agency Employing Reference:
IV. Name and Title of Individual Providing Reference Responses:
Phone Number: Email address: Current Address:
What delivery method was used to deliver this project (design build, design bid build, etc.)?
Does the information in II above accurately describe your project, and if not, please explain.
1. What was your role in the project?
2. What was the duration of the project?
3. Please describe the types of services the firm/person provided:
As applicable to the role he or she had on the team, please provide responses to the following questions using a scale of 0 to 10 with zero being the lowest rating and 10 being the highest rating.
9-10 Significantly Exceeded Expectations 7-8 Met and to Some Extent Exceeded Expectations 5-6 Met Expectations 3-4 Did Not Fully Meet Expectations 0-2 Failed to Meet Expectations
III. QUALITY OF BUILDING AND SERVICES
BUILDING
1. a. For the building, how satisfied were you with workmanship, quality of materials used and overall appearance? Circle one.
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
b. What could have improved your score?
2. a. For the interior spaces, how satisfied were you with the efficiency of the space and flexibility for future space changes?
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
b. What could have improved your score?
SERVICES
3. For the person named above, how satisfied were you with his or her commitment to the project?
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
b. What could have improved your score?
4. For the person named above, how satisfied were you with the quality of his or her project management methods and his or her response to unanticipated problems?
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
b. What could have improved your score?
IV. COST CONTROL
5. For the person named above, how satisfied were you with his or her commitment to the project budget?
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
b. What could have improved your score?
6. How satisfied were you with the handling and pricing of change orders?
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
b. What could have improved your score?
V. TIMELINESS OF PERFORMANCE
7. a. How satisfied were you with his or her ability to stay on schedule?
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
b. What could have improved your score?
8. a. How satisfied were you with his or her ability to respond to any of your questions and comments in a timely manner?
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
b. What could have improved your score?
VI. BUSINESS RELATIONS
9. a. For the person named above, how satisfied were you with his or her working relationship between the project team members?
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
b. What could have improved your score?
10. a. How satisfied were you with his or her problem resolution skills?
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
b. What could have improved your score?
11. Were any claims or mechanics liens filed in connection with this project? YES NO
If yes, please explain:
12. a. Would you contract with this person again? YES NO
b. What is your overall score for the person named above?
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
c. What could have improved your score?
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .