5442 BHWI Round 2 Attachment D Scoring Rubric Revised v1 with Addendum 1.pdf

Attachment D: Scoring Rubric (Revised v1 with Addendum 1) OHA RFGP 5442 under OregonBuys Bid Number S‐44300‐00004435

BHWI Clinical Supervision Expansion Program Round 2

Proposer Name:

Type of Organization:

Evaluator Name:

Date of Review:

Amount Requested:

Overall Score TOTAL: Cells this color are not required and for notes purposes only

Do you recommend this Proposer for an award?: Y/N/Partial On a scale of 1‐3 (1 = Top priority) what priority would you give this proposal?

Service Area(s) or County:

Evaluation Rubric Items Possible points Score Input Value What are the assets/strengths identified in Proposer’s response?

(Please describe)

Are there any concerns/weaknesses identified in Proposer’s response?

(Please describe)

If this Proposer is selected for an award, are there any recommended modifications to their Proposal you have?

(Please describe) Yes/No/

Unclear/Unknown Describe assets/strengths Describe concerns/weanesses Describe recommended modifications

Is funding requested being used for a new intitiative? (See Part 1, Q16)? If "no", then stop review process.

N/A

Does proposer currently meet insurance requirements and if not will they be able to obtain required insurance? If "no" to both (see Part I, Q18) then stop review process.

N/A

Has the organization experienced a loss of accreditation, loss of liability insurance, or had any fiscal audit findings resulting from an audit in the last 3 years (See Part II, Q4 of Information Sheet)? If "yes", indicate any concerns in this row and staff with team if necessary.

N/A

Does the proposal align within the funding guidelines of this solicitation? (See Budget Table) If "no" then stop review process.

N/A

Does the proposal increase supervision activities? If "no" then stop review process.

N/A

Proposer's partnerships with other community‐based organizations are appropriate for their proposal. If "no" then stop review process.

N/A

Population(s) served by Organization is in alignment with BHWI values and purpose. If "no" then stop review process.

N/A

Part II: Score Describe concerns/weaknesses Describe assets/strengths Describe recommended modifications Q1: Do the values and mission align with the mission of BHWi values and purpose?

1‐2‐3‐4‐5

Q2: The extent to which the proposal will address inequities and social determinants of health.

1‐2‐3‐4‐5

Q3: How the funding from this Grant will increase health equity outcomes in the culturally and/or linguistically specific communities your organization serves?

1‐2‐3‐4‐5

Part III: Score Describe concerns/weaknesses Describe assets/strengths Describe recommended modifications Q1: Program narrative is a clear and concise description of the program. Addressess how the program will address shortages in supervisory capacity and how funds will be used to advance health equity.

1‐2‐3‐4‐5

Q3: Organization identifies how frequent the program will evalaute project components, track objectives and monitor the impact/outcomes during the funding period.

1‐2‐3‐4‐5

Q4: Organization described how they will provide oversight of funds and fund expenditures.

1‐2‐3‐4‐5

Q5: Organization's plan for short and long‐term sustainability after funding has ended? Include any key partnerships that will aid in program sustainability.

1‐2‐3‐4‐5

OHA RFGP Number 5442 under OregonBuys Bid Number S‐44300‐00004435 for BHWI Clinical Supervision Expansion Program Round 2 Attachment D: Scoring Rubric (Revised v1 with Addendum 1)

Information form and background Ruleouts

Attachment A

Attachment D: Scoring Rubric (Revised v1 with Addendum 1) OHA RFGP 5442 under OregonBuys Bid Number S‐44300‐00004435

BHWI Clinical Supervision Expansion Program Round 2

Proposer Name:

Type of Organization:

Evaluator Name:

Date of Review:

Amount Requested:

Overall Score TOTAL: Cells this color are not required and for notes purposes only

Do you recommend this Proposer for an award?: Y/N/Partial On a scale of 1‐3 (1 = Top priority) what priority would you give this proposal?

Service Area(s) or County:

Evaluation Rubric Items Possible points Score Input Value What are the assets/strengths identified in Proposer’s response?

(Please describe)

Are there any concerns/weaknesses identified in Proposer’s response?

(Please describe)

If this Proposer is selected for an award, are there any recommended modifications to their Proposal you have?

(Please describe) Yes/No/

Unclear/Unknown Describe assets/strengths Describe concerns/weanesses Describe recommended modifications

OHA RFGP Number 5442 under OregonBuys Bid Number S‐44300‐00004435 for BHWI Clinical Supervision Expansion Program Round 2 Attachment D: Scoring Rubric (Revised v1 with Addendum 1)

Information form and background Ruleouts

Part IV: Buget Narrative Score 1‐5 Describe concerns/weaknesses Describe assets/strengths Describe recommended modifications Q1: Does the budget narrative describe the necessity, rationale and allocation of proposed costs?

1‐2‐3‐4‐5

Q2: Alignment of the budget narrative with the budget table (see Attachment B).

1‐2‐3‐4‐5

Q3: Budget narrative and propsoal are clearly aligned. 1‐2‐3‐4‐5 The budget is realistic considering area of need identified in proposal? Please, indicate any concerns in this row.

N/A

Score 1‐5 Describe concerns/weaknesses Describe assets/strengths Describe recommended modifications Are the goals reasonable and attainable? 1‐2‐3‐4‐5 Are the outcomes reasonable and attainable? 1‐2‐3‐4‐5 Programs outcomes are appropriate and clearly defined by measurable results

1‐2‐3‐4‐5

Organization ties outcomes to goals and objectives to build capacity for clinical supervision activites.

1‐2‐3‐4‐5

Score 1‐5 Describe concerns/weaknesses Describe assets/strengths Describe recommended modifications The extent to which the proposal will potentially expand access to behavioral health services.

1‐2‐3‐4‐5

The extent to which the proposal will potentially increase supervision activities. Consider sustainability.

1‐2‐3‐4‐5

Proposal potentially advances health equity within the organizations workforce.

1‐2‐3‐4‐5

The extent to which the proposal potentially increases culturally and linguistically specific services.

1‐2‐3‐4‐5

The extent to which the proposal potentially increases access in rural areas.

1‐2‐3‐4‐5

Proposal describes how the organization will potentially advance trauma informed care and anti‐racism within it's policies, programming and workforce.

1‐2‐3‐4‐5

Mission Alignment and Health Equity

Attachment C