5442 BHWI Round 2 Attachment D Scoring Rubric Final~4.pdf
PDF 99 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Clinical Supervision BHWI Expansion Round 2
- Solicitation number
- S-44300-00004435
- Issued by
- Marion County, Oregon
About this file
This document is an Attachment F: Scoring Rubric for the OHA RFGP 5442 under OregonBuys Bid Number S-44300-00004435 for the BHWI Clinical Supervision Expansion Program Round 2, which is a state and local contract opportunity involving the State of Oregon, Marion County, and the City of Salem. The scoring rubric outlines the evaluation criteria for proposals, including alignment with BHWI's values and purpose, addressing inequities and social determinants of health, increasing health equity outcomes, program narrative, oversight of funds, sustainability, and budget. The contract opportunity is seeking proposals to increase supervision activities and expand access to behavioral health services, with a focus on advancing health equity, trauma-informed care, and anti-racism within the organization's policies, programming, and workforce.
The scoring rubric provides a detailed evaluation process, with points assigned to various criteria. Proposers must meet all eligibility and proposal guidelines, and evaluators will make recommendations for awards and assign priority levels to the proposals. The contract opportunity is for a new initiative, and funding is provided through the grant program. Proposers must currently meet insurance requirements and have not experienced any recent losses of accreditation, liability insurance, or fiscal audit findings.
View the file
Other files
Show all 14
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Attachment F: Scoring Rubric OHA RFGP 5442 under OregonBuys Bid Number S-44300-00004435
BHWI Clinical Supervision Expansion Program Round 2
Proposer Name:
Type of Organization:
Evaluator Name:
Date of Review:
Amount Requested:
Overall TOTAL:
Application Meets all eligibility and proposal guidelines (check rows 14,15, and 16): Y/N
Do you recommend this Proposer for an award?:
Y/N/Partial
On a scale of 1-3 (1 = Top priority) what priority would you give this proposal?
Service Area(s) or County:
Evaluation Rubric Items Possible points
Is Proposer's Response in alignment with BHWI's Values and Purpose?
(Yes/No)
Score What are the assets/strengths identified in Proposer’s response?
(Please describe)
Are there any concerns/weaknesses identified in Proposer’s response?
(Please describe)
If this Proposer is selected for an award, are there any recommended modifications to their Proposal you have?
(Please describe)
Yes/No/ Unclear/Unknown Describe concerns/weaknesses Describe assists/ strengths Describe recommended modifications
Is funding requested being used for a new intitiative? (See Part 1, Q16)? If "no", then stop review process.
N/A
Does proposer currently meet insurance requirements and if not will they be able to obtain required insurance? If "no" to both (see Part I, Q18) then stop review process.
N/A
Has the organization experienced a loss of accreditation, loss of liability insurance, or had any fiscal audit findings resulting from an audit in the last 3 years (See Part II, Q4 of Information Sheet)? If "yes", indicate any concerns in this row and staff with team if necessary.
N/A
Does the proposal align within the funding guidelines of this solicitation? (See Budget Table) If "no" then stop review process.
N/A
Does the proposal increase supervision activities? If "no" then stop review process.
N/A
Proposer's partnerships with other community-based organizations are appropriate for their proposal. If "no" then stop review process.
N/A
Population(s) served by Organization is in alignment with BHWI values and purpose. If "no" then stop review process.
N/A
Part II: Yes/No Describe concerns/weaknesses Describe assets/strengths Describe recommended modifications Q1: Do the values and mission align with the mission of BHWi values and purpose?
1-2-3-4-5
Q2: The extent to which the proposal will address inequities and social determinants of health.
1-2-3-4-5
Q3: How the funding from this Grant will increase health equity outcomes in the culturally and/or linguistically specific communities your organization serves?
1-2-3-4-5
Part III:
Q1: Program narrative is a clear and concise description of the program. Addressess how the program will address shortages in supervisory capacity and how funds will be used to advance health equity.
1-2-3-4-5
Q3: Organization identifies how frequent the program will evalaute project components, track objectives and monitor the impact/outcomes during the funding period.
1-2-3-4-5
Q4: Organization described how they will provide oversight of funds and fund expenditures.
1-2-3-4-5
OHA RFGP Number 5442 under OregonBuys Bid Number S-44300-00004435 for BHWI Clinical Supervision Expansion Program Round 2 Attachment F: Scoring Rubric
Information form and background
Information Sheet
Attachment F: Scoring Rubric OHA RFGP 5442 under OregonBuys Bid Number S-44300-00004435
BHWI Clinical Supervision Expansion Program Round 2
Proposer Name:
Type of Organization:
Evaluator Name:
Date of Review:
Amount Requested:
Overall TOTAL:
Application Meets all eligibility and proposal guidelines (check rows 14,15, and 16): Y/N
Do you recommend this Proposer for an award?:
Y/N/Partial
On a scale of 1-3 (1 = Top priority) what priority would you give this proposal?
Service Area(s) or County:
Evaluation Rubric Items Possible points
Is Proposer's Response in alignment with BHWI's Values and Purpose?
(Yes/No)
Score What are the assets/strengths identified in Proposer’s response?
(Please describe)
Are there any concerns/weaknesses identified in Proposer’s response?
(Please describe)
If this Proposer is selected for an award, are there any recommended modifications to their Proposal you have?
(Please describe)
Yes/No/ Unclear/Unknown Describe concerns/weaknesses Describe assists/ strengths Describe recommended modifications
OHA RFGP Number 5442 under OregonBuys Bid Number S-44300-00004435 for BHWI Clinical Supervision Expansion Program Round 2 Attachment F: Scoring Rubric
Information form and background Q5: Organization's plan for short and long-term sustainability after funding has ended? Include any key partnerships that will aid in program sustainability.
1-2-3-4-5
Part IV: Buget Narrative Q1: Does the budget narrative describe the necessity, rationale and allocation of proposed costs?
1-2-3-4-5
Q2: Alignment of the budget narrative with the budget table. 1-2-3-4-5
Q3: Budget narrative and propsoal are clearly defined. 1-2-3-4-5 The budget is realistic considering area of need identified in proposal? Please, indicate any concerns in this row.
N/A
Yes/No Describe concerns/weaknesses Describe assets/strengths Describe recommended modifications Are the goals reasonable and attainable? 1-2-3-4-5 Are the outcomes reasonable and attainable? 1-2-3-4-5 Programs outcomes are appropriate and clearly defined by measurable results
1-2-3-4-5
Organization ties outcomes to goals and objectives to build capacity for clinical supervision activites.
1-2-3-4-5
Yes/No Describe concerns/weaknesses Describe assets/strengths Describe recommended modifications The extent to which the proposal will expand access to behavioral health services.
1-2-3-4-5
The extent to which the proposal will increase supervision activities. Consider sustainability.
1-2-3-4-5
Proposal advances health equity within the organizations workforce.
1-2-3-4-5
The extent to which the proposal increases culturally and linguistically specific services.
1-2-3-4-5
The extent to which the proposal increases access in rural areas. 1-2-3-4-5
Proposal describes how the organization will advance trauma informed care and anti-racism within it's policies, programming and workforce.
1-2-3-4-5
Outcomes
Mission Alignment and Health Equity
Review Sheet Proposer 1
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .