5-SLCI27013 Attachment 4 Score Sheet.xlsx

XLSX spreadsheet 30 KB Posted

Attached to
Salt Lake City Request for Proposals SLCI27013 - AI Enabled Non-Emergency Public Safety Call Handling and Assistive Solution
Solicitation number
SLCI27013
Issued by
Salt Lake County, Salt Lake City, Utah

About this file

This is an RFP evaluation score sheet for Salt Lake City Corporation's solicitation SLCI27013 for an AI-enabled non-emergency public safety call handling and assistive solution to be provided to the City's Emergency 911 Department. The evaluation framework establishes four mandatory compliance requirements that offerors must satisfy: adherence to City ethics requirements, successful provision of similar services to at least five different agencies or organizations, disclosure of any generative AI technology or systems being utilized, and certification that all operational activities and data storage will be physically located within the continental United States. The scoresheet indicates that proposals advancing beyond the mandatory requirements phase will be evaluated on six technical criteria: emergency detection and escalation safety (weighted at 30 percent), integration with existing systems (10 percent), AI functionality and accuracy (15 percent), analytics and reporting (10 percent), ease of administration (10 percent), and implementation and support (10 percent), with a total of 425 possible technical points available.

Offerors must achieve a minimum of 297.5 technical points (70 percent threshold) to qualify for the cost evaluation phase, though those achieving 318.75 points will advance to presentations. Cost evaluation comprises 30 percent of the total evaluation points, with the scoring methodology allocating full cost points to the lowest-priced proposal and proportional points to competing proposals based on their price differential relative to the lowest bid. The evaluation process culminates in a total possible score of 607.14 points, combining both technical (70 percent weighting) and cost (30 percent weighting) components to determine the contract award.

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
1-Confidential+and+Proprietary+Info+Declaration+Form.pdf PDF
2-SLCI27013 Attachment 1 - Sample Agreement.docx DOCX document
6-SLCI27013.docx DOCX document
3-SLCI27013 Attachment 2 -Scope of Work.docx DOCX document
4-SLCI27013 Attachment 3 Cost Sheet.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

Score Sheet

TITLE OF PROJECT: AI Enabled Non-Emergency Public Safety Call Handling and Assistive Solution
SOLICITATION # SLCI27013
RFP EVALUATION SCORESHEET
Score will be assigned as follows:
0 = Fail, the proposal fails to address the requirements or criteria described in the RFP or cannot be assessed du to missing information.
Firm Name:1 = Poor, the proposal inadequately addresses the requirements or criteria described in the RFP or cannot be assessed due to incomplete information.
2 = Unsatisfactory, the proposal addresses the requirements or criteria described in the RFP in an unsatisfactory manner.
Evaluator:3 = Satisfactory, the proposal addresses all requirements or criteria described in the RFP in a minimum satisfactory manner.
4 = Good, the proposal addresses all requirements or criteria described in the RFP and in some respects exceeds them.
Date:5 = Excellent, the proposal addresses and exceeds all of the requirements or criteria described in the RFP.
Minimum Mandatory RequirementsRFP SectionEvaluation (Pass/Fail)
1Compliance with the City Ethics RequirementSection V.a.i
2Offeror certifies that the proposed team has successfully provided services similar to those described in Attachment 2: Scope of Work for at least five (5) different agencies or organizations.Section V.a.ii
3Offeror shall indicate if Offeror and/or Offeror’s subcontractor(s) will be using or offering GenAI technology, model(s), service(s), or system(s)s, and provide details.Section V.a.iii
4Offeror certifies that all operational activities and data storage shall be physically located within the continental United StatesSection V.a.iv
Scoreable Technical CriteriaRFP SectionEvaluator Score (0-5)Criteria Weight% of Tech CriteriaPoints PossiblePoints
EarnedMinimum Required
1Emergency detection and escalation safetySection VII.b.13035.3%150.00.0
2Integration with existing systemsSection VII.b.21011.8%50.00.0
3AI functionality and accuracySection VII.b.31517.6%75.00.0
4Analytics and reportingSection VII.b.41011.8%50.00.0
5Ease of administrationSection VII.b.51011.8%50.00.0
6Implementation and supportSection VII.b.61011.8%50.00.0
Scorable Technical Criteria Total100.0%425.00.00.0
Possible PointsPoints Earned
Total Technical Points100.00%425.000.00
Required Technical Point ThresholdRFP SectionMin PercentMin Points RequiredPoints EarnedPercent EarnedEvaluation
70%297.50.00.0%

Presentations: Offerors that receive aminimum of 318.75 points will advance to the cost evaluation phase.

CostRFP SectionLow Cost OptionOffered CostPercent of TotalPoints PossiblePoints Earned
$0.00$0.0030%182.14ERROR:#DIV/0!
* Purchasing will use the following cost formula: The points assigned to each offerors cost proposal will be based on the lowest proposal price. The offeror with the lowest Proposed Price will receive 100% of the price points. All other offerors will receive a portion of the total cost points based on what percentage higher their Proposed Price is than the Lowest Proposed Price. The formula to compute the points is: Cost Points x (Lowest Proposed Price/Proposed Price).
Total Evaluation PointsPercent of TotalPoints PossiblePoints Earned
Total Technical Evaluation Points70%425.000.0
Total Cost Evaluation Points30%182.14ERROR:#DIV/0!
Total Evaluation Points100%607.14ERROR:#DIV/0!

image1.png

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .