5-SLCI26052 Attachment 4 - Score Sheet.xlsx

XLSX spreadsheet 76 KB Posted

Attached to
Salt Lake City Request for Proposals SLCI26052 Volunteer Management Software
Solicitation number
SLCI26052
Issued by
Salt Lake County, Salt Lake City, Utah

About this file

This is an RFP evaluation scoresheet for Solicitation SLCI26052, issued by Salt Lake City Corporation for the procurement of volunteer management software. The scoresheet serves as the standardized template for evaluating vendor proposals against defined criteria and weightings. The evaluation framework accommodates up to 20 potential offerors and includes assessment of mandatory requirements, technical criteria, policy criteria, and cost proposals. Mandatory requirements include compliance with the City's Ethics clause and Generative Artificial Intelligence usage policy. Technical criteria are weighted across four primary categories: Qualifications (30% weight, 150 points), Data Quality and Privacy (20% weight, 100 points), Technical Architecture and Security (20% weight, 100 points), and Implementation and Ongoing Technical Support (10% weight, 50 points), totaling 400 points. Additional policy criteria evaluation includes Sustainability, Business Certification, Apprenticeship, and Local Small Business considerations. Proposals must achieve a minimum threshold of 70 percent of technical points (280 of 400 points) to advance to cost evaluation.

The scoresheet employs a standardized five-point scoring scale ranging from 0 (Fail) to 5 (Excellent) for all evaluation criteria. Cost evaluation represents 20 percent of the total possible points (100 points), with the lowest-priced proposal receiving full cost points and all other proposals receiving proportional points based on the formula: Cost Points × (Lowest Proposed Price / Proposed Price). The total possible evaluation score is 500 points, comprising 400 technical points, policy criteria points, and 100 cost points. The evaluation process requires a minimum of five evaluators, with average scores calculated across all evaluator submissions for each criterion and offeror. The scoresheet format includes signature lines for up to five evaluators and specifies that offers failing to meet mandatory minimum requirements will not proceed to further evaluation stages.

View the file

Other files

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

Score Sheet

Volunteer Management Software
SOLICITATION # SLCI26052
RFP EVALUATION SCORESHEET
Score will be assigned as follows:
0 = Fail, the proposal fails to address the requirements or criteria described in the RFP or cannot be assessed du to missing information.
Firm Name:1 = Poor, the proposal inadequately addresses the requirements or criteria described in the RFP or cannot be assessed due to incomplete information.
2 = Unsatisfactory, the proposal addresses the requirements or criteria described in the RFP in an unsatisfactory manner.
Evaluator:3 = Satisfactory, the proposal addresses all requirements or criteria described in the RFP in a minimum satisfactory manner.
4 = Good, the proposal addresses all requirements or criteria described in the RFP and in some respects exceeds them.
Date:5 = Excellent, the proposal addresses and exceeds all of the requirements or criteria described in the RFP.
Minimum Mandatory RequirementsRFP SectionEvaluation (Pass/Fail)
1City Ethics Requirement. Offeror must accept the City's Ethics clause.RFP Doc. V.a.i
2Generatvie Artificial Intelligence if offered which complies with the City's Gen AI Usage Policy.RFP Doc. V.a.ii
Scoreable Technical CriteriaRFP SectionEvaluator Score (0-5)Criteria Weight% of Tech CriteriaPoints PossiblePoints
EarnedMinimum Required
1Qualifications - A statement of the firm’s experience and qualifications to meet the requirements of the City as outlined hereinRFP Document, V.b.a3037.5%150.00.0
2Data Quyality & PrivacyRFP Document, V.b.b2025.0%100.00.0
3Technical Architecture & SecurityRFP Document, V.b.c2025.0%100.00.0
4Implementation and ongoing techical supportRFP Document, V.b.d1012.5%50.00.0
Scorable Technical Criteria Total100.0%400.00.00.0
Possible PointsPoints Earned
Total Technical Points100.00%400.000.00
Required Technical Point ThresholdRFP SectionMin PercentMin Points RequiredPoints EarnedPercent EarnedEvaluation
70%280.00.00.0%
CostRFP SectionLow Cost OptionOffered CostPercent of TotalPoints PossiblePoints Earned
$0.00$0.0020%100.0ERROR:#DIV/0!
* Purchasing will use the following cost formula: The points assigned to each offerors cost proposal will be based on the lowest proposal price. The offeror with the lowest Proposed Price will receive 100% of the price points. All other offerors will receive a portion of the total cost points based on what percentage higher their Proposed Price is than the Lowest Proposed Price. The formula to compute the points is: Cost Points x (Lowest Proposed Price/Proposed Price).
Total Evaluation PointsPercent of TotalPoints PossiblePoints Earned
Total Technical Evaluation Points0%400.00.0
Total Cost Evaluation Points0%100.0ERROR:#DIV/0!
Total Evaluation Points0%500.0ERROR:#DIV/0!

Scoresheet Summary

TITLE OF PROJECT (to be inserted by the Division of Purchasing)
SOLICITATION # (to be inserted by the Division of Purchasing)
RFP EVALUATION SCORESHEET SUMMARY
Instructions:
Enter the solicitation number and name.
Enter each Offeror name.
Enter the Criteria name for each category.
Enter the Weight in column B that corresponds to the Criteria Weight on the Score Sheet tab column J for each criterion.
Enter the Total Possible Points for each Criterion, Cost Points, and Score Summary section.
Mandatory Minimum Requirements: Evaluate each offer and enter pass or fail
Ensure that the number of evaluator lines matches the number of evaluators.
Offers not meeting the Minimum Mandatory Requirements will not be evaluated further.
Ensure that the Total Average Score formula includes all of the evaluator line items.
Technical Scores: Enter each evaluator score for each offer.
Signatures:Date:
Evaluator 1__________________
Evaluator 2__________________
Evaluator 3__________________
Evaluator 4__________________
Evaluator 5__________________
Minimum Mandatory RequirementsOfferor AOfferor BOfferor COfferor DOfferor EOfferor FOfferor GOfferor HOfferor IOfferor JOfferor KOfferor LOfferor MOfferor NOfferor OOfferor POfferor QOfferor ROfferor SOfferor T
1
2
3
WeightTechnical ScoresOfferor AOfferor BOfferor COfferor DOfferor EOfferor FOfferor GOfferor HOfferor IOfferor JOfferor KOfferor LOfferor MOfferor NOfferor OOfferor POfferor QOfferor ROfferor SOfferor T
Criteria #1
Evaluator 1
Evaluator 2
Evaluator 3
Evaluator 4
Evaluator 5
Total Average Score0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0
Criteria #1 - Total Points (Total Possible Points = XX)0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0
Criteria #2
Evaluator 1
Evaluator 2
Evaluator 3
Evaluator 4
Evaluator 5
Total Average Score0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0
Criteria #2 - Total Points (Total Possible Points = XX)0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0
Criteria #3
Evaluator 1
Evaluator 2
Evaluator 3
Evaluator 4
Evaluator 5
Total Average Score0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0
Criteria #3 - Total Points (Total Possible Points = XX)0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0
Criteria #4
Evaluator 1
Evaluator 2
Evaluator 3
Evaluator 4
Evaluator 5
Total Average Score0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0
Criteria #4 - Total Points (Total Possible Points = XX)0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0
Criteria #5
Evaluator 1
Evaluator 2
Evaluator 3
Evaluator 4
Evaluator 5
Total Average Score0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0
Criteria #5 - Total Points (Total Possible Points = XX)0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0
Criteria #6
Evaluator 1
Evaluator 2
Evaluator 3
Evaluator 4
Evaluator 5
Total Average Score0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0
Criteria #6 - Total Points (Total Possible XX)0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0
Criteria #7
Evaluator 1
Evaluator 2
Evaluator 3
Evaluator 4
Evaluator 5
Total Average Score0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0
Criteria #7 - Total Points (Total Possible Points = XX)0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0
Total Technical Points (Total Possible Points = XX)0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0
Policy CriteriaOfferor AOfferor BOfferor COfferor DOfferor EOfferor FOfferor GOfferor HOfferor IOfferor JOfferor KOfferor LOfferor MOfferor NOfferor OOfferor POfferor QOfferor ROfferor SOfferor T
WeightTechnical Scores
Policy Criteria #1: Sustainability
Evaluator 1
Evaluator 2
Evaluator 3
Evaluator 4
Evaluator 5
Total Average Score0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0
0.000Criteria #1 - Total Points (Total Possible Points = xx)0.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.00
Policy Criteria #2: Business Certification
Evaluator 1
Evaluator 2
Evaluator 3
Evaluator 4
Evaluator 5
Total Average Score0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0
0.000Criteria #2 - Total Points (Total Possible Points = xx)0.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.00
Policy Criteria #3: Apprenticeship
Evaluator 1
Evaluator 2
Evaluator 3
Evaluator 4
Evaluator 5
Total Average Score0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0
0.000Criteria #3 - Total Points (Total Possible Points = xx)0.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.00
Policy Criteria #4: Local Small Business
Evaluator 1
Evaluator 2
Evaluator 3
Evaluator 4
Evaluator 5
Total Average Score0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0
0.000Policy Criteria #4 - Total Points (Total Possible Points = xx)0.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.00
Policy Criteria - Total Points (Total Possible Points = XX)0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0
Total Technical Criteria Points (Total Technical Criteria Possible Points = XX) Minimum Threshold = XX0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0
Total Cost PointsCost ScoresOfferor AOfferor BOfferor COfferor DOfferor EOfferor FOfferor GOfferor HOfferor IOfferor JOfferor KOfferor LOfferor MOfferor NOfferor OOfferor POfferor QOfferor ROfferor SOfferor T
Cost
0.0Cost Points0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0
Score SummaryOfferor AOfferor BOfferor COfferor DOfferor EOfferor FOfferor GOfferor HOfferor IOfferor JOfferor KOfferor LOfferor MOfferor NOfferor OOfferor POfferor QOfferor ROfferor SOfferor T
Total Technical Points (Total Possible = XX)0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0
Total Cost Points (Total Possible = XX)0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0
Grand Total Points (Total Possible = XX)0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0

image1.png image2.png

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .