The file's text, extracted by GovTribe without its formatting.
Score Sheet
| EVENT EQUIPMENT RENTAL SERVICES |
| SOLICITATION # SLCI26061 |
| Attachment 4- Score Sheet |
| Score will be assigned as follows: |
| 0 = Fail, the proposal fails to address the requirements or criteria described in the RFP or cannot be assessed du to missing information. |
| Firm Name: | 1 = Poor, the proposal inadequately addresses the requirements or criteria described in the RFP or cannot be assessed due to incomplete information. |
| 2 = Unsatisfactory, the proposal addresses the requirements or criteria described in the RFP in an unsatisfactory manner. |
| Evaluator: | 3 = Satisfactory, the proposal addresses all requirements or criteria described in the RFP in a minimum satisfactory manner. |
| 4 = Good, the proposal addresses all requirements or criteria described in the RFP and in some respects exceeds them. |
| Date: | 5 = Excellent, the proposal addresses and exceeds all of the requirements or criteria described in the RFP. |
| Minimum Mandatory Requirements | | RFP Section | Evaluation (Pass/Fail) |
| 1 | City Ethics Requirement. Offeror must accept the City's Ethics clause in Section VII, Proposed Content Paragraph "a." | RFP Doc.V, a:i | |
Scoreable Technical Criteria RFP Section Evaluator Score (0-5) Criteria Weight % of Tech Criteria Points Possible Points Earned
| 1 | A statement of the firm’s experience and qualifications to meet the requirements of the City as outlined herein | RFP Doc. V, b:1 | 5 | 5.0% | 25.0 | 0.0 |
| 2 | Identify any of the work that you intend to subcontract | RFP Doc. V, b: 2 | 5 | 5.0% | 25.0 | 0.0 |
| 3 | Detailed firm's experience in providing the services requested herein for similar customers fo similar size | RFP Doc.V, b:3 | 10 | 10.0% | 50.0 | 0.0 |
| 4 | Identify any special skills knowledge or skills that may be related or helpful to the services. | RFP Doc.V, b:4 | 10 | 10.0% | 50.0 | 0.0 |
| 5 | Describe the firm’s approach to customer service and communication throughout the event planning and execution process. | RFP Doc.V,b:5 | 15 | 15.0% | 75.0 | 0.0 |
| 6 | Describe your firm’s ability to provide flexible solutions and additional equipment or services beyond those specifically identified in this Scope of Work. Include example. | RFP Doc.V, b:6 | 25 | 25.0% | 125.0 | 0.0 |
| 7 | Provide a list of the rental equipment that your firm can provide to the city,that your firm can provide for the city as listed in the SOW (attachment 2). | RFP Doc.V, b:7 | 30 | 30.0% | 150.0 | 0.0 |
| Scorable Technical Criteria Total | | | | 100.0% | 500.0 | 0.0 |
| Policy Criteria | | RFP Section | Evaluator Score (0-5) | Available Points | Possible Points | Points Earned |
| 1 | Sustainability | Attachment 1 IV.E.1 | | 1.25% | 6.25 | 0.00 |
| 2 | Disadvantaged business enterprise | Attachment 1 IV.E.2 | | 1.25% | 6.25 | 0.00 |
| 3 | Apprenticeships | Attachment 1 IV.E.3 | | 1.25% | 6.25 | 0.00 |
| 4 | Local Small Business | Attachment 1 IV.E.4 | | 1.25% | 6.25 | 0.00 |
| Policy Criteria Total | | | | 5.00% | 25.00 | 0.00 |
| | Possible Points | Points Earned |
| Total Technical Points | 100.00% | 525.00 | 0.00 |
| Required Technical Point Threshold | RFP Section | Min Percent | Min Points Required | Points Earned | Percent Earned | Evaluation |
| Attachment 1 VI. | 70% | 367.5 | 0.0 | 0.0% | |
| Cost | RFP Section | Low Cost Option | Offered Cost | Percent of Total | Points Possible | Points Earned |
| Attachment 1 VI. | $0.00 | $0.00 | 30% | 225.0 | ERROR:#DIV/0! |
* Purchasing will use the following cost formula: The points assigned to each offerors cost proposal will be based on the lowest proposal price. The offeror with the lowest Proposed Price will receive 100% of the price points. All other offerors will receive a portion of the total cost points based on what percentage higher their Proposed Price is than the Lowest Proposed Price. The formula to compute the points is: Cost Points x (Lowest Proposed Price/Proposed Price).
| Total Evaluation Points | Percent of Total | Points Possible | Points Earned |
| Total Technical Evaluation Points | 70% | 525.0 | 0.0 |
| Total Cost Evaluation Points | 30% | 225.0 | ERROR:#DIV/0! |
| Total Evaluation Points | 100% | 750.0 | ERROR:#DIV/0! |
image1.png